C.S. Lewis: Mere Marketing?

Publisher, estate under fire for handling of C. S. Lewis’s identity.

In The Last Battle, the apocalyptic conclusion to C. S. Lewis's fantasy series The Chronicles of Narnia, humans, talking animals, and mythological creatures fight to restore Narnia and its lion-king Aslan, the central Christ figure.

Now a different battle is unfolding, one focused on Lewis's identity as perhaps the 20th century's preeminent literary apologist for Christianity.

Few noticed in March when HarperCollins announced its exclusive and potentially lucrative worldwide deal with the C. S. Lewis Co. in the United Kingdom (which holds the Lewis copyrights) to publish the works of Lewis in English. HarperCollins also announced plans to repackage Lewis's theological works, and to commission new Narnia picture books for preschoolers.

But several months ago Simon Adley, director of the Lewis Co., leaned on his new publishing partners to void a book deal in conjunction with a Lewis documentary because its script overemphasized Lewis's Christianity, according to documentary producer Carol Hatcher. An international controversy ensued, sparked by a front-page New York Times article headlined "Marketing Narnia Without a Christian Lion."

Much of the debate was ill-informed. Some Lewis fans and public commentators, including sociologist Andrew Greeley, misconstrued statements about HarperCollins's plan to market Lewis in a broad manner as a plan to de-Christianize the existing Narnia books.

"Plans are afoot to purge Christian content from the seven Narnia stories," Greeley wrote in mid-June. "Harper intends to censor out of C. S. Lewis' masterpiece that which is not most essential to it—its Christian imagery."

On the Internet, emotions of Lewis fans have run hot. One writer commented, "The Chronicles of Narnia are a work of art and having new stories written without the Christian theology that C.S. Lewis wove into the series is shameful."

Other criticism focused on the creation of new Narnia books. "It's ridiculous and I'm sure Lewis would have thought so, too," said A. N. Wilson, a biographer of Lewis, in an interview with The Sunday Times of London.

In an early June response to public criticism, HarperCollins said: "The goal of HarperCollins Publishers and the C. S. Lewis Estate is to publish the works of C. S. Lewis to the broadest possible audience, and to leave any interpretation of the works to the reader. The works of C. S. Lewis will continue to be published by HarperCollins and Zondervan as written by the author, with no alteration. Zondervan's editorial standards and Christian mission [have] not changed in any way."

Hatcher, an art director from Atlanta, had been negotiating with Zondervan, the evangelical publishing unit of HarperCollins. Zondervan had promised to support the film with $150,000 and to publish a companion coffee-table book and a video study guide. HarperCollins and the Lewis Co. offered her a contract, which she signed. In February, Hatcher received from Scott Bolinder, a Zondervan vice president, a copy of an in-house e-mail from Steve Hanselman, senior vice president of HarperSanFrancisco.

Hanselman's message said the script was "rather well done," and he supported the documentary. But Hanselman also wrote that the documentary's discussion of Narnia was "a biggie, as far as the estate. … was concerned."

He added, "The pages of the script suggest that Narnia will be treated from the vantage of children in need of hopeful fantasy, with the inspiration coming from memories and pictures in his head. If Stephen King and J. K. Rowling are the commentators on Narnia, as the script suggests, Simon [Adley] should be quite pleased. We'll need to be able to give emphatic assurances that no attempt will be made to correlate the stories to Christian imagery/theology." Hanselman wrote that the script does not characterize what "true Christianity" is, and said it should stay that way.

Hatcher was dumfounded when she read Hanselman's assessment. "I was literally pacing when I saw it. It was outrageous," she told Christianity Today. "They thought they were going to dictate what was going to be said. That was crazy."

Zondervan subsequently withdrew its contract because, according to Hatcher, "Simon felt that the script did not fit in with his marketing plans."

Hatcher made other attempts to develop the book with HarperCollins, but says she was stonewalled. Bruce Edwards, a professor of English at Bowling Green State University and author of several Lewis books, was actively involved in writing the initial script. He told CT that "layer after layer of constraint was being placed" by HarperCollins and the Lewis Co. on Hatcher's documentary, which has a budget of $550,000.

According to Hanselman's memo, Edwards's point of view is problematic. "Bruce Edwards has written about Narnia being essentially Christian books—as many hold them to be—but the documentary should not make this connection in any way," Hanselman wrote. "Narnia should come across as one of the great creations of fantasy literature, with roots in general myth and folklore." Hanselman said Adley would require that the Lewis estate give its approval and have a "stake" in the project in order for it to "move forward."

Adley's reactions to the controversy have been brief. "It's fatuous to suggest that we're trying to take the Christian out of C. S. Lewis," he told The New York Times. "We wouldn't have made the effort that we have with Mere Christianity if we felt that way. … I'm trying to get more people to read."

Adley declined CT's requests for an interview. HarperCollins did not allow either Hanselman or Bolinder to comment on the record.

Controlling the Lewis Legacy

Hanselman's e-mail also indicates HarperCollins's desire to evaluate other Lewis projects. Hanselman describes Adley's enthusiasm for an upcoming four-hour documentary being produced by Armand Nicholi, a Harvard psychiatrist and corresponding editor of CT who for the past 30 years has taught a class comparing the worldviews of Sigmund Freud and Lewis.

Hanselman said that, as with the Hatcher project, HarperCollins and the Lewis Co. "need to get that script and offer a similar assessment." But Nicholi—who has already paid the Lewis Co. for permission to quote from Lewis's works—says such an assessment is unwelcome. "It's been clear that since we are raising our own funds, we have control," Nicholi told CT. Nicholi is raising $3.6 million for his project. He has already received a $500,000 grant from pbs, providing that the original producers of the film maintain creative control.

Hatcher claims HarperCollins and the Lewis Co. have determined to remake Lewis's image to boost book sales and related income. "Their plan is to market [Lewis] as a great thinker, not a Christian. There's nothing wrong with marketing him to a broader audience," she says. "But they're trying to suppress who he was."

"What is wrong with trying to get people outside of Christianity to read the Narnian Chronicles?" argued Douglas Gresham, Lewis's stepson, on the MereLewis e-mail list. "Did [Jesus] take his message only to the Pharisees and Priests or did he 'secularise' it , try to make it available to a wider audience, by teaching the sinners and ordinary folk in the streets and fields? In today's world the surest way to prevent secularists and their children from reading [the Narnian chronicles] is to keep it in the 'Christian' or 'Religious' section of the bookstores or to firmly link Narnia with modern Evangelical Christianity."

One Lewis scholar said that Lewis himself would have taken a dim view of any marketing of his writings, religious or secular. "[Lewis] would dislike the whole concept of marketing," says Lyle Dorsett, a Wheaton College professor and an author of several books on Lewis. "Money didn't mean anything to him. … he believed money would destroy him."

Filling Narnia's Gaps

Susan Katz, president of HarperCollins children's division, has not yet released the names of the authors who will write the new books, which will use characters from the Narnia books in the creation of new stories for a younger audience. Katz says that HarperCollins and the Lewis Co. will produce a set of guidelines for the new Narnia authors. Earlier this summer, the Lewis Co. issued a list of established children's writers who might be approached, including Diana Wynn Jones, Berlie Doherty, and Geraldine McCaughrean.

The enormous popularity of the Harry Potter series has put a new spotlight on children's fantasy fiction. Since the first Narnia volume, The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, was published in 1950, global sales of Narnia books have topped 65 million. During the last two years, sales of Narnia books have increased 20 percent.

Elizabeth Devereaux, who reviews children's books for Publishers Weekly, said that while new Narnia books are not likely to achieve literary acclaim, they are likely to make money.

But Devereaux doesn't think that new volumes are a completely bad idea. "If you get a child where he wants to read related materials, that's good," she said. "It's going to rekindle an interest in Narnia."

Gresham, a consultant to Lewis projects, says the new books will draw younger readers at the right time. Yet he will not discuss Hanselman's e-mail or the new Narnia books. "I don't believe that printing the truth would do any good," Gresham told CT in an e-mail. "People would far rather accept a lie that gives them an excuse for outrage than a truth which gives them need for apology."

Will Lewis Survive Intact?

In spite of the public outcry, Wheaton's Dorsett told CT, "Nobody's going to finally undercut what C. S. Lewis did. His publishers will never change his image. I don't think they'll be able to pull it off. Lewis will live on, and the discerning reader will see the difference between the garbage that comes out to sell and the real thing."

The plan to produce new Narnia books is not the first posthumous adaptation of Lewis material. Walter Hooper, Lewis's former personal secretary, released an edited version of Dark Tower in 1977, claiming that Lewis wrote it before his death in 1963. Kathryn Lindskoog has written several books attempting to prove that Hooper—not Lewis—wrote it. Marvel Comics released a comic strip spinoff of The Screwtape Letters in 1994. And in 1997, HarperCollins launched The World of Narnia series, which featured abridged stories from the original. No such project was particularly successful.

"The stuff doesn't live," Dorsett said. "It dies out. Nobody pays attention. Even if it does prosper, it won't have any eternal value."

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere:

Also appearing on our site today is a Christianity Today editorial, Aslan is Still on the Move.

News about the new Narnia books was first reported by The Sunday Times of London.

The New York Times heated up the Narnia controversy by publishing parts of a leaked HarperSanFrancisco memo.

Additional media coverage included USA Today, The National Post, World,The BBC, and The Telegraph.

Christianity Today's Weblog covered the C.S. Lewis debate extensively:

Missionary Pilot Reportedly Off the Hook in Investigation of Peru Plane Shooting | Plus: Deadly church vans, more Narnia wars, and other stories from media sources around the world. (July 20, 2001)

The War for C.S. Lewis: The Prequel | Plus: Gabriel's blessing for the Guthrie family. (July 17, 2001)

The War for Narnia Continues | Charles Colson, Andrew Greeley, Frederica Mathewes-Green, and Lauren Winner join the battle—and Doug Gresham comes out to reply. (June 20, 2001)

Grief Observed Over Abolition of Lewis's Mere Christianity | Plus: Supreme Court okays Christian elementary school club, and American missionaries are still alive. (June 11, 2001)

God Banned from Narnia | Plus: Missionaries still held by terrorists despite military attack and other stories from mainstream media around the world. (June 4, 2001)

Narnia Will Return In New Books | As all of the Inklings' publishers await record interest, HarperCollins seeks to "fill in the gaps" beyond the wardrobe. (May 15, 2001)

Washington Post Covers North Korea's Persecution of Christians | Plus: Missionaries to United Arab Emirates deported, and HarperCollins's C.S. Lewis deal. (April 10, 2001)

Christianity Today sister publication Books and Culture recently looked at C. S. Lewis among the postmodernists.

Christian History, another Christianity Today sister publication, profiled Lewis for its issue on "The 10 Most Influential Christians of the Twentieth Century."

If it's Lewis you're interested in, Into the Wardrobe should fill your every desire.

Beliefnet also has a series of Lewis-centric articles, including a C.S. Lewis essay contest.

The Discovery Institute's C.S. Lewis and Public Life site is another wonderful resource of papers about and by Lewis.

Still hungry for more? You'll probably never have the time to read everything linked at the C.S. Lewis Mega-Links page.

Previous Christianity Today articles on C.S. Lewis include:

Myth Matters | C. S. Lewis bequeathed us a method and a language for sharing the gospel with the modern and postmodern world. (April 17, 2001)

Walking Where Lewis Walked | My reluctant entry into the world of pilgrimage. (Feb. 7, 2000)

Still Surprised by Lewis | Why this nonevangelical Oxford don has become our patron saint" (Sept. 7, 1998)

Jack Is Back | The search for the historical Lewis (Feb. 3, 1997)

Navy: Judge Says Chaplain Can Sue Navy

Evangelicals say Catholics and liturgical Protestants are more likely to be promoted.

A San Diego judge has ruled that a chaplain can continue part of his lawsuit against the U.S. Navy because his questions about promotional procedures may indicate religious discrimination.

The ruling, issued June 20, is the latest development in a string of suits by evangelical chaplains who claim they have been discriminated against by naval chaplaincy officials. Nonliturgical chaplains say that Catholic and liturgical Protestants are more likely to be promoted.

In this case, Lt. Cmdr. Patrick M. Sturm, a Navy chaplain based in San Diego, filed suit after being denied promotion three years in a row. After seeking reconsideration by a naval board and filing his suit in federal district court, Sturm was promoted retroactively. The Navy then sought to have the case dismissed.

U.S. District Court Judge Thomas J. Whelan dismissed the part of the suit relating to Sturm’s promotions, but decided to consider his claims of stacked selection boards within the Navy.

“The pleadings contain specific and detailed factual allegations which suggest the Navy may be favoring certain religious groups over others,” Whelan wrote, “causing an unconstitutional religious preference or an infringement upon plaintiff’s rights to religious freedom.”

The Navy declined to respond to Whelan’s ruling.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

Earlier Christianity Today coverage of the naval bias suits includes:

More Navy Chaplains Allege Discrimination | “We’re not on the same ground as the high church group or the Catholics,” say evangelicals. (April 18, 2001)

Evangelicals File Bias Suit Against Navy | Claims made that complaints of religious discrimination have been ignored. (May 22, 2000)

The Washington Post covered the first of the suits when originally filed in April 2000.

Former U.S. Navy chaplain suing for reinstatement after allegedly being forced to resign for preaching ‘nonpluralism’, according to Religion News Service.

Judge Thomas J. Whelan presides over the Southern District of Califonia, but the site has no files on the case.

The Navy Chaplain Corps operates several Web sites, including those for the Navy Chief of Chaplains, the Chaplain Resource Branch, and Chaplain Education.

Other Christianity Today articles about religion in the military include:

The Just-Chaplain Theory | The church need not divorce the military to remain a godly counterculture.(July 27, 2000)

Irreconcilable Differences | The church should divorce the military. (March 6, 2000)

Wiccans Practice on U. S. Bases | Court okays pagan ceremonies. (July 12, 1999)

Military Chaplains Win Speech Case | Military personnel can speak against partial-birth abortion (June 6, 1997)

Military Chaplains Sue Over ‘Project Life’ Ban | Chaplains ordered to “actively avoid” political comment. (December 9, 1999)

Church-State: Conservatives Vow to Revive Vouchers

Proposal left out of education reform bills

Vouchers that allow parents to use taxpayer money to help their children attend private or religious schools have been stripped from House and Senate education reform bills (CT, June 11, p. 15). Disappointed conservatives promise to keep trying.

The Senate bill requires states to test students in grades 3-8 annually, using national guidelines. Problem schools would receive more money while they change their curricula and staff. If students still fail to improve, they would be allowed to switch to other public schools and, eventually, use tax dollars for private tutoring. After five years of failure, schools would be taken over by the state or by private companies.

A pilot program to provide vouchers to poor parents in 10 cities also failed in Congress. But the Senate approved an amendment by Sen. Jesse Helms (R-N.C.) to penalize schools that discriminate against the Boy Scouts for its stance against homosexuality.

The House and Senate versions now must be reconciled before any reform becomes law.

“The education bill is anything but perfect,” says Connie Mackey, director of federal relations for the Family Research Council. “It did not represent the President’s initial [approach].”

But the FRC will continue fighting for vouchers. “Nothing’s ever dead on the Hill,” Mackey says. “You just repackage and try again.”

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

See more updates in Yahoo’s full coverage areas on the Education Curriculum and Policy and School Choice and Tuition Vouchers.

More Christianity Today articles on school reforms are available in our education area. Previous articles on school vouchers include:

Reading, Writing, and Reform | Vouchers dropped, but testing, tax credits remain in Bush education plan. (June 10, 2001)

Vouching for Parents | Vouchers are not an attack on public schools but a vote of trust in families. (April 2, 2001)

Weblog: Appeals Court Says Vouchers Violate Church-State Separation (Dec. 13, 2000)

Religious Right Loses Power | A few victories, but more losses for conservatives. (Dec. 18, 2000)

School Choice Measures in Tight Races | Recent surveys show much opposition to voucher initiatives in California and Michigan. (Sept. 27, 2000)

Florida School Voucher Plan Struck Down by State Judge | Church-state issues not addressed in ruling. (March 24, 2000)

Judge Freezes Voucher Enrollments | (Oct. 4, 1999)

Editorial: Religious Schools Make the Grade | Give Wisconsin an ‘A’ for saying no to secularist nonsense. (Aug. 10, 1999)

Voucher Plan Draws Mixed Reviews (July 12, 1999)

Voucher Victory | School-choice advocates win in Wisconsin, but can the movement gain momentum? (Sept. 7, 1998)

Judge Stalls Voucher Expansion (March 3, 1997)

Voucher Opponents Vow to Gut Cleveland Program (Oct. 28, 1996)

Briefs: North America

The Florida state attorney general’s office has charged Crosswalk.com CEO Jon Scott Fehrenbacher with two counts of scheming to defraud and one count of exploitation of the elderly. The complaint alleges that Fehrenbacher violated a noncompete clause by using mutual-fund screening software at Crosswalk.com. He had sold the rights to the software before joining the company. Crosswalk.com board chairman Jim Buick said he expects the charges to be dismissed as baseless. Fehrenbacher has entered a plea of not guilty.

Orlando-based Campus Crusade for Christ raised more funds through Internet giving in fiscal 2000 than any other charity that participated in a survey conducted by The Chronicle of Philanthropy. Online donations provided $2.5 million of the $350 million in private support the organization received, representing a 70 percent increase in Internet contributions during the previous year. Officials said the rise in online donations is the result of increased awareness of the site and donors’ increased comfort with online transactions.

In his first public preaching event in seven months, Billy Graham spoke to overflow crowds at the Greater Louisville Crusade on June 21-24. About 2,300 people responded to the invitation each evening. It was the evangelist’s first crusade in Louisville since 1956.

Delegates to the annual meeting of the Southern Baptist Convention, held June 12-13 in New Orleans, affirmed covenant marriage and passed resolutions against human cloning, euthanasia, discrimination against military chaplains, and genocide in Sudan. The denomination of 15.9 million launched a Council on Family Life, which will address increasing divorce and cohabitation rates among Southern Baptists. Fred Luter Jr., a New Orleans pastor, became the first African American to preach the convention sermon.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Presbyterians Void Ban on Gay Clergy

Presbyteries will vote on national meeting’s action during the next year.

Conservatives in the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) are expressing great dismay after delegates to this year’s General Assembly voted to overturn a ban on ordaining homosexual clergy and produced a statement that fails affirm clearly that Jesus is the only way to heaven.

During June’s General Assembly at the denomination’s headquarters in Louisville, Kentucky, delegates voted 317-208 to lift a ban on ordaining homosexuals. The action nullified a 1978 resolution prohibiting ordination of “self-affirming, practicing homosexuals.” It also removed the requirement that ordained clergy are “to live either in fidelity within the covenant of marriage between a man and a woman, or chastity in singleness,” which had been in place since 1997.

“In one stroke of the pen, the assembly threw out the church’s historical position that sexual behavior is limited to a covenant marriage between a man and a woman,” says Parker T. Williamson, chief executive officer of the Presbyterian Lay Committee, based in Lenoir, North Carolina.

But the resolution must be ratified by a majority of the 2.5-million-member denomination’s 173 presbyteries. Last year the assembly voted to ban same-sex unions, but regional votes overturned the ban.

Newly elected moderator Jack Rogers, a retired San Francisco Theological Seminary professor, says it is appropriate for presbyteries to decide clergy ordination. At the national level, he says, the church should only establish standards on matters of salvation. Rogers, who called the debate on homosexuality the “Presbyterian civil war,” believes the denomination eventually will agree that active homosexuals must be accepted into the clergy.

“The church went through the same thing with the role of women and slavery and segregation,” Rogers told Christianity Today. In each case, “People believed the Bible taught one thing, and now everybody believes the Bible teaches something else.”

Conservatives, meanwhile, have formed a Confessing Church Movement within the PCUSA (ct, June 11, p. 15). The movement adheres to three basic beliefs: Jesus alone is the way of salvation; the Bible is God’s revealed Word; and marriage is the only appropriate relationship for sexual intercourse. By implication, joining churches indicate they will not install ministers who do not adhere to the beliefs. By the end of June, the Confessing Movement had signed up 538 of 11,200 PCUSA congregations.

Rogers says he is determined to keep the denomination together. The General Assembly voted 467-41 to appoint a 17-member “spiritual discernment” task force to undertake a four-year study on how to bridge divisions concerning “Christology, biblical authority and interpretation, ordination standards, and power.”

Joe Rightmyer, executive director since 1995 of the Louisville-based Presbyterians for Renewal, is encouraged by the plans for a lengthy churchwide study. “For years all we have been talking about is homosexuality,” Rightmyer says. “Now we have an opportunity to deal with each other theologically.”

Christ’s Role in Salvation

In Louisville, delegates confessed “the unique authority of Jesus Christ as Lord” in a 369-163 vote. “Although we do not know the limits of God’s grace and pray for the salvation of those who may never come to know Christ, for us the assurance of salvation is found in confessing Christ and trusting him alone.”

Many conservatives expressed regret that the resolution did not go further. A failed proposal said that Jesus alone is the “singular saving Lord.” The debate on whether Jesus is the only way to salvation lasted for two hours.

A comment by a Presbyterian minister from Chicago, Dirk Ficca, at a peacemaking conference in California in July 2000—”What’s the big deal about Jesus?”—sparked an outcry in the denomination and led to the debate at this year’s General Assembly.

“The General Assembly clearly was not the Presbyterian Church; it was not the church of Jesus Christ,” Williamson says. “They were unable to answer unequivocally the question Jesus asked: Who do you say that I am?”

Rightmyer agrees. “There was a real sadness in my spirit because unbelief was expressed on the floor of the assembly,” he says. “There’s nothing more essential in the life of our church than the doctrine of the Atonement.”

Rogers says that many delegates had reservations about creating new doctrinal statements from the floor. Williamson argues that if the church cannot agree that Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life, there will be few conservatives left to appease.

“This is a church in anguish,” Williamson says. “This assembly ruptured the soul of the denomination.”

The PCUSA might not have to wait until 2005 for a formal division, if presbyteries approve the sexuality measure by next year. “We already have schism in the church,” Williamson says. “At that point it would take formal shape.”

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

The PCUSA‘s site for the 213th General Assembly had daily reports and photos.

Christianity Today’sWeblog examined the PCUSA General Assembly’s decisions.

Media coverage of the vote for homosexual clergy included The Washington Post, The Dallas Morning News, The Chicago Tribune, and Louisville’s Courier Journal.

Coverage of the debate over Jesus as the only savior ran in The Dallas Morning News and Courier Journal.

Presbyweb offers extensive links and posts Ficca’s exact comments from July 2000 that led to “The Jesus Debate.”

Previous related Christianity Today articles include:

Presbyterians Vote Down Ban on Same-Sex Unions | Opponents say vague wording led to defeat. (March 29, 2001)

Presbyterians Propose Ban on Same-Sex Ceremonies | Change to church constitution, which passes by only 17 votes, now goes to presbyteries. (July 5, 2000)

Presbyterians urged to allow liberals to leave over homosexual ordination | “Irreconcilable” differences exist in the Presbyterian Church (USA) over the ordination of gay clergy. (February 28, 2000)

Presbyterians Support Same-Sex Unions | Northeast Synod rules 8-2 in favor of continuing church’s “holy union” ceremonies (January 10, 2000)

Homosexual’s Election Upheld | First Presbyterian Church of Stamford (Conn.) did not violate church law by electing an openly homosexual man to governing board. (August 16, 1999)

Presbyterians in Stalemate over Homosexual Ordination (August 10, 1998)

Evangelicalism: NAE President Resigns in Wake of Financial Woes

After just two years as president of the National Association of Evangelicals, Kevin Mannoia resigned July 7. Mannoia initiated a series of wrenching changes and presided over a time of financial difficulties.

Mannoia says he stepped down at the urging of NAE’s executive committee. “I wouldn’t have done this if I didn’t sense that this is what the committee wanted,” he told Christianity Today.

Founded in 1942, NAE has more than 50 Protestant denominations as members, encompassing 43,000 individual congregations. In addition, about 250 parachurch ministries and schools are members.

NAE has recently undergone two dramatic changes—relocating from Carol Stream, Illinois, to Azusa, California (near Los Angeles), and voting in March 2000 that organizations may hold dual membership with the National Council of Churches, the mainline ecumenical body with a liberal reputation.

Mannoia, 45, has said he wanted to change the organization’s identity, moving it from an alternative to theological liberalism to an encourager of churches to transform communities. NAE’s conciliatory stance toward the NCC sparked controversy among NAE supporters. While Mannoia said the changes would encourage more ethnic diversity, some NAE supporters remained concerned. National Religious Broadcasters broke long-standing ties with NAE in the spring partly because of such concerns.

Billy Melvin, NAE’s president from 1966 to 1994, has been critical of Mannoia’s point of view. “If it is possible for a denomination to have membership in both the NAE and NCC, then that indicates there is no difference between the organizations,” he said.

Melvin disapproves of the NCC’s interaction with the Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches, an association of 300 churches supporting homosexual relationships.

Financial Pressures

In a June press release, Edward Foggs, chairman of NAE’s board, praised Mannoia for the changes he initiated as president. Yet some of these changes created substantial financial pressures for the group. Longtime financial contributors, who began questioning NAE’s new direction, placed their support on hold.

Mannoia said NAE recently laid off three employees. “A month or two ago, we hit bottom,” he said.

Don Argue, NAE’s president from 1995 to 1998, says the organization draws support from several sources: member dues, appeals through the mail, and foundation grants. NAE confirmed that in 2000 the amount of donations to the organization dropped by 36 percent, from $887,915 in 1999 to $564,614, and the association’s total income dropped 29 percent, from $1,555,817 in 1999 to $1,109,181.

NAE’s expenses on fundraising efforts dropped by more than half, from $89,000 in 1999 to $39,000 in 2000. Total expenditures also declined.

Mannoia, a bishop of the Free Methodist Church of North America, admits he is not a fundraiser—an aspect of his job that Foggs says is crucial to NAE’s success.

“You cannot carry out a vision without adequate resources,” Foggs says. “He was not a fundraiser. That was a part of his [job] that he found difficult to embrace.”

Although Mannoia says NAE’s financial health is on the mend, he admits that the group has endured external and internal conflict. “In the process of change, you also create friction,” he says. “I realize I have been the catalyst for a lot of that.”

Mannoia says he wanted to continue promoting strong vision and movement for NAE, while the executive committee felt it was time to consolidate the organization’s assets and recuperate from a hard year.

“There are those who would assert that the pace of change was more rapid than many could embrace,” Foggs says.

“I’ve invested in creating a climate of change,” Mannoia says. “As you do these kind of things, there comes a point when your leadership is not as effective as it should be.”

Decision in Question

The decision to allow dual memberships with the NCC is now in question. The NAE executive committee plans to meet in October to reevaluate the issue of dual association.

NAE’s executive committee now also has the delicate task of selecting Mannoia’s successor. “We’ll do an internal assessment and ask, ‘What kind of leadership gifts do we need?'” Foggs says. “Our process in the past has been to present a name at our annual meeting.”

NAE’s next annual meeting is scheduled for March 2002.

Foggs also said the executive committee is considering trimming NAE’s board, which has 168 members. “We’ve discussed the prospect of converting the board into an advisory group,” he says, adding that the change would eliminate unnecessary and undue delays in decision-making.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Court Ruling is Good News for Equal Access

Religious conservatives hail religious club case as protection for free-speech.

A U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding the right of religious groups to meet in public school buildings will establish broad protections for free speech, legal experts say.

On June 11, the Court ruled in Good News Club v. Milford Central School that religious clubs cannot be prevented from meeting at public schools after hours if other private groups are allowed to meet during that time. In a 6-3 opinion written by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court said excluding a club because of its religious viewpoint violates the First Amendment.

“Overall this is a huge boon for religious freedom,” says Jordan Lorence, senior counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund. “The court essentially said you can’t use the fact that someone is religious as an excuse to treat them worse than somebody else.”

Thomas Marcelle, the attorney for the Good News Club, found particular significance in the Court’s rejection of the argument that speech with an explicit evangelical message should not be protected alongside other speech.

No ‘Wiggle Room’

The school district had argued that the Good News Club’s activities—which included singing, praying, listening to Bible lessons and memorizing Scripture—constituted religious worship and could be barred under a New York law that prohibits religious groups from using public school buildings.

The club uses a curriculum from Child Evangelism Fellowship, a national group based in Warrenton, Missouri. CEF focuses on leading children to Christ. It has approximately 1,200 missionaries overseas, 700 full-time employees in the United States and Canada, and an additional 40,000 volunteers around the world.

Religious conservatives and Christian legal scholars hail the decision as a landmark free-speech case that will protect religious activities from discrimination in the public square. “This is a major victory that will end 18 years of litigation on the equal access issue,” says Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice. Sekulow adds that the ruling is expected to be widely implemented since the majority opinion’s broad language “doesn’t leave any wiggle room.”

Opponents argue that the decision fails to distinguish between a clearly established religious forum designed for adults and an adult-led evangelistic effort targeting young children. They also complain that the Court’s broad interpretation of what constitutes free speech means school districts can no longer exercise discretion about the kinds of groups that use their facilities.

“If the KKK [Ku Klux Klan] wants to call itself The Good Fun Club and teach about patriotism and God, it can do it,” says Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. Rather than allow schools to become “battle zones for religious and political recruiters of every kind,” Lynn says, some school districts may simply decide to close their doors to everyone.

“The choice they’ll have to make is, either allow everybody to come in after school, including competing religious groups, or close the forum completely,” says Edwin Darden, senior staff attorney for the National School Board Association. “If they choose the latter, there are going to be some excellent programs that have served the community that would be harmed.” Some already have been harmed. Responding to a state appellate court ruling that an equal-access suit brought by a member of the Fellowship of Christian Athletes chapter may go forward, trustees of the Saddleback Valley Unified School District on June 12 revoked the club status of 29 groups, with nearly 1,200 members, on four campuses in and around Mission Viejo.

Later Meeting Times

Milford Central School Superintendent Peter Livshin says the school board is likely to maintain an open forum, but could decide to postpone private club meeting times until after 5 o’clock to establish a clearer separation between club and school activities.

Stephen Fournier, pastor of Milford Community Bible Church and sponsor of the Good News Club, says such action would make it difficult to hold club meetings on campus and would send the message that the Good News Club is not welcome. “I can think of no other reason for them to do this other than to keep us out,” Fournier says.

Lorence says he is amazed by the degree of hostility toward letting religious groups exercise their First Amendment freedoms. “Sometimes the mindset of school officials is they’d rather have asbestos in the ceiling tiles than private religious speech,” he says.

Both sides say they expect the decision will embolden more religious groups to seek the use of public school buildings not just for club activities but also for worship services after school hours. Marcelle says that liberal groups may start challenging the renting out of public schools by churches for worship services.

The Good News ruling is part of a recent trend legal experts say shows the Court leaning away from a strict separationist view. In June, the Court also let stand an Alabama law allowing voluntary group prayers at extracurricular school gatherings and sent back for reconsideration a lower court ruling upholding a Louisiana school district’s policy banning the Christian Coalition from using school buildings for prayer meetings.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

Also posted on our site today: Good News Indeed | How many times must the Supreme Court tell schools not to exclude faith groups?

Supreme Court voted in a 6-3 decision (PDF | HTML) to allow the Good News Club of Milford, New York, to use public school buildings.

Editorials on the decision ran in: The New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle, The Seattle Times , USA Today. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, New York Post, Christian Science Monitor, Detroit Free Press, and Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

Related Christianity Today articles include:

Weblog: Beyond the 6-3 Votes That Mattered | Newspaper editorials weigh in on Good News Club v. Milford School District. Plus other stories from mainstream media around the world. (June 14, 2001)

Weblog: Grief Observed Over Abolition of Lewis’s Mere Christianity | Plus: Supreme Court okays Christian elementary school club, and American missionaries are still alive. (June 11, 2001)

School Fights Christian Athletes Club | Pending trial in California will test the limits of religion on campus. (June 7, 2001)

Weblog: Supreme Court Apparently Offers ‘Good News’ for Bible Club | Plus: Ghosts of former Supreme Court decisions return to haunt college campuses, and other stories from around the world. (March 1, 2001)

Equal Access Case Argued | Can an after-school Christian club use public school facilities? The Supreme Court will decide. (May 5, 2001)

Weblog: The Nicest Battle Over Religion in Schools | Plus: Colson gets to vote, Dr. Laura apologizes, and other stories from other media sources. (Oct. 11, 2000)

Philippines: Kidnapped Missionaries Reported Safe

But danger increasing for Burnhams—and for workers around the world.

At last report, two kidnapped American missionaries in the Philippines were believed to be alive and not seriously injured. But Martin Burnham, 41, and his wife, Gracia Burnham, 42, are suffering from malaria, according to a statement from their agency, New Tribes Mission (NTM), based on a report from a released captive.

Abu Sayyaf guerrillas captured the Burnhams and 18 others on May 27 at a resort off the island of Palawan.

Abu Sayyaf, a Muslim separatist group, initially said the Burnhams would be beheaded if its demands were not met. NTM says the captive who was released reported that Martin Burnham has a superficial back injury from a shrapnel wound. Second-hand reports indicate that the Burnhams are an encouragement to their fellow captives.

Robert Klamser, executive director of Crisis Consulting International in Ventura, California, told Christianity Today that there are on average one or two missionary kidnappings annually.

“Generally, we are seeing increasing danger to evangelical missionaries throughout the world,” Klamser says. “Two major factors that contribute to the increasing danger are the destabilization and instability in many regions that followed the end of the two-Superpower era. … and the increasing missions push into areas dominated by other religious systems.”

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

New Tribes Mission Online has regular updates on the Burnhams.

Martin Burnham was allegedly injured during fighting between Abu Sayyaf and government forces. The rebels escaped and left bodies behind. An Abu Sayyaf spokesman said Burnham’s injury was “nothing to worry about.”

The Philippines president has ordered a fresh offensive on the kidnappers. Back home, charities rally to help Burnham children.

According to The BBC, Abu Sayyaf (“Sword of God”) has made an industry of kidnapping.

The Orlando Sentinel examined the life of missionaries and the test of faith that it can be.

The BBC reported that the Philippines has been called the kidnapping capital of the world.

For developments on the Burnhams, see Yahoo’s full coverage and ABS-CBN News.

Christianity Today coverage of the Burnham kidnapping includes:

New Tribes Missionaries Kidnapped | Muslim rebels in Philippines threaten to kill Martin and Gracia Burnham and 18 others if military intervenes. (May 29, 2001)

Yugoslavia: Evangelical Churches Stoned, Vandalized

Persecution from Orthodox extremists on rise since Milosevic forced from office.

The months following Yugoslavia’s largely peaceful political revolution have been anything but tranquil for the Protestant-Evangelical Church in Leskovac. Evangelicals have been assaulted and beaten, and the meeting places of Serbian and Romani (Gypsy) Christian fellowship groups have been stoned and vandalized.

“The city planning officials are against us,” says Stefan Stankovic, a church elder and a Serb, referring to municipal efforts to tear down a tent in which 1,000 Romani Christians meet for worship. “Our offices have been broken into and burglarized. They are even cutting our phone lines. There is no end to intimidation.”

This church, with 200 people in its Serb fellowship, is in a city of 80,000 about 30 miles from the southern border with Kosovo, where rebels continue to push for full independence. But its experience is not unique.

Since Vojislav Kostunica became president and former leader Slobodan Milosevic was forced from office last October, Serbian media, Serbian nationalists, and some Orthodox extremists have begun publicly labeling evangelicals as religious heretics, traitors, and evil sects “imported from the West.” This campaign has coincided with a sharp increase in violent incidents against non-Orthodox churches. Amid Slobodan Milosevic’s extradition on war crimes charges, evangelicals hope the fear of prosecution will curb fresh attacks on religious minorities.

According to Operation World, Orthodox Christians account for 67 percent of the population in Yugoslavia. The nation consists of Serbia—where 94 percent of the country’s people live—and the small but fractious province of Montenegro. There are 10.6 million citizens in Serbia, only 8,000 of whom (or.075 percent of the total population) are evangelicals, meeting in 200 local fellowships. The first Baptist church in Novi Sad, now the capital of Serbia’s northern province of Vojvodina, was founded in 1892.

“Baptists, Pentecostals, and others are dangerous religious cults who damage physical and psychological development of your children,” said Zoran Lukovic, a police inspector, in a Ministry of Education-sponsored lecture to elementary and high school teachers in Belgrade. “They also destroy families.” In his book Religious Cults, endorsed by the Ministry of Police, Lukovic links evangelicals with fringe groups, calling them all “wolves in sheep’s clothing.”

The Social Democratic Union (SDU), a member of the ruling coalition, has so far been alone in defending evangelicals, accusing elements of the former government of encouraging the violence. After the Baptist church in Novi Sad was pelted with rocks twice in one week in April because the pastor appeared on a public religious education panel, the SDU said in a statement, “It is obvious that persecution against so-called sects is on [the] increase. … Some members of the Socialist Party of Serbia, who are insisting on a fight against sects, are spreading religious intolerance.”

The socialists, however, deny any involvement. Branislav Ivkovic, Socialist Party vice president, told Christianity Today, “The Socialist Party has nothing to do with these people of. … darkened mind who object to others being of a different religion. … The increase is happening today, after seven months with the new government.”

The lynch-mob mentality is spreading to neighboring Bosnia as well. The Protestant-Evangelical Church in Bijeljina was recently stoned after a series of threats. Some people disturbed church services, says Vukasin Vukovic, a ruling elder of the congregation.

“We are facing the most difficult period in our 50 years of existence,” Vukovic says. “We were not persecuted this much even under the communists.”

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

Yugoslavia’s revolution saw Slobodan Milosevic’s generally peaceful resignation of power to President Vojislav Kostunica in the wake of a “roller coaster election” and a wide public movement.

For more articles, see Yahoo’s full coverage on Yugoslavia.

See Christianity Today’s persecution section and previous articles on the Balkans:

Bishops Worry War Crime Tribunal Will Create Martyrs | Four government ministers resign in protest of Croatia’s handing over of generals. (July 20, 2001)

The Case for Compassion in Serbia | A year after NATO bombing, Yugoslav Christians discover unity in caring for the poor. (March 6, 2000)

Doing Church Amidst Bombs and Bullets | Balkan evangelicals feel strain of ethnic cleansing (May 24, 1999)

Bridging Kosovo’s Deep Divisions | A tiny evangelical minority has a vision for how to overcome the explosive mix of religion and nationalism. (Feb. 8, 1999)

Orthodox Condemn Milosevic (Oct. 4, 1999)

Evangelicals Resent Abandonment (July 12, 1999)

Church Planting Faces Uphill Battle (Sept. 1, 1997)

Serbian Baptists Hope for Return to Croatia (Nov. 11, 1996)

Briefs: The World

Bending to international pressure, the Taliban regime in Afghanistan has backed off its recent edict requiring Hindus and other non-Muslims to wear yellow badges and orange or yellow clothing, the Afghanistan Peace Organization reports. Instead, Hindus will be required to carry identification cards to show to authorities. A Taliban official said the dress code was meant to protect Hindus from harassment by Muslim religious police. Warren Larson, academic program director of Muslim studies at Columbia International University, says the Taliban’s mistreatment of non-Muslims is actually turning people away from Islam. “I think they’re digging their own grave—making Islam unpopular,” he said. “The more Muslims see of this harshness, the more they are coming to Christ.”

Leaders from both Jewish and Orthodox Church communities in Russia met recently to question the mission activities of the evangelical groups Jews for Jesus and Shma Israel. Conference participants said the missionaries—who call Jews to believe in Jesus Christ—interpret many aspects of Judaism and Orthodoxy incorrectly. The Moscow meeting (which used the theme “The Missionary Threat—How to Combat It?”) included training for specialists who will oppose missionaries in the Jewish communities. Leaders also announced that a “Magen” league would be established to monitor the activity of the groups. David Brickner, executive director of Jews for Jesus, said that while organized opposition is not unusual, Russian Jewish leaders are using a “bizarre” strategy of allying with the Orthodox Church and the Russian government—two institutions that have been responsible for persecuting Russian Jews in the past. Brickner sees their efforts as “a direct response to the work of the Holy Spirit,” noting that hundreds of Jews and Gentiles in Minsk, Moscow, and St. Petersburg accepted Christ in recent evangelistic campaigns.

Police and protesters clashed in Egypt on June 17 when 6,000 Coptic Christians gathered at the Coptic Orthodox Cathedral in Cairo to protest a defamatory article in the state-run Islamic newspaper Al-Nabaa. Christian leaders worry that the story may spark more discrimination and persecution against Christians. The story accused the Al-Mohurraq monastery of sponsoring prostitution and extortion and featured sexually explicit photos of an alleged monk and an unidentified woman. Church authorities say the monk had been excommunicated from the Coptic Church in 1996 and that the photos came from a video he had made to extort money from the married woman involved.

As a result of new radio programs in Mongolia, Indonesia, Russia, and South Korea, the Far East Broadcasting Company recently reached an all-time high of over 500 broadcast hours per day. An increased demand for gospel radio broadcasts in countries like Mongolia, where no Christian churches had existed between the 13th century and 10 years ago, has allowed the FEBC to peak in the number of hours it is heard each day worldwide.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube