Good King Bad King

How Christian was the king whose name is almost always associated with the Bible?

Christianity Today January 1, 2000

With this article, we begin a new weekly feature from the editor of our sister publication Christian History.

In old westerns, white hats and black hats clearly distinguish the heroes from the villains. But in real life—particularly political life—that distinction is much more difficult to make. How should we evaluate someone whose public accomplishments are coupled with serious personal failings?

Take the famous King James for example. On January 12, 1604, he presided over a meeting at his Hampton Court estate of English bishops and the leaders of the Puritan movement. The purpose of the meeting was to address the Puritans’ call for church reforms, as defined in their Millenary Petition (so named because it bore 1,000 signatures). One of their concerns was the need for a new Bible translation, which James, a student of theology himself, promptly approved. “I have never yet seen a Bible well-translated,” he said.

Work began in 1607, and the first copy appeared in print in 1611. Though famous as the “Authorized Version,” the translation was only authorized by its own title page, which declared it “Appointed to be read in Churches.” Its authorization, in a practical sense, was given by the King’s Printer, which ceased producing any other version in a large (folio) edition suitable for church use. However, its merit was also a factor: it was a big improvement over the earlier Bishops’ and Geneva Bibles, even though it relied on flawed New Testament manuscripts and a hazy comprehension of Hebrew. King James became a hero and we in the United States honor him every time we mention the KJV (it’s still called the Authorized Version elsewhere).

But just how honorable was James? Not very. Though he agreed with the Puritans on the Bible issue, he was enraged by their other demands, which included a desire to be free from the rule of the bishops. James liked bishops, and he skewed laws in their favor so they wouldn’t object to his immense personal faults: horrible table manners, frequent drunkenness, gross conceit (he told Parliament in 1610, “If you will consider the attributes of God, you shall see how they agree in the person of a king”), and blatant homosexuality (it should be noted that his homosexuality is still a source of great debate). He would much rather keep the bishops’ loyalty than accommodate the Puritans—a choice that eventually contributed to civil war.

So here we have a man who knew theology but considered himself nearly godlike, supported church leaders but only the ones who supported him, and took one great step forward in Bible translation while setting England back several paces with his wholehearted rejection of the Puritans and their ideas. A mixed legacy indeed. But if God can use the pagan king Cyrus to bring the Jews back to Egypt, he can certainly work through a corrupt monarch to proclaim his message anew.

Related Elsewhere

More Christian History, including a listing of events that occurred this week in the church’s past, is available at ChristianHistory.net

For more on James I and the King James Version, see Britannica.com.

Copyright © 2000 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Peacemaking at Top of Agenda of Man Likely To Be Baptist World Alliance President

Billy Jang Hwan Kim will likely become first Korean to head Baptist organization

Christianity Today January 1, 2000

Dr Billy Jang Hwan Kim, a South Korean Baptist pastor likely to be elected president of the Baptist World Alliance (BWA), has called for Baptists to play a greater role in solving ethnic and religious conflicts, particularly those involving Christians.

On January 8, unless there is a last minute challenge, the eighteenth Baptist World Congress, meeting in Melbourne, will officially elect Dr Kim, a 64-year-old broadcaster and pastor, as its president. He will be the first Korean to be elected to the post, which he will hold for the next five years, until the 2005 congress of the BWA, which represents 80 percent of the world’s Baptists.

His church, the Korea Baptist Convention, is a relatively small organization within South Korea, with about 600,000 members in a total population of 42 million. The main Protestant churches in South Korea are the Presbyterian and Methodist churches.

Dr Kim’s election was recommended last July by the BWA’s general council, meeting in Dresden, Germany, and he is the sole candidate who will be presented to the congress January8. In theory he could be challenged from the floor of the meeting, but this is highly unlikely to occur.

Many of the BWA president’s duties are ceremonial, but he—all presidents thus far have been males—plays a key role in directing the organization, in representing it in meetings with government leaders, and in speaking out on issues of justice and human rights.

Asked, during an interview with Ecumenical News International (ENI), about his main focus as president, Dr Kim said he wanted to promote the unity of Baptists around the world, particularly their role in helping to solve ethnic and religious conflicts. He singled out violence in Indonesia and in India where members of other faith groups have attacked Christians. In Indonesia hundreds of church buildings have been destroyed in recent months.

Dr Kim expressed general concern for Christian minorities, especially Baptists, in developing countries, pointing out that in Western countries Baptists had a strong presence—”no one can touch them”—but that in many developing countries, Baptists were vulnerable.

A Christian of conservative views, with a strong belief in the importance of scripture and preaching as the keys to Christian family life, Dr Kim is known in Korea as a charismatic preacher, highly successful evangelist and as chaplain to the Korean national police force. The church where he is senior pastor, the Central Baptist Church in Suwon, South Korea, attracts a total of about 10,000 people to its six services each Sunday.

He is also director of the Far East Broadcasting Company, a Christian network of five radio stations that broadcast the Gospel to Christians in Korea as well as to ethnic Koreans in neighboring China, Russia and Japan. A particular service to Korean-speaking Christians in China, provided by one of Dr Kim’s radio stations, is a daily half-hour reading of the Bible in Korean. The reading is slowed down to enable Korean speakers to write down the text, as they do not have Bibles. “If the readings are too fast, we get letters saying slow down’,” Dr Kim said.

In Billy Kim, the BWA is choosing as its president someone who believes in finding strong and effective solutions to the problems faced by Baptists. He told ENI that not so long ago some Koreans were criticizing Baptists, saying that because of their belief in baptism by immersion they were in fact a sect. He decided to take action to fight this prejudice and devised a plan to baptize 10,000 people at the same time. Local Baptist pastors told him that they would never be able to find 10,000 people who wanted to be baptized, so he asked them all to stop baptizing converts for a year. The numbers of those seeking baptism quickly built up, and in 1990, during the sixteenth Baptist World Congress, held in South Korea, more than 10 000 people were baptized by immersion in the Han River in Seoul. National television covered the event and helped end prejudice against baptism by immersion and against Baptists.

Asked what was the major challenge to Baptist churches in South Korea at the end of the 20th century, Dr Kim said: “Parking spaces. Forty years ago, only the mayor and deputy mayor in a town might have a car. Now the average family has two cars and people want to drive to church. They spend 10 minutes looking for a place to park. But an acre of land costs US$1 million, or even $2 million downtown. So we have to investigate high-rise parking areas or underground parking.”

Dr Kim was raised in what he describes as typical traditional Korean beliefs, combining Buddhism, Confucianism and animism. But his fate was decided when United Nations troops were stationed near his home in Seoul in the 1950s, after the end of the Korean War. He and other adolescents went to the camp to ask American soldiers for chocolate. He was given work, tending a fire and polishing the soldiers’ boots. One soldier, Sergeant Carl Powers, asked him if he would like to go to the US to attend school. He attended a school in Greenville, South Carolina, where he converted to Christianity after a student told him about the Gospel. He entered the ministry and returned to Korea where his family then converted to Christianity.

Dr Kim told ENI that Sergeant Powers had paid his school fees for eight years. On Christmas Eve 1978, Dr Kim baptized Powers in the River Jordan in the Holy Land. “On a human level, it’s not possible to plan such things,” Kim told ENI. “But with God all things are possible.”

Dr Kim will be the 18th president of the BWA. Asked by ENI whether Baptists believed that males should hold positions of leadership within the church, Dr Kim, who is married with three children and six grandchildren, referred to Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians and said that God had created the family unit and that man should exercise spiritual leadership within it.

“Margaret Thatcher did a good job as a political leader, but I don’t know what sort of leader she was in her home, because I didn’t visit her home,” he said. “In a house, in a football team, in a big corporation, there has to be one leader. If you are given that authority, you have to exercise it properly. Most of the ladies in my context, in Korea, let the men be leaders, in spiritual roles and within the home. If a father exercises spiritual leadership, the children behave well.”

Asked if his job made him the Baptist pope, Dr Kim laughed. “I don’t think Baptists would allow a pope,” he said. “Our philosophy is one of local autonomy. I support that, but we should co-operate on issues affecting the Baptist family.”

Copyright © 2000 Ecumenical News International. Used with permission.

Related Elsewhere

The Baptist World Alliance Web site has some information, but not much, on their congress.

Copyright © 2000 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Pastors

How to Share the Preaching Load

I learn by coaching

I love to preach, but sermon preparation has never come easily to me. Worse, outside of the occasional comments from my congregation—”Good sermon, Pastor!” or “I really liked that story about … “—there was no one who could offer constructive feedback. Consequently, Mondays were usually filled with nagging feelings of inadequacy. I learned to deal with this over the years through experience and prayer. But many younger pastors struggle with “I wonder how I’m doing” week after week.

Some time ago, I was talking on the phone with Jeff, a longtime friend and a young pastor fresh out of seminary. I heard echoes of my early struggles in his questions: “When do you block out study time?” “How do you move from text to sermon?” “Where do you find good illustrations?”

Suddenly, I had one of those “Aha!” moments. The familiar passage in 2 Timothy came to mind: “And the things that you have heard from me … commit these to faithful men who will be able to teach others also” (2:2, NKJV). This was not simply an exhortation to be involved in discipling others. Paul, a preacher, was charging two other preachers, Timothy and Titus, with the responsibility of preparing others to preach. In a sense, they were to be “preacher coaches.”

I asked Jeff if he’d be open to a “sermon coaching” relationship. He could send sermon tapes and manuscripts for me to evaluate, and then we could discuss them and address any questions that might arise.

Jeff was eager to start. It has been about a year since we began, and our experiment has been a boon for both of us.

I’ve since developed mentoring relationships with two other pastors besides Jeff. They each say it’s helpful and encouraging to have a seasoned pastor, who’s still preaching, offer them counsel. And it has helped me to keep thinking and working on the fundamentals.

The questions I ask as a coach often come back to haunt (and help) me as I prepare my upcoming messages. As a coach, you have to “think on your feet,” which brings what you know to the surface and then redeposits it deeper inside of you.

I am now a firm believer in sermon coaching. Every veteran pastor would do well to find a younger preacher who’s eager for direction, and offer him ongoing encouragement and advice. Then see how both of you grow.

Charles F. Boyd Southside Baptist Church Greenville, South Carolina Charles.Boyd@ssm.org

My group study retreat

Most senior pastors know that it sometimes feels like you’re all alone. The lack of encouragement and feedback can deprive you of the “life support” needed to keep your preaching effective.

I used to agonize over this tension, until in 1994 five of my Denver Seminary classmates and I decided to take a five-day “spring break” retreat to exhaustively study one book or topic from the Bible. We’ve done it every year since.

Our first year, we had the use of a vacation home in Estes Park, Colorado, where we studied Malachi. In following years, it was Galatians in Durango, Romans in Frisco, 1 Timothy in Lake Walloon, Michigan, and the Sermon on the Mount in Lake Tahoe.

Our primary objective is to establish a serious study from which we can develop a sermon series. Armed with lexicons, dictionaries, commentaries, and various other resources, we begin by breaking down the topic into three or four study segments, which then become the major preaching units. We supplement our findings with illustrations and support points.

It has become much more than just a study. Every year we leave with a greater sense of blessing from God, and from one another.

During my first 10 years as a senior pastor, I often found myself asking: “Who pastors the pastor?” “With whom can I share my hurts and frustrations?” “Who will listen to me, accept me, and love me when the pressures of ministry weigh me down?”

For me the answer is our retreat group, where we’ve prayed together, studied together, and literally washed one another’s feet for the sake of Christ.

Bob Blahnik Suburban Bible Church Highland, Indiana bobblahnik@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2000 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Heart & Soul

I know of an old preacher who was dying of brain cancer. As his health deteriorated, he lost his ability to speak. This was no surprise, for the doctors had told him it would happen. What did surprise him was his own reaction.

He wrote to his family saying how pleased he was that when he lost his voice and therefore his ability to preach, he had kept his pleasure in God.

He’d had dark doubts about his motivations. Had preaching become an idol? Would he no longer love God when he was no longer able to do the thing he loved to do for God? Had he slipped into what T. S. Eliot said was the greatest betrayal of all: doing the right thing for the wrong reasons?

He was relieved to discover that, at the end of his life, he had not. He still loved God more than preaching.

Preaching can be heady stuff. True, it is sometimes the opposite. Bruce Thielemann said the call to preach brings no special honor, just special pain, calling “those anointed to it as the sea calls its sailors; and just like the sea, it batters and bruises and does not rest. … To preach, to really preach, is to die naked a little at a time, and to know each time you do it that you must do it again.”

But more often the mere fact of having people sit and listen to you week in and week out can poison the soul.

I vividly remember the first time I made a broad gesture as I spoke, pointing toward the sanctuary exit, and saw half the congregation turn, as one person, to look that direction. My reaction: Wow! I hope to see that happen again! In a single stroke of narcissism, I was losing God while preaching about him. The content was theological, but the subject was me. Great betrayal. Right words, wrong reasons.

Irenaeus said the glory of God is man fully alive, and the life of man is the vision of God. This is doubly true of preachers and their hearers. When God is supreme in preachers and their preaching, people come alive. It’s glorious. The opposite is also true. To play to the crowd and exchange the vision of God’s glory for the pleasure of being thought eloquent or interesting or, that awful word, dynamic, is to deal death not only to one’s self, but to one’s listeners.

Do you love God more than talking about God?

A friend has a wall in his office with pictures of his heroes, among them Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Flannery O’Connor, Francis Schaeffer, and C. S. Lewis, people he believes finished strong, as in Paul’s words: “the time has come for my departure. I have fought the good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the faith” (2 Tim. 4:6, 7). Of course, only the dead can qualify for his gallery.

I want to finish strong. Not like certain retired preachers I used to avoid when I was younger. Denied the pleasures of regular preaching, they just had to have someone to listen to them, at length. If I’m being harsh here, it’s because I fear my own ugly cravings. Words come too easily for me, and too often. I want to be a quiet man, a good listener.

I want to finish strong. Like Joe Blinco. Joe was a great preacher and associate evangelist with Billy Graham. He was a mentor to me.

Joe also died of brain cancer and lost his ability to speak before he went home. I was very, very nervous as I knocked on his door one day just before his speech was completely gone. I didn’t know what to say. A preacher’s nightmare!

He opened the door, shook my hand and spoke a sentence he had obviously practiced over and over again. With excruciating labor, he slurred out the only thing he was able to say that day.

What was the one thing this old preacher wanted to say to this younger preacher? Just three words: “God is good.”

What a finish.

Ben Patterson is dean of the chapel at Hope College P.O. Box 9000, Holland MI 49422

Copyright © 2000 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

PreachingToday.com

Holy Expectation

Recently LEADERSHIP launched an online sermon resource, www.PreachingToday.com, which offers a searchable database of illustrations and a monthly online journal. Here’s a sampling of some recent elements in the journal.

If I had to make my living with my hands, I would probably starve to death. Living in the tenements of New York City, my family depended on the superintendent to make repairs when things in our apartment broke. So I never learned to fix things myself. A few years ago a neighbor, noting my ineptness, asked my wife, “Bonnie, how do you live with a guy like that?”

She replied, “Very, very carefully.”

Because I don’t believe I can fix things, I usually don’t even try. When I do try, I tend to give up whenever I hit a snag. That’s normally right after I pick up a tool. I live with low expectations, and Bonnie and I pay a price for it—to plumbers, mechanics, and handymen.

One day—surprise— we discover God was at work beyond our most expansive imaginations

—Haddon Robinson

Recently, I purchased some software for my computer and tried to install it myself. I followed the directions closely, step by step, and I was stunned when it worked! I was surprised by my surprise. But that is the result of living with shriveled expectations.

Our ministries are stunted when we live with diminished expectations. In fact, our surprise when God works is a dead giveaway of our condition.

We preach the Word of God and then are startled when a woman in our congregation hears the gospel and finds that it is, indeed, the best news ever.

We register shock on our personal Richter scale when a young man who was a victim of abuse hears what Jesus says about forgiveness and decides to confront his older brother who had molested him and get things settled.

We can hardly believe it when a husband involved in an affair sits at communion and, faced with taking the bread and cup, decides to end the illicit relationship.

We’re handling dynamite, and we didn’t expect it to explode.

When we lose the sense of holy expectation, our preaching gets downgraded to a performance in which we are required to say something religious to pass the time between 11:25 and noon on Sunday morning. We make the calls, attend the meetings, conduct the funerals, officiate at weddings, but we don’t expect that God will show up. We pray for the sick, but we don’t believe our prayers will make much difference. We counsel the bewildered, but we don’t count much on the difference God can make.

Haddon Robinson, professor of preaching at Gordon-Conwell Seminary, South Hamilton, Massachusetts, is senior editor of PreachingToday.com.

How Urgency Seeps Away

One of the ways carnality plays itself out in my preaching is my automatic focus on “How am I doing? Is this connecting? Are people being attentive? Do they think it’s going well?”

One area I want to grow is to be able to let go of that. I want my goal to be simply to help people take their next step toward God.

When I can do that, on the one hand it relieves a lot of personal anxiety because it’s no longer my well-being or sense of value that’s on the line. On the other hand, it makes preaching much more important because if preaching is just about trying to convince people they should like me, that’s a trivial task. But if it is about proclaiming the Word of God and allowing the Spirit to form Christ in people’s hearts, then it is an authentically urgent task.

Remove the dividers When preaching is at its best, it is not a series of compartmentalized statements: a didactic proposition, an example, a joke to relieve tension, application.

That approach to preaching often feels canned and artificial to folks. When preaching is done at its best, it all melds together, and the heart is deeply stirred. Often there’s a sense of fierce joy and deep challenge that are combined. When that happens, that’s preaching.

John Ortberg, from “True Urgency,” Preaching Today Audio #196. He is teaching pastor at Willow Creek Community Church in South Barrington, Illinois, and a contributing editor to Preaching Today Audio.

West Angeles Church of God in Christ, Los Angeles, California

Series: Romans

Sermon titles:
“I Am Not Ashamed of the Gospel” (Romans 1:14-16)
“I Am a Debtor” (Romans 1:14)
“When God Gives Up” (Romans 1:18-32)
“God’s Kindness Should Lead to Repentance” (Romans 2:1-4)

Why this series?
I wanted the congregation to possess a high level of spirituality for and during the year 2000. The Lord led me to preach this series.

Bethlehem Baptist Church, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Series: Romans (for the last year and a half)

Sermon titles:
“The Faith, Grace, Certainty Connection”
“Faith: In Hope, Against Hope, for the Glory of God”
“Why Was Jesus Put to Death and Raised Again?” (all based on Romans 4:16-21)
“Faith Credited as Righteousness: Why? Which? How?” (Romans 4:22-25)

Why this series?
Because it is the greatest book in the Bible.

Ginghamsburg United Methodist Church, Tipp City, Ohio.

Series:
The Jesus Perspective

Sermon titles:
“Jesus’ Perspective: The Word of God” (Romans 4:17; Philippians 2:5)
“Y2K Compatible” (Revelation 3:7-8, 11-12)
“Following Ancient Paths” (1 John 2:7-8; Jeremiah 6:16)
“The Walk” (1 John 2:5-6)

Why this series?
I had a concern about the real content of our Christian lives. Large churches can produce people with no notable distinction from non-Christians in the areas of character and relationships.

Any surprises during study?
This series was born out of a particularly difficult time in our church. While many issues can surface during such a time, focusing on the simple truths of Jesus, not organized religion, seemed imperative. Two truths that surfaced were (1) the mystery of the powerful Jesus, and (2) the embodiment of love.

WHAT THEY’RE PREACHING NOW

Bishop Charles Blake

John Piper

Michael Slaughter

Copyright © 2000 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Sound Bite: After a Terrorist Bombing

When President Kennedy was assassinated almost 40 years ago, Walter Cronkite interrupted “As the World Turns” with the tragic announcement.

Pastor Gene Boutellier climbed the tower of his Fresno church, and began pulling the bell rope. Much later, exhausted from his tolling, he descended and found the sanctuary full of weeping people. Tear-streaked faces turned upward, wondering what he would say.1 The scene was repeated the following Sunday in virtually every church in the nation. People needing hope turned to their pastors. Preachers of the generation called it “The Sunday with God.”

When President Kennedy’s son died in a plane crash last year, the news media climbed their towers and sounded the alarm. After witnessing a week of non-stop coverage, pastors ascended their pulpits wondering, What should I say? Should I say anything at all?

And if they’re like me, they wondered, How do I preach to the endless tide of natural disasters, terrorist attacks, celebrity deaths, and political intrigue? And why does this seem to be happening so often?

Preaching at the speed of satellite

I watched the famed low speed Bronco chase from a Holiday Inn in Tallahassee, Florida. Returning home from a week-long vacation, I had turned on the television to see what my congregation might be talking about. What I found was a major shift in the way news is processed and presented.

With their interminable reportage of O.J. Simpson’s murder trial, the networks discovered an insatiable public appetite for the mindless repetition of scanty facts. With the proliferation of satellite news channels, tragedies once distant now unfold without interruption in our living rooms. And senseless acts, once given some context by those reporting them, are increasingly presented raw.

Are there more wars? Or is it that we all have cable access to rumors of wars? Are the earthquakes severe? Or are we harder rocked by sensurround accounts of them? Whichever the case, the world as seen on TV makes less sense than it ever has. And the people who soak in an average of four hours of television per day come to church hoping on some level that the preacher will make sense of it all.

Rather, rather not

As a journalist-turned-pastor, I have regularly used the news to illustrate my sermons, but only once have I preached a whole sermon on a news event. In one memorable week, our city was shaken by the drive-by shootings of several children, one of them in our neighborhood; a suspected drug dealer was found slain execution-style four blocks from our church; and police reported that New Orleans once again led the nation in murders. I had to address the fear that gripped us all.

We must deal with tragedies when they are our own, but even if they are distant, episodes like the massacre at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, and the killings at Wedgwood Baptist Church in Fort Worth force the preacher to reconsider the sermon schedule. If my recent conversations with pastors are any indication, few are comfortable doing so.

Tim Keller pastors Redeemer Presbyterian Church in Manhattan. “Some of my folks here have said they wish I’d talk more about current events,” he says candidly. “I’m not sure I’m wise enough to pull it off.”

Keller has two concerns: one is that the news will overshadow his message. “When you talk about something that is making headlines, the illustration becomes the point.” Keller says his listeners, including non-Christians, “want to hear eternal truths, not an interpretation of news events.”

He wonders too about the unreliability of early reports. He usually waits a year or more before referring to a news event. “It often takes months to get perspective,” Keller says.

Keller points to the sermons of the old masters as examples. The only sermons of Jonathan Edwards and others that seem irrelevant now are those preached about national events, Keller says. “It is remarkable how poorly reasoned those sermons are. That is what originally made me hesitate about preaching on current events.”

“Who says a sermon has to last for 500 years?” counters Joseph Jeter, Jr., professor at Brite Divinity School at Texas Christian University and author of the book Crisis Preaching. “All of us would like to preach a 500-year sermon, but it would have to be a very general sermon.”

In his research, Jeter found many preachers who refused to speak to news events. “Some said they don’t know what to say; others don’t want to sensationalize. But if your people bring to church a concern they’re confused and disturbed about, and nothing is said, that is like looking for bread and getting a stone.”

Choosing to address a news event requires discernment: of the likely lasting impact of the event, of the emotional needs of the congregation at the moment, and of the Spirit’s leadership in sermon preparation.

About Natural Disaster

The pastor helps people wrestle with the sovereignty of God.

Earthquakes are ultimately from God. Nature does not have a will of its own. And God owes Satan no freedom. What havoc demons wreak, they wreak with God’s permission.

That’s the point of Job 1-2 and Luke 22:31-32. God does nothing without an infinitely wise and good purpose. “He also is wise and will bring disaster” (Isaiah 31:2). “The Lord is good” (Psalm 100:5). Therefore, God had good and all-wise purposes for the heart-rending tragedy in Turkey that took thousands of lives on August 17, 1999.

Sound Bite

—John Piper
pastor of Bethlehem Baptist Church,
Minneapolis, Minnesota.
An excerpt from his church newsletter,
reprinted in
World, September 4, 1999.

Lessons from the epicenter

A tornado ripped through Goshen (Alabama) United Methodist Church during the Easter drama on Palm Sunday 1994. The building just exploded, says Pastor Kelly Clem, burying worshipers crowded in the sanctuary under three feet of rubble. When the debris was cleared, 20 were dead, including Clem’s four-year-old daughter Hannah. The media descended on the tiny community outside Birmingham.

“They asked us ‘Why?'” Clem says. “Isn’t the sanctuary supposed to be safe? Isn’t this going to shatter your faith?” And the larger, and harder question: “Why would God let this happen to a church?” “During the crisis is not the time to ask the why question,” Clem says. “The real question is ‘What am I going to do with the life I have today, with the family members I have today, with the church I have today?'”

Clem’s words to her congregation on Easter morning a week later spoke to the need of the moment: How can we be the comforting church when we’re all suffering? Help with the why question came later.

The pastor’s temptation in a crisis-prompted sermon is to offer answers. Although the people may say they want answers, what they really need is help dealing with overwhelming emotion.

A little more than six months after the shooting deaths of 15 students at Columbine High School, nearby West Bowles Community Church continues to wrestle with the catastrophe while at the same time watching a great revival in Littleton and in their church.

“Some wanted to make sense of (the deaths),” says Pastor George Kirsten. “I don’t think we can. Others would say, ‘Where can I turn? Is there any hope? Is there any comfort?’ That’s the issue we addressed loud and clear.”

Kirsten’s church became a clearinghouse for wise counsel. Many Columbine students came to West Bowles two days after the shootings to talk through their trauma. They didn’t seek out the counselors sent by the school system, according to Kirsten, but went instead to other teens, youth from the church who were willing to listen and to cry with them.

Both Kirsten and Clem approached the preaching task as fellow strugglers. They expressed what their people were feeling and what they themselves were feeling. “Sometimes that’s all we can do—cry with our people,” Jeter surmises.

Craig Barnes calls this “emergency room talk.” Barnes is pastor of National Presbyterian Church in Washington, D.C. He recommends the E.R. approach to emotionally wrenching crisis. “You don’t do a lot of constructive theology in emergency rooms. You just remind them that we live in the hands of God, and that’s a wonderful place to be. The constructive preaching comes in the second wave.”

We live for moments when we stand on the stump and say, “I have a word from the Lord.”

Breaking news can wait

“Crisis rips the veneer off,” Barnes says. “It can be very helpful.” Yet in 20 years of pastoral ministry, Barnes counts only a handful of occasions when national news became sermon fodder. Most he treated briefly—the deaths of Princess Diana and Mother Teresa in the same week produced two paragraphs to close a message on the cost of following Christ.

Pastoring in the nation’s capital, Barnes has felt pressure to speak to the news. He has resisted. For many months he refused to address the investigation that led to the impeachment of the president. “I told my congregation I was taking the high road, but when everything finally came out, I had to speak.”

News anchor Peter Jennings called while Barnes was preparing his sermon. “He was taking a survey on how churches were handling it. He wanted to know whether I was calling for the head of the president or the head of the special prosecutor. Those were my only two options.

“I explained that the gospel is a little bit larger than that. My intent in this kind of sermon is to transcend the options. I want to say something that is clear and useful as people work their way through the issue. The crisis sermon should draw them to Jesus as Savior, as opposed to leaving them with the ‘right’ answer.

“We live for those moments when we can stand on the stump and say, ‘I have a word from the Lord.’ If it’s truly the word of the Lord, then it’s not just for the president or the prosecutor. It’s for all of us.”

The preacher’s temptation is to exegete the crisis, rather than the Scripture. Barnes avoids this by starting with his congregation’s emotions and moving quickly to the text.

“All preaching has to maintain both sides of that sacred conversation,” Barnes says. “You have to tell the Lord how it is down here. The people need to hear that. They need to see you as Moses, as the person who is speaking on their behalf before the Lord, in order also to hear the word of the Lord from you.”

For the most part, Barnes sticks to his preaching plan. He has found that his text, selected as much as a year in advance, has spoken to the need on the few occasions when he has preached on a crisis.

Like Keller, Barnes waits to refer to events such as Columbine and Wedgwood. “There are some pretty heroic stories that emerge in the second wave of media coverage. I think there is more valuable information there for the preacher.”

While crises that directly affect the local church must be addressed immediately, others, more often national or world events, can wait until more information is available and the lasting impact of the event has been determined. A real crisis will still merit attention in a few weeks or months. Until then, inclusion in the pastoral prayer will suffice to acknowledge awareness of the congregation’s feelings.

Other crises—and many of the incidents generating non-stop news coverage fall in this category—are simply distractions.

During a Political Scandal

The preacher identifies with the feelings of the listener.

This has been a difficult week for the American public. How many times have we seen the banner “The Presidency in Crisis”? There is no shortage of people offering their political analysis of this.

I have no calling to add to that analysis. Instead, as a pastor, my calling is to speak to the anxiety of our own lives. These are clearly anxious times for us. We feel upset, discouraged, frightened, and a bit sick to the stomach.

Now on Sunday morning, we have gathered into church to look for a Word from the Lord. In my experience the Word of the Lord doesn’t come as a word about someone else, a political agenda, or a word that easily reduces to the simplistic options we construct. Rather the Word of the Lord comes as a ray of light that pierces through the darkness of our own lives. So the real question the church should be asking is not what should he do, or they do, but what should you and I be doing now?

Sound Bite

—M. Craig Barnes
pastor of National Presbyterian Church,
Washington D.C.
The introduction to his sermon
from Romans 13:11-14,
September 13, 1998.

Grieving for people you don’t know

“I’m surprised by how much that hurts me,” my wife said, some months after the death of John Kennedy, Jr.

“That it hurt at all? Or that is still hurts?” I asked.

“Both, I guess. I see their pictures at the magazine stand, and I ache, deeply. Some celebrity deaths you expect to affect you. Diana, certainly.” (My wife had stayed up overnight so she would not miss the royals’ wedding on television.) “But I didn’t expect to feel this one.”

I understood her feelings. In our star-eyed culture, we keep electronic vigils by many bedsides, and the deaths of people we’ve never met become very real to us. Our listeners need help mourning losses both real and imagined. But do tragic, widely reported deaths merit attention from the pulpit?

Some instances should be referenced, but most are distractions from the real issues, according to Argile Smith, preaching professor at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary. “What separates them from truly catastrophic events is that they are everyday events that happen to famous people.” People are born, live, and die, and except for their fame, most would not make the news. Neither should they make the pulpit.

Still, Smith admits, the emotions of his listeners must be considered. “I had prepared to preach on death and resurrection one Sunday. The night before that sermon, Princess Diana was killed. Because that was what everybody was talking about, I scrubbed my introduction and started with her death. The message wasn’t about Diana, but it spoke to some things people were thinking about.”

Smith is watchful when invoking the names of the famous. “Be careful not to make value judgments on dead people or speculate on their salvation,” he warns. “The preacher can help his congregation with their emotions without expressing opinions about the deceased.” In other words, don’t say anything you wouldn’t say at the celebrity’s funeral.

In time, Smith says, the preacher develops an internal mechanism for deciding which events are worth talking about.

After a Terrorist Bombing

Evangelist says God can be trusted.

Since I have been here (in Oklahoma City) I have been asked the question: “Why does God allow such a terrible thing to happen?”

Over three thousand years ago, there was a man named Job who struggled with the same question. H5/24/2005 9:28AMe asked why. He was a good man, and yet disaster struck him suddenly. He lost seven sons and three daughters. He lost all his possessions. He lost his health. Even his friends turned against him. His wife said, “Curse God and die.”

In the midst of his suffering he asked this question: “Why?” Job didn’t know. “Why did I not perish at birth?” he cried.

Perhaps this is the way you feel. And I want to tell you that God understands those feelings.

I have to confess that I never fully understand, even for my own satisfaction. I have to accept by faith that God is a God of love and mercy even in suffering. … Times like this will do one of two things: either make us hard and bitter and angry at God, or make us tender and open and help us to reach out in trust and faith.

I pray that you will not let bitterness and poison creep into your soul, but that you will turn in faith and trust to God even if we cannot understand. It is better to face something like this with God than without him.

Sound Bite

—Billy Graham
at the memorial service for victims of the Murrah Federal Building bombing in Oklahoma City, April 25, 1995.

That’s the way it really is

The danger of preaching to the crisis too frequently is that the temporal rather than the eternal begins to drive the preaching schedule. The preacher becomes reactionary, Chicken Little in the pulpit. On the other hand, ignoring crisis, whether real or perceived, may be seen by our listeners as failure to speak to their needs.

By preaching appropriately when the news intrudes, we can show our listeners that God still cares and that he can still be trusted even in catastrophe’s aftermath.

Our goal, always, is to help people view the issues of life and death in the light of Christ. “If this world is going to make sense,” Smith says, “it will only be when we see it through the eyes of Jesus.”

Eric Reed is associate editor of LEADERSHIP.

1. Boutellier told his story to Joseph Jeter, Jr., in Crisis Preaching (Abingdon, 1998).

At a Glance

Preaching in times of crisis

You may not have all the answers, but you should acknowledge the questions.

  1. The crisis is only part of the message. Current events serve as good introductions. Start with the story people are talking about, then lead them to Scripture.
  2. Weep with those who weep. Approach most events from the same perspective as your congregation. Express their worry, grief, or confusion. Say what they’re feeling.
  3. Exegete the Scripture, not the crisis. The event is not the sermon. The tragedy must not overshadow the eternal truth.
  4. Eulogy comes from “praise.” Illustrate without making value judgments on deceased persons or the disposition of their souls.
  5. It’s okay to ask “Why?” The pastor doesn’t have to give all the answers. Raise questions that should be discussed in small groups or handled more fully in newsletters or other forums.
  6. Find the redemptive center in a crisis. Share hope. Point to Jesus.

Copyright © 2000 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

When the News Intrudes

When President Kennedy was assassinated almost 40 years ago, Walter Cronkite interrupted “As the World Turns” with the tragic announcement.

Pastor Gene Boutellier climbed the tower of his Fresno church, and began pulling the bell rope. Much later, exhausted from his tolling, he descended and found the sanctuary full of weeping people. Tear-streaked faces turned upward, wondering what he would say.1 The scene was repeated the following Sunday in virtually every church in the nation. People needing hope turned to their pastors. Preachers of the generation called it “The Sunday with God.”

When President Kennedy’s son died in a plane crash last year, the news media climbed their towers and sounded the alarm. After witnessing a week of non-stop coverage, pastors ascended their pulpits wondering, What should I say? Should I say anything at all?

And if they’re like me, they wondered, How do I preach to the endless tide of natural disasters, terrorist attacks, celebrity deaths, and political intrigue? And why does this seem to be happening so often?

About Natural Disaster
The pastor helps people wrestle with the sovereignty of God.

Earthquakes are ultimately from God. Nature does not have a will of its own. And God owes Satan no freedom. What havoc demons wreak, they wreak with God’s permission.

That’s the point of Job 1-2 and Luke 22:31-32. God does nothing without an infinitely wise and good purpose. “He also is wise and will bring disaster” (Isaiah 31:2). “The Lord is good” (Psalm 100:5). Therefore, God had good and all-wise purposes for the heart-rending tragedy in Turkey that took thousands of lives on August 17, 1999.

Sound Bite

John Piper
pastor of Bethlehem Baptist Church,
Minneapolis, Minnesota.
An excerpt from his church newsletter,
reprinted in World, September 4, 1999.

Preaching at the speed of satellite

I watched the famed low speed Bronco chase from a Holiday Inn in Tallahassee, Florida. Returning home from a week-long vacation, I had turned on the television to see what my congregation might be talking about. What I found was a major shift in the way news is processed and presented.

With their interminable reportage of O.J. Simpson’s murder trial, the networks discovered an insatiable public appetite for the mindless repetition of scanty facts. With the proliferation of satellite news channels, tragedies once distant now unfold without interruption in our living rooms. And senseless acts, once given some context by those reporting them, are increasingly presented raw.

Are there more wars? Or is it that we all have cable access to rumors of wars? Are the earthquakes severe? Or are we harder rocked by sensurround accounts of them? Whichever the case, the world as seen on TV makes less sense than it ever has. And the people who soak in an average of four hours of television per day come to church hoping on some level that the preacher will make sense of it all.

Rather, rather not

As a journalist-turned-pastor, I have regularly used the news to illustrate my sermons, but only once have I preached a whole sermon on a news event. In one memorable week, our city was shaken by the drive-by shootings of several children, one of them in our neighborhood; a suspected drug dealer was found slain execution-style four blocks from our church; and police reported that New Orleans once again led the nation in murders. I had to address the fear that gripped us all.

We must deal with tragedies when they are our own, but even if they are distant, episodes like the massacre at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado, and the killings at Wedgwood Baptist Church in Fort Worth force the preacher to reconsider the sermon schedule. If my recent conversations with pastors are any indication, few are comfortable doing so.

Tim Keller pastors Redeemer Presbyterian Church in Manhattan. “Some of my folks here have said they wish I’d talk more about current events,” he says candidly. “I’m not sure I’m wise enough to pull it off.”

Keller has two concerns: one is that the news will overshadow his message. “When you talk about something that is making headlines, the illustration becomes the point.” Keller says his listeners, including non-Christians, “want to hear eternal truths, not an interpretation of news events.”

We live for moments when we stand on the stump and say, “I have a word from the Lord.”

He wonders too about the unreliability of early reports. He usually waits a year or more before referring to a news event. “It often takes months to get perspective,” Keller says.

Keller points to the sermons of the old masters as examples. The only sermons of Jonathan Edwards and others that seem irrelevant now are those preached about national events, Keller says. “It is remarkable how poorly reasoned those sermons are. That is what originally made me hesitate about preaching on current events.”

“Who says a sermon has to last for 500 years?” counters Joseph Jeter, Jr., professor at Brite Divinity School at Texas Christian University and author of the book Crisis Preaching. “All of us would like to preach a 500-year sermon, but it would have to be a very general sermon.”

In his research, Jeter found many preachers who refused to speak to news events. “Some said they don’t know what to say; others don’t want to sensationalize. But if your people bring to church a concern they’re confused and disturbed about, and nothing is said, that is like looking for bread and getting a stone.”

Choosing to address a news event requires discernment: of the likely lasting impact of the event, of the emotional needs of the congregation at the moment, and of the Spirit’s leadership in sermon preparation.

Lessons from the epicenter

A tornado ripped through Goshen (Alabama) United Methodist Church during the Easter drama on Palm Sunday 1994. The building just exploded, says Pastor Kelly Clem, burying worshipers crowded in the sanctuary under three feet of rubble. When the debris was cleared, 20 were dead, including Clem’s four-year-old daughter Hannah. The media descended on the tiny community outside Birmingham.

“They asked us ‘Why?'” Clem says. “Isn’t the sanctuary supposed to be safe? Isn’t this going to shatter your faith?” And the larger, and harder question: “Why would God let this happen to a church?” “During the crisis is not the time to ask the why question,” Clem says. “The real question is ‘What am I going to do with the life I have today, with the family members I have today, with the church I have today?'”

Clem’s words to her congregation on Easter morning a week later spoke to the need of the moment: How can we be the comforting church when we’re all suffering? Help with the why question came later.

During a Political Scandal
The preacher identifies with the feelings of the listener.

This has been a difficult week for the American public. How many times have we seen the banner “The Presidency in Crisis”? There is no shortage of people offering their political analysis of this.

I have no calling to add to that analysis. Instead, as a pastor, my calling is to speak to the anxiety of our own lives. These are clearly anxious times for us. We feel upset, discouraged, frightened, and a bit sick to the stomach.

Now on Sunday morning, we have gathered into church to look for a Word from the Lord. In my experience the Word of the Lord doesn’t come as a word about someone else, a political agenda, or a word that easily reduces to the simplistic options we construct. Rather the Word of the Lord comes as a ray of light that pierces through the darkness of our own lives. So the real question the church should be asking is not what should he do, or they do, but what should you and I be doing now?

Sound Bite

M. Craig Barnes
pastor of National Presbyterian Church,
Washington D.C.
The introduction to his sermon
from Romans 13:11-14,
September 13, 1998.

The pastor’s temptation in a crisis-prompted sermon is to offer answers. Although the people may say they want answers, what they really need is help dealing with overwhelming emotion.

A little more than six months after the shooting deaths of 15 students at Columbine High School, nearby West Bowles Community Church continues to wrestle with the catastrophe while at the same time watching a great revival in Littleton and in their church.

“Some wanted to make sense of (the deaths),” says Pastor George Kirsten. “I don’t think we can. Others would say, ‘Where can I turn? Is there any hope? Is there any comfort?’ That’s the issue we addressed loud and clear.”

Kirsten’s church became a clearinghouse for wise counsel. Many Columbine students came to West Bowles two days after the shootings to talk through their trauma. They didn’t seek out the counselors sent by the school system, according to Kirsten, but went instead to other teens, youth from the church who were willing to listen and to cry with them.

Both Kirsten and Clem approached the preaching task as fellow strugglers. They expressed what their people were feeling and what they themselves were feeling. “Sometimes that’s all we can do—cry with our people,” Jeter surmises.

Craig Barnes calls this “emergency room talk.” Barnes is pastor of National Presbyterian Church in Washington, D.C. He recommends the E.R. approach to emotionally wrenching crisis. “You don’t do a lot of constructive theology in emergency rooms. You just remind them that we live in the hands of God, and that’s a wonderful place to be. The constructive preaching comes in the second wave.”

Breaking news can wait

“Crisis rips the veneer off,” Barnes says. “It can be very helpful.” Yet in 20 years of pastoral ministry, Barnes counts only a handful of occasions when national news became sermon fodder. Most he treated briefly—the deaths of Princess Diana and Mother Teresa in the same week produced two paragraphs to close a message on the cost of following Christ.

Pastoring in the nation’s capital, Barnes has felt pressure to speak to the news. He has resisted. For many months he refused to address the investigation that led to the impeachment of the president. “I told my congregation I was taking the high road, but when everything finally came out, I had to speak.”

News anchor Peter Jennings called while Barnes was preparing his sermon. “He was taking a survey on how churches were handling it. He wanted to know whether I was calling for the head of the president or the head of the special prosecutor. Those were my only two options.

“I explained that the gospel is a little bit larger than that. My intent in this kind of sermon is to transcend the options. I want to say something that is clear and useful as people work their way through the issue. The crisis sermon should draw them to Jesus as Savior, as opposed to leaving them with the ‘right’ answer.

“We live for those moments when we can stand on the stump and say, ‘I have a word from the Lord.’ If it’s truly the word of the Lord, then it’s not just for the president or the prosecutor. It’s for all of us.”

The preacher’s temptation is to exegete the crisis, rather than the Scripture. Barnes avoids this by starting with his congregation’s emotions and moving quickly to the text.

“All preaching has to maintain both sides of that sacred conversation,” Barnes says. “You have to tell the Lord how it is down here. The people need to hear that. They need to see you as Moses, as the person who is speaking on their behalf before the Lord, in order also to hear the word of the Lord from you.”

For the most part, Barnes sticks to his preaching plan. He has found that his text, selected as much as a year in advance, has spoken to the need on the few occasions when he has preached on a crisis.

Like Keller, Barnes waits to refer to events such as Columbine and Wedgwood. “There are some pretty heroic stories that emerge in the second wave of media coverage. I think there is more valuable information there for the preacher.”

While crises that directly affect the local church must be addressed immediately, others, more often national or world events, can wait until more information is available and the lasting impact of the event has been determined. A real crisis will still merit attention in a few weeks or months. Until then, inclusion in the pastoral prayer will suffice to acknowledge awareness of the congregation’s feelings.

Other crises—and many of the incidents generating non-stop news coverage fall in this category—are simply distractions.

After a Terrorist Bombing
Evangelist says God can be trusted.

Since I have been here (in Oklahoma City) I have been asked the question: “Why does God allow such a terrible thing to happen?”

Over three thousand years ago, there was a man named Job who struggled with the same question. He asked why. He was a good man, and yet disaster struck him suddenly. He lost seven sons and three daughters. He lost all his possessions. He lost his health. Even his friends turned against him. His wife said, “Curse God and die.”

In the midst of his suffering he asked this question: “Why?” Job didn’t know. “Why did I not perish at birth?” he cried.

Perhaps this is the way you feel. And I want to tell you that God understands those feelings.

I have to confess that I never fully understand, even for my own satisfaction. I have to accept by faith that God is a God of love and mercy even in suffering. … Times like this will do one of two things: either make us hard and bitter and angry at God, or make us tender and open and help us to reach out in trust and faith.

I pray that you will not let bitterness and poison creep into your soul, but that you will turn in faith and trust to God even if we cannot understand. It is better to face something like this with God than without him.

Sound Bite

Billy Graham
at the memorial service for victims of the Murrah Federal Building bombing in Oklahoma City, April 25, 1995.

Grieving for people you don’t know

“I’m surprised by how much that hurts me,” my wife said, some months after the death of John Kennedy, Jr.

“That it hurt at all? Or that is still hurts?” I asked.

“Both, I guess. I see their pictures at the magazine stand, and I ache, deeply. Some celebrity deaths you expect to affect you. Diana, certainly.” (My wife had stayed up overnight so she would not miss the royals’ wedding on television.) “But I didn’t expect to feel this one.”

I understood her feelings. In our star-eyed culture, we keep electronic vigils by many bedsides, and the deaths of people we’ve never met become very real to us. Our listeners need help mourning losses both real and imagined. But do tragic, widely reported deaths merit attention from the pulpit?

Some instances should be referenced, but most are distractions from the real issues, according to Argile Smith, preaching professor at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary. “What separates them from truly catastrophic events is that they are everyday events that happen to famous people.” People are born, live, and die, and except for their fame, most would not make the news. Neither should they make the pulpit.

Still, Smith admits, the emotions of his listeners must be considered. “I had prepared to preach on death and resurrection one Sunday. The night before that sermon, Princess Diana was killed. Because that was what everybody was talking about, I scrubbed my introduction and started with her death. The message wasn’t about Diana, but it spoke to some things people were thinking about.”

Smith is watchful when invoking the names of the famous. “Be careful not to make value judgments on dead people or speculate on their salvation,” he warns. “The preacher can help his congregation with their emotions without expressing opinions about the deceased.” In other words, don’t say anything you wouldn’t say at the celebrity’s funeral.

In time, Smith says, the preacher develops an internal mechanism for deciding which events are worth talking about.

That’s the way it really is

The danger of preaching to the crisis too frequently is that the temporal rather than the eternal begins to drive the preaching schedule. The preacher becomes reactionary, Chicken Little in the pulpit. On the other hand, ignoring crisis, whether real or perceived, may be seen by our listeners as failure to speak to their needs.

By preaching appropriately when the news intrudes, we can show our listeners that God still cares and that he can still be trusted even in catastrophe’s aftermath.

Our goal, always, is to help people view the issues of life and death in the light of Christ. “If this world is going to make sense,” Smith says, “it will only be when we see it through the eyes of Jesus.”

Eric Reed is associate editor of LEADERSHIP.

1. Boutellier told his story to Joseph Jeter, Jr., in Crisis Preaching (Abingdon, 1998).

At a Glance

Preaching in times of crisis

You may not have all the answers, but you should acknowledge the questions.

  1. The crisis is only part of the message. Current events serve as good introductions. Start with the story people are talking about, then lead them to Scripture.
  2. Weep with those who weep. Approach most events from the same perspective as your congregation. Express their worry, grief, or confusion. Say what they’re feeling.
  3. Exegete the Scripture, not the crisis. The event is not the sermon. The tragedy must not overshadow the eternal truth.
  4. Eulogy comes from “praise.” Illustrate without making value judgments on deceased persons or the disposition of their souls.
  5. It’s okay to ask “Why?” The pastor doesn’t have to give all the answers. Raise questions that should be discussed in small groups or handled more fully in newsletters or other forums.
  6. Find the redemptive center in a crisis. Share hope. Point to Jesus.

Copyright © 2000 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

The All-Purpose Pastor

During my senior year in college, I met several times with one of the legends in my denomination. This larger-than-life character pastored a large church, was a noted author, and had an extensive radio ministry. I consciously made him my role model and studied his work habits. I wanted to be as productive as he was.

Once I asked him how he became effective in so many areas of ministry. He told me it came with age and experience.

“The longer you serve, the broader your ministry becomes,” he said. “You can’t afford to be a specialist when you serve in the emergency room of the soul.”

I determined then I was going to excel in everything, just as he did.

Ten years later, I found I had not excelled at everything. I had too much to do and too little time to do it.

Another older pastor who became a mentor offered some advice. If I continued at the pace I was working, he told me, I would soon burn out. He said I should choose whether I wanted to be a pastor or a preacher, and I should make that decision before I turned 40.

“Churches will allow you to be mediocre in both areas when you are young,” he said, “but once you’re in midlife, congregations need you to excel in one and bring in people to help you in the other.” According to him, to be effective in my mature years, I had to choose either pastor or preacher to be my “major” and the other to be my “minor.” He had decided to be a pastor, and his ministry gave evidence that was a good choice.

Now I had a dilemma: my two role models espoused conflicting views. One said you can do all things well while the other said you had to be a specialist.

Meet the Reverend Doctor

In America’s early days, there was great similarity between the country doctor and the country parson. One cared for the body and made house calls. The other cared for the soul and did home visits. Both doctor and parson were seen as wisdom figures; people stood in awe of their commitment and stamina.

In the last 30 years, the medical profession has shifted in emphasis from the general practitioner to the specialist.

Most pastors, however, must still function as generalists. Yet for most it takes until midlife to become competent in the three key areas of pastoral work: communication, pastoral care, and leadership. And most feel more confident and competent in one than in the other two.

But when I visit with pastors serving effectively in their fifties and sixties, I discover that over time most of them had to develop competence in all three areas.

It is ironic that, just at the point of achieving competence, some ministers are tempted either to focus their ministries on one area or to leave the ministry because the demands appear to be too great.

For me it took almost a decade of work in each area to reach a measure of competence. Now, I am a pastor with three specialties. Finally, in my fifties, they come together and I feel competent as a spiritual “general practitioner.”

Stage one: “Preacher-boy”

The church I served during seminary never asked me any questions about my theology or care-giving skills before they asked me to serve as pastor. The congregation did hear me preach four times, however, before they suggested I might become their pastor.

In my denomination, preaching is considered to be the basic pastoral skill and, as a result, I felt the most pressure to excel in that area. I worked diligently on my communication skills during my twenties.

My first church after seminary asked some questions about my leadership ability, but its search committee made it clear that energy and excitement were expected in the pulpit. At that stage, I never wanted anyone to leave the church on Sunday morning saying “he had nothing to say” or “he didn’t say it well.” I learned to preach without notes, and this discipline alone added several hours each week to my sermon preparation time.

To make time for study, I learned to make hospital visits in record time. By doing most of the talking, I could control the length of the visit and make a quick transition to the bedside benediction before the patient could report the details of his surgery. I also realized I could make better time by visiting sick and grieving members when they had other visitors.

I presented the illusion of care-giving. Because I made so many visits, people could not say I neglected them. But because I never took time with them, neither could they say I helped them. I cringe as I think of the folks I hurried past while preparing for the pulpit.

My first full-time church after seminary grew quickly, but I didn’t know how to lead the church through a building program. While both my immediate successor and I worked on preaching and motivation, we struggled with leading the organization. The church did not get the badly needed new building and new location until they called a pastor who was strong in leadership skills. He may not have been as polished in his preaching, but he accomplished what neither of his predecessors could. With the building completed, he has since enhanced his communication skills.

My point is simply that I neglected certain basic pastoral skills early in my ministry in order to focus on preaching. Often communication skills receive the most attention in the early years.

The same problem can afflict staff members. One minister of education nurtured his writing skills while neglecting organizational development. He knew the university community in which he served read his newsletter with a magnifying glass but paid little attention to whether his programs were properly developed. As result, his printed pieces were well received, but the small groups under his leadership were dying. He had to learn basic leadership skills to better serve and nurture his small group coordinators.

Most churches will tolerate some weakness in their pastor, but they tend to resent anyone who completely neglects one of the three key roles

Stage two: real life in real time

During my thirties I learned how to pastor. Serving in a community with an average age of 48 forced me to deal with church growth at a slower pace. I began to focus on life issues.

Grieving, I grudgingly learned, cannot be accelerated. For a pastor to be a healing presence requires time and listening. Answers given to a dying patient are not as crisp and concise as the well-spoken lines in a sermon. Counsel is often revised in mid-sentence without the help of a thesaurus.

Although I was hesitant to think so at the time, my preaching and communication skills did not grow during this stage of my life; perhaps they even deteriorated a little.

Stage three: leading by design

My focus shifted again in my forties. I discovered I was not a natural leader. I had confused inspiration with leadership. I could motivate people, but despite the enthusiasm I generated in the churches I served, often little was accomplished.

Occasional insights and outbursts of vision are not the same as leadership. I had to learn how to communicate vision on a regular basis, develop strategies, and recruit, train, and develop other leaders. I consciously determined to read books, attend conferences, and hold myself accountable in the area of leadership.

By pushing hard, I tried not to neglect pastoral responsibilities such as hospital visitation, but I became painfully aware that it was during this stage of ministry that I was criticized for neglecting people.

Leadership is the most difficult role for me and is crucial to my current church in its stage of development. Within a four-year period, we started an entire second Sunday school, completed one capital fund-raising campaign and started another, and added midweek and contemporary worship services.

I am confident if these leadership demands had been made on me at an earlier stage in my ministry, my discomfort with this role would have triggered a search for a new congregation.

A born (again) leader

In recent years I’ve begun to see the tasks of leadership and management as central to my calling. They cannot take the place of preaching or pastoral care, but since I believe God called me into ministry, he must have been aware of the full responsibilities of my call. If I’m to live out my call, I cannot jettison the parts of it that make me uncomfortable. Rather than resenting the administrative side of my call, thinking it is something the human side of the church had added, I now see it as a gift from God—something to be accepted and developed.

Two events prompted this shift. A younger minister with great potential resigned his church because the administrative duties overwhelmed him. When he came to see me, he was accepting some responsibility for his situation.

He said, looking back, he had rarely prayed for these responsibilities except in times of crisis. He commented that if he ever had the opportunity to pastor again, he would pray for power and wisdom in administration as well as preaching. I realized I had not prayed often for these tasks either—other than prayers for deliverance.

In another conversation, an older pastor proudly told me he did not invest much time in the management of the church. Two families from his church who had recently joined ours confirmed that. Both had commented how their pastor did not seem to care for the church. Theirs were not horror stories of an abusive pastor, but rather of benign neglect. They cited declining facilities and the late arrival of Sunday school curriculum as examples. This pastor was good at one-on-one pastoral care, but his church interpreted administration as corporate pastor care. At that, he failed.

Most churches will tolerate some weaknesses in their pastor and staff, but they tend to resent those who completely neglect one or two of the three key roles. The minister who does not have basic competency in communication, pastoral care, and leadership may be perceived as incompetent at best, and at worst uncaring.

Don’t settle for a no-growth zone

A member from another church wanted to know how he could help his pastor. The congregation, he told me, loved its pastor, a fine caregiver and an adequate leader. Yet he imagined himself as an outstanding communicator. The church disagreed.

Some board members had gently suggested that while he was working on his doctor of ministry degree, he take some classes in preaching. He resented the suggestions, and some of his key leaders were afraid he was going to resign due to hurt feelings.

I can empathize with the tendency not to want to hear bad news. But we dare not refuse to benefit from honest appraisal of our strengths and weaknesses.

An older minister urged me to set up a system for evaluation in my present ministry. So every other year, I meet with our 48 deacons in small groups and ask them three questions:

  1. What does the pastor need to know about his performance or the performance of the staff?
  2. What are the challenges the church is facing?
  3. What appears to be going extremely well in the life of the church?

The response is mostly affirming, but occasionally some direct comments are made. One time a frequent critic of mine spoke up. Unsure how to evaluate his remarks, I asked one of my friends, who told me there was some truth to the criticism.

“If you felt the same way as my critic,” I said, “why didn’t you tell me?”

“I didn’t think it was a significant enough matter to burden you with it,” he replied.

Inviting evaluation has never been easy for me, but I am more capable of handling critique now than I was 25 years ago.

As a young minister, I did not always know how to evaluate properly the evaluation of others. If I liked the person who was offering the criticism, I would accept it as valid, while if I did not like the individual, I would reject it as petty or irrelevant. But I’ve discovered that my friends can be wrong and my enemies can be right. Most criticism is at least partly true, and I gain the most if I will endure the pain of sifting through it.

A woman wrote me recently regarding three grammatical mistakes and one mispronounced word in a Sunday morning sermon. Although they were not major mistakes, they were mistakes. I can remember the time I would have either ignored the letter or found a kind way to tell her I was sorry she had missed the point of the message. This time I read the letter and concluded she was correct. I called the woman and thanked her, and she worked with me on the word I had mispronounced for years.

The following Sunday I made sure I used the word in the sermon for her sake and for my mine. I received an anonymous note in the offering plate that read, “Praise God, after nearly seven years of being our pastor, you finally said, ‘escape’ correctly.”

Without accepting evaluation, I would never have corrected something that was so easy to change.

While we all tip the hat to personal development, growth is painful. But we must resist the temptation to plateau. For those who are willing to push past their limits, to grow in all the pastor’s specialties, the best is yet to come.

This article is excerpted from Your Ministry’s Next Chapter: The Best Is Yet to Come, the eighth volume in Leadership’s “Pastor’s Soul” book series. To enroll in this series, call toll-free, 800-806-7796, and mention offer E8A28. If you like the book, pay $14.95. You’ll then receive the next quarterly volume, and you may cancel at any time.

Gary Fenton is pastor of Dawson Memorial Baptist Church 1114 Oxmoor Birmingham AL 35209 dawsonmemorial@compuserve.com

Here’s how my ministry as a “general practicioner” developed.

In my twenties, I honed my preaching skills. My congregations wanted energy and vitality in the pulpit, and I wanted to deliver.

In my thirties, I turned to pastoral care. I learned the hard way that genuine caring was required for effective communication.

In my forties, I learned to lead. My church needed direction, and I discovered the difference between cheerleading and leadership.

In my fifties, I’ve given up specialization. I see effective ministry as a mix of all three essential skills.

Most churches will tolerate some weaknesses in their pastor, but they tend to resent anyone who completely neglects one of the three key roles.

At a Glance

Copyright © 2000 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Everything I Preach is Stolen

I am dreading the day when, in the middle of some anecdote, a visitor jumps up and yells, “Hey, I heard that sermon last year. My pastor preached it! “

I just know that a lynch mob will be formed immediately; my elders and deacons will hold the rope, while one of our older ladies knits away, mumbling “guillotine” under her breath.

The fact is, everything I preach is stolen. Some of it from other thieves. It occurs to me that I may not have had an original thought in years. Of course, that thought is not original either.

Book after book, article after article, I read these incredibly brilliant ideas and find them a few weeks later creeping into my messages. At first, I didn’t really notice. I actually thought that I might be responsible for a few of the better thoughts expressed from the pulpit. Yet just as soon as I re-read a book I had not touched for years, I would come across that same, brilliant, original insight. Not mine.

In the beginning, I tried to hide it. I would read the latest book and quickly preach the best ideas it contained before any of my elders or deacons had a chance to read it. That wasn’t good enough. I found myself subscribing to all the latest journals. I hid them in my desk. I locked them in my study and came in late at night and early in the morning when no one else was around, just to read them.

But occasionally, one of my leaders would come to me praising an article he had just read, and I would lose three weeks of messages.

Eventually I became desperate. I would comb the libraries, looking for the great preachers of the past. Surely no one would recognize the words of Spurgeon if I nipped here and tucked there and added an anecdote from Edwards.

Finally, the fugitive lifestyle became too much. Exhausted, at the end of my resources, I confessed all to my congregation. It was, I was certain, the end of my ministry. My credibility would never be the same. Even my wife and children would disown me.

To my amazement, they forgave me.

Now, I am enrolled in “Preacher’s Anonymous,” doing the twelve steps and using only the Bible. At least, I was. Has anyone noticed those great sermons on the Internet?

Robin Toupin is pastor of Port McNeill Full Gospel Church P. O. Box 377, Port NcNeill B.C., Canada V0N2R0

Copyright © 2000 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Building Your Leaders

How You Pay Volunteers

And get them to say yes next time

“It’s tough to lead people who don’t get paid for what they do.” How many times have you heard a colleague in ministry say that?

Leading volunteers is not easy, but the issue of money may not be the problem. Here’s why: all workers in today’s highly competitive job market are, in essence, volunteers; every day they choose to leave or stay. Most valuable employees, especially in the technical field, frequently entertain job offers from headhunters. A friend, an IT professional, recently quit his job on Friday and started a new one the next Monday. He didn’t plan on quitting, but when he did, he had several options.

Beyond that, every day, every hour, even paid employees decide how well they are going to work. Quality work, especially in creative or service sectors, has always been given, not extracted by a paycheck. Only volunteers go the extra mile—in business or in ministry.

So what makes people stay and produce if it isn’t money?

What people get paid (or don’t get paid) may contribute to dissatisfaction, but it really can’t contribute to satisfaction, which usually comes from internal motivators.

An acquaintance, a chemist in the computer industry, recently complained to me that his company didn’t recognize him for one of his inventions—a special solution that washes silicon chips. His company pays him a big salary, but “what I want is recognition for what I’ve done,” he said.

What he really wanted was something church leaders can give those who serve in the church.

Another kind of pay

“Psychic income” refers to what motivates people other than money, such things as respect, recognition, and challenge. Psychic income may be the only earthly benefit people receive from serving in the church, yet it’s often in short supply.

Simple things such as a thank-you note, clear communication and expectations, a leader who’s excited about the work—all contribute to psychic income, which makes volunteers feel their service was worthwhile, part of something great.

I heard the president of Sunset magazine in San Francisco say, “I want to create an environment so when headhunters call the people that work for me, they say, ‘I couldn’t imagine working any place else.'” Salaries don’t create that kind of environment.

I was recently asked to participate with an “interpretive movement” team in our Sunday worship service. (Interpretive movement, in my opinion, is a euphemism for dance—but at least I didn’t have to wear a leotard.) A men’s chorus sang “The Lord’s Prayer,” and our team used simple arm-and-body movements to express the meaning of the prayer. The worship experience was powerful.

I’m not an interpretative movement kind of guy; my wife gasped when she heard I had said yes. Yet from the moment I was asked to participate in the service, through the long rehearsals, to the thank-you note I received in the mail a couple days after the service, I felt appreciated, important. I believed my involvement contributed to the worship of God.

Why? Because our leader, a volunteer whose full-time job is nursing, kept us focused on why we were doing this: to lead people in holy worship. Plus, she did the little things that translated into psychic income for the team: the warm invitation, the follow-up phone calls, clear expectations, well-directed rehearsals, and the brief but heartfelt thank-you note.

I may even, uh, do it again sometime.

Dave Goetz is executive editor of PreachingToday.com

“I don’t think we really understand our community,” Susan said. For a moment, the banter around the table stopped. The other eight members of Pine Valley Community Church’s strategic planning team waited for Susan to continue.

“Our plans for outreach assume that agriculture will continue to drive our valley’s economy. But has anybody noticed the kind of people who are moving into our valley? They’re a white-collar crowd. Plus, we’ve been talking about ministries that will reach the boomer crowd. But did you see the article in Sunday’s paper about the number of 20-year-olds who live in the valley? I don’t think we can make plans that are strategic until we take time to understand our community.”

Rod chimed in, “Maybe we should hire a consultant to profile our community.”

Jerry frowned. “That would be nice, but we can’t afford a consultant. Is there a way we can gather the information we need?”

As the discussion continued, the team members realized they could function as their own demographic consultant. Susan offered the first suggestion: “I’ll stop by the Chamber of Commerce tomorrow on my way home from work. I believe they have put together a community profile that they send out to prospective businesses and individuals who inquire about moving here.”

Dave, a high school teacher, said: “I’ll visit with Pine Valley’s high school principal. He and the school board chairman have a good handle on the growth rate in the valley. They would also know what some of the trends are and what kinds of problems teens will be facing in our valley in the future.”

Others suggested visiting friends in key roles: a newspaper editor, a bank president, and a manager at Wal-Mart. Another suggested a simple demographic analysis of the congregation, which could be compared with the profile of the community from the Chamber of Commerce’s information. Another suggested the custom reports available from http://factfinder.census.gov/ and paid for by U.S. tax dollars. The team left that evening with a list of action steps which would form the basis of their strategic plan.

Gathering the Right Information

Case study: ways to understand your community

What Would You Do?

  • Where would you begin to look for helpful information about your community?
  • How do you make the connection between information you gather and specific, strategic steps for the church?

What Happened?

To Discuss

  1. If you were to put together a community survey, what kinds of questions would you ask? What do you want to know about your community?
  2. What role should prayer play in the planning process?
  3. A church can’t meet the needs of every demographic niche in its community. How does a church determine what to say yes to?

Steve Mathewson, pastor of Dry Creek Bible Church in Belgrade, Montana.

Copyright © 2000 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube