The evangelical movement is notoriously difficult to define and nearly impossible to harness. Sweeney, associate professor of church history at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, advocates history as a way to promote consensus and tolerance. In his brief survey, he begins with the 18th-century Great Awakening and ends with observations on how mainstream evangelicalism incorporated charismatic practices, such as "praise songs."
Sweeney worries the movement will fragment along secondary theological lines. He prods some Calvinists for caring more about their theological distinctives than about evangelical cooperation. He chides evangelicals for not building enduring institutions, and for neglecting black and Pentecostal believers.
Sweeney lauds Mark Noll for recounting the evangelical impact on politics, science, and culture. Perhaps this is why Sweeney reserves only a footnote for significant political developments from the last 25 years.
Sweeney charges his readers—mostly seminary and college students—to fill a looming leadership void: "The founding neoevangelical leaders are passing away.
The question remains whether others will arise to take their place, finding a way to choreograph this massive, motley Christian movement without requiring its members (futilely) to march in single file."
Twenty years ago, Republicans, Democrats, evangelicals, gay activists, and African leaders joined forces to combat AIDS. Will their legacy survive today’s partisanship?
One formed me. The other entertained me.
Twenty years ago, Republicans, Democrats, evangelicals, gay activists, and African leaders joined forces to combat AIDS. Will their legacy survive today’s partisanship?
If we want to combat dangerous ideas, we need to have clear definitions.español
Kids’ addictions to their phones isn’t a legislative issue. It’s a discipleship one.
