Narnia isn't racist or sexist—just universalist
After the September 11 terrorist attacks, it seems like Weblog should be discussing C.S. Lewis's "Learning in War-Time" rather than The Chronicles of Narnia. Nevertheless, no one is debating whether Lewis's October 22, 1939, speech (reprinted in The Weight of Glory, The Essential C.S. Lewis) is being bastardized by a greedy cabal. And despite the 9/11 horrors, the not-quite-last battle for Narnia continues. The latest volley comes from prolific commentator Gregg Easterbrook in The Atlantic Monthly. "Although Narnia has survived countless perils, the Chronicles themselves are now endangered," he begins. "On one front they face the dubious honor of corporate marketing. On another literary voices have begun to denounce them as racist and sexist works." Since the former front has garnered much more publicity in America that the former, Easterbrook quickly sums it up and moves on. He'd rather address "a fad of anti-Narnia writing in Britain" led by Philip Pullman, whose His Dark Materials trilogy "are driven by the premise that God is evil—a celestial impostor who pretends to have created the universe and who so intensely hates flesh and blood that he wants people to live a repressed, joyless existence followed by hell, even for the righteous."

Like a recent "defense" of The Chronicles of Narnia by The New York Times Book Review's Judith Shulevitz, Easterbrook admits that in reading the books to his children, he winced at certain points. "But does having characters say darkies make Lewis racist?" he asks. "Does leaving Susan back in London attending dull parties make him sexist?" His rhetorical question suggests that it does not. But then Easterbrook goes on to defend Narnia because, above all, it seems to deviate from Christian orthodox teachings:

In Narnia, after all, heaven has an open-door policy. In the final book of the Chronicles, Emeth, a noble Calormene, dies trying to save others. Emeth (Truth in Hebrew) then finds himself in heaven, being praised by Aslan, and asks why he has been permitted to enter when in life he worshipped in a rival faith. Aslan tells Emeth that the specifics of religion do not matter: virtue is what's important, and paradise awaits anyone of good will. This seems an up-to-date message—and a reason the Narnia books should stand exactly as they are.

Maybe it's time for a moratorium on people "defending" C.S. Lewis.

Outlaw miracles, says Kenyan columnist
Here's an idea from Nairobi's The Nation newspaper: hold faith healers to truth-in-advertising laws. Columnist Wycliffe Muga argues it's the only way "to put an end to the evangelical conmanship which has been a thriving industry in Kenya for so many years now." He also calls for "a Miracle Verification Centre established by an Act of Parliament and operating under the independent control of the Kenya Medical Association." Those whose miracles cannot be regularly authenticated "could thereafter continue to preach the gospel if they so wish; but they should not be allowed to advertise miracle crusades or to publicise their claims to being able to perform miracles." After all, Muga argues, Jesus told a healed leper to show himself to the priest for authentication and he and his apostles never hung "Come and receive your miracle" banners around Jerusalem. (But of course, Muga is wrong when he says, "Miracle healing was not done in concealment.")

Article continues below

Pacifism, just war, and other Christian responses to the 9/11 attacks:

Judgment Day:

Article continues below
  • Giving repentance a bad name | There is nothing novel about the impulse of people, in times of calamity, to ask, "Am I living right?" (Al Knight, The Denver Post)



Roman Catholicism:

Related Elsewhere

See our past Weblog updates:
October 2
September 28 | 27 | 26 | 25 | 24
September 21 | 20 | 19 | 18 | 17
September 14b | 14a | 13 | 12 | 10
September 7 | 6 | 5 | 4
August 31 | 30 | 29 | 28 | 27
August 24 | 23 | 22 | 20
August 17 | 16 | 15 | 14 |13
August 10 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 6