Aliquippa’s Star Attraction

A drive down Franklin Street in Aliquippa, Pennsylvania, is a joyless ride. The main thoroughfare in this depressed steel town 25 miles northwest of Pittsburgh is lined block after block with empty and boarded-up storefronts. The bleak faces of unemployed men populate the scene.

Further down the street, however, there is an incongruous splash of new color: the bright red door of All Saints Episcopal Church, and 12 repainted row houses, home to members of the Community of Celebration.

The Episcopal religious order, which originated in Houston and later moved to Great Britain and Scotland, relocated three years ago to Aliquippa. Its members share their possessions and salaries and live on a stipend of $160 each per month. And they have added more than fresh paint to the face of this city of 16,000.

“They’re certainly a group dedicated to their fellow men,” observes Syl Grecco, owner of Marsyl’s Dress and Bridal Shop several blocks east of All Saints Episcopal. “They’ve introduced Christian precepts to help people understand each other, the color of skin notwithstanding. They’re very loving people.”

The community was invited to the Pittsburgh area in 1985 by the local Episcopal bishop, Alden Hathaway, an evangelical who is quietly gathering Episcopal renewal groups into his diocese. “When I heard they were looking to leave Scotland for an industrial community somewhere in the West, I wrote to them and said, ‘That describes us,’ ” Hathaway said. “I said, ‘Would you not come and see if God is leading you to Pittsburgh?’ ”

In the end, God led the Community of Celebration to Aliquippa, a town in which the local hot-dog shop sells pancakes for 25 cents and where the economy is so bad the University of Pittsburgh chose it to study as a worst-case scenario.

Bill Farra, 43, the church’s senior warden, moved to Aliquippa with his family in April 1985 to contact and reassure the townspeople that his was a group that meant to stay. The group’s first order of business was to change a dilapidated funeral home into an office and to remodel 12 run-down row houses into homes.

It wasn’t long before the townspeople began to wonder just who these Episcopalians were—especially the ones with heavy British accents.

On The Wings Of Song

Farra plays guitar with a group of musicians, called the Fisherfolk, for the 80-person congregation of the Community of Celebration. The Fisherfolk conduct worship seminars all over the English-speaking world. Bill’s wife, Mimi, one of the main composers for the Fisherfolk, sometimes works out of her living room, which is home to a piano, a guitar, and piles of records, cassette tapes, and sheet music.

Betty Pulkingham, another Fisherfolk composer who also leads the children’s choir at All Saints Episcopal, says the music has drawn many neighbors to the church. “People tell us, ‘There is something different about your music,’ ” Betty says. “The only thing I can tell them is that we’ve a depth of commitment to each other.”

The haunting quality of the worship led by the Fisherfolk on Sunday mornings transforms the Eucharist from the Episcopal Book of Common Prayer into a flight of song. On one particular Sunday morning, Vicar Graham Pulkingham preaches on the star of the Magi. An Episcopal priest, Pulkingham attained fame in the early 1970s for making Houston’s Church of the Redeemer a show place for social action and charismatic renewal. He aims to do a similar thing in Aliquippa.

“Are we the star that can attract people to us?” Pulkingham asks. “It won’t start by preaching the gospel to the rich. But it will start when we preach the gospel to the poor. But we’ll have to embrace them, laugh with them, weep with them, and suffer with them. We may not see the fruit of it for ten years. But we are the star in this part of God’s heaven.”

Farra agrees. “Give this church grace in Aliquippa to catch the vision of being the star,” he prays aloud in the service.

Afterward, the Farras visit Jerry Holmes, who is a high school Latin teacher. Holmes is one of 13 “resident companions”—Christians from around the country who have moved close to the community but have not joined the order. Farra reasons that if enough people like the Holmeses—that is, people with jobs—move to Aliquippa, the town can re-establish a base for economic development. And the Holmeses are hooked on the group’s brand of worship and common lifestyle. This is the most intense, committed group of Christians they have encountered in a long time, the Holmeses say, and they want more.

Hatching New Jobs

The next day, Farra visits the Aliquippa Alliance for Unity and Development, a group of social agencies that aid the suffering, develop jobs, and rebuild the area’s economic base. Farra is chairman of the board. After dropping in at headquarters, he drives down the road to the Ohio riverfront, where the alliance sponsors the West Aliquippa Business and Technology Center, also known as “the business incubator.” After the alliance acquired a former bank near the riverfront, it recruited unemployed steelworkers to remodel the bank into a mall, in which fledgling businesses can operate until they become profitable enough to rent office space of their own.

Farra enters the building and greets the steelworkers-turned-construction-crew. The workers are four recovering alcoholics who had little experience in construction when they first were laid off. The group apprenticed the steelworkers to a contractor who performed renovation projects within the community, and the quartet has since landed more contracts, such as the one to remodel the former bank building.

Another hallmark of the Community of Celebration is its ability to bring black and white Christians together in the racially polarized area. In 1985, when NBC-TV officials were looking for a site to film for a Christmas segment on hope for the unemployed, they contacted the Community of Celebration. The community called on 100 townspeople from 13 black and white churches to attend a concert of Fisherfolk music. Filmed in a black church and televised Christmas Eve, the event was a first for Aliquippa.

Community of Celebration members claim they could never maintain this level of involvement without a community lifestyle reminiscent of the early 1970s—living together in households and placing salaries in a common pool. The religious order of 23 core-group members, along with one novice and two postulants, accepts married couples, singles, and children. To maintain a freshness in their Christian life, the community meets daily at All Saints Episcopal for morning and evening prayer. Many in the community are composers and musicians, and their main means of support is their music. Music is also the way they attract the townspeople in the group.

Change is slow in a region where people measure progress in decades and newcomers are rarely trusted. But the Community of Celebration has been successful so far in reaching the people of Aliquippa. Daniel Britza, mayor of Aliquippa, says the group has made a difference in only three years.

“They’ve done a lot of contacting people who are down and out, and they’ve helped in many ways,” Britza says. “They do what they do without making a lot of money. That has basically impressed people here the most.”

By Julia Duin, a religion writer for the Houston Chronicle.

Being 50 Is Okay

In a few days I will observe—though probably not celebrate—my fiftieth birthday. I still have much to learn, dream, and accomplish. On the other hand, one cannot reach a major milestone without some reflection and self-assessment; I am curious about the progress and present status of the people among whom I have ministered over the past 25-plus years.

One special group for me has been the New England congregation for whom I served as pastor in 1968. Affiliated with a “mainline” denomination, the parish dates back to the late seventeenth century, and the historic meetinghouse was the object of affection and pride for the small band of regular worshipers. Although few members understood or shared my evangelical convictions, all were unfailingly gracious to me and tolerant of my theology. I found it easy to love and appreciate these friends.

When I moved to another position, the church gave me a small flowering crab-apple tree as a farewell gift. The tree was planted in front of our now former home, where it has continued to grow, flourish, and bear an ever-more spectacular and bountiful display of blossoms and fruit.

In subsequent years, whenever I saw the tree and thought of that special congregation, I sought a report on what God was doing in their midst. What I learned often thrilled—and usually humbled—me.

When I left the church, a young seminary graduate whom I had seen develop fine ministry skills was called to serve as their minister. Thus began a bonding partnership in ministry that has now extended over two decades. In an era when the average pastoral tenure is becoming shorter and shorter, both pastor and people have exercised the patience and perseverance necessary to have not only a long ministry together, but an effective one as well.

Gradually the Holy Spirit brought renewal and revival to the congregation: solid, but not flashy. The redemptive power of the gospel captured first one, and then another person and family. New understanding and vision followed from clear biblical exposition. Men and women were nurtured through fellowship and prayer in many formats. Indifferent neighbors were galvanized by the vital faith coursing through the renewed people of God.

Additional staff were engaged. New ministries and programs were added to fulfill growing opportunities for expressing the love of Christ to those in need. Over the years attendance has grown more than tenfold. The budget for ministry and mission has grown even more—and the annual fund-raising fair is just history now.

Last month I was invited back to help celebrate the construction of a wonderful new meetinghouse. Reminiscent of the old historic building, long outgrown, the new facility reaches out to invite all those who need the Good News of salvation and who need help with the challenges of life in a thousand ways.

I think I understand how Paul felt as he thought fondly of his Philippian friends among whom he had ministered. I know why he began his letter to them as he did: “I thank my God every time I remember you” (v. 3).

Likewise, I identify with Paul’s heartfelt expression in his two letters to the Thessalonians. Like Paul, I thank God for all my friends, new and old, in that New England church. Regardless of how they are earning their living, their first vocation is the life of faith as disciples of Jesus Christ. Their efforts, often frustrating and sometimes exhausting, are prompted by their love in growing ways. And they have demonstrated a “sheer dogged endurance” because of the hope they have in our Lord Jesus Christ. Their tree is in blossom.

Even as I affirm them for this good report, I too long that their faith might become ever more complete. I know the Lord can enable them to expand their love and nurture for one another and for others yet to be reached. I boast about them now and will even more as the grace of God continues to invade their lives together.

Such memories are good. The hopes and dreams are even better.

Being 50 is okay.

Letters

Billy Graham’S Example

Thanks for the exceptional issue on Billy Graham’s ministry [Nov. 18]. Not only has he shaped famous organizations and influential periodicals, he has also been a model of gospel preaching for numbers of nameless men and women. Both my son in England and I owe our gospel ministries in large measure to the example of Billy Graham, for whom we thank the Lord.

Rev. Wayne Detzler

Calvary Baptist Church

Meriden, Conn.

In his editorial [Nov. 18], Kenneth Kantzer tries to refute the charges that Graham was an opportunist in capitalizing on the celebrated “Puff Graham” order given by William Randolph Hearst. However, if such an order was ever issued, it was never really obeyed. Anyone who examines newspaper coverage during his crucial Los Angeles crusade will discover that the Hearst-owned papers gave Graham no greater exposure than the non-Hearst press. Hearst papers in other cities reported little or nothing about Graham until he was drawing huge crowds in New England and the South. The credit (in human terms) for Graham’s rapid rise since 1949 should be given to Graham himself, and to his co-workers.

Lou Shapiro

San Bruno, Calif.

I find Martin E. Marty altogether too shortsighted by limiting Billy Graham to time and space [Nov. 18]. I believe he missed the real genius of the man. Graham has a visioning ability that is rare indeed. It was this that enabled him to inspire others to follow Christ and to implement his farsighted projects.

Rev. Neville Peterson

Wolf Point, Mont.

Change and growth? Martin E. Marty is the one who has really changed and unmistakably grown.

Rev. Mark T. Gorgans

Elberta Alliance Church

Elberta, Ala.

Tangled Facts

Thank you for your coverage of Kathryn Lindskoog’s C. S. Lewis Hoax [News, Nov. 18]; I look forward to your full review. The book raises in a clear way, with carefully marshaled evidence, issues that need to be addressed. I’ve met Paul Ford and have regard for his insights. But I wish he had not dabbled in amateur psychoanalysis. I don’t think it’s fair to reduce the issues to “a struggle to determine who was more important to Lewis.” Lindskoog is to be commended for her commitment in pursuing the tangled facts and for charity in presentation (this is called hoax—as in prank—rather than fraud).

Terri Williams

Portland, Oreg.

Paul Ford has not even read the book. Yet he advised Multnomah and other publishers not to accept Lindskoog’s work for publication. This type of obstructionism will not help clarify controversies surrounding the Lewis estate.

Lloyd Billingsley

Poway, Calif.

Ford’s false analysis not only insults me, but also insults those luminaries who have believed in the book and encouraged me along the way.

Kathryn Lindskoog

Orange, Calif.

I was dismayed by the omission of a story commemorating the twenty-fifth anniversary of the death of C. S. Lewis. Instead, you ran a story on Lindskoog’s book, which stirs a controversy. I agree with Walter Hooper on one point: This is “a curious way to celebrate the twenty-fifth anniversary of Lewis’s death.”

Terrence Neal Brown

Memphis, Tenn.

Prolife Concerns And The Arms Race

Charles Colson in his column “Seamless Garment or Straitjacket?” [Nov. 4] observes that to extend prolife concerns to the arms race is to “worship biological life.” He notes that such an approach “seems plausible” and that “this sweeping definition of the seamless garment leads some, logically indeed, to conclude that deterrence is immoral.” However, some of us evangelicals say there is nothing plausible or logical about striving for a “consistent ethic of life” that opposes abortion, the nuclear arms race, euthanasia, and economic exploitation. In fact, it is plausibility and logic that have brought on the devastation of these social problems. It is, rather, the Scriptures and faith that are the foundation for this approach.

Rev. Wayne North

Harrisonburg Mennonite Church

Harrisonburg, Va.

In spite of Colson’s quoting C. S. Lewis (from 1948—hardly fair in presuming what Lewis would say today), there’s no tradition in Christianity justifying the total annihilation of humanity on the grounds that loss of liberty would be a worse fate. Yet that seems to be what Colson advocates. Isn’t that the worship of liberty? At least Colson’s honest. For nuclear deterrence to work, there must be officials prepared to commit global suicide rather than surrender—if an enemy is willing to risk the same ends for conquest.

Dave Jackson

Evanston, Ill.

True justice is impossible apart from logical consistency—and frankly, the “seamless garment” theory is far more consistent than Colson’s militarism. Neither freedom nor justice would mean much in a postnuclear world fit only for cockroaches.

Mark Pettigrew

Springfield, Mo.

I was disappointed Colson could not accept that people who are trying to be consistently prolife could be an important voice in the Christian community.

William A. Fitzgerald

Kalamazoo, Mich.

One Of Us?

Why try to claim novelist Flannery O’Connor as “one of ours” (i.e., an evangelical; Books, Nov. 4) when she herself doubtless would have shunned such a label? Are we also to claim Mark Twain because he married a staunch Presbyterian before whom he bowed and scraped? O’Connor wrote about people to whom God was an ever-present reality, thus giving all of us a more honest and sharper focus on modern life than do many contemporary novelists. We can and should acclaim her profound insights and skills, as well as her remarkable courage and faith under great suffering, but please, let it rest there.

James W. Reapsome

Wheaton, Ill.

It’S About Time!

It is about time the largest, most influential Christian magazine in the United States recognized the largest, most influential Christian evangelical denomination in our country [Nov. 4]. Southern Baptists across the years have been a witness for Christ and have repeatedly shown that in spite of tensions, we are a creative, dynamic group of people, not bound either by our southern heritage or geography. I appreciate the clarity with which some of our best spokesmen expressed who we are. We ask you to pray for us as we continue to minister in the “entire United States.”

Dale G. Robinson

The Southern Baptist General

Convention of California

Fresno, Calif.

Dating the beginning of the Baptist church to the Puritans is somewhat obtuse and denies the true beginnings of the Anabaptists, thousands of whom died for their belief in the priesthood of the believer and salvation on faith alone, before and during the Protestant Reformation in Europe.

Donald C. Thompson, M.D.

Morristown, Tenn.

The last paragraph in the sidebar “How the Convention Works” is incorrect in saying: “The president of the SBC appoints the committees that, in turn, appoint the groups that exercise direct control over the mission boards, seminaries, and other convention agencies.”

The president of the SBC appoints the committees that nominate people for the mission boards, etc. These nominees are brought before the convention in session where others may be nominated. Then the boards are elected (or rejected) by the messengers at the convention. This process means that, though influential, the SBC president is hardly “… one of the most powerful ecclesiastical figures in America.”

Royce Ballew

Waco Baptist Church

Waco, N.C.

Missing Detail

An important detail was dropped out of my article, “How Important Is Preaching?” [Oct. 21], during the editorial process. I am distressed that the article appeared as if Bartlett Giamatti’s words are my own. The following should have been enclosed in quotation marks and attributed to Giamatti:

“Words were units of energy. Through words man could assume forms and aspire to shapes and states otherwise beyond his reach. Words had this immense potency, this virtue, because they were derived from and were images of the Word, the Word of God which made us and which was God. Used properly, words could shape us in His image, and lead us to salvation. Through praise, in its largest sense, our words approach their source in the Word, and, therefore, we approach him.”

Lloyd J. Averill

University of Washington

Seattle, Wash.

Lone Ranger Approach

I want to register our protest in the strongest possible terms for the Church in Action article “Rising Star at the Twirling Tomato” [Oct. 21]. In addition to statistical and geographical errors, the article encourages a “lone ranger” approach to ministry and potentially slights many fine Chrstian congregations in Utah. In fact, Pastor Les Lofquist has sent letters of apology to several area churches! Since the average attendance at Washington Heights Baptist Church (CBA) is almost 400, only by defining fundamental in its narrowest sense could anyone claim that there are only two fundamental churches with a total attendance of 300 in the Ogden area. The offense caused by this implication is magnified by the consideration of the values used to limit the “good” churches in the Salt Lake area to only 15! Perhaps CT could write another article about ministry in Utah.

Rev. James L. Wakefield

Utah Conservative Baptist Association

West Jordan, Utah

Pastor Pollster

Polls played such an important role in the presidential campaign that my church figured there had to be a way to Christianize them. So last fall, while neighboring churches were searching for Sunday school teachers and choir directors, our church hired a pastor pollster. What better way to measure whether our church was “on track”?

There was some resistance to the idea at first, since our planning and growth consultants (Joshua, Caleb, and Associates) pointed out that polls tend to reflect the will of the people more than the will of God. But 10 out of 12 members surveyed disagreed with this report, so we went ahead.

In the past few months, we’ve learned some interesting things. For example, one Sunday our exit poll showed that 45 percent of the congregation felt the pastor spoke too long; 43 percent felt he didn’t speak long enough; and 12 percent said they didn’t know he had spoken at all.

Another poll showed that the pastor’s “approval rating” was higher among inactive members than active members.

Unfortunately, our pastor pollster didn’t last long. He made the mistake last week of suggesting that the congregation, as well as the pastor, be the subject of opinion polls. He wanted to poll the community to determine our church’s approval rating.

A solid 97 percent of the congregation thought that was a bad idea.

EUTYCHUS

More than Just “The Facts”

Evangelicals have been called the people of the Book. They are also the people of the annual convention, the weeklong crusade, and the two-day workshop. Not surprisingly, then, we at CT find an ongoing challenge in not only knowing which of these events to cover, but how best to cover them.

This month’s cover story showcases a writing style we hope to use increasingly as we report on the peripatetic activities of the modern church. Calling on the writer not only to report “the facts” of an event, but to describe graphically the sights, sounds, and smells in a first-person analysis, this style allows the reader to experience and understand an event without leaving his or her sofa.

In the months ahead, such reports will feature a recent meeting in Chicago (attended by about 5,000 theologians and biblical scholars), and a meeting in a small Michigan town (attended by almost the entire population of 400) to raise funds for international Bible distribution.

In this issue, however, the reader visits Buffalo, New York—an unlikely venue for a battle of world views. But for one week last August, that is exactly what took place. Billy Graham brought crusade evangelism to Pilot Field, while out at the Amherst Campus of the State University of New York (SUNY)/College at Buffalo the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU) held its tenth world congress.

Needless to say, it made for an interesting week—a “battle” executive editor Terry Muck was eager to join.

HAROLD B. SMITH, Managing Editor

History

The Life and Thought of Caspar Schwenckfeld von Ossig

In this series

Sometime in 1518, or perhaps 1519, Caspar Schwenckfeld experienced what he refers to as a “visitation of the divine” (in German, Heimsuchung Gottes, literally “home-seeking of God”). He admits that he was not particularly religious during his early years as a court advisor, but his pattern of behavior changed after 1518.

The visitation to which he refers was not the only change in his life at the time. He was directly affected by his reading of Luther’s writings, and he undertook a serious study of the Scriptures at this point in his life as well. Shortly before September 1519, his father died and not long after that Schwenckfeld began to lose his hearing, an event which forced him to return to his family estate at Ossig (now run by his brother Hans) and to serve Duke Friedrich as only an occasional advisor, although he did remain highly influential at the court.

By 1521 he was seriously supporting the cause of reform, and had won his Duke to his programme by 1522. But from the very beginning Schwenckfeld’s position seems to have differed from Luther’s, and by 1524 the differences were abundantly clear. In June of that year he published an Admonition to the Silesian preachers in which he attempted to rectify problems he saw arising from Luther’s theology.

He was concerned above all that the five principles at the center of Luther’s position were misleading the simple people of the day. These were (1) that faith alone justifies, (2) that an individual does not have free will, (3) that we cannot keep God’s commandments, (4) that our works are of no avail, and (5) that Christ has made satisfaction for us.

The Nature of Faith

Ever concerned with the practical results of theology, Schwenckfeld did not reject these principles out of hand in his Admonition. Indeed, he had been initially drawn by their very “practicality” for the reform he supported. But by 1524, he had come to believe that if pressed too far, these keystones of reformation could prove ultimately destructive of their very intent.

To grasp the issue it might be best for a moment to stand back from the specifics of Schwenckfeld’s argument and look at the debate over the first principle, “that faith alone justifies,” in its full context.

The traditional theology that Schwenckfeld had inherited had always taught that an individual is justified by grace through faith—that was a Catholic as well as a Protestant position. The problem arose in regard to the nature of the faith by which one is justified. Catholics in Schwenckfeld’s day (and ours) teach that justifying faith must be understood in the context of Galatians 5:6: “For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is of any avail, but faith working through love.”

It was this last phrase, “working through love,” which had led to the problems Luther pointed to.

When simplistically interpreted by some theologians, this phrase had come to mean for many that the faith which availed was dependent on the acts of love through which it worked. Worse yet in the hands of ecclesiastical bureaucrats “works of love” came to be understood as the fulfillment of institutionalised religious regulations.

In this setting, one can understand both Luther’s and Schwenckfeld’s sense of release when they read Ephesians 2:8: “For by grace you have been saved through faith.” Here “faith” stood alone; the words “working through love” were missing, and the remainder of the verse emphasized the fact: “this is not of your own doing, it is the gift of God—not because of works.” Faith availed in itself for salvation and required no “working through love,” certainly not in the sense of keeping the particular rules set down in a code of church law, or by reciting formulaic prayers.

Unlike Luther, Schwenckfeld did not proceed to limit his theology by this insight (Luther’s so-called “canon within the Canon”). He was always more concerned with the results of a theological system on the life of individuals and the society in which they lived. He often spoke of his work as a “middle way” between what had become in the early sixteenth century two warring positions. Thus he would continue to uphold the need for Christian works of love while supporting what he considered the central insight of the Wittenberg Movement. The results were to be expected: He was viewed by both sides as supporting their opponents.

The Sacramental Center of Faith

Surprisingly enough, it was not over the issues noted in the 1524 Admonition that the real debate between Schwenckfeld and Luther erupted. To find a middle way between two opponents, as was the case in the so-called “faith-works” issue is one thing; it is quite another when a topic arises in which there are three conflicting opinions. This was the case regarding the Lord’s Supper.

By the middle of the 1520s this debate was already in full flower. Catholics maintained that when the priest elevated the bread at the altar and pronounced the words of consecration, the bread became the body of Christ (this position is called transubstantiation). The Swiss, under the leadership of Uldrich Zwingli, on the other hand, rejected such a position altogether and insisted that the bread merely represented the body of Christ. [See our earlier issue on Zwingli, Vol. 3, No. 1 for a discussion of Zwingli’s view of the Lord’s Supper.]

In a sense, in this disagreement, Luther’s position was the middle way. Those who followed him taught that more than simple representation occurred in the sacrament, but they rejected any interpretation which might lead one to think in terms of magical transformation. The body of Christ they taught, was “in, with, and under” the bread (called consubstantiation).

For Schwenckfeld all three explanations were unsatisfactory. Once again, what troubled him more than the divisive theologies of the Sacrament were practical results. Those who eat and drink of the body and blood of Christ unworthily, he believed with St. Paul, are “guilty of profaning” the body and blood (1 Cor. 11:27). What constituted unworthy participation more than doing so while anathematizing one’s fellow Christians? All three groups celebrated this central rite of Christian faith and unity while in open warfare with other Christians.

The situation was an open offence to the Faith, and Schwenckfeld was early concerned with it. He and his learned friend, Valentine Crautwald, had discussed the issue at length and the latter was greatly troubled over it.

Crautwald returned home after attending early communion on 16 September 1525 to consider the matter. After a full day of reflection he fell asleep for a short time and awoke before dawn on September 17. Suddenly all the passages of Scripture relating to the problem were before him, and a “sweet voice” opened them to him.

The vision he experienced and the ten days following it which were spent in detailed examination of its implications, he described in a letter to Schwenckfeld. Schwenckfeld in turn developed the results of the vision along with Crautwald.

The disputed words of institution should be read as follows: “My body is this, namely, food.” “It was not until the disciples had eaten the bread and drunk the wine that Christ spoke the words. Bread is not a food until the grain has been grown, threshed, ground, baked and eaten; bread when eaten nourishes and strengthens the body.” The word “is” in the words of institution means “is,” not “represents,” but one must distinguish between the physical and the spiritual. “Give the physical to the body, the spiritual to the poor soul which is spiritual; let physical bread nourish the physical body, the invisible [bread], the invisible soul.”

By faith, then, one truly does eat the spiritual body of Christ, and in time Schwenckfeld and Crautwald would work out the implications of their theology, teaching that the spiritual grain thus eaten by faith grows in the believer, transforming him or her toward the full image of God, the person of Christ.

On 30 November 1525 (two months after Crautwald’s vision), Schwenckfeld traveled to Wittenberg to present their findings to Luther [See Journey to Wittenberg] He was rebuffed by the great reformer, and from then on their paths would clearly separate.

The Suspension (“Stillsand”) of the Sacrament

In spite of Luther’s rebuff, Schwenckfeld seems to have remained hopeful that his “middle way” might yet become a reality. He returned to Liegnitz and there with the aid of his duke and the brotherhood that had formed around him, worked avidly for the reform of the church in his area He supported the foundation of a university in Liegnitz and encouraged extensive catechetical work, both of theoretical and practical nature.

He also continued to write and speak on behalf of his explanation of the Lord’s Supper. But what of the practice of the Supper? Christians were still fighting with one another and now Schwenckfeld as well had entered the fray. On 21 April 1526 he, Crautwald, and the preachers and pastors of Liegnitz issued a circular letter reflecting the tension they then felt, and their solution for the impossible situation in which they found themselves.

“The fact of the matter is this: Since we and many others, including some of the populace, have felt and recognized that little betterment is resulting as yet from the preaching of the Gospel,” something must be wrong. And what could be more wrong than the improper celebration of the central Christian rite? “[Since this is the case,] we think that the Holy Sacrament or mystery of the body and blood of Christ has not been observed according to the Gospel and command of Christ.” Those who eat and drink unworthily, eat and drink judgement unto themselves, and therefore, “we admonish men in this critical time to suspend for a time the observance of the highly venerable Sacrament.”

The suspension did nothing to ease tensions within Christendom; for the next four years the bulk of Schwenckfeld’s writing was directed to this issue. His duke, Friedrich II supported him, but as the heat of the reformation debate increased, Friedrich increasingly found himself in a dilemma. Politically it was necessary for the Silesians to draw closer to the Lutheran position, but with a counselor of so high a profile as Schwenckfeld expressing an anti-Lutheran position, this was difficult.

Finally in 1529, to avoid bringing his duke further embarrassment, Schwenckfeld went into voluntary self-exile. The most reasonable place for him to take refuge was the city of Strasbourg, then undergoing a reform under the direction of Martin Butzer.

Time in Strasbourg

Strasbourg was remarkably tolerant for the time, and as a result attracted persons of widely differing religious opinions. It was here, for example, that Schwenckfeld met the Anabaptist Pilgram Marpeck with whom he would enter a lengthy debate in the 1540s. It was also here that he seems to have come to know the thought of Melchior Hofmann, whose position on the celestial body of Christ had much in common with his own, although he always maintained that Hofmann had borrowed ideas from him and not he from Hofmann.

Although he maintained a peaceful tone in the debate at the time, Schwenckfeld held a firm debating position. He supported his ideas with learning and care, and he did attract enough followers that his opponents were forced to take him seriously (his position as a member of the nobility also seems to have required this).

Nevertheless, his point of view was a minority one during the period and was never supported by a powerful political leader. What this meant was that he was ever forced to debate without the possibility of winning. That pattern would remain throughout his life.

We must take care not to romanticize the results. Like other supporters of unpopular theological positions at the time, Schwenckfeld undoubtedly suffered persecution, and it is clear that he never settled permanently in one place for the rest of his life. However, he was able for significant periods of time to find the physical stability necessary for the study and production of his numerous theological treatises and letters.

Confessor of the Glory of Christ

In 1541 he was living near the south German town of Kempten and had for his use the library of the Benedictine monastery there. It was here in the same year that he completed his longest and most complex work, The Great Confession on the Glory of Christ.

Schwenckfeld’s thought on the nature and person of Christ was fully developed by 1538 at the latest, but he had been reflecting on the question from his earliest writings on the sacrament in the 1520s. What he was ever concerned with was that the body of Christ not be disparaged, or, to put it positively, that the glorified body of Christ be properly confessed.

Because Schwenckfeld’s christology was not accepted by his contemporaries or later generations (indeed, it was considered heretical by many), it continues to be noted as one of the most “peculiar” aspects of his thought. But, peculiar or not, it was the center-point of his work, and, in honor of this core doctrine, his followers continued to call themselves “Confessors of the Glory of Christ” until the eighteenth century.

The obscure theological details and their source in the writings of the early church need not detain us at this point. Simply put, Schwenckfeld distinguished two natures (a divine and a human) in the person of Christ, as does Christian orthodoxy. But he thought of the human nature in terms of a “celestial flesh.”

Jesus’ flesh, he taught, was increasingly divinised by his divine nature during his earthly sojourn, so that it was transfigured and thereafter resurrected, taken up, and glorified at the right hand of the Father. It is on this glorified flesh that the believer feeds by faith; it is this flesh which by faith believers spiritually partake of, and which, in turn, grows like a grain of mustard in them as they grow daily in the image of Christ.

Whatever one might think of Schwenckfeld’s christology today (whether it can be defended or not as orthodox as he thought it could) is a separate question. What we need to understand is Schwenckfeld’s intention in developing such a doctrine. He never thought simplistically or literally. The glorified body of Christ which sits at the right hand of the Father is the body of which one partakes in the Sacrament. It is not to be separated from the body of Christ in which believers live and move and have their being and which they call by the name “Church.”

Thus one eats and drinks judgement upon oneself, according to I Corinthians 11:29, when one eats and drinks of the body and blood of Christ in the Lord’s Supper “without discerning the body”; “body” here referring to the bread which is the spiritual body of Christ—the community of believers throughout the world, or the Church—and referring to the glorified body of Christ itself.

By approaching the sacrament without discernment—without recognizing that the Church is the universal (catholic) body of Christ, and not merely the physical social-political entity made up of those who hold particular doctrines in common against others—one disparages the Glorified Christ.

Looking Above for Peace

It was for this reason that Schwenckfeld so strongly opposed the Anabaptist Pilgram Marpeck. Marpeck and the Anabaptists (later Mennonites) attended to the historical Jesus of Nazareth. Schwenckfeld was not opposed to this attention and certainly not to the Anabaptists’ attempt to imitate the life of the earthly Jesus. What he asked of them in addition was that they “lift up their hearts” to the image of the Glorified Christ so as not to become only caught up in concerns for purity of their local and limited congregational life.

And the theology of the Glorified Christ is also the context in which Schwenckfeld’s often-noted concern for religious toleration arises. His is not a political position (as is that of, for example, the American Constitution); it is a theological one.

One confesses the glory of Christ not by supposing that all religious opinions are of equal value, and effectively holding that they are makers of taste and that in such maker one person’s opinion is as good as another’s.

For Schwenckfeld religious toleration depended not on looking below oneself but on contemplating above one’s possibilities:

Only when all believers had raised their sights to the One above all others, would the suspension of the sacrament come to an end in reality, a hope toward which he reached throughout his life, and for which he still yearned, we are given to understand, when he died in the home of friends in the city of Ulm in 1561.

Copyright © 1989 by the author or Christianity Today/Christian History magazine. Click here for reprint information on Christian History.

History

The Reformation Era

An old adage says, “To the victors belong the spoils.” In no place does this prove truer than in the writing of history. History has most often been written from the point of view of the winners, not the losers. For this reason the writing of the history of the reformation era has always caused difficulty.

Indeed, until the beginning of this century there were few studies of the Reformation not written either from the point of view of the victorious Catholics in the south and east of Europe, or from that of the Lutheran and Reformed church Protestants in the north. And for both these groups, those reformers such as Schwenckfeld, now referred to as Radical Reformers, were represented negatively. Designated as Schwaermer (German for “swarmers”) they were considered to be foolish, impatient revolutionaries with erratic theologies of little interest to anyone. They rightly deserved to be forgotten. If their memories were maintained at all, it was to secure images of what was not to be thought or done.

As Reformation studies have progressed, however, it has become clear that such a designation is far too simplistic. The Reformation of the early sixteenth century was not a single unified movement that clearly ascertained the evils of a corrupt institution, determined the best approaches to eradicate them, and moved resolutely in one direction to do so. It was a period not of one reformation, but of many.

At least 25 years before Luther posted his 95 theses, loyal adherents of the traditional faith were working to reform the Church from within. They deliberately chose to work under the episcopal system. The Reformation they inaugurated is today referred to as the Catholic, or Counter Reformation.

With Luther and the Reformed Church movement of the Swiss, the structural framework of reform was shifted. Insisting that there was a need for the reform of doctrine as well as morals, these protesting groups sought support from their local political rulers (magistrates): they sought to carry out their reform with the support of the secular state. As a result it has become customary to refer to these groups (i.e., Lutherans, Zwinglians, Calvinists, and in some sense the Church of England) as the Magisterial Reformers.

There were, however, large numbers of Reformers who do not fit either of these patterns. They worked for the most part as individuals or as separatistic local congregations and they differed as much among themselves as they did from the major Catholic and Magisterial Protestant movements.

Categorized generally under the rubric “the Left Wing of the Reformation,” or more recently, “the Radical Reformation,” they can be divided into four general groups.

The first group sought to bring about the Kingdom of God on earth by the sword and is suitably referred to as Revolutionary. To this group belonged Thomas Müntzer and the Anabaptists who took control of the city of Münster where they were stopped by military force in 1535.

A second group, termed Anabaptists (the ancestors of present-day Mennonites, Amish, Hutterites, and the step-parents of modern Baptists) were small groups who were committed to the peaceful establishment of the Kingdom of God.

The third, an assemblage of rationally oriented thinkers, saw the Kingdom of God as manifest—and manifested—in that spark of the divine in every human person.

Schwenckfeld is perhaps the best representative of the fourth Radical reformation group, the Spiritualists. He and others who are placed in this category tended to make a sharp distinction between spirit and flesh, the spiritual words of the Scripture and the physical letters, the spiriual-invisible universal Church and the physical institutionalized forms of Christianity, the spiritual sacraments and the bread or water.

However, one must always take care not to make too sharp the distinctions between these different groups. The peace-loving and pacifistic Anabaptist Menno Simons had brother, it is said, who joined the revolutionaries. The Anabaptist Pilgram Marpeck had much in common with his opponent Schwenckfeld. And although the Radicals tended to see themselves as joined theologically for the most part with the Magisterial Reformers, most of them held to a view of grace and free will distinctly at odds with that of Luther.

History has most often been written from the point of view of the winners. Luther, Calvin, and other larger-than-life characters have dominated our books on the Reformation. Our interest in them is not misplaced; it is certainly based on the great roles they played.

But the Reformation was much more. And in the tumult of that colorful and complex era we have overlooked and forgotten people whose lives and ideas hold a significance we may have only slightly appreciated.

Caspar Schwenckfeld is such a character. His name, which will sound odd to most, has been usually relegated to footnotes, or mentioned with little explanation of who he was or what he believed.

Yet, fortunately, when God surveys his people as they quickly pass across the stage of history, he sees what our pages cannot record—what is in their hearts. From our pride we have presumed to declare the winners and the losers.

Copyright © 1989 by the author or Christianity Today/Christian History magazine. Click here for reprint information on Christian History.

History

Caspar Schwenckfeld von Ossig: A Gallery of Associates

This Christian History Gallery focuses on associates of Caspar Schwenckfeld, and on his followers who traveled to Pennsylvania to escape persecution.

Valentine Crautwald

BORN AT NEISSE, Silesia, Crautwald attended the University of Cracow and became secretary to the Bishop of Breslau in 1514. A highly learned scholar, strongly affected by the humanist movement of the day, he met Schwenckfeld in 1523 and two years later, after Schwenckfeld spoke to him about the controversy over the meaning of the Lord’s Supper, Crautwald had a vision during which he came to what would be the distinctive Schwenckfeldian understanding of the Supper.

Together with Schwenckfeld he worked assiduously for the reformation in Liegnitz and after the latter’s self-exile in 1529, in spite of his increasing isolation in his own country, he wrote and studied in defense of the Schwenckfeldian cause until his death in 1545.

Adam Reissner

THE EXACT DATES of Reissner’s life are unknown. He was born sometime between 1496 and 1500 in Mindelheim in south Germany and died after 1576, but before 1582. He attended the University of Ingolstadt as a young man and there studied Hebrew and Greek under the famous Johann Reuchlin. For some years he was at Wittenberg. In 1531 he met Schwenckfeld in Strasbourg and became a loyal follower. In spite of this he was able to maintain his position as municipal clerk in his Catholic home-town until 1548. From then until his death he dedicated himself to the Schwenckfeldian movement, serving as secretary to Schwenckfeld and aiding in the publication of his works as well as writing books of his own.

Michael Hiller

A SILESIAN PASTOR and pro-Schwenckfeldian, Hiller produced sermons with a strong mystical bent. These sermons were among the most copied works next to those of Schwenckfeld himself among later Schwenckfelders. Hiller died in the late 1550s.

Johann Werner

AN EARLY DEFENDER of Schwenckfeld, Werner was a preacher at the Church of St. Peter and Paul in Liegnitz. His Catechism and Sermons were favourites of Schwenckfelders to the mid-nineteenth century.

Erasmus Weichenhan

FROM 1538 TO his death in 1598 this strongly pro-Schwenckfeldian Silesian pastor compiled what would be the favourite collection of sermons used by the Schwenckfelders down to this century.

Antonius Oelsner

A SILESIAN SHEPHERD, Oelsner had read Schwenckfeld in his youth and was converted in 1580. Thereafter he had visions and began to wander about the Silesian countryside preaching. He was imprisoned for two years and on his release took up his preaching again. He was sentenced as a galley-slave in 1595.

Daniel Sudermann

A RESIDENT OF Strasbourg in the early 1600s, a significant poet and student of mysticism, Sudermann played an important role in collecting and saving Schwenckfeld manuscripts. For a time he owned Schwenckfeld’s annotated Bible (now preserved in the Schwenckfelder Library [see The Schwenckfeld Bible]).

Martin John, Jr.

PERHAPS THE MOST significant personality among Schwenckfelders in the later 1600s, Martin John Jr. was remarkably well read in the radical theological literature of his day, and was responsible for a renewal among the Schwenckfelder communities which remained in the Harpersdorf area.

In the spring of 1669 he and his wife Ursula made a journey through Germany and into Holland visiting kindred spirits. When the Pietist Awakening began a few years later he came into close contact with many of its adherents and introduced his Schwenckfelder fellow-believers to it.

Sybilla Eisler

THE WIFE OF a councilman in the city of Augsburg, Eisler has the distinction of having received more letters from Schwenckfeld than any other person. Particularly attracted to Schwenckfeld’s theology, she not only prodded him to express himself on a number of questions, but played a major role in preserving his correspondence.

Agatha Streicher

A NOTED PHYSICIAN, Streicher was a member of a family especially devoted to Schwenckfeld. She was present at his death in her family’s home in 1561 and wrote an account of the last months of his life.

George Weiss

THE FIRST PASTOR among the Schwenckfelders in America, Weiss played a prominent role in defending the Schwenckfelder cause during the Jesuit persecution and directing the emigration to Saxony and America [see the article Freedom in Pennsylvania]. An informed theologian he was well-versed in Latin, Greek and Hebrew, worked energetically on the compilation of a Schwenckfelder hymnbook, and worked to bring cohesion into the group in its first six years in America. He died in 1740.

Balthasar Hoffmann

PERHAPS THE MOST astute of the 18th-century Schwenckfelders, Hoffmann was transcribing Schwenckfelder documents when he was eleven years old. In 1721 he travelled with his father Christopher and another representative, Balthasar Hoffrichter, to the Imperial Court in Vienna to plead for toleration in the midst of the Jesuit persecution in Harpersdorf. He remained there for five years before returning home to join the emigration first to Saxony and then to America.

Taking over the leadership role in America after Weiss’s death in 1740, Hoffmann continued his pastoral role among the Schwenckfelders both in a formal and informal way until his death in 1775. A prolific copier of manuscripts, poet, and theologian, he produced three large treatises in biblical studies, and a great many other works.

Christopher Schultz

ONLY 16 YEARS OLD at the time of the 1734 emigration, Schultz came to America as an orphan, and kept the most extensive diary account of the journey to Pennsylvania.

An avid student of Schwenckfelder theology he took a major leadership role in the group in 1764, compiled the first hymnbook of the American Schwenckfelders (published in 1762), wrote the first significant Schwenckfelder history entitled Vindication of Caspar Schwenckfeld and a large compendium of the Christian faith. With his cousin Christopher Kriebel he helped shape the Schwenckfelder school system. He died in 1789.

Copyright © 1989 by the author or Christianity Today/Christian History magazine. Click here for reprint information on Christian History.

History

The World of Schwenckfeld’s Birth

Imagine for a moment that we are able to climb into one of those fabulous time machines of science fiction fable, set the clock back five centuries, and travel across half a millennium to Europe in 1489.

We arrive on a hill overlooking a village, amid green grass and yellow daisies. Before us we can see the red-tiled roofs of houses in the town, their steep slopes broken up by small windowed dormers. Our eyes are almost immediately drawn to the church and its high bell tower, which seems to form the center of the town, and which stands above all the other buildings, as if to direct and draw them up, as it were, into the heavens.

Our initial view is shaped by the romantic illusions we have brought with us from our more complicated technological world of rabid schedules and interminable rush-hour traffic.

The village we see before us is “picturesque”; a village, we imagine, bustling with friendly, healthy, hard-working people, who will surely welcome respectful strangers into their integrated community. These fortunate folk have no need for words like pollution, economic decline, ecological disaster, social despair, or nuclear winter.

The idyllic image, however, passes quickly. Even from a distance, we begin to focus on the dirt houses and the thatch roofs scattered without order around and within the village. (Those quaint red roofs are on the houses owned by the most prosperous inhabitants.) As we wander down from our pleasant, grassy knoll and enter this charming little village, our romantic curiosity turns to shock.

Everything stinks! We alone seem to notice the garbage floating in the rough-cut canals. Our breath is taken away by the mingled odors of smoke, refuse, and cooked cabbage.

The people we see have obviously not bathed. Indeed, they are filthy, and appear never to have washed. The result is only too evident. Their hair is unkempt; they are missing teeth. (They have never heard of nylon combs, toothbrushes, disposable razors, fingernail clippers, steam irons, deodorant, or Kleenex tissues.)

We cannot mistake the rich who appear in the streets. They are dressed in finery—deliberately chosen to mark themselves off from their inferiors; though their clothes, like those of the less-fortunate folk around them, have a somewhat wrinkled look. They travel with a retinue, begetting both fear and contempt in the eyes of the lower classes. However, they are as feeble as anyone before Fortune, who is close to being considered a deity by both rich and poor.

In the thatched roofs we can now and then hear the squeaking and scampering of rats. If the people only knew, as we know, that those rats carry fleas that can transfer the bubonic bacillus to human beings: the black plague.

There appear to be many more crippled people around than in the comfortable society we have left. In this world a broken limb can easily result in death, and if it does not, its mark will always remain; for a broken bone cannot be set properly. In this world, what we consider simple, easily cured diseases, kill or maim permanently.

Everyone is in the narrow streets. It is here where business is done, gossip is exchanged, visiting occurs, fights break out, games are played, news is announced.

And there is much news in 1489. The Turks are moving ever closer. There is almost always a public execution to be spoken of, acts of revenge to be commented upon, warnings that since December 28 (the anniversary of the slaughter of the innocents in Bethlehem) fell on a Thursday last year, all the Thursdays in the coming year will be ill-omened. Even more are there warnings about the imminent end of the world.

No one has reason to mention the insignificant birth of a son, three years earlier, to a Saxon miner named Luther, but the church bells (often affectionately given personal names) are always clanging to announce the beginning or conclusion of a life, dangers to come or joys to behold, a religious procession, a pilgrimage, a traveling preacher with a particularly entertaining style.

News of Change

Other great news can be told as well. A new method of printing books is sweeping Europe, and it is said that in a very few years affordable bound volumes will be available on almost every subject imaginable. Talk abounds about new discoveries everywhere. Intelligent youths excitedly discuss the system of “humanistic” learning, and dreams of traveling to Italy where a whole new world of artistic expression is breaking forth in literature, music, architecture, sculpture and painting.

Mention is made of the great possibilities for the study of Greek, since many precious Greek manuscripts are now in Italy, brought by scholars who were forced to flee Constantinople after its capture by the Turks 30 years before.

Also, in spite of the cynicism among a large part of the laity concerning clerical offices, and the decadence of many clerics themselves, there are signs of hope for the reform of a church burdened by weariness and despair.

New orders of dedicated clergy and laity are being formed in Italy and elsewhere. Renewal movements are stirring in most monastic orders. Possibilities for reform exist as never before. But whether reform will remain merely potential or tip forward into reality, few can say for certain.

These hopes which reach forward to a new world are raised up and cast down at almost the same time. This paradox is perhaps best exemplified in the person of Giovanni Battista Cibo, the son of a Roman senator, and the man elected Pope Innocent VIII in August 1484.

The State of Rome

Before entering the priesthood Giovanni had fathered three illegitimate children. After entering the ecclesiastical world he made use of his earlier training at the Court of Naples to win himself influential friends and to secure a bishopric and become a cardinal.

He was a friend of the violent and ruthless Cardinal delta Rovere (the nephew of Pope Sixtus IV). When Rovere, who wanted to be Pope himself, realised he could not win in the election in 1484, he used power and bribery to secure the papacy for Innocent VIII. This way he could control the papacy, by controlling Innocent VIII, until he could get the position himself. (Rovere was elected Pope Julius II in 1503.)

A weak and ineffective leader, Innocent VIII found himself in an impossible situation. The tool of delta Rovere, he was forced to enter quarrels and wars not of his own making. To pay the costs, he expanded the papal bureaucracy and sold the new posts to the highest bidders. In 1489 he planned a meeting of major European states, hoping to form a united crusade against the Turks.

However, Innocent was not a mere pawn of those politically more aggressive. Although nothing came of his meeting in 1490 for a crusade, he did arrange a sort of truce with the Sultan.

He was also deeply concerned with church reform. He continually attempted to improve clerical morals, and moved firmly against ecclesiastics who made use of their offices for personal gain. But he vacillated between corruption and reform, offering no clear signs to those about him who were willing to play a role in ecclesiastical renewal.

It is said that on his deathbed, he begged the cardinals to choose a person of stronger moral fiber than he had been. Unfortunately, they did not heed his advice, and less than 25 years later a more violent form of social and religious change proved tragically necessary.

Schwenckfeld’s Early Years

Into this troubled, expectant world of Innocent VIII, Caspar Schwenckfeld was born at his parents’ estate of Ossig in Silesia.

Now a part of Poland, Silesia was then and remained until the end of the second world war, predominantly German-speaking.

We know little of Schwenckfeld’s early life, a fact which seems to suggest that it was for the most part normal for his day. (Those who write the lives of persons they consider great, tend not to report the obvious.) In all likelihood he was born in 1489, but we do not know the day or the month.

No one saw fit to report the pattern of his education and although he studied at university for a time, he seems not to have felt it necessary to complete a degree. His life was, in all likelihood, fairly well pre-planned. As the intelligent and socially well-adjusted son of a “good” family, he could gain a reasonable position at one of the courts of Silesia or elsewhere.

It is, thus, not surprising that we find him serving as an advisor to Duke Karl I of Munsterberg-Oels from 1511 to 1515, and undertaking a similar position with Duke George I of Brieg in 1515. In 1518, after this seven-year “apprenticeship” and being almost thirty years old, he raised his status significantly with a move to the Court of Duke Friedrich II of Liegnitz.

It was here at Liegnitz, in the very year of his move, that all the normal expectations that a young and talented civil servant might have had, ended.

Copyright © 1989 by the author or Christianity Today/Christian History magazine. Click here for reprint information on Christian History.

History

The Hard Journey to America

Pennsylvania offered freedom and peace for the Schenkfelders. Founded by the Quaker William Penn, it was a place where groups who were persecuted and driven away elsewhere were welcomed. But though the journey to freedom was one of hope, it was also one of pain and fear; much that the travelers had known was left behind forever. Ocean travel could be a frightening experience.

The Schwenckfelders settled into their new life amidst other folk with similar tales of persecution and flight; many of them were from Germany (the so-called Pennsylvania Dutch—the “Dutch” is actually from Deutsch, the German word for “German”). They were hardworking, industrious farmers. They decorated their homes, furniture, wagons, written documents with colorful, symbolic designs—the folk art we still immediately associate with the “Pennsylvania Dutch” traditions.

Schwenckfelders emphasized learning and were careful to preserve and transmit their rich intellectual tradition, making new copies of their loved books by hand into the 19th century.

One Schwenckfelder who left us an account, in diary form, of the crossing to Pennsylvania was Christopher Wiegner, who was born in Ober-Harpersdorf, Silesia, on February 24, 1712. He died at 33 years in 1745 in Towamencin township in Pennsylvania. The Jesuit persecution of Schwenckfelders arose when Wiegner was a young boy; Schwenckfelders were forbidden to sell their goods or land, or to emigrate; they were denied Christian burial. At 14, Christopher secretly fled with his family to Saxony to escape the persecution. When more trouble arose there they fled to America.

The following account is taken from The Spiritual Diary of Christopher Wiegner, translated and edited by Peter C. Erb and published by the The Society of the Descendants of the Schwenckfeldian Exiles, Pennsburg, PA. This excerpt is a shortened selection, beginning from page 87, of Wiegner’s more complete account.

1734

June 28 On the 28th we left Rotterdam [Holland] in the evening.

July 10 … we arrived at Helfort Schleis. The captain came to us.

July 11 On the 11th we went to sea. In the afternoon nearly all of us were sick.

July 12 … Christopher Kriebel’s child died at night.

July 13 On the 13th it began to be better.

July 17 … we arrived at Plymouth [England]. In the afternoon we went to the town to refresh our bodies.

July 18–19 On the 18th and on the 19th a woman gave us some money.

July 29 On the 29th we left the harbor …

Aug 3 On the 3rd Hubner’s child died.

Aug 4 On the 4th side wind. Becalmed in the evening. At night a strong contrary wind arose. Because of this we were very ill until the 5th and 6th. On the 5th we had already gone 700 English miles.

Aug 8–9 … This night Gregorious Schultz’s child died.

Aug 11 On the 11th a contrary wind broke off the centre mast.

Aug 14 … a French populated ship from the West Indies came. [There was great concern among the members on board that it was a pirate ship since it flew no flag and turned around, after passing, and swung toward us as if to take fire…

Aug 17 … heavy rain and loud thunder.

Aug 18 … a contrary west wind with rain and thunder. Schubert’s child died.

Aug 19–20 … a contrary wind so strong it threw waves over the ship up to the sail cloth. Many were very ill. I was affected as well.

Aug 22 … Mrs. David Schubert died. In the evening we were met by an English ship from the West Indies which caused much fear since it did not raise a flag.

Aug 25 On the 25th still contrary winds. The waves struck 10 ells over the ship. Because I was not properly lodged, my head became fevered and my thoughts were not able to remain firm, struggle so hard as I might. It finally caused me much sorrow. I remembered how a Christian must conquer all in Christ. I called to him from the heart for strength. In the evening the dear Saviour took away the struggle and gave me such peace that I thought of nothing nor knew nothing except my: Lamb and Saviour. It was a heavy concern with me to know if it was not my calling to dedicate my life completely to chastity, poverty and voluntary discipleship and service.

Aug 26 … a little north wind. This day I had a stirring impulse to pray to the dear Saviour to help me in the Pennsylvania trial.

Aug 28 On the 28th Hoffman’s George died. Be calmed in the evening…

Aug 30 Once again a ship from New England met us with herring.

Sept 1 On the 1st the wind was still south east. I still lay sick. On the same day a very hot night. Almost everyone slept on the deck. I could not because of my weakness.

Sept 4 On the 4th I promised the dear Saviour without certain knowledge of his will that I would not marry nor purchase farm nor cattle. Be merciful unto me dear Lord Jesus. Teach me and let me not become a disgrace, for I thought it was intended for me out of your grace. Lord Jesus, let me live according to your counsel.

Sept 5 … becalmed. A very great heat at night … Mrs. Reinwalt failed.

Sept 9 … heavy rain with thunder.

Sept 12 … the wind good, from the north. An English ship from Gibraltar met us. It was going to Marienland (Maryland). I got a chill again.

Sept 13 …A Palatine child was buried. They shot several times at a large fish. Several very large ones could be seen beside the ship. They fished. The man-eaters bit at the small fish and ripped off 2 lines ….

Sept 16 … a good wind. Today I was so angry that I was not able to consider anything other than it had ruined me. The cause was that I wished to eat Stockfisk and my mother gave it away. My heart was greatly moved to contrition and humility. This lasted until evening when I received a friendly glance of grace and that evening I was gladdened.

On the 15th a small bird came to the ship which we believed to be a land bird. It allowed itself to be captured.

On the 16th they shot a big bird but it fell in the water. Before midnight they still did not find the bottom.

On the 17th in the morning around 3 o’clock they found the bottom at 55 fathoms. They hung anchor. At noon the sailors saw land and found the bottom at 16 fathoms. In the afternoon at 15 fathoms. The wind still good.

Sept 18 On the 18th we saw land and forest. The bottom was 5 fathoms…. My heart greatly hungered that Jesus would be for me essential righteousness.

Sept 19 …we travelled into the stream. An English ship met us with whom we exchanged letters. Two more met us with horses, goats, pigs and sheep.

Sept 20 … a good wind. Mrs. Reinwalt died.

Sept 21 … we went by New Castle. There we received the first apples which were very good. In the afternoon the captain left because the sailors didn’t return. They held out a lantern on the shipstick and beat the drum. While this was going on they fought near the mast. After this the sailors beat each other frightfully.

Sept 22 On the 22nd we arrived in Philadelphia in the morning. George Scholtz and Klem and afterward Schonfeld came to meet us there.

Copyright © 1989 by the author or Christianity Today/Christian History magazine. Click here for reprint information on Christian History.

History

From the Archives: On the Prayer of Faith

to Caspar Schwenckfeld, his beloved friend and brother in the Lord

Good health to you Caspar. Be strong in the Lord. As I readied myself to respond to your wishes and prepared to write to you on the prayer of faith, that request of the Lord’s disciples came to my mind: Lord teach us to pray. The experience led me to seek with them a similar request from the Lord, but I expanded it more fully: Lord teach us, in the first place, to experience what the prayer of faith is which is given by the spirit of faith and secondly, teach us not only to pray, but grant by your kindness that it be done in faith and according to your will. Amen.

The prayer of faith is mentioned in the fifth chapter of James the apostle: And the prayer of faith will save the sick man, and the Lord will raise him up…. Following the same author we are able to define our subject in the following manner: The prayer of faith occurs when you pray in faith, so that you make no judgements, nor experience anything in your heart other than those things which steadfast and prayerful faith raise in you. It will accomplish its own ends….

From the first epistle of John, the fifth chapter, we are able to say that to pray in faith is to make a request in the confidence which we have before God, that if what we request is according to his will, he will hear us. It is according to the will of the Lord that we seek, and according to his will that we be heard. But why do we not say with the Lord himself? It is prayer in the spirit (from which you have faith) and in truth (through which you pray) which gives you what you request. For the Lord, who often remained through the night in prayer for us and abided in the prayer of faith prescribed what the prayer of faith should be in Matthew 17:21: This kind of devotion, never comes about except through prayer and fasting. Therefore I say this: The prayer of faith is that by which demons are cast out and every power of the adversary is trodden under foot. By true fasting the body of the praying man is chastened so that he prays in his faith for an increment and plenitude of spiritual gifts. From this indeed we learn the power and manner of prayer and, moreover, the nature of faith. Faith prays and faith seeks. Wherefore true prayer is not without faith, nor is faith idle, but it fasts and teaches one to pray.

Moreover in prayer as Christ described and required it, faith everywhere holds the victory palm….

Furthermore it is made clear what the prayer of faith is, namely, believing while praying, knowing and understanding for certain that you will receive what you request. These things indicate as well that every hesitation ought to be absent from our heart in prayer and the certainty present that we shall be heard. In like manner it is pointed out that not every prayer is of faith or in faith nor that prayer in faith is able to be undertaken by everyone, but it is for those in particular who are for the most part mature in the spirit and apprehend more fully the knowledge and truth which is Christ.

For through this prayer whatever God created is made holy (1 Tim. 4:4–5), and in this prayer one must always remain steadfast and succumb (Luke 18:13). Paul urged us to pray constantly. Now someone might note that Paul says that we do not know how to pray as we ought. And this is true, for prayer, unless it be at the instigation of the Holy Spirit, as the following references indicate, will not be powerful enough to be the prayer of faith. Therefore we ought to pray insofar as the spirit of his truth is in us….

I believe it is now manifest that the prayer of faith and the prayer of the Spirit are the same, for Jude in his letter writes: Pray in the Holy Spirit and Revelation 5:8 notes that the prayers of the saints are bowls filled with the best perfume for the spirit which is the most precious and eminent being before God.

… Although it is fitting that all are invited to pray and exhorted to persevere in prayer, nevertheless, God alone always knows what is in fact prayer and hears his true worshippers. They are not judged by us but they either pray to the Lord or do not pray to him. Attention must be directed to faith’s beginnings. Just as the first movements of the prayer of faith are none other than increments to that faith and from these initial impulses the spirit leads the pious, insofar as they walk from faith into faith, to perfection, so those who pray are strengthened continually in the prayer of faith.

John taught his disciples to pray, as did Christ the Lord of glory, but! Christ required from his disciples not faith in the first place. At times we found them guilty of unfaithfulness. They were growing in faith until they would pray that perfect prayer of faith, and persevering in it, move others to pray likewise ….

From this it is clear that the spirit of God prays in the pious, at times in those beginning, at times in those growing in prayer, at times in fullness of faith and prayer. It prays, supporting our weaknesses, teaching where and when prayer is fitting, raising groans in those who say nothing but who groan and weep in such a way that their minds are not yet moved, their lips are not yet closed nor are their eyes dry and, if they consider other matters, they do not have the spirit of prayer in a false manner. The spirit moves them from these groanings to speak within the heart. After it restores the house of prayer in its tabernacle, it unites to itself the whole mind and those things which are internal in common prayer. In this it adds to the mind, the mouth, tongue, sounds, sighs, clamors. It adds to the clamors so that tears, laments, cries and wails follow. Finally the spirit gives perseverance lest we fall short or tire of bringing our petitions before the throne of grace so that we might receive what we seek and achieve our desires. Yet not content with this it stimulates us to give thanks for those things which occurred either through us or by others in our name. And when it has incited us to give thanks it crowns us with new riches, granting us growth and prayer in faith and making us recipients of heavenly treasure so that we abound even more fully in such wealth.

Thus we are always beggars and always wealthy. We know our wealth because of the magnitude of the goodness and grace of God which he bounteously spreads upon us, yet we are aware of our poverty as well since we are aware of our infirmity and the fact that the sick and the needy are the ones involved in making requests and giving thanks. Moreover, it comes about that we do not seek what pleases us, but rather what pleases him to whom we pray. We do not request those things of which we approve.

However, it is those things which are necessary for us and are worthy for God which take precedent. These gifts far exceed our poverty, which is not in any way able to take in at once the immense power of the riches in the treasury of the Lord and however much one desires that those things for which we pray at once be augmented and fulfilled, we are not able to bring it about. Moreover we are compelled together to look to the Lord who gives and in him, who is able to do all and who controls all, to be wealthy, although he does not always bestow gifts nor offer all things at once ….

I shall pray in the spirit and I shall pray in the mind. I shall sing psalms in the spirit and I shall sing psalms in the mind. Prayer is made by the spirit and prayer is made by the mind joined with the spirit. The spirit prays with its own groanings; the spirit also prays having been united with the mind, so that the spirit, which the faithful receive for what is necessary, and at the same time the mind, by whose ministry along with those things which work with it, the building up of the church is served, have fruit, while the whole person may be subservient to those united members of his or her inheritance.

But concerning the prayer of faith which Christ states is far from the many words of the Gentiles—perhaps, by you especially, it is practiced too much. I, as I said before, pray in the first place with the disciples of the Lord that the Lord teach me to pray, in however small and inferior a manner I with my weaknesses of body and mind am able to be compared to them. Yet, I pray that the prayer of faith might follow in spirit and in truth and finally with perseverance and intent constancy which he is worthy to bring about, Amen. I ask, unskilled as I am, that if you have any correction or additional things to add, share them with me and fare well in the name of him who teaches his own to pray.

At Liegnitz, Saturday after the eighth day of the Epiphany, in the year 1529.

Corpus Schwenckfeldianorum, vol. 2,

pp. 432–39. Translation, Peter C. Erb

Copyright © 1989 by the author or Christianity Today/Christian History magazine. Click here for reprint information on Christian History.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube