Pastors

Ben Patterson on Prayer

God loves the little things, the secret things his servants do.

Leadership Journal August 22, 2001

Twenty-eight thousand pounds at birth! That’s what Dr. Bernard Nathanson estimates we would weigh if we continued to grow throughout gestation at the rate we grow in the first two weeks of life. That’s how steep the trajectory of cell division is.

Add to this biological tumult the unimaginably intricate and precise processes of organization that take place during this time, and the picture is breathtaking. Everything from the ability to hit a baseball to the swirl of cowlicks to the sound of a person’s laugh are fixed into place. In magnitude, the change is comparable to a tsunami; in complexity, to the transformation of winter into spring. The first two weeks of life may be the most important.

But the real glory and mystery of it all is that it takes place on a scale that is microscopic. The grandest, most awesome stage of human life is, for all practical purposes, invisible.

How like God. He likes small things. Resisting the proud and giving grace to the humble, he can be found in two places: one high and lofty, the other among the lowly and contrite (James 4:6; Isa. 57:15). And since none of us can get up that high, it is wise to stay down low.

So we do the “little thing”—we pray for his kingdom to come; we don’t bring it in. Oh, the conceit of prayerless activity! P.T. Forsyth said our worst sin is prayerlessness because of what it says about who we really think is in charge of the church and the universe. God save us from the people who would renew the church and bring justice in the world without praying. Having the appearance of godliness, but denying its power, they are more dangerous than the wrongs they would set right. They will replace old evils with new evils, themselves.

I know, because I’ve been one of those people, and can still be. It took six weeks on my back to help me see this.

In the spring of 1980 I was suffering great pain from what was diagnosed as two herniated discs in my lower back. The prescription was total bed rest. But since my bed was too soft, the treatment ended up being total floor rest. I was frustrated and humiliated. I couldn’t preach, I couldn’t lead meetings, I couldn’t call on new prospects for the church. I couldn’t do anything but pray.

Not that I immediately grasped that last fact. It took two weeks for me to get so bored that I finally asked my wife for the church directory so I could at least do something, even if it was only pray for the people of my congregation. Note: it wasn’t piety but boredom and frustration that drove me to pray. But pray I did, every day for every person in my church, two or three hours a day. After a while, the time became sweet.

Toward the end of my convalescence, anticipating my return to work, I prayed, “Lord, this has been good, this praying. It’s too bad I don’t have time to do this when I’m working.”

And God spoke to me, very clearly. He said, “Stupid (that’s right, that was his very word. He said it in a kind tone of voice, though). You have the same twenty-four hours each day when you’re weak as when you’re strong. The only difference is that when you’re strong you think you’re in charge. When you’re weak you know you aren’t.”

That’s when I began to understand that God loves the little things, the secret things his servants do, because when we stop being lords, he can be Lord of his church. And when he is Lord, there is power, and there is fruit.

The good fruit visible in the church is planted in prayers prayed in weakness and in secret. What happens in prayer is to the spiritual realm what the first two weeks of life are to the physical.

Ben Patterson is a featured speaker at the National Pastors Convention in February 2002—check out www.NationalPastorsConvention.com for all the details, to request a free brochure, and to register by the Early Bird deadline.

To reply to the editors of this newsletter, write Newsletter@LeadershipJournal.net.

Sign up for the Church Leader’s Newsletter and receive a new article plus useful information in your inbox every week!

Copyright © 2001 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal.Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Latest Research on Christian Parents

Surprises about Christianity in the home.

Leadership Journal August 15, 2001

Recently, the national press has devoted extensive coverage to children’s and family issues. With that in mind, a recent study sponsored by Christian Parenting Today, a publication of Christianity Today International, provides data on how its subscribers are rearing their children. The survey addresses such questions as: How do Christian parents rate their church’s children’s programs? Are Christian families too busy for devotions? Do Christian parents care what their kids watch on TV, see at the movies, or do online?

Busy Families

Not including work and school, the typical family spends more than seven hours each week in organized activities outside the home. Even with all this activity, Christian families still have dinner together five or six nights a week, according to the survey. Most families turn off the TV (64%) and wait until everyone is present before eating (59%). Nearly nine in ten families (88%) pray before the evening meal. While eating dinner, nearly all families (95%) discuss the day’s happenings. However, just four in ten (39%) have family devotions once a week or more. Fifty-two percent rarely, if ever, have family devotions.

Church Satisfaction

More than nine in ten (91%) families surveyed attend church weekly. Most parents are either extremely satisfied (45%) or satisfied (41%) with their house of worship. Sixty-nine percent or more of parents consider Sunday school, youth, and children’s programs extremely important. But the majority of parents would not describe themselves as “very satisfied” with any of these three programs at their church. Parents are more pleased with the music and quality of preaching during worship services.

Regulating Media Intake

Turning to media choices, almost all families surveyed have a TV (99%), and most have Internet access (82%) and go to the movies with their kids (67% in the past year). The parents surveyed are very involved in controlling their children’s media exposure. The typical parent waits until their child is almost nine before allowing him or her to see a PG-rated movie and almost 14 before allowing him or her to see a PG-13 movie. Most parents (55%) will not allow their child to see an R-rated movie. When it comes to TV watching, parents normally must approve a program before it’s viewed (87%) and they limit the amount of time their children spend in front of the set. With the Internet, parents exercise even more control. Half of them do not let their children go online. Those parents who do, either sit beside their child, stay in view of the computer, periodically check on them, or use filtering software.

About The Study

One thousand surveys were mailed to the subscribers of Christian Parenting Today, and 508 completed surveys were returned by December 4, 2000, a response rate of 51 percent. The margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points. The typical respondent was a 35-year-old working mother with two children at home.

John C. LaRue, Jr., is vice-president of Internet research and development for Christianity Today International, in Carol Stream, Illinois. He may be reached by e-mail at editor@churchlawandtax.com. Previous Special Reports can be found online here.

To reply to the editors of this newsletter, write Newsletter@LeadershipJournal.net.

Sign up for the Church Leader’s Newsletter and receive a new article plus useful information in your inbox every week!

Copyright © 2001 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal.Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Lost & Found: My Soul

I thought my soul was fine, but it wasn’t.

Leadership Journal August 8, 2001

I lost my soul.

I mean, I didn’t know I had one.

What I really mean is, I knew I had one, but I’d never come in contact with it.

I came from a tradition where souls were a theological reality, not a faith reality. Souls were for saving, not for communing. Souls were for converting and, once they were converted, they were to be left alone. Souls were too mystical, too subjective, too ambiguous, too risky, too … well, you know — New Age-ish.

I came from a wonderful evangelical tradition that has always lifted up the integrity of the Word of God, the significance of the church, the centrality of salvation. But that same tradition, in the past few years, has seen an epidemic of moral failure. There seems to be an ever-increasing amount of defections from the faith. More and more of my friends are dropping out, giving up, or just placing their faith on the shelf for a while.

Why?

We’ve lost touch with our souls. We’ve been nourishing our minds, our relational skills, our theological knowledge, our psychological well-being, our physiological health … but we’ve abandoned our souls.

Our souls have been lost.

Until a few months ago, I had no idea I’d lost my soul somewhere. In the busyness and clutter of my life, as I traveled all over the world serving God, I thought my soul was just fine, thank you. But my soul wasn’t fine. I spent hours every day doing God’s work, but not one second doing soul work. I was consumed by the external and oblivious to the internal. In the darkness of my soul, I was stumbling around and bumping into the symptoms of my soul-lessness — I was busy, superficial, friendless, afraid, and cynical — but I didn’t know where all these negative parts of my life were coming from.

For months I’d known something was wrong with me. I was filled with longings I couldn’t identify, yearnings I couldn’t express, and an emptiness that seemed to be expanding. I was desperate even though I couldn’t articulate my desperation.

I decided to spend a week at L’Arche, a community for the mentally and physically challenged in Toronto, Canada. I didn’t know why, really, I just knew I needed to do something. To be honest, I expected to be inspired by Henri Nouwen and touched by the mentally and physically disabled people who lived there.

Within a few days, I became aware that my whole life was consumed with doing rather than being. I knew what it meant to believe in Jesus, I didn’t know what it meant to be with Jesus. I knew how to talk with Jesus, I didn’t know how to sit still long enough to let Jesus talk to me. I found it easy to do the work of God, but I had no idea how to let God work in me. I understood soul-saving, but I was clueless about soul making. I knew how to be busy, but I didn’t know how to be still. I could talk about God, I just couldn’t listen to God. I felt comfortable with God’s people, but I felt uncomfortable alone with God. I was acquainted with the God “out-there,” but I was a complete stranger to the God “in-here.” I could meet God anywhere … except in my heart, in my soul, in my being.

It took only a few hours of silence before I began to hear my soul speaking. It only took being alone for a short period of time for me to discover that I wasn’t alone. God had been trying to shout over the noisiness of my life, and I couldn’t hear him. But in the stillness and solitude, his whispers shouted from my soul, “Michael, I’m here. I’ve been calling you. I’ve been loving you, but you haven’t been listening. Can you hear me, Michael? I love you. I’ve always loved you. And I’ve been waiting for you to hear me say that to you. But you’ve been so busy trying to prove to yourself that you’re loved that you haven’t heard me.”

I heard him, and my slumbering soul was filled with the joy of the prodigal son. My soul was awakened by a loving Father who had been looking and waiting for me.

— Mike Yaconelli is co-founder and owner of Youth Specialties (http://www.YouthSpecialties.com) and pastors the slowest-growing church in America. Mike will be a featured speaker at the National Pastors Convention in February 2002 in San Diego. Don’t miss it! For details, go to http://www.NationalPastorsConvention.com.

From Building Church Leaders, a resource to train leaders, published by Leadership Journal(c) 2001 Christianity Today International. To find out more about Building Church Leaders, go to: http://ChristianityToday.com/bclbrochure/index.html

To subscribe to Building Church Leaders, go to: http://store.yahoo.com/cti/builchurlead2.html

To reply to the editors of this newsletter, write Newsletter@LeadershipJournal.net.

Sign up for the Church Leader’s Newsletter and receive a new article plus useful information in your inbox every week!

Copyright © 2001 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal.Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

News
Wire Story

Episcopalians: More ‘Missionary Bishops’ Ordained

Anglican Mission in America continues to grow

Defying Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury George Carey and Presiding Bishop Frank Griswold of the Episcopal Church in the United States (ECUSA), Anglican archbishops from Asia and Africa have ordained four former or current Episcopal priests as “missionary bishops” to the United States.

They are part of the fledgling but potentially schismatic Anglican Mission in America (AMIA). With theological liberals in control of the American church, conservatives say they are alienated and their perspectives are ignored by those in power. Leaders of AMIA say that ECUSA has strayed from its biblical and theological moorings.

The June 20 ceremony, attended by an international congregation of more than 1,100, was performed by Emmanuel Musabu Kolini, archbishop of the Episcopal Church in Rwanda, and Datak Yong Ping Chung, archbishop of the Anglican Church in South East Asia.

The four new bishops are Thomas William Johnston of Little Rock, Arkansas; Thaddeus Rockwell Barnum of Pawleys Island, South Carolina; Alexander Maury Greene of Denver; and Douglas Brooks Weiss of Campbell, California.

The three-hour ceremony at Colorado Community Church in Denver brings to six the number of AMIA missionary bishops in the United States. Eighteen months ago, Kolini and the previous archbishop of Singapore, Moses Tay, ordained Charles Murphy and John Rodgers (a CT corresponding editor) as bishops.

“We have become the mission field,” Murphy told Religion Today. “In a bold reversal of the missionary actions of the last 500 years, the churches in Africa and Asia have undertaken a labor of love and courage to renew and revitalize the Anglican faith in America.” The Anglican Mission in America has 75 clergy, 37 congregations, and approximately 8,000 members, across the United States. Johnston is already working with five other clergy in Missouri and Texas to begin new missions, and another congregation is developing in St. Louis.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

Both the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Mission in America have official Web sites with information and background.

The Episcopal News Service covered the Episcopal Church reaction to the consecrations. Plus, the site has bios on the four new AmiA bishops.

Classical Anglican Net News regularly covers the AMiA from a more conservative perspective.

The Denver Post reported on the June 20 ceremony and on Alexander Maury Greene, the seventh Colorado priest to leave the diocese within a year. But Colorado Episcopal bishop Jerry Winterrowd isn’t worried about the diocese.

Read some the testimonies of people who decided to leave the U.S. Episcopal Church.

Previous Christianity Today articles on this topic include:

Waging Peace | How two Episcopalians—one liberal, one conservative—have learned to say reconciliation. (July 6, 2001)

Identity-Based Conflicts | Father Brian Cox has preached reconciliation in Eastern Europe, Southern California, and now in his own denomination. (July 6, 2001)

Inside CT: Getting Personal | Behind Douglas LeBlanc’s story of reconciliation in the Episcopal Church (July 6, 2001)

Conservative Anglicans Defy Episcopal Church | Anglican bishops from abroad launch U.S. ministry for Episcopal reform. (Oct. 5, 2000)

Intercontinental Ballistic Bishops? | Maverick conservatives gain a toehold among Episcopalians. (April 25, 2000)

Episcopal Church on Brink of Ecclesiastical Civil War Over Consecrations | (Feb. 2, 2000)

One Church, Two Faiths | Will the Episcopal Church survive the fight over homosexuality? (July 12, 1999)

Dying Church Bequeaths Sanctuary to Anglicans | (Sept. 7, 1998)

Culture
Review

A.I.: Artificial Intelligence

Despite Steven Spielberg’s reputation for producing warm fuzzies, A.I. is bleak.

Christianity Today August 6, 2001

A.I.: Artificial Intelligence
Directed by Steven Spielberg
Warner Bros.

Christians have argued for centuries that God gave us free will, with all the potential for sin and pain that that entails, because he wanted children who would love him, and not mere robots who would do whatever they were programmed to do. But these days, as neurologists and psychologists develop maps of the brain, many people consider themselves machines. This has profoundly influenced how we understand such concepts as love, free will, and the soul.

The flip side of this mechanistic view of human nature has become popular in science fiction (the genre in which the implications of our scientific theories get fleshed out): to treating artificially intelligent machines as persons, with the same rights as people. These issues are explored in A.I.: Artificial Intelligence, a new film about a robot child who is programmed to love.

Steven Spielberg wrote and directed A.I. from a concept that Stanley Kubrick spent years developing (who died in 1999). Kubrick’s concept was based, in turn, on the short story “Supertoys Last All Summer Long” by Brian Aldiss.

A.I. is set in a dystopic future, when global warming and rising oceans have drowned many of the world’s cities, and married people cannot have children unless the government picks their names in a lottery. Robots of various sorts have existed for decades, serving as butlers, nannies, and prostitutes, but when the film begins, no one has yet created a robot for childless couples.

That all changes when Professor Hobby (William Hurt), an entrepreneurial scientist, proposes making android children to offer genuine love to the parents who adopt them. These children, he says, will have real emotions and even a subconscious mind, and they will have dreams and desires that were not built into them. At the same time, they will be hard-wired to give their adoptive parents a perfect, everlasting love.

One of Hobby’s assistants asks whether the scientists, or the broader society, will have a moral responsibility to these robots, should they ever be rejected by their parents, but Hobby dismisses her concerns. After all, he says, “In the beginning, didn’t God create Adam to love him?” Thus the film raises the disturbing, if not entirely original, question of whether creators, including God, owe anything to their creations, or whether they may abandon their creations at will.

Robophobic Horrors

The prototype for this new line of artificial children is named David, and he is played with a sometimes eerie sensitivity by Haley Joel Osment. David is sent to live not with one of the planet’s many childless couples but with the parents of a real boy who is frozen in a cryogenic coma.

David’s new mother, Monica (Frances O’Connor), objects that there can be no substitute for her son, Martin (Jake Thomas), who is, after all, not dead yet. But she quickly overcomes her objections, and although David’s behavior is anything but natural, she activates the program that will bond David to her for the rest of his life.

But then Martin is miraculously cured and comes home, and the sibling rivalry that ensues between him and David leads to a couple of life-threatening incidents that finally compel Monica to send David away. By the time she abandons him in the woods, it is clear that, just as Monica has imprinted herself on David’s heart and mind, he has imprinted himself on hers; their separation tears them both apart and is one of the most heart-wrenching scenes in recent memory. Determined to win back his mother’s love, and inspired by Carlo Collodi’s Pinocchio, David decides to track down the Blue Fairy and ask her to make him a “real” boy.

But first he must deal with the prejudices of his robophobic society. And yes, the film does suggest that those who believe there is a qualitative difference between humans and androids may be harboring an attitude that is tantamount to racism. Although the film encourages a reductive view of robot behavior—the robots that preceded David are little more than “sensory toys,” Hobby tells us—it also suggests that robots are people too. By extension, one might wonder whether the filmmakers would encourage a reductive view of human behavior, and, like some sociobiologists and evolutionary psychologists in our own day, explain all of our instincts away as mere biochemistry.

David is captured by religious rednecks and taken to the Flesh Fair, a festival in the woods where humans who feel threatened by androids take sadistic glee in torturing the machines to death. One of the robots in the holding pen mutters that history is repeating itself, and the line evokes memories of Schindler’s List and Amistad, two previous Spielberg films that dealt with systemic racism. To make sure we don’t miss the point, the first android victim we see has black features and the voice of stand-up comic Chris Rock.

When it is David’s turn to be destroyed, one of the fair’s ringleaders, a burly Irishman named Lord Johnson-Johnson (Brendan Gleeson), tells the crowd that scientists have made androids as part of a “grand scheme” to replace “all of God’s little children” with machines. Then, to goad the crowd into participating in David’s demolition, he quotes, out of context, one of Jesus’ most famous sayings: “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” Jesus, of course, said this to point out that none of us is free of the taint of sin, and thus, we have no right to condemn each other.

But Johnson-Johnson says this to flatter his audience, to persuade them of their superiority over robots and those who build them. Ironically, sin is a quality that belongs only to fully conscious beings such as humans and angels, so if Johnson-Johnson is correct, and robots do not have souls, then the humans at his fair are the only sinners there. Conversely, if robots do have a sinful nature, then who knows? God may have given them souls after all. (One wonders if the Christians in this futuristic society have ever tried to evangelize the robots.)

A Gigolo Guide

The film’s use of religious themes and images continues as David escapes from the Flesh Fair and resumes his quest for the Blue Fairy. He is helped by Gigolo Joe (Jude Law), an eager-to-please android who has been framed for murder by a jealous husband and is now hiding from the law.

The relationship between these two perfectly captures the film’s central tension between Kubrick’s cold, cynical rationalism and the warm-and-fuzzy spirituality typical of Spielberg. David is convinced the Blue Fairy exists, but Joe is not so sure. Joe argues that David’s belief in her may be nothing more than an “electronic parasite”—or a “mind virus,” to use the term favored by outspoken atheist Richard Dawkins—and the way Joe sees it, selfishness and sensuality are all that really exist, in the end.

When David asserts that Monica might still love him, Joe replies that he merely fulfills her emotional needs: “She loves what you do for her, as my customers love what I do for them.” And as he stands outside a chapel in Rouge City, a high-tech red-light district populated by robot hustlers, Joe declares that, although those who made the robots are always looking for their own Creator, in the end, most humans settle for the empty physical pleasures provided by androids like him. “I’ve picked up a lot of business in this spot,” says Joe.

If Joe’s view of human nature sounds bleak, Spielberg does try to hold out the hope that there is a spiritual dimension to our lives that takes us beyond ourselves. But the concept of love that David is supposed to represent is fundamentally flawed. If love is characterized by personal sacrifice and selfless acts, then David’s love is not quite real, no matter what the ads for this movie say.

In a word, David is not free. To borrow a concept from Paul, he remains a slave to his synthetic flesh, and as far as this film is concerned, there is no liberator—no savior—in sight.

Peter Chattaway reviews films for Books & Culture and BC Christian News.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

A.I. is based on Brian Aldiss’s short story, Super-Toys Last all Summer Long.

The film’s official Web site has storyboards and features on robots and the film’s art. Plus a neat “Chatbot” will actually hold conversations with visitors.

RottenTomatoes.com gives a quick-look guide to A.I.’s critical reviews. Read full reviews from Film Forum’s Jeffrey Overstreet, Roger Ebert, Chicago Tribune, The Washington Post, Focus on the Family, and Salon.com.

Supersphere has an interesting account of the story behind A.I., which includes Eyes Wide Shut’s enigmatic Teddy Bear. Other articles on the making of the film ran in: Wired, Entertainment Weekly, and The Guardian.

In marketing of the film, numerous cryptic Web sites began popping up in some sort of mystery game existing in the same setting as A.I. The dozens of sites branch out from each other so look for links and working phone numbers.

Christianity Today Film Forum has looked at A.I.:

Spielberg and Kubrick—The Brothers Grimmer What Christian and mainstream critics are saying about A.I., crazy/beautiful, and Baby Boy, plus readers’ video alternatives. (July 5, 2001)

Right, Wrong, and Rated ‘R’ | Is nudity a no-no? Also, what critics and readers are saying about A.I., Cats and Dogs, Kiss of the Dragon, and Scary Movie II. (July 12, 2001)

Cover Story

Silicon Valley Saints

High-tech Christian executives in California are bringing biblical values back into a mecca of Mammon.

A field of shattered dreams lies south of San Francisco along Highway 101 down to San Jose. Newly emptied office buildings in Silicon Valley are a visible sign that hard times have hit the multibillion-dollar technology industry. While the legendary founders of Silicon Valley are retired millionaires, some in the next generation of high-tech heroes are losing big time. Billions of dollars in stock-market equity have disappeared as investors have sold off stock in publicly traded firms. The tech-heavy Nasdaq market has lost over half its value in the last 18 months.

But even as the downward spiral of the high-tech industry persists, a potent spiritual transformation is unfolding. Is God at work through a new alliance of Christian executives in Silicon Valley? Their faith-centered approach to wealth and power is revealing that the "next new new thing" may be the timelessness of Jesus Christ.

As workaholic executives burn out, this growing network of faith-focused business leaders is determined to save Silicon Valley's soul. The executives' aim of bringing biblical values back into the marketplace has the potential to change the high-tech corporations that are changing the world of work.

These executives have turned to Os Guinness, the evangelical author, sociologist, and consultant, as a key resource. In an interview with Christianity Today, Guinness said Christian business leaders in Silicon Valley have an "extraordinary opportunity" to deploy their business enterprises in ways that embrace a Christian worldview. "Silicon Valley will have a longer lasting and more global impact than the 1960s," says Guinness, who has observed California's Bay Area for 30 years. For Guinness, the firms of Silicon Valley are at the forefront of a "second Industrial Revolution" in which information technology will transform how people live and work.

During a recent tour of Silicon Valley firms, Christianity Today spoke with several of the most prominent Christians there about their high-tech, high-finance world, and how faith influences their work.

Michael Yang, 39, as much as any other individual Christian executive, represents the promise and plight of an Internet capitalist. Yang, who emigrated from South Korea in 1976 at age 14, graduated from the University of California- Berkeley with degrees in electrical engineering and computer science. After working at Xerox, Samsung, and other firms, Yang in 1998 founded MySimon.com, the spectacularly successful Web site for comparison shoppers. Yang sold MySimon.com last year to another Internet firm for $700 million.

Soon after, Yang launched an online auto shopping site called Dreamlot.com. But with fierce competition, the site never took off and was closed in less than a year, proving that no one has a foolproof strategy for business success and that early career success can be difficult to repeat. His latest effort is NetGeo.com, an Internet company that provides technology services to business Web sites.

As paper wealth from a declining stock market has evaporated, some Christian business leaders are reevaluating their achievements and career direction. Before the dot-com bust of 2000 and the power short-circuits of 2001, not many executives took time to consider where they were going strategically or considered their spiritual needs. Everyone wanted "to jump into the river of riches to a field of dreams," says Tal Brooke, Berkeley-based author of Virtual Gods and president of the Spiritual Counterfeits Project. Indeed, the Valley is home to an estimated 250,000 millionaires out of 2.5 million inhabitants.

"It is a fact," Yang said recently in a Bible study. "It is hard to feel spiritual need" when basic physical needs are fulfilled.

Executive Bible Studies

The Protestant roots of Silicon Valley symbolically died with the passing away of Valley hero Bill Hewlett, cofounder of Hewlett-Packard, the area's first high-tech firm. On January 1, 1939, he and David Packard, classmates at Stanford University, launched an electronic measuring-device company from a one-car garage in Palo Alto. Six decades later, Hewlett-Packard led the Valley in revenues, with $47.1 billion.

A close friend remembers that Hewlett, a longtime member of the liberal Palo Alto Presbyterian Church, had an old-fashioned devotion to God and country. Hewlett's son recalls how he would sit in his father's lap and learn "how to follow the score of Handel's Messiah." Out of his traditional Protestant ethic came the famous "HP Way" of teamwork, flat hierarchy, innovation, and quality.

In the last two decades, church attendance in the Valley has been hardly the norm. It was, in fact, a curiosity. Today, however, as executives count the empty workplace parking slots as layoffs persist, parking spots at evening Bible studies are in short supply.

"I could hardly get to sleep last night; I was so excited about what is spiritually happening here," says John Brandon, a top executive at Apple Computer, in an interview with CT. Start-up churches, new Bible studies, and a growing network of prayer groups are having a subtle but significant influence on the high-tech industry by changing the hearts and minds of entrepreneurs, who in turn are changing the way they work.

Silicon Valley Fellowship has emerged as a network of Christian high-tech leaders. It has organized itself into a parachurch ministry that sponsors small groups as well as monthly lunches. At a January event, for example, former Microsoft executive John Sage traced his career from Harvard to high-tech to founding Pura Vida Coffee, which markets high-quality coffee beans to support Christian ministry in Costa Rica.

At one of the new Silicon Valley Bible studies, Christian executives (many of whom asked not to be named) face their fears. During the session, the mood is glum. "I am sitting in the midst of company turmoil," David tells his fellow Silicon Valley executives.

"We are in a recession," another says.

"No, a depression," another CEO corrects.

Greg Slayton, the CEO of ClickAction.com, functions as the elder statesman of the Bible study. Slayton remembers that when he came to Silicon Valley, he sensed how even Christian leaders were under its spell.

"I couldn't get them to return my phone calls. I wasn't an immediate IPO [initial public offering of a stock] prospect," Slayton reminiscences with a touch of bitterness.

Now in his early 40s, Slayton's habit of walking light on his feet, as if he is ready to race at any moment, makes one want to run after him wherever he goes. But this evening, he too is on the edge of exhaustion from his frantic pace. "The sense of isolation is a curse," Slayton warns. "It is the curse of 10,000 acquaintances. You find no one to talk to when things go really bad."

During the meeting, one new member recounts his challenge. "I am winding down a company," he says. "There is such ugliness and not much charity." He was ill-prepared by his business school to make ethical decisions while in catastrophe. "I could have made a lot of money for the company and myself by ripping off our customers before we go out of business." As he speaks, his cheeks redden with anxiety and pain. He might have sold software that would have been orphaned one minute after his company died.

Many Christian executives in Silicon Valley keep something in their office to remind themselves of where they came from and to whom they are responsible. One executive's wall features three framed newspaper articles denouncing his ethics and leadership abilities.

"It keeps me humble," he says. Slayton has his kids' artwork spilling off the walls of his office into the hallway—looking more like the kids' finger-painting room than the office of the president. "It reminds me not to forget my family, and reminds my employees too."

As the discussion turns to how these executives may be Christian witnesses in the workplace, the Bible study has come to exactly where Slayton wants it: How to bring about lasting change. "What are we taking away to do differently tomorrow?" Slayton asks. "If there isn't some practical impact, we are wasting our time."

Praying for Intel

Immigrant-owned enterprises are now a majority of all start-up corporations in the Valley. A quick drive down Highway 101 to the south end of the Valley brings into view via Technologies, where an openly born-again executive, Chen Wen-chi, is turning his company away from its reputation as a cold-blooded attack dog in the chipmaking business to being both competitive and compassionate.

You would not guess, at first appearance, that Chen is head of the third-largest chipmaker in the world. He moves diffidently, even shyly, down the hall, in his rumpled black suit, white shirt, and dark tie. His calm and alert exterior signals his intelligence, discernment, and an ability to plan ahead. He quickly checks off the large and small changes he has made in the company to glorify Christ: strategic decision meetings preceded by prayer in every via facility worldwide, Bible studies and praise sessions at the end of the work week, and increased attention to needs in the local community.

"We don't just plop a factory down and forget the community now. We help with water treatment and give engineering scholarships," Chen says. "Even our chip names—Joshua, Samuel, Ezra—tell of our business struggles and how God has led us." Yet at first the feisty chipmaker put off invitations to attend church with replies like "You have got to be kidding! I tried it!"

Chen took a job at via Technologies in 1987, becoming CEO in 1993. Chen thought he couldn't fail, but he did. Under his leadership, the company foundered. Intel sued to put via out of business over patent infringements.

Suffering business pressure each weekday, he dismissed friends' invitations to church so he could catch up on his sleep. Whether he was in Taiwan, Hong Kong, China, or Silicon Valley, Chen's answer was always "No, I'm not interested."

But Chen couldn't sleep on any continent. He says he wasn't bothered by the state of business as much as by his feeling that the crisis showed he lacked some essential ingredient of life. He tried diets, fortunetelling, and more work. One of via's owners kept suggesting he go to church.

Finally, he says, "I thought I would give God a challenge. I asked, 'Lead me to believe you.'" His Christian friends joined in the prayer, though his older friends were more skeptical. "It was [God's] miracle that I changed. It took place by God continually placing challenges before me. Then in 1995 I decided the Bible is a logical book, and I became a Christian."

Chen announced his decision to his astonished employees. He and the chairwoman of his board started to pray that God would save the company and transform it to his glory. Chen knew that his life and his company were being changed fundamentally. He saw answers to prayer and old business partnerships renewed. His friends and acquaintances from earlier days do a double take when they see his big, dog-eared Bible flop on the table during business meetings.

"God is placing me in Silicon Valley so I can be his servant here," he says. "And it gives me more rewards. They now come from within. Before, I would fluctuate like the stock market." His view of business has changed, Chen says with a wry smile. "I even pray for the people at Intel now!"

Stepping Through God's Doors

Many other Christian executives are fighting for the survival of their firms, however, and some will lose. Katherine Leary, a New York transplant in Silicon Valley and the top executive with the distance-learning start-up Pensare, recently tried to merge her firm with another in a desperate attempt at financial viability.

Pensare started out with great buzz in 1997. There were the legendary founders like Dean Hovey, an entrepreneur sought by Steve Jobs for advice on designing the look for Apple Computer's Macintosh line. There were the education superstars like Harvard Business School, which adopted Pensare's system of delivering a high-quality graduate education and advice to corporate executives via the Internet. In January Mother Jones magazine featured Pensare as one of the two important shapers of a new high-tech style of long-distance learning. But inside the company there were round-the-clock meetings on how to survive.

"As a Christian, there is a huge opportunity when you are running a company to help find a road map through the confusion that goes on when you are going under, having a takeover, or layoffs, We have burned $37 million in four years and only have $1.5 million revenue to show for it," Leary says.

In spring 2000, the company was diving hard after three years of happy chaos. The CEO was a great Foosball (table soccer) player, and one cofounder claimed to be the best Foosball player in the Valley. While executives huddled in the back game room, creditors pounded at the front door.

Leary had resolved to quit, even though she originally had believed Pensare was a closed door that God had opened. Leary had played it safe in New York's corporate world for years, but she had a sense that she was more afraid of change than standing for Christ. Eventually she embraced change, taking a position at Pensare. After three difficult years, she went to the CEO and resigned.

"You can't resign because I am quitting first," he told a stunned Leary. She stumbled home in a daze. "I prayed, 'God, I thought we were really clear on this!'" The same day she intended to resign, Leary took over the CEO's job. "I believe that God put me in these circumstances for one reason or another. He cares as much about the job I do here as what I do in church."

But in March, the curtain on Pensare came down quickly. Leary was having lunch when she took a call from a Philadelphia executive, whose firm decided not to buy out Pensare. Within days, the first of 80 Pensare workers were laid off without severance pay. Within weeks, Pensare filed for bankruptcy and an auctioneer sold off its physical assets and products.

In late June, Leary, told CT, "We tried to be as noble as we could in shutting down Pensare." Workers gave her and another executive a standing ovation minutes after the layoffs were announced.

Leary said she has struggled with guilt since the firm closed, trying to determine what she could have done differently. "If there is a little personal hell, that is what it is. You go over every single move you made."

Leary told CT that her pastor pointed out to her that Peter didn't walk on water until he got "out of the boat." For Leary, getting out of the boat means leaving the corporate world for a job at Menlo Park Presbyterian. Leary will focus on the field of business leadership. "There is little relevant stuff about how to work, how to balance, break new ground."

Jumping off a Cliff

In Silicon Valley, financial risk-taking is a premier sport. Milo Medin, head of technology at ExciteAtHome, a leading broadband Internet service provider, once said the company could succeed only by investors' throwing themselves off a cliff. He had few volunteers.

But Medin's coworkers at ExciteAtHome understand: an emblem of the firm's whimsical, risk-taking culture is a slide that allows workers to move between floors at their headquarters.

"Two years ago, our network put on a lot of users," Medin told CT in an interview. "We needed a new backbone structure unlike anything anyone had built before."

He needed investors badly, and he told venture capitalists that they needed to bet the company on his new high-speed Internet structure. Even for ExciteAtHome, the risk was unnerving. "It was not a conservative bet," Medin says.

Much of Medin's credibility comes from his success in advocating TCP/IP (a computer protocol for the Internet) while he worked at NASA's Ames Research Center. "He's evangelical in his approach," recalls Christine Falsetti, project manager for NASA's research and education network. "Milo marshaled the fight to make TCP/IP the de facto standard."

ExciteAtHome is a joint venture of two companies: Excite—which hosts the world's fourth-largest Internet portal after AOL, Yahoo, and MSN—and At Home, a broadband Internet service. At Home's broadband system is Medin's brainchild. The reason he's about to bet the company on his plan is because of his faith in Christ. "Christians can be more aggressive risk-takers in the Valley," Medin says. "Our values are not wrapped up in business and career."

Before getting the go ahead, he asked himself, "What if nobody will do it the way we want?" He checked his engineering and he checked himself. "My answer was that God has put me here and led me along this path, so it will work out how he wants."

ExciteAtHome has taken Medin's bet, and Medin's souped-up network may rescue the company from other woes. As a Bank of America analyst puts it, Medin's network is a hidden jewel that will become the crown jewel. If it does, the execution of the business will fall largely on the shoulders of fellow Christian Byron Smith, the head of the consumer broadband unit.

Having managed consumer brands like Downy fabric softener and Mr. Clean for Procter & Gamble, and created the One Rate plan for AT&T, Smith came to ExciteAtHome a year ago to help the company market Medin's system.

Smith and Medin faced some hard questions when they proposed restrictions against pornography and adult chat rooms (called "clubs" at Excite). "The people here are incredibly libertarian, but at the same time, they are very ethical about their work, and to the stockholders." Smith and Medin were able to join forces to rein in the smut on the Excite Web site. They had to convince libertarian-minded executives that some boundaries are good. "I tried to draw some lines," Smith recalls. He appealed to the libertarian ethic and the good of the company. "There is some frankly illegal stuff going on, but it is very hard to control," he says. Smith also argued that the pornographic chat rooms were growing so fast that it was costing the company too much to carry them. "The bad stuff takes over."

Playing the Lord's Way

Guinness says that Silicon Valley Christians may draw inspiration from William Wilberforce's Clapham Circle, a group of 18th-century Christian friends and industrialists who focused attention on England's social ills and on developing moral leadership. "Wilberforce was on the board of 69 different initiatives at one time, from founding the first Bible society to abolishing slavery to establishing the national art gallery," says Guinness.

Yang, for his part, is a key supporter of a new Christian university in Korea. Slayton, who worships at a poor and predominantly African-American church in Palo Alto, champions Christian microenterprise development in poor countries. Nonetheless, spiritual renewal in Silicon Valley is just beginning. It will take decades to determine if, in fact, the renewal will have a lasting influence.

In the meantime, Slayton says the future of Silicon Valley hangs in the balance, and Christian business leaders play a critical role in being a moral counterweight to the pursuit of wealth and success.

Thousands of private planes take off and land at the airport just around the corner from Slayton's office in Palo Alto. Across the street sits the stately Ming's Chinese Restaurant, the regular site of multimillion- and multibillion-dollar deals. Slayton's own company hasn't done too badly either, seeing a 1,300 percent increase in revenue from third quarter 1999 to third quarter 2000. The Jaguars and Benzes flow along the street onto the entrance ramp of Highway 101 in front of Slayton's office.

"It is never quite enough," Slayton says. He knows. At one point he was so busy running a previous company that he forgot his wife's birthday and his promises to be together on their wedding anniversary. He learned that he needed to play the game in the Lord's way. "I have told Marina a hundred times since then that she was right. Now I rarely work on Sunday."

Slayton encourages all his employees to do the same, and to go home no later than 7:30 each evening. Slayton and his fellow Christians, Chen, Leary, and Medin, are redefining community, business, success, and risk.

"If you are willing to bet your job on your beliefs, you can go a long way," says Medin's oft-repeated war cry. Christians in high tech realize that the second act of the Internet revolution may see its power brokers trade their shattered dreams for God's grace and truth.

Tony Carnes is CT's senior news writer and the editor, with Anna Karpathakis, of New York Glory: Religions in the City (New York University Press).

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

A ready-to-download Bible Study on this article is available at ChristianBibleStudies.com. These unique Bible studies use articles from current issues of Christianity Today to prompt thought-provoking discussions in adult Sunday school classes or small groups.

Related articles appearing on our site today include A Church for Internet Entrepreneurs and Reporting with the Top Down.

Silicon Valley Fellowship is a community of Bay Area business professionals that equips and encourages its members in their pursuit of Christ-like living and a transformed Silicon Valley.

When Electronic Business recently profiled Wen-Chi Chen, he came to the interview Bible in hand.

Companies discussed in the article include: mySimon.com, NetGeo.com, Hewlett-Packard, Apple Computer, ClickAction.com, and Excite@Home.

"The Silicon Valley" name is derived from the dense concentration of electronics and computer companies there since the mid-20th century.

A December 2000 study found more Internet users log on for religious purposes than for many secular reasons.

Tal Brooke's Spirtual Counterfeits Project is online. His book Virtual Gods is available at Amazon.com and other book retailers.

Read January's Mother Jones article on Pensare and long-distance learning.

Pura Vida Coffee's Web site offers five kinds of coffee and more information on where their money goes.

Previous Christianity Today coverage of Pura Vida includes:

Coffee Sales Perk Up Ministry Support | Pura Vida has donated $10,000 to missions and aid organizations. (Jan. 10, 2000)

Coffee That Cares | A Costa Rican church underwrites an urban outreach effort with premium coffee sales." (Oct. 5, 1998)

Ideas

A Church for Internet Entrepreneurs

Grace Presbyterian had a Web site before it even had Sunday services

In Silicon Valley, many churches are taking as much advantage of new technology as start-up corporations. One new congregation in Los Altos, near Sunnyvale, had a Web site before holding its first worship service.

Drew Fields, pastor of the start-up Grace Presbyterian, quit his job at a Wall Street investment bank specializing in media, attended seminary, then joined the staff of Redeemer Presbyterian in Manhattan.

But his latest passion is launching Grace Presbyterian as a church designed to specialize in outreach to Internet entrepreneurs.

Once Fields decided to lose his New York suit, the Valley’s infectious enthusiasm for the next new thing started to grip him. He was pleasantly surprised by how a Web site could create a church before it was ever founded.

“We are doing a non-normal church-planting. So, we became like a typical dot-com. A buzz started before we even arrived,” Fields tells CT. “We already had a gathering of people, though we didn’t live here in the Valley.”

Former members of Redeemer Presbyterian had called Fields to tell him that a church such as Redeemer, which emphasized reaching young urban professionals, was urgently needed in Silicon Valley.

Many Silicon Valley workers are curious about spiritual issues, although religion is not pursued with the same vigor as are money and pleasure.

“Overall, what has impressed me is the unbelievable busyness of people,” Fields says. “If you aren’t there first with a business idea, then someone else will get there before you.”

If Silicon Valley residents are not working at “their really cool, cutting edge job,” they want “really cool play,” he says.

A local anthropologist says that Valley residents are not so much irreligious as unconnected with a church community. “We had somehow bought into the idea that this was the heartland of godless atheism, and that’s not true at all,” says Jan English-Luek of San Jose State University.

The new attenders of Fields’s church start-up are eager for new friendships. An accountant at Price Waterhouse Coopers recalls the time a coworker came into work one day declaring, “No social life, no dates, and only fellows!”

It is not just the lack of social outings that leaves people lonely. “I had no friends outside work for five months,” the accountant says, “until this church’s Bible study in October.”

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

Related articles appearing on our site today include The Silicon Valley Saints and Reporting with the Top Down.

The Grace Presbyterian web site offers information and ministry connections. The church’s former site, Silicon Valley Project, is also still online.

Ideas

Silicon Values

Digital culture’s relentless critic, Paulina Borsook, discusses the ‘religion’ of Silicon Valley and its virtual extensions

Paulina Borsook was an early and nearly solitary critic of the excesses of Silicon Valley and its virtual extensions. She argued, against the conventional wisdom, that wealth and technology were not the greatest goods in today’s society. Raised in a Jewish home, a member of the American Civil Liberties Union at age 14, the former contributor to Wired now describes herself as a “secular humanist and fierce civil libertarian.” With her recent book Cyberselfish: A Critical Romp through the Terribly Libertarian Culture of High Tech (Public Affairs, 2001), Borsook has only cemented her position as a prophetic voice in today’s high-tech wilderness. She recently spoke with Helen Lee, a former editor at Christianity Today who is now CEO of SmartBride.com, about the values of Silicon Valley and its influence on society at large.

Could you describe the tenets of the “religion” espoused by the high-tech community?

The beliefs include things like “Technology is the solution to all human problems,” “The market is the true test of everything,” “Money is the highest good,” and “All government and regulation is bad.”

There is also an overreliance on the spreadsheet way of knowledge, which says that if it can’t be quantified, then it has no value. In the high-tech world, the intuitive and subjective is bad. If you can’t count it, it doesn’t exist. So I ask, How do you quantify social services or art? Do these things have no value because they are nonquantifiable?

How much have the cultural changes prevalent in Silicon Valley migrated to the rest of America?

The other incredibly toxic aspect of this culture is the narcissism of the high-tech community. These people have bought into the idea that they are part of the best, most important, most innovative thing that’s ever happened. And anyone who is outside it doesn’t add any value.

The high-tech culture is not divorced from the rest of society; it is an exacerbation and exaggeration of what’s going on in society as a whole. The ’80s were another time of cuckoo financial speculation, when the economy was about “winner takes all” rather than being about what companies were actually doing. What happened more recently in high tech was just an extension of that financial system and an exaggeration of what’s been in play for years.

The question is, What are our value systems as a society? The stockholder theory of value has become dominant over the last 20 years, and what’s crazy is that a company’s highest priority is now to its stockholders, not to its customers, certainly not to its employees, or to its community. Most people today have a 401K, a retirement fund, and they want to see their portfolios going up, and those portfolio managers want to see quarter-by-quarter returns—so in a terrible way, we’re all playing a part in the fact that stockholder value is taking over everything.

Are we seeing this attitude change now that the days of easy money seem to be behind us?

I don’t know yet; it’s a little early to tell. I have to wonder, with the Nasdaq sinking and dot-coms dying, what are people going to fall back on? If they’ve been taught that money is the only and best good and that the market is the best test, what are they left with? I wonder about the people who felt that money was the only thing worth having, that the wealth somehow proved you were a hip, evolved, wise person, but now what? Are you not as evolved?

Has Silicon Valley changed in light of all this?

With all this real dot-com kookiness gone away, perhaps there’s going to be a resurgence of craft over wealth, people attracted to this stuff only because they like it instead of wanting to just get rich quick from it.

I feel like there’s a lot less arrogance on the streets of Silicon Valley, and that’s nice. Practically speaking, the traffic isn’t nearly as heavy; the difference is palpable! You can feel that people are moving away, that people aren’t acting as though they are the dot-com kings anymore. The irrational exuberance is gone. I also sense that people are having a hard time financially. More people are out of work, or are not finding work.

Given that more people might be questioning their value systems, do you think there might be a new openness in high-tech circles to spirituality?

Market corrections can help bring sensibility back. It causes a needed cognitive dissonance: “If we are the masters of the universe, and there is endless prosperity, and this is a new economy, and it’s the best thing that ever happened, then what happened?” Hopefully people will not just see that they’re broke but that maybe the whole value proposition was wrong.

There is a relationship between the pagan community and the high-tech community that is very strong; it has been there for years and will never go away. And that’s spirituality of a kind. I think people are hungry for connection, and where I see it in an icky way is in the interest in Erhard Seminars Training, now called Landmark Forum. It’s a human-potential movement, with a culty, weird rhetoric. The same stuff has morphed into a couple of incarnations and is very popular in the high-tech community because it’s a shortcut to questions such as, What should I do with my life? What are my values? How should I act? How can I be a more effective human being?

Has technology impeded people in this industry from fostering true human connections?

I see this as being a stand-in for those who want community and spirituality. A lot of people going through this are single, or going through a divorce, and what is appealing about this movement to geeks in particular is that a lot of it is dressed up as technology. It’s algorithmic, a step-by-step problem-solving.

We crave intimacy and we fear it. The Net can give you a marvelous feeling of pseudointimacy, but I would never tell people that what they’re experiencing online isn’t real. Particularly in high tech, where work is the only thing in your life, the online avenue may be the only way to have a connection that’s human. But although technology has value, it’s not a replacement for the real thing. It is good for some things, but not the same thing as having neighbors and friends.

In Cyberselfish you imply that the high-tech culture, with its libertarian values, affected much of society. How much so?

On a plane I once sat next to an evangelical Christian who has been in the pc industry for 20 or 30 years, and after our conversation, I concluded that if he had been living in a different part of the country, involved in a different line of work, I am almost sure he would have been much more socially conservative. But the libertarian, I-don’t-care-what-you-do values in California were trumping his professed belief system. I don’t think he knew where it came from, and I don’t think he realized he was different from what his equivalent would have been in another line of work in another part of the country.

I think it’s first important to identify the beast: you need to recognize and understand the beliefs that the high-tech community is proposing. But you don’t have to buy into them, and when these issues come up in your own communities, schools, libraries, or investment choices, you will be able to make the right decisions. Regimes change, but culture perseveres. High tech is going to continue to influence our culture, so it’s important to know that although you can be affected by this culture, you don’t have to be.

Do we have anything to fear as a culture from technology’s presence in our everyday life?

Since the late ’60s, we’ve become increasingly media-saturated, and that to me is problematic. It blows my mind that people will go hiking and bring their cell phones with them. Or go hiking and bring their laptops but not enough water! We live in such mediated environments now, and we need to make efforts not to be bombarded with it all the time.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

Last week, Christianity Today examined how Christians are influencing Silicon Valley. Articles in that package include:

Silicon Saints | High-tech Christian executives are bringing biblical values into a mecca of Mammon. (July 27, 2001)

A Church for Internet Entrepreneurs | Grace Presbyterian had a Web site before it even had Sunday services. (July 27, 2001)

Reporting with the Top Down | Behind Tony Carnes’s reporting on Silicon Valley churches. (July 27, 2001)

“Cyberselfish” originally appeared as an essay in Mother Jones, which also published a follow-up article.

Cyberselfish.com offers excerpts from the book and information about Boorsook.

Archived Wired magazine articles by Borsook include “The Anarchist,” “How Anarchy Works,” and “The Accidental Zillionaire.”

Borsook’s Cyberselfish: A Critical Romp through the Terribly Libertarian Culture of High Tech is available at Amazon.com and other book retailers. Audible.com has it in audio format.

“The Silicon Valley” name is derived from the dense concentration of electronics and computer companies there since the mid-20th century.

Helen Lee, formerly of Christianity Today, is now CEO of SmartBride.com and assistant publisher of re:generation quarterly.

Pay No Attention to that Man Behind the Curtain

The electronic wizardry that helps Billy Graham tell the old, old story to millions

Billy Graham is not the great Oz, but he does rely on a lot of technological stuff behind the scenes to make him larger than life: to wit, the gadgetry that allows the multitudes to see him on dual Jumbotron screens. Last summer’s crusade in Nashville was the first to be broadcast via the Internet, albeit tape-delayed (see webcast.billygraham.org for the Fresno crusade in October and www.billygraham.org for updates on Graham crusade activity generally).

Behind the powerful public presence there was a little man, Rodney Morris, hidden away in the sound module of a video truck, who ensured that Graham’s voice boomed appropriately throughout Adelphia Coliseum and, later, in local tv broadcasts throughout the nation. A brief peek at the inner workings of the devices that electronically handle God’s message of hope.

Audio Master Tapes

The tapes are used for radio broadcasts of Hour of Decision and Decision Today, and go into the BGEA archives. Usually four copies are made. They also represent a technological record of the sowing of spiritual seed: During the Nashville crusade, which drew record-breaking crowds to Adelphia Coliseum, 4,903 people made initial professions of faith in Christ as Lord and Savior.

Preview Television Monitor

If you’re the sound engineer, you may like to know what the video technicians are cutting to next, so as not to be caught flatfooted when the next person speaking/singing/ shouting opens his mouth.

Audio Console Video Monitor

A computer reminds you of the various elements that you’re supposed to be tracking—volume, equalization, what sources are routed to what outputs—on this digital console. As a bona fide computer, it not only monitors but executes commands. For example, it can store the volume and tone control settings for Michael W. Smith (obtained during rehearsal), whose ensemble uses 46 microphones.

Individual Input Metering

Allows you to see the relative intensity of each sound source; useful for instantly determining which microphones are in use. Crusade technicians use up to 152 microphones on a busy night. This requires an equivalent of over 14 miles of individual microphone cables when the truck is 500 feet from the stage.

Aural Dicrostulator

Dicrostic is not in The American Heritage Dictionary, and BGEA technicians say it was easier to invent this term than to remember what it’s really called. But it can add digital reverberation (echo) to any voice or instrument that needs it, as well as eliminate any annoying dither. Dither refers to the ambiguity between two digital states, “somewhat analogous to a centuries-old Balkan border conflict,” BGEA technician Wally Duguid says.

Individual Camera Monitors

These allow you to see what’s happening on stage and around the venue. A typical crusade uses seven cameras: Two cover the main podium and performers’ faces, two hand-held cameras on stage show close-ups of the musicians and instruments, two crane cameras follow or generate movement and capture audience responses. One “high/wide” is in position to show the whole crowd—71,800 on the third night of the June 2000 crusade in Nashville.

Program Monitor

This screen shows you what people will be seeing on their televisions or, put another way, what just happened. If you see something happening on this screen without hearing it, it’s too late to do anything about it—except take sound off continually recorded backup microphones to insert into the tape-delayed broadcasts.

Program Runsheet

Sometimes ignored once the program starts, this is the scripted order of events. Innovative speakers on the platform, musicians arriving late after delayed flights, and other contingencies can quickly make it irrelevant.

Musician-to-Technology Interface Buffer Unit

Otherwise known as the sound mixer or engineer, Rodney Morris has primary responsibility for mediating any unpleasant audio conflict between crusade musicians and the tape machines.

Thrashulator

Named after longtime BGEA sound engineer and technical consultant Bill Thrasher, this device removes acoustic feedback, the howling or squealing peals emanating from rogue microphones. Technological advances notwithstanding, there is still no real-time cure for the common whining microphone.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Bridging the Digital Divide

How one Toronto mission is bringing computer literacy to inner-city kids

“Forget adults. Focus on children,” a business executive told Rick Tobias, director of Toronto’s Yonge Street Mission (YSM).

Tobias’s original plan had been to teach impoverished adults and single moms computer literacy so they could get jobs. But when Tobias asked businesses if they would hire YSM’s grads, they laughed. They told him bluntly that a lack of white-collar social skills—never mind computer literacy—barred most poor people from employment in Toronto’s silver and gold office towers.

What to do? Taking the business community’s counsel to heart, Tobias decided to shift his focus to younger students, who could break the cycle of socioeconomic depression in their community.

Named after Toronto’s most famous street, the Yonge Street Mission has for more than a century served the urban poor—everyone from newly arrived refugees to homeless people who sleep on city grates during the winter. Most of YSM’s clientele live in southeast-central Toronto, an area dominated by Regent Park, a subsidized housing development with a 50 percent unemployment rate.

Regent Park looks like a prison without bars—it doesn’t need them. The children here face steep odds against finding living-wage employment in the wired world. They have 66 percent less access to computers than other children in Toronto. Teachers try hard, but poor schools throughout Canada seldom have enough money for classroom computers.

Canada’s situation mirrors that of the United States. A 1998 study by the U.S. Department of Commerce worried that “while computer penetration has increased nationwide, there is still a significant ‘digital divide’ based on race, income, and other demographic characteristics.” For example, 51 percent of U.S. households own computers, but the numbers decrease to 28.7 percent among inner-city African Americans and 31 percent among Hispanics.

Going from computerless homes to computerless classrooms, many children are being educated for irrelevance to the 21st century economy. And irrelevance of any kind has a devastating effect. “By the time our children hit grade 5, they are emotionally dropping out of school,” Tobias says, “and by the time they hit grade 10, they have dropped out, period.” He hopes that introducing youths to computers at an early age will help reverse those trends.

Earning a Bright Future

When Tobias marketed his retooled computer-literacy program—providing hardware, training, and software for elementary students—both business and local educators were enthusiastic. td Securities, the Toronto-Dominion Bank’s stockbrokerage arm, became YSM’s prime partner, helping to build and fund a computer lab. Microsoft Canada chipped in with free software for the lab and for graduates of the program. Dozens of business people volunteer with the program as well.

YSM began cautiously in 1999 with a 12-week course that covered word processing, database, spreadsheet, graphics, and typing skills. Kids who passed a final exam got a refurbished Pentium computer to take home, loaded with up-to-date software.

“We talk about it as a learn-and-earn program,” Tobias says. “We do not tell the kids we are giving them a computer. We tell the kids they are earning a computer.”

Rachel, 13, is excited about the prospect of receiving a home computer. She had tried using computers but did not get far because she did not know how to type, a skill she is now learning at the mission.

Julie, 11, drifted into the program with a friend and stayed, determined to get a computer. She says a computer with Internet access would help put her in touch with the world outside Regent Park. “If I do a project I can get information. I can also get information from my friends and my cousins,” who are scattered through Vietnam and the United States.

YSM has graduated five classes to date, with 176 out of 200 students passing, and has placed computers in more than 150 homes. The program’s success makes the mission the largest supplier of information technology in the neighborhood. The lab has recently added a six-week Internet course. Passing students (and their families) will get ten years of free Internet access at home, courtesy of the Royal Bank and AOL-Canada, to see them through school.

The Ultimate Test

When Christianity Today visited Yonge Street Mission recently, the computer classes started late so students could attend a school-sponsored antiviolence response rally—sparked by a shooting death near the elementary school. The lab is directly across the street from Regent Park, behind YSM’s used clothing store, several doors down from an abortion clinic, and half a block from a small park “owned” by career drunks and drug users.

The program is bursting with kids, mostly of Caribbean, Middle Eastern, and south Asian origin. When one boy tried to sneak a friend in, coordinator April Binnie told him that the friend could listen but there were no available computers.

The fourth- through sixth-grade class was learning to build Web pages. They peered intently as a volunteer from a local Web design company showed them how to capture an image file and place it on a Web page.

The seventh- and eighth-graders were eagerly tackling a graphic-arts assignment: Choose a corporate logo and reproduce it in ClarisWorks. As Binnie and a volunteer circulated and offered suggestions, there was no “acting out,” just a low, continuing hum from the workstations.

Before earning his computer, Marlon, 12, had to go “all over” to access the Internet. Now, with his own machine, he’s building a Web page. He looks forward to being able to use the Internet at home: “If I have projects, I could do it right at my house instead of staying at school a long time.”

YSM does not, as a matter of policy, directly proselytize the children, who are mostly Muslim or Hindu. More subtle forms of evangelism are not discouraged, though. The word-processing exercise, for example, offers the students the chance to adorn the text of 1 Corinthians 13 with color printing and artwork—and the best examples are prominently displayed.

So far, Tobias and his staff are pleased with the way the program is working. “Teachers in our community now tell us that the kids coming out of our lab teach not only the other students but the teachers,” he says. “All of a sudden, they go from being stigmatized and not doing very well to having a skill even the teachers don’t have.”

YSM’s goal is to position poor kids for a shot at well-paying jobs. Toward that goal, a course in computer rebuilding and repair is also in the planning stages.

“This computer lab runs as a prime model of what can happen when faith communities and businesses partner together,” Tobias says. One key difference: In Canada, the “digital divide” is driven by income, not race. Thus the political risks for businesses that get involved may be lower.

The ultimate test of YSM’s computer lab is not whether students are online. It is whether business will really hire them four to five years from now for career-starting summer jobs. So far, several supporting companies, including td Securities, have said yes. Tobias says YSM eventually will provide a job-etiquette course for applicants, to teach critical skills that students do not learn at home or school.

“It will take five or ten years to know the full impact,” he says. “But what we know already is that our kids are doing better than before. The teachers are excited. Those are good enough outcomes for us at this stage.”

Denyse O’Leary is a journalist in Toronto and author of the forthcoming book Faith@Science: Why Science Needs Faith in the 21st Century (J. Gordon Shillingford).

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

Yonge Street Mission’s online site includes good information on the organization, volunteer opportunities and a quarterly newsletter.

Other Christianity Today articles on discipleship in the digital age include:

Silicon Saints | High-tech Christian executives are bringing biblical values into a mecca of Mammon. (July 27, 2001)

A Church for Internet Entrepreneurs | Grace Presbyterian had a Web site before it even had Sunday services. (July 27, 2001)

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube