A federal judge has dismissed a Navy chaplain's claim that Naval superiors discriminate against non-liturgical clergy in promotion and hiring (CT, May 21, 2001, p. 19). Calling the ruling a "temporary speed bump on the road to justice," Dean Broyles, the San Diego lawyer for the plaintiff, quickly filed an appeal of the ruling, made in June.

Thomas Whelan, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of California, granted a Justice Department motion to dismiss a suit brought by Pentecostal chaplain Patrick Sturm. Lt. Cmdr. Sturm says Protestant clergy from non-liturgical churches—such as Baptists and Pentecostals—face discrimination in hiring and promotion in the Navy Chaplain Corps compared to clergy from liturgical churches, such as Episcopalians or Lutherans. Sturm's superiors promoted him after he filed suit.

The judge's ruling cited policy changes the Navy has made since Sturm filed the lawsuit. Whelan noted that seniority alone now determines candidates for promotion, a process that cannot exclude a particular faith group. The judge noted that from 1990 to 2001, more non-liturgical Protestant chaplains went on active duty than chaplains from any other group, including Roman Catholics and members of other religious groups, such as Islam. Non-liturgical clergy are the largest group within the chaplain corps.

Whelan ruled that the composition of the chaplain corps and the new changes in the selection process "conclusively demonstrate that any form of institutionalized discrimination is not only improbable, but for all practical purposes, impossible."

Nonetheless, before and after the June ruling, 25 current or former non-liturgical chaplains joined a class-action lawsuit against the Navy. Attorney Art Schulcz of Vienna, Virginia, who represents 42 plaintiffs in the class action, says the Navy has dramatically improved its practices since he began representing plaintiffs several years ago.

Schulcz says 32 percent of the sailors and Marines who disclose their church affiliation are non-liturgical Protestants, while 40.7 percent of chaplains are now non-liturgical. On the other hand, while only about 7 percent of sailors and Marines claim a liturgical affiliation, 35.2 percent of chaplains in those branches are liturgical.

"What they're saying now—and what they're also admitting indirectly—is that they've changed," Schulcz says. "But they forget to say they've changed because of litigation. They also don't have procedures to ensure this old-boy network doesn't dominate in the future."

Schulcz questioned the California ruling, saying that a case cannot be rendered moot because a defendant has righted a wrong. "When you have evidence of a pattern over a long period of time," Schulcz says, "the courts are supposed to be wary of claims that the wrong has been fixed."

Neither the Justice Department nor the Navy will comment on the cases.

Related Elsewhere

Recent news articles include:

Chaplains feel stand justified—The Daily News, Jacksonville, N.C.(August 11, 2002)
Navy chaplains take stand on prayers, wage lawsuit—Associated Press (August 11, 2002)
Chaplains allege unfair treatment in race, religion—The Daily News, Jacksonville, N.C. (August 8, 2002)

Previous Christianity Today articles include:

More Navy Chaplains Allege Discrimination"We're not on the same ground as the high church group or the Catholics," say evangelicals. (April 18, 2001)
Evangelicals File Bias Suit Against NavyMay 22, 2000

Other Christianity Today articles about religion in the military include:

The Just-Chaplain TheoryThe church need not divorce the military to remain a godly counterculture. (July 27, 2000)
Irreconcilable DifferencesThe church should divorce the military. (March 6, 2000)
Wiccans Practice on U. S. BasesCourt okays pagan ceremonies. (July 12, 1999)
Military Chaplains Win Speech CaseMilitary personnel can speak against partial-birth abortion (June 6, 1997)
Military Chaplains Sue Over 'Project Life' BanChaplains ordered to "actively avoid" political comment. (December 9, 1999)

Have something to add about this? See something we missed? Share your feedback here.

Our digital archives are a work in progress. Let us know if corrections need to be made.