Pastors

Sound Bite: During a Political Scandal

When President Kennedy was assassinated almost 40 years ago, Walter Cronkite interrupted “As the World Turns” with the tragic announcement.

Pastor Gene Boutellier climbed the tower of his Fresno church, and began pulling the bell rope. Much later, exhausted from his tolling, he descended and found the sanctuary full of weeping people. Tear-streaked faces turned upward, wondering what he would say.1 The scene was repeated the following Sunday in virtually every church in the nation. People needing hope turned to their pastors. Preachers of the generation called it “The Sunday with God.”

When President Kennedy’s son died in a plane crash last year, the news media climbed their towers and sounded the alarm. After witnessing a week of non-stop coverage, pastors ascended their pulpits wondering, What should I say? Should I say anything at all?

And if they’re like me, they wondered, How do I preach to the endless tide of natural disasters, terrorist attacks, celebrity deaths, and political intrigue? And why does this seem to be happening so often?

Preaching at the speed of satellite I watched the famed low speed Bronco chase from a Holiday Inn in Tallahassee, Florida. Returning home from a week-long vacation, I had turned on the television to see what my congregation might be talking about. What I found was a major shift in the way news is processed and presented.

With their interminable reportage of O.J. Simpson’s murder trial, the networks discovered an insatiable public appetite for the mindless repetition of scanty facts. With the proliferation of satellite news channels, tragedies once distant now unfold without interruption in our living rooms. And senseless acts, once given some context by those reporting them, are increasingly presented raw.

Are there more wars? Or is it that we all have cable access to rumors of wars? Are the earthquakes severe? Or are we harder rocked by sensurround accounts of them? Whichever the case, the world as seen on TV makes less sense than it ever has. And the people who soak in an average of four hours of television per day come to church hoping on some level that the preacher will make sense of it all.

Rather, rather not

As a journalist-turned-pastor, I have regularly used the news to illustrate my sermons, but only once have I preached a whole sermon on a news event. In one memorable week, our city was shaken by the drive-by shootings of several children, one of them in our neighborhood; a suspected drug dealer was found slain execution-style four blocks from our church; and police reported that New Orleans once again led the nation in murders. I had to address the fear that gripped us all.

We must deal with tragedies when they are our own, but even if they are distant, episodes like the massacre at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, and the killings at Wedgwood Baptist Church in Fort Worth force the preacher to reconsider the sermon schedule. If my recent conversations with pastors are any indication, few are comfortable doing so.

Tim Keller pastors Redeemer Presbyterian Church in Manhattan. “Some of my folks here have said they wish I’d talk more about current events,” he says candidly. “I’m not sure I’m wise enough to pull it off.”

Keller has two concerns: one is that the news will overshadow his message. “When you talk about something that is making headlines, the illustration becomes the point.” Keller says his listeners, including non-Christians, “want to hear eternal truths, not an interpretation of news events.”

He wonders too about the unreliability of early reports. He usually waits a year or more before referring to a news event. “It often takes months to get perspective,” Keller says.

Keller points to the sermons of the old masters as examples. The only sermons of Jonathan Edwards and others that seem irrelevant now are those preached about national events, Keller says. “It is remarkable how poorly reasoned those sermons are. That is what originally made me hesitate about preaching on current events.”

“Who says a sermon has to last for 500 years?” counters Joseph Jeter, Jr., professor at Brite Divinity School at Texas Christian University and author of the book Crisis Preaching. “All of us would like to preach a 500-year sermon, but it would have to be a very general sermon.”

In his research, Jeter found many preachers who refused to speak to news events. “Some said they don’t know what to say; others don’t want to sensationalize. But if your people bring to church a concern they’re confused and disturbed about, and nothing is said, that is like looking for bread and getting a stone.”

Choosing to address a news event requires discernment: of the likely lasting impact of the event, of the emotional needs of the congregation at the moment, and of the Spirit’s leadership in sermon preparation.

About Natural Disaster

The pastor helps people wrestle with the sovereignty of God.

Earthquakes are ultimately from God. Nature does not have a will of its own. And God owes Satan no freedom. What havoc demons wreak, they wreak with God’s permission.

That’s the point of Job 1-2 and Luke 22:31-32. God does nothing without an infinitely wise and good purpose. “He also is wise and will bring disaster” (Isaiah 31:2). “The Lord is good” (Psalm 100:5). Therefore, God had good and all-wise purposes for the heart-rending tragedy in Turkey that took thousands of lives on August 17, 1999.

Sound Bite

—John Piper
pastor of Bethlehem Baptist Church,
Minneapolis, Minnesota.
An excerpt from his church newsletter,
reprinted in
World, September 4, 1999.

Lessons from the epicenter

A tornado ripped through Goshen (Alabama) United Methodist Church during the Easter drama on Palm Sunday 1994. The building just exploded, says Pastor Kelly Clem, burying worshipers crowded in the sanctuary under three feet of rubble. When the debris was cleared, 20 were dead, including Clem’s four-year-old daughter Hannah. The media descended on the tiny community outside Birmingham.

“They asked us ‘Why?'” Clem says. “Isn’t the sanctuary supposed to be safe? Isn’t this going to shatter your faith?” And the larger, and harder question: “Why would God let this happen to a church?” “During the crisis is not the time to ask the why question,” Clem says. “The real question is ‘What am I going to do with the life I have today, with the family members I have today, with the church I have today?'”

Clem’s words to her congregation on Easter morning a week later spoke to the need of the moment: How can we be the comforting church when we’re all suffering? Help with the why question came later.

The pastor’s temptation in a crisis-prompted sermon is to offer answers. Although the people may say they want answers, what they really need is help dealing with overwhelming emotion.

A little more than six months after the shooting deaths of 15 students at Columbine High School, nearby West Bowles Community Church continues to wrestle with the catastrophe while at the same time watching a great revival in Littleton and in their church.

“Some wanted to make sense of (the deaths),” says Pastor George Kirsten. “I don’t think we can. Others would say, ‘Where can I turn? Is there any hope? Is there any comfort?’ That’s the issue we addressed loud and clear.”

Kirsten’s church became a clearinghouse for wise counsel. Many Columbine students came to West Bowles two days after the shootings to talk through their trauma. They didn’t seek out the counselors sent by the school system, according to Kirsten, but went instead to other teens, youth from the church who were willing to listen and to cry with them.

Both Kirsten and Clem approached the preaching task as fellow strugglers. They expressed what their people were feeling and what they themselves were feeling. “Sometimes that’s all we can do—cry with our people,” Jeter surmises.

Craig Barnes calls this “emergency room talk.” Barnes is pastor of National Presbyterian Church in Washington, D.C. He recommends the E.R. approach to emotionally wrenching crisis. “You don’t do a lot of constructive theology in emergency rooms. You just remind them that we live in the hands of God, and that’s a wonderful place to be. The constructive preaching comes in the second wave.”

We live for moments when we stand on the stump and say, “I have a word from the Lord.”

Breaking news can wait

“Crisis rips the veneer off,” Barnes says. “It can be very helpful.” Yet in 20 years of pastoral ministry, Barnes counts only a handful of occasions when national news became sermon fodder. Most he treated briefly—the deaths of Princess Diana and Mother Teresa in the same week produced two paragraphs to close a message on the cost of following Christ.

Pastoring in the nation’s capital, Barnes has felt pressure to speak to the news. He has resisted. For many months he refused to address the investigation that led to the impeachment of the president. “I told my congregation I was taking the high road, but when everything finally came out, I had to speak.”

News anchor Peter Jennings called while Barnes was preparing his sermon. “He was taking a survey on how churches were handling it. He wanted to know whether I was calling for the head of the president or the head of the special prosecutor. Those were my only two options.

“I explained that the gospel is a little bit larger than that. My intent in this kind of sermon is to transcend the options. I want to say something that is clear and useful as people work their way through the issue. The crisis sermon should draw them to Jesus as Savior, as opposed to leaving them with the ‘right’ answer.

“We live for those moments when we can stand on the stump and say, ‘I have a word from the Lord.’ If it’s truly the word of the Lord, then it’s not just for the president or the prosecutor. It’s for all of us.”

The preacher’s temptation is to exegete the crisis, rather than the Scripture. Barnes avoids this by starting with his congregation’s emotions and moving quickly to the text.

“All preaching has to maintain both sides of that sacred conversation,” Barnes says. “You have to tell the Lord how it is down here. The people need to hear that. They need to see you as Moses, as the person who is speaking on their behalf before the Lord, in order also to hear the word of the Lord from you.”

For the most part, Barnes sticks to his preaching plan. He has found that his text, selected as much as a year in advance, has spoken to the need on the few occasions when he has preached on a crisis.

Like Keller, Barnes waits to refer to events such as Columbine and Wedgwood. “There are some pretty heroic stories that emerge in the second wave of media coverage. I think there is more valuable information there for the preacher.”

While crises that directly affect the local church must be addressed immediately, others, more often national or world events, can wait until more information is available and the lasting impact of the event has been determined. A real crisis will still merit attention in a few weeks or months. Until then, inclusion in the pastoral prayer will suffice to acknowledge awareness of the congregation’s feelings.

Other crises—and many of the incidents generating non-stop news coverage fall in this category—are simply distractions.

During a Political Scandal

The preacher identifies with the feelings of the listener.

This has been a difficult week for the American public. How many times have we seen the banner “The Presidency in Crisis”? There is no shortage of people offering their political analysis of this.

I have no calling to add to that analysis. Instead, as a pastor, my calling is to speak to the anxiety of our own lives. These are clearly anxious times for us. We feel upset, discouraged, frightened, and a bit sick to the stomach.

Now on Sunday morning, we have gathered into church to look for a Word from the Lord. In my experience the Word of the Lord doesn’t come as a word about someone else, a political agenda, or a word that easily reduces to the simplistic options we construct. Rather the Word of the Lord comes as a ray of light that pierces through the darkness of our own lives. So the real question the church should be asking is not what should he do, or they do, but what should you and I be doing now?

Sound Bite

—M. Craig Barnes
pastor of National Presbyterian Church,
Washington D.C.
The introduction to his sermon
from Romans 13:11-14,
September 13, 1998.

Grieving for people you don’t know

“I’m surprised by how much that hurts me,” my wife said, some months after the death of John Kennedy, Jr.

“That it hurt at all? Or that is still hurts?” I asked.

“Both, I guess. I see their pictures at the magazine stand, and I ache, deeply. Some celebrity deaths you expect to affect you. Diana, certainly.” (My wife had stayed up overnight so she would not miss the royals’ wedding on television.) “But I didn’t expect to feel this one.”

I understood her feelings. In our star-eyed culture, we keep electronic vigils by many bedsides, and the deaths of people we’ve never met become very real to us. Our listeners need help mourning losses both real and imagined. But do tragic, widely reported deaths merit attention from the pulpit?

Some instances should be referenced, but most are distractions from the real issues, according to Argile Smith, preaching professor at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary. “What separates them from truly catastrophic events is that they are everyday events that happen to famous people.” People are born, live, and die, and except for their fame, most would not make the news. Neither should they make the pulpit.

Still, Smith admits, the emotions of his listeners must be considered. “I had prepared to preach on death and resurrection one Sunday. The night before that sermon, Princess Diana was killed. Because that was what everybody was talking about, I scrubbed my introduction and started with her death. The message wasn’t about Diana, but it spoke to some things people were thinking about.”

Smith is watchful when invoking the names of the famous. “Be careful not to make value judgments on dead people or speculate on their salvation,” he warns. “The preacher can help his congregation with their emotions without expressing opinions about the deceased.” In other words, don’t say anything you wouldn’t say at the celebrity’s funeral.

In time, Smith says, the preacher develops an internal mechanism for deciding which events are worth talking about.

After a Terrorist Bombing

Evangelist says God can be trusted.

Since I have been here (in Oklahoma City) I have been asked the question: “Why does God allow such a terrible thing to happen?”

Over three thousand years ago, there was a man named Job who struggled with the same question. He asked why. He was a good man, and yet disaster struck him suddenly. He lost seven sons and three daughters. He lost all his possessions. He lost his health. Even his friends turned against him. His wife said, “Curse God and die.”

In the midst of his suffering he asked this question: “Why?” Job didn’t know. “Why did I not perish at birth?” he cried.

Perhaps this is the way you feel. And I want to tell you that God understands those feelings.

I have to confess that I never fully understand, even for my own satisfaction. I have to accept by faith that God is a God of love and mercy even in suffering. … Times like this will do one of two things: either make us hard and bitter and angry at God, or make us tender and open and help us to reach out in trust and faith.

I pray that you will not let bitterness and poison creep into your soul, but that you will turn in faith and trust to God even if we cannot understand. It is better to face something like this with God than without him.

Sound Bite

—Billy Graham
at the memorial service for victims of the Murrah Federal Building bombing in Oklahoma City, April 25, 1995.

That’s the way it really is

The danger of preaching to the crisis too frequently is that the temporal rather than the eternal begins to drive the preaching schedule. The preacher becomes reactionary, Chicken Little in the pulpit. On the other hand, ignoring crisis, whether real or perceived, may be seen by our listeners as failure to speak to their needs.

By preaching appropriately when the news intrudes, we can show our listeners that God still cares and that he can still be trusted even in catastrophe’s aftermath.

Our goal, always, is to help people view the issues of life and death in the light of Christ. “If this world is going to make sense,” Smith says, “it will only be when we see it through the eyes of Jesus.”

Eric Reed is associate editor of LEADERSHIP.

1. Boutellier told his story to Joseph Jeter, Jr., in Crisis Preaching (Abingdon, 1998).

At a Glance

Preaching in times of crisis

You may not have all the answers, but you should acknowledge the questions.

  1. The crisis is only part of the message. Current events serve as good introductions. Start with the story people are talking about, then lead them to Scripture.
  2. Weep with those who weep. Approach most events from the same perspective as your congregation. Express their worry, grief, or confusion. Say what they’re feeling.
  3. Exegete the Scripture, not the crisis. The event is not the sermon. The tragedy must not overshadow the eternal truth.
  4. Eulogy comes from “praise.” Illustrate without making value judgments on deceased persons or the disposition of their souls.
  5. It’s okay to ask “Why?” The pastor doesn’t have to give all the answers. Raise questions that should be discussed in small groups or handled more fully in newsletters or other forums.
  6. Find the redemptive center in a crisis. Share hope. Point to Jesus.

Copyright © 2000 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

What Game Are We Playing?

Track, golf, basketball, and football teams require very different skills. So does leadership of different size churches.

Sport icons

Something stirred inside me as I heard Ben describe the church he was planting. I didn't know whether it was awe or jealousy. Ben had all the bases covered. From philosophy of ministry to vision and goals, he knew where he was headed.

He had mapped out a clear and powerful system of discipleship, church governance, leadership structures, and ministry patterns. I was sure he was laying a solid foundation upon which to build the ministry. So was he.

Now, nearly 20 years later, we both realize he was actually making a critical mistake. He had constructed an organizational straitjacket that choked the very entrepreneurial spirit that initially caused his church to boom.

What happened?

Ben failed to realize that growth changes everything. With structures so strongly stated and so firmly entrenched, he made it nearly impossible to change them when they no longer worked. And when his leadership molds couldn't be broken, the church broke.

Like Ben, many church leaders fail to understand that more members and staff don't just make a church bigger. They make it different. Roles and relationships change, often dramatically, usually unintentionally.

Ministry growth is more than adding players. Sometimes it's a whole new ballgame. And if you don't adapt, it's not long until conflict erupts.

Over the past 19 years, the church I pastor has slowly and steadily grown. More like a glacier than an avalanche, we've worked our way through the stages of growth, from one-man show to megachurch. Along the way, we've had to reinvent ourselves many times. Some changes were so natural we hardly noticed them. Others were difficult, some gut-wrenching. But all the changes were inescapable. Our only choice was to embrace them or resist them; we could not avoid them.

I liken them to sports. As your church or ministry team grows, your game changes. Here's what you can expect at each stage.

Track star

The solo pastor can be compared to a track and field star. That's where most of us start out, and many choose to stay. On the up side, the single-staff pastorate offers tremendous freedom. On the down side, it can be overwhelming and lonely.

Like the sprinter, the solo pastor may work out with others, but he performs alone—often without fanfare and usually before a small crowd peppered with family and friends.

Independent types love it. Sometimes the highly relational do, too, because the smaller church provides opportunity for deeper personal relationships.

The opposite can also happen, especially in a small church with a long history of ingrown relationships. The new pastor can be shut out, viewed by the members as an outsider.

Most solo leaders I've known want to be part of a team. They often pull together a group of lay leaders or close friends within the church to create a team.

Clubhouse buddies

With growth comes the inevitable addition of a team member or two. Key leaders may be paid staff or lay members. Either way, the small leadership team of two to four resembles players on the golf course.

Golf is a highly relational game. So are these teams. Golf is most enjoyable when played with friends. And while it's preferable that players have similar skills, a stroke a hole is no big deal among pals. The leisurely pace allows for extended conversation and camaraderie. It's a major part of the game. Afterward, everyone is expected to hang around for a snack and a drink while debriefing that round and planning the next one.

For the highly relational pastor, a golf-size leadership team is the most enjoyable stage. The relationships are often deep, the sharing genuine, and the concern for one another goes far beyond the course. Doing what you like with people you like is hard to beat.

Playmakers and scorers

As the team grows beyond a foursome, its relationships begin to resemble those found in basketball. More a team sport than a friendship sport, basketball depends upon working together, trusting one another, and sharing the ball.

No one expects everyone on a basketball team to be best friends. There are too many players for that. Some are stars and some are role players. It's also played before a larger crowd.

The ministry team of five to twelve key leaders (whether paid or volunteer) is similar. Everyone is in the loop. They all know what the others are doing and are supposed to do. When the coach addresses the team, he speaks to everyone at once. There are few surprises.

During a basketball game, those who aren't in the game watch those who are. Offense and defense involve everyone. Most players can play multiple positions. Changing positions for the good of the team is usually no big deal, a minor change in focus.

A winning team needs a star player or two. Given freedom to go one-on-one, these players can make or break the team. Adding or losing a star player can turn the season around.

While basketball teams do not have the same depth of relationships found on the golf course, the good ones have great esprit de corps. Everyone rides to the game in one van. The locker room is lively. Trash talk is half the fun.

Offense, defense, special teams

When the primary leadership team increases beyond 15, the game changes radically. More like a football team, the dynamics can be very uncomfortable for the golfer. And for those who still think they're playing basketball, ministry can become confusing—and painful.

Football is a game of highly specialized roles. Few players are interchangeable. Guards seldom become quarterbacks. Teamwork is more important than one-on-one skill. In fact, a great athlete who freelances can mess up the entire game.

Football players don't know what everyone else is doing. The offensive and defensive teams have different playbooks and different game plans. When not in the game, they may not even watch their teammates; they huddle with their unit and position coach to plan for the next series. Most players have to watch the game films to know what happened.

The sheer number of players and the distinctly different roles make camaraderie a challenge. While the basketball team rides everywhere together, the football team takes may take two buses.

For the members of a leadership team that once played basketball, this is a difficult adjustment. They may feel out of the loop and insignificant. Some won't be able to make the change. Some won't want to. But there is nothing they can do about it. The game has changed. The only question: Am I going to put on the pads, retire, or just stand here in my shorts and get run over?

How you know it's a whole new game

A star football player and good athlete, Tim decided to go out for the varsity basketball team. He made the team. But whenever it came time to play hard-nosed defense, he reverted to the tactics he'd learned on the football field. He never quite understood that this was a new game with new rules.

What football player Tim called "a little pushing and shoving," the basketball referee called a foul. Soon Tim was on the bench, frustrated that the officials didn't appreciate the tight defense that had won him awards as a cornerback.

While changes are inevitable in a growing church, they are not always easy. Leaders who don't see them coming or don't realize they have already taken place pay a high price in emotions and relationships. So do their teammates and churches.

Besides simply the number of players, here are other signs that the game has changed.

Relational overload. An increase in time spent massaging relationships is an early sign that the game may have changed.

My preferred style of leadership is relational. I'd rather convince than give directives. I don't do memos (okay, I didn't do memos). Instead, I prefer to pass vision and direction through ad hoc meetings around lunch or the water cooler.

That worked well for a long while. Adding a few staffers and a weekly staff meeting, we easily made the transition from track to golf to basketball. We hit our stride. We hummed along on a long winning streak. It was a blast. Everyone was happy.

But with steady growth in attendance came the need to add new players. Eventually we were no longer an overgrown basketball team. We were a football team. But since the staff came aboard one at a time, I didn't realize the game had changed. I noticed I was suddenly spending a lot of time keeping everyone in the loop.

The ministry team thought we were still playing basketball, so they were upset every time something happened that they didn't know about. I thought we were still playing basketball, so I assumed their complaints were legitimate. Their grievances about relational issues eventually pointed me to structural issues. Only when I realized I was trying to lead a football team like a basketball coach did I find my way out.

Increased miscommunication. When important messages are chronically missed or misunderstood, it's time to change the way we play the game.

On a golf team, communication is easy and natural, there is seldom a need to set up a special meeting to discuss anything. They probably covered it on the way to the clubhouse.

When our church staff was small, we hardly ever had a scheduled meeting. It felt silly. If we had something to discuss, we did it on the spot. It was fun and fluid, and took little time or planning. But as our staff grew, that style was less effective. Someone was always missing from our discussions. The larger team needs intentional communication.

I've coached my son's basketball teams. Ocasionally, another team will throw a surprise defense our way. Nothing is harder than trying to explain to the kids in the middle of a game what's happening and how to beat it. It seldom works.

The information is not that complicated. But you need a chalk board, about two minutes of explanation, and several walk-throughs. The problem is the number of people who need to grasp it. If just one kid misunderstands or tunes out, we'll turn the ball over, no matter how well the others understand.

Usually, we just do the best we can and then deal with it at the next scheduled practice. Larger teams need special meetings, chalk talks, and film sessions to keep everyone on the same page. And if the group grows large enough, you'll have to break it down into smaller groups to facilitate communication.

That's not as easy as it sounds. Expect resistance when shifting between sizes. Duffers who thrive on leisurely fairway talks will feel cheated when you suddenly call an in-bounds play for the last shot. They don't want to substitute rambling conversations with agenda-driven meetings.

For many of them, it's not the game but the relationships that count most. And hoopsters who once knew everything about the game plan aren't usually thrilled with a new structure that leaves them focusing on only part of the picture. For them, knowledge holds the key to power and prestige.

Because of this resistance (and the fact that some of us like the old game better than the new game), it's tempting to communicate in the old ways long after they no longer work. That might keep one or two players happy, but the rest of the team will flounder. The coach can either help the team adapt to the new reality, or wait until serious conflict solves the problem by shrinking the group to a more comfortable size.

Conflict over decisions. Many ministry teams are hamstrung when it comes to making decisions. Their structures remain stuck in the past, appropriate for a game they are no longer playing.

Sometimes the trouble comes from making decisions too quickly. This usually happens when a long-time track-star pastor adds staff or moves to a new ministry with existing staff. Used to being his own counsel, the pastor continues to make decisions without consulting (or at times even informing) the rest of the team. This is a serious breech of golf etiquette. If continued, the new partners usually start looking for another partner.

More commonly the bottlenecks occur when we try to include too many people in the process. Some years ago we added just one person to a key team. Previously, this tight golf team made great decisions and enjoyed the process. But suddenly things fell apart. A group that once reached consensus quickly started debating every little thing. Coalitions formed, relationships suffered. What were once enjoyable strategy sessions became dreaded staff meetings.

What happened? The game had changed, but the players didn't know it. The problem was not the newest member. The problem was adding one player too many without changing the rules.

Look what happens each time a new person joins the decision-making mix: With two people, you have to maintain just two lines of communication. Adding a third creates six lines. A fourth, 12. A fifth, 20. Add a sixth person and you now have 30 lines of communication to monitor!

No wonder growing leadership teams find their old processes breaking down.

The basic principle: daily operational decisions need to be pushed out to the frontline while decisions about vision and direction are made by an ever-narrowing group at the top. This ensures that those close to the action make good decisions and those who shape vision are not bogged down by relational overload.

As a church grows, directional decision-making shifts from congregation to board to staff. At the same time, operational decisions once vested in the solo pastor and a few lay members shift to staff or to specialized team leaders.

Unfortunately, it's here that many church leadership teams get stuck. As a result, important decisions become bottlenecked and meetings turn combative. The real issue is not who makes decisions, but that the decision-making architecture remains appropriate to the game. When it no longer fits, we must be willing to change it.

Play ball!

As a kid I played a variety of sports. I certainly had a favorite. But once a season began, it didn't matter which one I liked the best or which one came most naturally. All that mattered was my ability to adapt to the game we were currently playing.

That was great training for ministry. Some leaders choose their game without considering their church's season, and they keep playing it no matter the results. It's a tough way to do ministry. The odds of success are about the same as Tiger Woods dropping a 15-foot putt with a basketball. Some things just won't happen, no matter how hard we try.

In contrast, successful leaders play the game that's in season. They accept the conditions and the rules. They discern which kind of leadership is needed and they adjust their structures, roles, and relationships accordingly. And they play ball!

Larry Osborne is senior pastor of North Coast Church in Vista, California.

Capitalize on the strengths of your game.

A Pastor's Playbook

Pastors in this game Your best play Rethink strategy when
track star run their own race at their own pace one-on-one pastoral ministry growth of 30% or more forces major changes
clubhouse buddies collaborate with the whole team personal mentoring of key leaders conflict at board level shows some are not in new game
playmakers and
scorers
keep the team informed of plays get the ball to shooters for better scoring increase in turnover means dissatisfaction with new roles
offense, defense,
special teams
coordinate the coaches let units specialize, but remind offense and defense they're one team burned-out leaders reveal tendency toward "silo" (isolated) ministry

Pastors

Growing Up with God

An age-by-age guide to nurturing your child’s faith

Leadership Journal January 1, 2000

Four-year-old Alicia made a slight mistake when she said her Bible verse: “That who so ever believes in him should not perish but have ever laughing life.” Grinning, her mother didn’t correct her. That’s exactly how she wants Alicia to feel about Jesus.

From their earliest days, we want our children to know the joy of learning about Jesus. But how much can a child really understand about God? And how does that change as she gets older? To help our children develop a faith that will carry them into adulthood, it’s essential we play off their strengths at each stage of development.

A Solid Start:

Birth to 2

Even these early years are critical to your child’s spiritual development. As a parent, you’re always there, ready to feed your baby when he’s hungry, play with him when he’s awake and rock him when he’s fussy. Through these experiences, your child develops a foundation of love and trust in you that will later lead to trust in God.

Children under 2 also learn by imitating. When you pray with your toddler, she might fold her hands and try to copy the language and tone of your prayers. These activities will eventually help your child make sense of the concept of having a relationship with God.

Children first become conscious of God around age 2. The God-images they develop now are crucial to their future concept of who God is. You can help shape your child’s idea of God by talking about God’s love and kindness. You can assure your child that we can trust God to take care of us.

This is also a great time to use your child’s natural curiosity as a spring board for talking about God’s power and creativity. Talk about God as the Creator as you walk outside, read about nature or visit the zoo.

Bible truths for Birth to 2-year-olds: • God made all things. • God loves and cares for me. • Jesus, God’s Son, loves me.

Learning Explosion:

Ages 3 and 4

At this stage, a child will often express his thoughts and feelings through play. As your child learns more about God’s love, he’ll want to show God love in return. He can do that through simple songs and prayers.

This is also a stage of rapid mental development. Between the ages of 3 and 10, the activity level in your child’s brain is about 225 percent higher than that of an adult brain.

With this expanding mental ability comes a better understanding of right and wrong. So as your preschooler learns Biblical truths like loving others and respecting parents, he can begin to apply those truths to his actions. Now is a good time to talk to your child about his conscience. Explain that the conscience is one way God talks to us. When our conscience tells us something is wrong, we need to listen.

Bible truths for 3- and 4-year-olds: • The Bible tells me about a loving God and his Son, Jesus. • I can listen to Bible stories and learn Bible verses. • I’m beginning to understand that the Bible is God’s Word. • I know that Jesus feels sad when I do something I shouldn’t.

A Child of God:

Ages 5 and 6

At this age, many children who have been raised in Christian homes are ready to ask Jesus to be their friend for life. Although this is an exciting time for parents, it’s important to let them make their own decision. Sharon, the mother of 6-year-old twins says, “They’re asking questions about sin and Jesus’ death on the cross. But they don’t quite get it yet.” She says. “I’m not pushing them. I want their decision to be made for the right reasons, not be cause they’re pleasing me.”

By the time your child reaches 6 years old, she starts to realize that Bible stories and songs actually relate to her own identity as a Christian. You can use simple symbols as teaching tools. For example, set an extra plate and chair at the table and explain that it’s for Jesus who is with you all the time even though you can’t see him.

Bible truths for 5- and 6-year-olds: • Jesus loves everyone and that’s why he came to earth. • I know who God is, what he’s like and what he’s done for me. • I can talk to God whenever and wherever I want. • I know people in Bible times loved God and served him, and I know how I can love and serve him today.

Ready to Reach Out:

Ages 7 and 8

Once your child reaches this stage, the questions start to get harder: If the little girl in the Bible story was dead, why did Jesus lie and say she was only sleeping? Why did you tell that policeman you didn’t know the stop sign was there?

When your child asks these kinds of questions, don’t worry. Questions and doubts are clues that your child is maturing and learning to seek out her own answers. When she finds those answers— by searching Scripture or talking to you—she’ll be better equipped to follow God on her own, rather than simply following your example.

At this age, children are beginning to realize that God can use them to do his work. For example, when 8-year-old Brian put all $20 of his birthday money in the offering, his Sunday school teacher questioned him: Did he know how much that was? Did he know he wouldn’t get it back? Brian was surprised that she’d questioned his gift. “Of course I want to give all of it,” he told her. “The missionary who visited our class needs it for the computer he told us about.”

Encourage your child to use his special abilities to serve God and those around him.

Bible truths for 7- and 8-year-olds: • The Bible is God’s truth for me. • Jesus’ death and resurrection makes a difference to me. • The Ten Commandments are hard to obey. I need Jesus’ help. • The world is a big place, and God is working all over the world.

Digging Deeper:

Ages 9 and 10

Obviously, parents are pleased when their children provide correct answers to spiritual questions. But it’s important to encourage them to dig deeper and to grapple with spiritual issues.

If your child doesn’t ask hard questions, ask them yourself. One mother did this with her children. Tina Reiman says, “When we discussed David’s sins of adultery and murder, I asked my children why God would take the throne away from King Saul and not take it away from David. We looked at the ways David and Saul each reacted when his sin was revealed. This gave us a chance to contrast true repentance and mere regret.”

Ask probing questions that require your child to think deeply. Just as physical exercise develops athletes, spiritual activity will grow disciples.

Bible truths for 9- and 10-year-olds: • The Bible defines right and wrong, and I’m responsible for choosing right. • Salvation is for me and all people who trust Jesus. • The Bible is the big picture of God working with his people, and I’m part of that picture.

Big Changes:

Ages 11-14

The relative calm of the 9- and 10-year-old world seems to shatter around age 11 when the child’s mind makes the dramatic leap from following concrete rules to a world of infinite possibilities. Around this time, your child will begin to think about “What if … ” questions: What if Jesus hadn’t died? What if my Buddhist friends aren’t wrong?

Encourage your teen to test theories and move to higher levels of abstract thought. This allows him to see God in an even bigger way. Seek out answers to tough questions together. The search itself will show your teen that faith is a process of growing and learning, even for adults.

At this stage, your child will also begin to wrestle with her own identity and where she fits in this world. Help her find that identity in the Lord. Encourage her to join a church youth group or a Christian club at school. Help her find an older Christian who can serve as a mentor. Support her interest in mission trips or other outreach efforts.

Bible truths for 11- to 14-year-olds: • Being a Christian is part of who I am and the choices I make reflect that identity. • God’s Word is filled with people just like me who were faced with difficult circumstances. I can look to the Bible for solutions to problems I face. • God wants me to serve him by serving others through missions trips and ministries.

As your child grows and develops, keep your eyes open to indications that he’s moving toward spiritual maturity.

Eight-year-old Jeffrey and his father were watching a TV program about a cult. The child kept saying, “That’s not true.”

“How do you know that’s not true, Jeffrey?” his dad asked.

“Well,” responded Jeffrey, “when you’ve been a Christian as many years as I have, you know what’s right and what’s wrong.”

Amen to that!

Marlene LeFever is director of church relations for Cook Communications Ministries.

We’d really like to know what you think about this article!

Is this the kind of article you’d like to see more of? Is there a topic you’d like us to cover? Please send your suggestions to cpt@christianparenting.net

Copyright © 2000 by the author or Christianity Today/Christian Parenting Today Magazine.Click here for reprint information on Christian Parenting Today.

Pastors

How Should Christian Leaders Handle Accusations and Lies?

13 Bible-based replies from our readers.

Leadership Journal December 29, 1999
Furious young man looking at camera and pointing you while standing against grey background

Recently a reader wrote, "I've been struggling with this false, unconscious belief in my ministry: I must defend myself against accusations and lies that are spread against me. Do you know how to handle this problem in a biblical way? I want to give it to the Lord and let him deal with it, but it hurts too much. Do you know how leaders deal with this situation?"

Other readers sent the following wise counsel. (Some items were lightly edited for brevity and clarity.)

1. Examine Yourself (1 Cor. 11)

No matter what people say negatively, it hurts. I have found the key is gaining God's perspective on who I am. Even on my best days I am fallible. So I prayerfully ask myself these questions:

1. Are the accusations or lie true in any way? Have I directly or inadvertently reflected that motive or intent?

2. Where is the criticism coming from? There are people who are regular and reasonable in my life and those that are not. I choose to hear the opinion of the regular and reasonable above the others.

3. What does my accountability partner say about the accusations and lies? If you don't have an accountability partner, you are standing without a balanced and objective viewpoint on the practices, habits, and yes, attacks in your life.

2. Don't Return Evil for Evil (1 Pet.)

What should you do with the urge to defend yourself when others make accusations and spread lies? A righteous indignation arises to defend the Lord's cause. At the same time, the ego flinches from the attacks. Separating our ego from true zeal makes for a tough job.

In his first letter, Peter gives us direction.

The Lord Jesus' reaction sets the standard. He "opened not his mouth" to the most unjust accusations of all time. No reviling, no threats. He "kept entrusting himself to him who judges righteously" (1 Pet. 2:21–25, NASB). We have been called exactly for this purpose, to suffer as Christ suffered, "leaving you an example to follow in his steps." Do not return evil for evil, but in place of an eye for an eye, give a blessing instead! Inheriting the blessing depends on it.

Rejoice in suffering and keep working (4:10–14). Don't let a few keep you from serving the Lord and blessing the lives of many. See the opportunities, not the difficulties.

The big issue is this: What result do I want to see from people accusing me and lying about me? Do I want to see myself cleared? Or am I more concerned to see the truth of the gospel prevail in those who speak evil? Peter encouraged the persecuted to work toward conversion, not confrontation: "Keep your behavior excellent among the Gentiles, so that in the thing in which they slander you as evildoers, they may on account of your good deeds, as they observe them, glorify God in the day of visitation" (2:12).

What can Peter mean by an evildoer glorifying God on the last day except by his conversion? What a wonderful result from our Spirit-controlled speech and actions, to bring the opponent to the Lord's kingdom!

3. Go to the Offended Person (Matt. 5)

The Bible tells us if our brother offends us, go to him and work it out. Second, forgive him and let him know that you love him or her in spite of the situation. Third, don't let a negative outcome hinder you from moving on with your life.

4. Let God Vindicate (Deut. 32:35)

After an amalgamation of two school districts, my husband was under fire from a news reporter who was trying to discredit his reputation as financial CEO of the head office. The reporter would fight with stories casting doubt about Ron's reasons for picking certain consultants, suggesting that my husband wanted perks such as hockey tickets and gifts. The reporter continued to dig up information that had to be defended. We gave the truth in kindness but couldn't always prove our credibility and so we became very distraught, wondering how the stories would be twisted.

I read "'Vengeance is mine, I will repay,' saith the Lord." Then I saw where Jesus was led as a lamb to the slaughter and opened not his mouth. I wondered how that is possible, but I convinced my husband that we were not to retaliate against our accusers. We also read where it says "Do not return insult for insult but return good for evil." And "Love your enemies and bless those who despitefully use you."

In an attempt to be obedient, we talked only to the Lord and each other about our feelings and then acted in mercy to others.

My husband collapsed and died at work a year ago. I did not know how God could now bring good because Ron was gone and everything seemed over. I had to be cautious about not blaming or becoming bitter; he was only 51. The honors and presentations of respect for him have been nonstop this whole year. Our family has been invited to present scholarships paid for by his company to students in his name. The office was dedicated in his honor with a plaque of his head and a write-up about his loyalty and integrity. The same newspaper that tried to discredit him had to print a full page about his character in glowing reports. From 700 to 1,000 people came to the funeral, telling us amazing stories of their love for him.

This proved to me that God had vindicated us, even though I wish Ron was still here.

5. Have Faith (Matt. 14)

My personal Scripture that I live by is this: "Remember how the LORD your God led you all the way in the desert these forty years, to humble you and to test you in order to know what was in your heart, whether or not you would keep his commands" (Deut. 8:2).

We receive many different tests throughout our lives. Satan knows your weakest points. Fear is Satan's primary weapon. He moves in response to fear. He challenges the promises of God with it.

An excellent example of this is found in Matthew 14 when Jesus invited Peter to come to him on the water. "But when [Peter] saw the wind boisterous, he was afraid; and beginning to sink, he cried, saying, 'Lord, save me'" (verse 30). What enabled Peter to walk on the water? His faith in the Word of Jesus. What caused Peter to sink? He was afraid. It wasn't the wind that defeated him; it was his fear.

Faith is developed by meditating on God's Word. The Word of God is the sword of the Spirit. Use it to fight Satan every time he comes against you. Hold up your shield of faith and quench all of his fiery darts.

6. Beware "Heart Murder" (Matt. 5)

May God begin to heal you as you read this.

Read Matthew 5:21–26 and the commentary on it from Matthew Henry. Here is Jesus showing the Jews how they have explained away the spiritual meaning of the Sixth Commandment. They taught that nothing except actual murder was forbidden by the Sixth Commandment. Christ shows us that "all rash anger is heart murder. By our brother, here, we are to understand any person, though ever so much below us, for we are all made of one blood.

'Raca' is a scornful word, and comes from pride: Thou fool is a spiteful word and comes from hatred. Malicious slanders and censures are poison that kills secretly and slowly. Christ told them that how light so ever they made of these sins, they would be called into judgment for them. We ought carefully to preserve Christian love and peace with all our brethren."

Even if we are not at fault, we should make peace. Go directly to the one or ones who have done this to you and ask forgiveness. Yes, ask for forgiveness! You will not believe what God will do with all of this until you do it. God does want to heal you. He loves you so much and wants you to move past all of this. He does not want this to be something that would come between the both of you. Again, he loves you.

7. Don't Worry about Undeserved Curses (Prov. 26)

Proverbs 26:2 reads, "Like a fluttering sparrow or a darting swallow, an undeserved curse does not come to rest." The "undeserved curse" does not come to rest because of the "sow and reap" principle. Sow lies and rumors, and you'll reap a reputation of sowing lies and rumors. Sow goodness, and all those "undeserved curses" will not come to rest.

Remember Jesus did not open his mouth against such lies and rumors. As followers of Christ, neither should we.

8. God Is the Judge, Not You (Matt. 7)

I have tried to not chase ambulances or parked cars. The "ambulances" will wear you out, because one can never catch up to the rumor mill. "Parked cars" are going nowhere and will only give you a bloody nose. The difficult issue is discerning between the two.

If one can go to the source of the rumor, then and only then can issues be addressed. After conversing with the person(s), the responsibility for correction of words or issues lies upon the original source.

Trying to pastor two churches, 16 miles apart, in two different cultures and two differing counties has taught me to consider what issues are really vital to the kingdom of God. I have limited time and energy.

Most importantly, God is the judge, not I.

9. Defend Your Ministry (2 Cor.)

Consider taking the apostle Paul's approach with the Corinthians. In his second epistle, he defended himself by being honest about his credentials as an apostle, a leader, and a man who truly loved serving God. He stressed his unconditional love for the Corinthian congregation because he wanted to make sure they were aware that he had their best interest at heart.

Also, he informed them about the false teachers and their doctrine so the Corinthians could gain a deeper understanding of what was actually going on. The apostle Paul's goal for the Corinthian church was to provide them with valid information so they could make informed decisions, as well as trust and have faith in the spiritual guidance he freely provided to them.

Paul was not trying to boast or brag about his ministry. He did not have to, because his miraculous works spoke for themselves and represented him well. However, in his absence, he realized the importance of reminding the Corinthian church of the authority of his apostleship. The apostle Paul knew how imperative it was to quickly defeat Satan.

10. Call on God (The Psalms)

Read the Psalms. I am amazed at the forthrightness with which many psalmists express their anguish over the words and deeds of their enemies. They say exactly what they think and feel. They call on God to take care of vengeance. When I give it a moment's thought, it's a no-brainer: He can do a much better job than I ever could.

11. Look to Jesus' Example (Heb. 12)

We need look no further then to our Shepherd, Jesus Christ. When he was being falsely accused and mocked and lied about, he did not defend himself. In fact, he allowed all this scorn and reproach to happen to him for he was assured of his place in God.

Acts 8:32–33: "He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth: In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth."

Heb.12:1–4: "Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God. For consider him that endured such contradiction of sinners against himself, lest ye be wearied and faint in your minds."

Matthew 5:11–12: "Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you."

We need to take Jesus' example and return good for evil and love for hate, forgiveness for unforgiveness, and sweetness for bitterness. Do not fight back, but allow room for God's intervention.

12. Realize Your Real Battle (Eph. 6)

All lies and false accusations stem from the Devil, who is the father of lies, as taught by Jesus in John 8:44. Our battle, then, is against "the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms" (Eph. 6:12).

Second Timothy 2:26 talks about people who are opposing the Lord's servant. He is to gently instruct them in the hope that God will grant them repentance: "and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the Devil, who has taken them captive to do his will." These people are prisoners of war, doing the bidding of the father of lies.

Don't play the Devil's game. In fact, do the opposite.

13. Persecution Shows We're Following Jesus (John 15)

Jesus told us ahead of time that we would be persecuted in his name. If this reader is facing the slings of the world, then he must be working well in God's kingdom! Well done, good and faithful servant.

For more advice on this topic, check out this article from our sister publication, ChurchLawandTax.com.

Pastors

Cardboard Daddy

Your family doesn’t need a proxy.

Leadership Journal December 29, 1999

Earlier this year an article floated into my electronic inbox from the Ziff-Davis Network. It heralded yet another computer breakthrough from a major corporation: Sidi Yomtov, an Israeli chip designer working for National Semiconductor, developed a way to combine 43 PC chips onto a single silicon wafer — miniaturization that makes big news in the ever-shrinking world of personal computers. The author described the pressure National Semiconductor experienced and, by extension, the stress Mr. Yomtov felt as the lead designer of the new chip:

“Coordinating a team of 90 engineers in four different time zones, [Yomtov] is at work or on the road so much that his three daughters in Tel Aviv erected a life-size cardboard cut-out of him in the family’s living room. ‘I put my entire prestige of two decades at National behind this project,’ says the bleary-eyed Yomtov. ‘I was afraid that if it didn’t work, I might not be able to show my face … ‘

“Yomtov, meanwhile, expects the next version of his chip to be ready in six months … “

As I read that, I wondered if the cardboard cut-out was a family joke or a Band-Aid over a festering wound. How sad, I thought, that a man could be so worried about losing face that he risks losing his family.

And then I felt the Lord challenge me: How many times have I placed my career before my wife, my family, and my spiritual well-being? How many times have I stayed late in the office to write one more e-mail or finish one more task? How many times have I allowed the pursuit of recognition among my peers to overshadow the needs of my family? How often have I gone home only to obsess over unfinished office work, wandering through the weekend distracted and dimensionless, not sharing myself with my family?

I have resolved to take stock regularly of my life: Is my involvement at home three-dimensional or only a two-dimensional cardboard proxy? My family needs me — not a substitute, a Kodak memory, or the mere promise (or threat) of my presence. As I complete that thought, now is a good time to leave the office and enjoy an evening with my wife.

—Rich Tatum, online project supervisor for PreachingToday.com. To comment on this devotional, e-mail Newsletter@LeadershipJournal.net.

Sign up for the Church Leader’s Newsletter and receive a new article plus useful information in your inbox every week!

Copyright © 1999 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal.Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Hope for the Difficult Emotion

Changing sinful patterns happens in community.

Leadership Journal December 15, 1999

Last issue’s devotional on the subject of anger uncorked a geyser of responses. Here are only a few:

*”Last week I lost my temper with another member of my congregation, and God dealt with me firmly for it. I regretted the words as they were coming out of my mouth. I come from a rough background, and my anger has been an ongoing battle ever since I got saved. I had to go back to that person and apologize for my performance and ask for forgiveness. I was forgiven, but I still beat myself up for it.”

*”Did Jesus sin when he, in anger, picked up a whip to drive the money changers out of the temple? Do you think he struck any of the money changers when he was driving them out?”

*”Anger, righteously, rather than selfishly motivated, is God’s intuitive gift. If it is of the Spirit rather than of the flesh (or of human nature as the GNB puts it), it can alert us to danger: physical, emotional or moral. But then we have to resist the temptation of over-balancing into destructive self-righteousness.”

*”Good devotional, but would have been better if you included some information or resource on HOW TO UNLEARN anger on a biblical basis.”

Guilty as charged. How does one unlearn angry responses?

Change in behavior, slathered with prayer, most often happens in community — with a spouse who speaks the truth in love, with a therapist who opens our eyes to our destructive patterns and the reasons behind them, with a friend who loves us in spite of ourselves, with a child who mirrors back to us our unhealthy patterns, with a small group that dares to love us unconditionally.

There seems to be both an internal and external component to change: the insight that sheds light on the reason we’re angry (internal) and the intervention (external) that aids us in getting us over the hump of change.

Where is God in all this? He makes change possible, working through those around us to say to us what needs to be said and strengthening our will to overcome the impossible. May this Christmas season Christ’s love overcome all your anger.

—Dave Goetz is executive editor of PreachingToday.com and editor of ChurchLeadersOnline.com. To comment on this devotional, e-mail Newsletter@LeadershipJournal.net.

Sign up for the Church Leader’s Newsletter and receive a new article plus useful information in your inbox every week!

Copyright © 1999 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal.Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

News
Wire Story

Ministries Intensify As East Timorese Refugee Camps Grow

Evangelicals working furiously to meet physical and spiritual needs

Evangelical Christians from Indonesia and other countries have intensified efforts to minister to the physical and spiritual needs of thousands of East Timorese people settling into refugee camps at the western end of the Indonesian island.

Despite limited funds and inadequate staffing, believers are sharing the gospel with refugees from ethnic people groups that previously have had little or no access to the message.

An estimated 300,000 people have fled into the Indonesian-held western half of the island of Timor since East Timor voted for independence from Indonesia in August. The vote sparked violent reactions in the already tumultuous region, with hundreds of people in East Timor believed to have been killed by militias loyal to the Indonesian government in Jakarta.

Baptist relief efforts began as members of Kupang Baptist Church in West Timor ministered to 14 Baptist families from Dili, East Timor, who had fled to Kupang. As the refugee numbers increased, a team of 11 young adults from a Baptist student group in Jakarta joined the church in Kupang to help care for the refugees, who were being housed at the Noelbaki refugee camp outside the city.

A Baptist representative involved in the relief efforts said the 515 people (105 families) the church is now caring for had fled their village near Dili, leaving their homes, land and most of their belongings. Their village leader is a member of Dili Baptist Church.

He added that the size of the camps has continued to increase because refugees are not quickly returning to East Timor, mainly due to misinformation and intimidation tactics being used by anti-independence elements in Timor.

“Opportunities for ministry are increasing and we are moving the ministry into a longer-term project, even though we have neither the funds nor adequate personnel,” said the representative. “The project is functioning by faith on gifts from Indonesian Baptist Churches, [international] churches in Indonesia, individuals and a church in Australia.”

Workers saw an immediate need to begin ministering to the physical, spiritual and social needs of the refugees, beginning with the target group of 105 families from Dili, but open to any who want to attend.

“We have distributed milk and basic food items, clothing and school books and have three nurses and a doctor working in the camp clinic,” he said. “We are holding Bible lessons for the children, which have opened the door for adult Bible studies and personal witnessing.”

Working with Campus Crusade for Christ, the Jesus film has been shown several times in the camps, he added. However, “we have only enough personnel to continue what we have been doing into early December. We desperately need funds and more people to continue.”

Although the majority of East Timor claims to be Catholic and the West Timorese claim to be Protestant, the Timorese are animistic at heart, said a Southern Baptist worker.

“The refugees from East Timor come from 17 people groups that are less than 2 percent evangelical,” he said. “Our goal is to establish a church-planting movement among the refugees who come from these different unreached people groups.”

According to reports, the Noelbaki camp—with approximately 13,000 inhabitants—and a second camp nearby, Tuapukan, housing 30,000 refugees—do not meet even the basic needs of the refugees.

The Baptist response teams also have installed a pump on one well at the Tuapukan camp and a water storage tank. In addition, 15 water purifiers donated from individuals in the United States have been installed in both camps to provide clean drinking water.

“Noelbaki is a series of barracks built with tin roofs, plywood dividers and no floors, stretching several kilometers,” said the Baptist representative. “Each barrack is divided into 16 sections of 2.5 square meters. Families get one or two sections, depending on the size of the family. The government-built barracks cannot hold all the refugees, so a thousand refugees have built shelters of palm leaves.”

Conditions in the camp are deplorable, relief workers said. Noelbaki camp, located on a seasonal rice field, flooded when the first early rainstorm of the season hit in October, spreading human waste throughout the camp. Because of the condition of the barracks, refugees were forced to sleep in the mud.

“Our doctor and nurses have begun to circulate through the camp doctoring the sick,” said a Baptist worker. “Even still, the poor living conditions in the Tuapukan camp are taking the lives of four to 11 children every day.”

Contributions toward the relief efforts in West Timor can be sent to the International Mission Board, Hunger and Relief Fund—Timor Relief, P.O. Box 6767, Richmond, VA 23230.

Rankin is an overseas correspondent covering Asia for the International Mission Board.

Copyright © 1999 Baptist Press.

Related Elsewhere

See our earlier story, “Church Aids Refugees Despite Violence” (Oct. 25, 1999)

News
Wire Story

Plans for Meeting Between Baptist Jewish Heads Called Off

SBC President says Jewish leaders ‘simply wanted opportunity to bash Southern Baptists’

Tentative plans have been quashed for a meeting between Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) President Paige Patterson and six Jewish leaders who charged the SBC with “deception” in evangelistic outreach to Jews.

Patterson, in a December 7 letter to Gedale B. Horowitz, president of the New York-based Jewish Community Relations Council, wrote:

“You have now made it crystal clear that our people cannot sit down with the very people who signed the letter of complaint and look them in the eyes and talk with them as friends. With regret, I accept your refusal of our offer, and there the matter ends.”

Patterson said he is left to conclude what he had “feared is true. You are not interested in discussing the matter as friends and coming to a credible understanding. You apparently simply wanted to have the opportunity to bash Southern Baptists in the newspaper.

“I, for the life of me, can fathom no other possibility in the light of the willingness of six of you to sign a letter, which you send first to the press, and then refuse to accept our invitation to meet with you for discussion.”

Horowitz, in a December 3 letter to Patterson, had reiterated a counterproposal for a “one-on-one” meeting “in a private setting.” He had proposed the meeting after a correspondence between Patterson and six Jewish leaders, including Horowitz and the top administrators of four Orthodox and non-Orthodox Jewish rabbinical schools.

A private meeting “would be most conducive” to discussing their concerns, Horowitz wrote, further stating, “I am confident that we can arrive at a mutually agreed upon and amicable resolution of our conflict.”

Patterson’s original proposal was for a daylong conference at a neutral site that would involve “eight Jewish leaders, the six of you and two others of your choice. Southern Baptists will also bring eight leaders to the table in an attempt of Jews and Baptists to enhance understanding and encourage absolute integrity of religious expression as we relate each to the other.”

Patterson listed two conditions: “First, that our Jewish friends would have to understand that Baptists cannot abandon the proclamation of our faith, and second, that two of our eight representatives would be, in the interest of maximum understanding, ‘Messianic Jews.'” In a November 22 letter, Patterson also suggested that a conservative Orthodox rabbi, Daniel Lapin of Seattle, moderate the discussion.

Patterson, in another exchange of letters, responded to Chicago Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein, founder and president of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. In an announcement carried by the Associated Press, The New York Times, and other national media last Friday, Eckstein said, “I have no choice but to suspend cooperation with the SBC until it clearly and unequivocally repudiates the targeted proselytizing of Jews.”

Among factors Eckstein cited for his decision were an SBC-wide evangelistic focus on the city of Chicago for the year 2000; a Jewish prayer guide issued in September by the SBC’s International Mission Board focusing on the Jewish High Holy Days; and a Jewish evangelism resolution adopted during the SBC’s 1996 annual meeting.

Breaking relations with Southern Baptists, Patterson wrote to Eckstein, “does not change our loyalty and love for Jews. It does not change my personal love and appreciation for you, and it does not change the fact that if misunderstood and misrepresented to the whole world, we are going to continue to share the glorious gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ with every human being on the globe and that includes our Jewish friends.”

Concerning Eckstein’s contention that Southern Baptists are “targeting” Jews, Patterson wrote that such a notion is “manifestly absurd.”

Patterson expounded: “A relatively small percent of the world’s total population is Jewish. Southern Baptists today have nearly 5,000 career missionaries spread out across the earth, and we are concerned with getting the saving gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ to all people. We do not discriminate ethnically, religiously, or otherwise. We share Christ with those with whom we have an opportunity to share Christ. Given the fact of the relatively small Jewish population in comparison to the population of the whole, my guess is it would probably be the case that out of every 5,000 times some Southern Baptist shares the gospel with somebody that one of those receiving the witness might be Jewish.”

Eckstein, in his news release, said Jews “don’t like being targeted … and for good reason. Our history is rife with well-intentioned, supposedly ‘loving’ efforts at targeted proselytizing by Christians who later turned to savage persecution and even pogroms when it became apparent that we would not willingly abandon the faith of our fathers. We’ve often been loved to death by the presentation of the gospel to us. The SBC may choose to forget this past, but Jews will not. We cannot afford to. To ignore this history?worse, to expect Jews to ignore it?is just plain wrong. What’s more, historically these attempts at conversion have never worked, and they won’t work today.”

Patterson, in his letter to Eckstein, made note of “the incredible antagonism that I sense on the part of the Jewish people toward other Jews who have embraced the Messiah.”

But, Patterson noted, “Simply using Jewish symbols would mean that even our churches are deceptive since we, too, utilize many of the symbols of Judaism, not to mention the ultimate symbol, the Torah.”

Patterson also wrote: “It makes no sense to me whatsoever that philosophy professors and others in the universities across this country can solicit Jewish people to atheism (apparently with some success), and when the Jewish people become atheists, they are still considered Jews.

“Yet when a person who is a Jew becomes a believer in the Messiah, he no longer has standing as a Jew . …

“It also makes no sense to me that the Jewish community is more concerned about Jews who embrace the Messiah and still believe in the one true God of Israel than they are Jews who reject the most fundamental tenet of Judaism it seems to me?namely, the one true and living God,” Patterson wrote.

Horowitz, in his December 3 letter, also reiterated his charge that “the ‘Messianic’ movement, with the SBC’s imprimatur,” is attempting “to blur the distinction between Christianity and Judaism.” Horowitz also wrote that “the entire Jewish community views as offensive and deceptive the SBC’s endorsement of the use in Christian worship and conversion of symbols and rituals sacred only to Judaism.” Horowitz also cited several examples of the deception he is alleging.

Patterson responded, “I repeat that which I have before said to you that we intend to be involved only with those Christians (whether Jewish or otherwise) who are up front about who they are and what they are doing.

“I also wish to make clear to you once again that I am still a thoroughgoing proponent of religious liberty. I do not approve, for example, of what seems to me to be the deceptive method of Mormon missions, but I do still uphold their absolute religious liberty to believe whatever they want to believe and to press the discussion of it in the open market. I would do that same thing for any organization of Christian Jews.”

Patterson reiterated his belief that “it is reprehensible whenever efforts are put forth of any kind to limit religious liberty.”

Copyright © 1999 Baptist Press. Used with permission.

Related Elsewhere

See our recent coverage of the tensions between Jews and the Southern Baptist Convention:

Witnessing vs. Proselytizing | A rabbi’s perspective on evangelism targeting Jews, and his alternative.” (Dec. 3)

CT Classic: Christmas and the Modern Jew | Christians often seem to lack both good missionary strategies toward Jews and sensitivity to their situation in life.” (Dec. 3)

CT Classic: Billy Graham: ‘I have never felt called to single out the Jews’ | The evangelist discusses targeted evangelism in one of his most quoted statements.” (Dec. 3)

CT Classic: Graham Feted By American Jewish Committee | In 1977, Graham walked a fine line between in his work ‘to proclaim the Gospel to Jew and Gentile.’ ” (Dec. 3)

Southern Baptist President Vows to Continue Chicago Evangelism Plans | Paige Patterson accuses Chicago religious leaders of creating ‘the stuff from which hate crimes emerge.’ ” (Dec. 3)

Southern Baptists Counter Warning that Evangelism Effort Will Breed Hate Crimes | Chicago evangelistic outreach ‘not targeting groups,’ leaders assure.” (Nov. 30)

News
Wire Story

Homosexuality: Falwell Tames His Tongue

Moral Majority founder promises to tone down anti-gay speech at meeting with homosexuals.

Jerry Falwell has made a surprising about-face in his war of words with homosexuals. The Moral Majority founder previously has called gays “Sodomites” and said there can be “no peaceful coexistence” between homosexuals and Christians. Falwell’s National Liberty Journal has argued that Tinky Winky, the purple character from the children’s television program Teletubbies, serves as a gay icon. In the wake of recent violence against homosexuals, Falwell is offering a truce and pledging to tone down his criticisms.

In an unprecedented event, Falwell hosted 200 evangelical leaders and 200 homosexuals at his Thomas Road Baptist Church in Lynchburg, Virginia, October 23. The idea for the reconciliation gathering came from Mel White, a minister who ghostwrote Falwell’s autobiography years before declaring himself homosexual. White now heads Soulforce, an interdenominational homosexual rights group.

Citing the recent shootings of Christians at Columbine High School and Wedgwood Baptist Church, and the murder of gay student Matthew Shepard, Falwell agreed that hateful words can be a precursor to violent actions. Both White and Falwell publicly agreed to work toward reducing animosity between Christians and homosexuals.

Falwell did not budge on his belief that homosexuality is a sin. This remains a point of disagreement with White, who said, “Calling someone [a] sinner over and over and over again approaches hate speech very quickly.”

The meeting also revealed emerging fault lines between conservatives. Falwell scrapped plans to serve food at the late-afternoon meeting amid concerns from the Family Research Council (frc) and others that the Bible prohibits eating with sinners (1 Cor. 5:11). The frc also issued a statement before the meeting expressing its concerns that observers may place Falwell’s orthodox Christian views on homosexuality on a “moral par” with the “unbiblical distortions” of White. About two dozen antihomosexual protesters marched in front of the church Sunday morning.

Falwell told attendees that he is motivated by Christ’s example of loving his neighbors. In an editorial following the meeting, the New York Times called Falwell’s pledge to curb hate speech “a measure of how far the gay rights movement has progressed toward cultural acceptance”—but the article also labeled Falwell’s views as “bigotry.”

Despite the controversy, participants were generally pleased with the event’s progress toward removing stereotypes, and more meetings may follow. “What we have here is a great moment for our country—gays and Falwell worshiping together,” White says. “It’s a small start, but it’s a start.”

Send us email!
Send us email!

News
Wire Story

Christians Protest Proposed Mosque

In their strongest statement on the issue to date, the three major Christian denominations in Israel and the West Bank closed church doors for two days in November to protest an Israeli proposal to permit construction of a mosque alongside Nazareth’s Church of the Annunciation.

Leaders of the Greek Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and Armenian churches said the Israeli decision, in effect, constitutes discrimination against the local Christian community and a government show of favoritism toward a small group of Muslim “fundamentalists.”

“Peaceful co-existence and confident harmony have recently been shaken by a series of sad events that have been painful and counterproductive for the majority of both faith communities,” the letter said.

“Despite the ruling of the court of law in Israel that the land adjacent to the Basilica of the Annunciation is state land, the government has supported a small group of fundamentalists who are intent on building a mosque only a few meters away from the historical church of the Annunciation in Nazareth.”

The decision to close the churches in midweek was in tended to express the “disapprobation of all the churches at the way that their rights have been summarily violated,” added the letter, signed by Greek Orthodox Patriarch Diodoris I, Latin (Catholic) Patriarch Michel Sabbah, and Armenian Patriarch Torkom Manoogian.

“There can’t be a shadow of a doubt concerning the government commitment toward Christian freedom of worship in every site in Israel,” said Shlomo Ben Ami, Israeli Minister of Public Security, in a statement that expressed regret about the protest.

“Any sort of damage or a threat of damage to the legitimate religious interests of the Christians in the state of Israel as a whole and especially in Nazareth will be dealt with by a firm hand, as is required in a state of law,” his statement said.

In October, an Israeli court ruled that Muslim leaders in Nazareth have no legal right to block plans by the town’s Christian mayor to construct a plaza area next to the Church of the Annunciation that would accommodate millions of Christian pilgrims expected to visit during 2000.

The Nazareth District Court ruled that only about 135 square yards of the half-acre plot are legally owned by the waqf (an Islamic religious trust) and that the rest is state-owned land.

Muslim activists seized the land two years ago and erected a makeshift mosque on the site. They insisted the land was owned by the waqf, and that a permanent mosque should be constructed on the plot (CT, June 14, 1999, p. 24).

Meanwhile, plans are proceeding for a visit by Pope John Paul II in March. “The local churches might protest, they might do something, but I don’t think it will affect the papal visit,” said Rabbi David Rosen, a liaison to the Vatican for the Israel office of the Anti-Defamation League.

Copyright © 1999 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube