News

If You Give a Tsunami Survivor a Crayon

Ministries in Sulawesi, Indonesia, engage kids in a crucial first step in trauma healing: play.

Christianity Today November 27, 2018
Jon Krause

In a church in the bayside city of Palu, Indonesia, volunteers smile wide as they lead dozens of children in sing-alongs with hand motions. They pass around coloring pages with packs of crayons and colored pencils. The group sits cross-legged on the white tile floor, hands folded in their laps, to pray together.

It looks like a typical day at Sunday School—and that’s the point. Because outside of the walls of GPID Manunggal Palu, these kids’ world is a disaster zone.

A 7.5-magnitude earthquake struck nearby in late September, causing a massive tsunami, aftershocks, and mudslides that killed more than 2,000 of their neighbors—including hundreds of students at a Bible camp. Their streets are unrecognizable, with crumbled buildings and buckled roads. They’ve lost homes, electricity—and normalcy.

“The kids miss their normal routine,” said Priscilla Christin, spokesperson for World Vision Indonesia. “Routines like school are especially important when children have experienced a scary event.”

Days after the earthquake, ministries rushed to provide safe spaces and trauma recovery programs specifically for kids, who often can’t process what has happened or what they’re feeling as readily as adults. “They lack both the language and life experience to understand what they’re going through,” said Jamie Aten, founder and executive director of the Humanitarian Disaster Institute (HDI) at Wheaton College.

Relief charities like World Vision and Samaritan’s Purse have seen on the ground what researchers like Aten have concluded: Even basic care—like a safe location, kids to play with, and someone to talk to—can go a long way toward reducing long-term trauma.

“If you’re meeting the physical needs of a child, know—according to the research that we’ve done—you’re also attending to that child’s emotional well-being and their spiritual well-being and even social well-being,” said Aten, who studied children’s responses to disasters such as the San Francisco earthquake and Hurricane Katrina.

“All of those parts of who we are, that make us human, are all interconnected. When we’re able to intervene in one area, it starts to minister to other parts of that person.”

Across Indonesia’s Central Sulawesi province, nearly a half-million children were affected by the disaster. More than 2,700 school buildings were reported destroyed, so churches and ministries opened their doors to offer kids a place to go beside the makeshift tents their families now live in.

Within three weeks after the disaster, more than 1,000 kids—Muslim and Christian alike—were regularly showing up at World Vision sites across the province. At these “child-friendly spaces,” they could play, sing, draw, and socialize, with the help and direction of trained facilitators. “When we ask them how they feel, some of the children would remain silent, staring at a blank space,” Christin said.

In crisis mode, many little kids have the same big questions as their parents: What will we do next? Why did this happen to us? Where was God?

“Giving them a safe space to play, to learn, to be a child, helps reconstitute themselves, to build confidence. You want to give them opportunities to express themselves, to talk,” said Ken Isaacs, vice president of programs and government relations at Samaritan’s Purse.

In addition to the basic necessities, children need “psycho-social activities, an encouragement, a hug,” he said. “They need to know there’s going to be a tomorrow.”

Unable to deploy teams on the ground due to government restrictions, Samaritan’s Purse coordinated relief efforts in Central Sulawesi through its local church partners in the world’s most populous Muslim country. Christians make up about 10 percent of the population in Palu but up to 60 percent in some surrounding villages, Isaacs said.

The Indonesian Protestant Church in Donggala (GPID), the biggest Protestant denomination in the province, suffered major losses. A GPID Bible camp outside Palu moved nearly a kilometer in a mudslide, burying more than 200 high school students in the mud and rubble.

Aid workers with World Help searched for survivors in surrounding villages, spotting baby strollers in front of collapsed wooden houses and pulling tiny bodies out from the mud.

GPID focused its trauma counseling programs on children, while also reaching out to visit members who lost loved ones or homes, said board member and pastor Yance Darmawan.

The magnitude of loss also weighed on workers and volunteers. David Soetedjo with Indonesian Care, an urban ministry partnering in the relief efforts, asked for prayers for God to continue to enable the workers tasked with providing psychological and spiritual assistance.

“God has suffered with survivors.” ~ Yuberlian Padele, Tentena Theological Seminary

Even worship itself can be a vehicle for routine and normalcy for families after disaster, HDI research indicates.

In Central Sulawesi, Christians began the healing process in worship services, one song and sermon at a time. Some gathered in the grounds where their sanctuaries once stood or held impromptu services at evacuation sites. Congregants tried to balance their sense of trauma with hope that God would bring restoration and renewal, Darmawan said.

In church buildings that withstood the devastation, the tragedy lingered. At Bethany Fresh Anointing, an evangelical church in Palu, the worship band’s keyboardist played in the church’s first gathering since the disaster, even though his home had been destroyed and his wife and son were still missing. On the church’s Facebook page, church members commemorated the dead in comment threads, praying that the youngest victims among them are now in the arms of Jesus.

At Immanuel Church, another evangelical congregation in Palu, the empty pews serve as stark reminders of the friends and neighbors who were trapped or fled after the earthquake. Attendance has dropped from 2,000 to just 300, and church leaders wonder how they will maintain their ministries without the community to fund and support them.

“The church is very instrumental in maintaining the faith of the people,” said Yuberlian Padele, rector of Tentena Theological Seminary and former general chairperson of the Central Sulawesi Christian Church (GKST), a major Reformed denomination in Indonesia.

Several Salvation Army congregations in Central Sulawesi immediately organized open kitchens and temporary schools and reached out to serve their Muslim neighbors. “We are the same victims of the tsunami,” said Major Santi White. At churches, she said, you can tell that the Christian community “is very close to God” in the midst of the recovery. “They feel fear of the Lord.”

As they look to the future of the faith they hope to pass down to the next generation, local Christians have to reconcile the physical destruction with eternal hope. “The vast majority of very mature Christians accept the reality of the loss and destruction,” Padele said. “God has suffered with survivors; God will always defend them in starting a new life. God has prepared the best life now and in the future.”

Kate Shellnutt is associate online editor for Christianity Today.

Was this article helpful? Did we miss something? Let us know here.

News

When the Word Becomes Words

Ann Voskamp and photographer Esther Havens document the moment a new Bible translation arrives in a rural Kenyan community.

Esther Havens

The word of God comes riding in on a camel. It’s a kind of modern-day Palm Sunday in Northern Kenya, the nomadic Rendille people waving their worn sticks instead of palm branches, the Word of God itself stacked in bound cardboard boxes, lashed to the hump of a swaying dromedary.

More than a thousand Rendille and dozens of distant neighboring tribespeople have gathered in the stifling heat, with ready smiles and raised hands, to greet the completed New Testament in their own mother tongue. They have been parched for living water under the desert sun for decades—centuries—and this day is nothing short of a resurrection coming. Dancing women stir the dust with their feet, thousands of beaded necklaces rattling like rising bones, and they point out how even the Word-carrying camel can’t seem to stop grinning.

The Rendille translation is one of more than 120 nearing completion in Africa alone in 2018. Over three decades ago, two faithful missionaries and two deeply committed Rendille tribesmen began laying the foundation for this day when they set out to translate parts of both Testaments into the Rendille language. Their painstaking work finally came to fruition in the last three years, thanks to technology and consulting methods beyond those early missionaries’ wildest imaginings and to partnerships between groups including Wycliffe, Seed Company, BTL Kenya, and Africa Inland Mission.

Which is what makes today, the day the Good Book comes, seem like a divine visitation.

Pastor David Gargule, a native Rendille who holds master’s degrees in theology and in organizational leadership and management, has returned here to the desert, because what would it be to find success in the world if his own people were lost? When he was six years old, he remembers watching his mother throw stones at the Bible translators to drive them away.

But it was Bible translators, Gargule posits, who brought community development. Who empowered the Rendille to run adult literacy programs, to offer elementary and secondary education for generations of nomadic children, to sink wells and plant churches for nomadic herdsmen and stand up an emergency response system.

“The Bible is the foundation,” Gargule tells me. “How can we give a Christian education if we don’t have a Bible available? We are not only here to give physical water. How can we give spiritual water?”

He leans forward so the paradigm shift catalyzed by the gospel can’t be missed: “No child marriages. No female circumcisions. Give every child equal rights. Give a girl equal rights with boys.”

Gargule points to a window, toward some herds of camels, and explains that his people used to value camels more than people. The animals drank from the scarce well water before women and children did. But after the gospel arrived, the children moved ahead of the camels in line.

“That’s why we brought the gospel in on the back—on the heart—of a camel,” Gargule says, eyes brimming. “To show the importance of the gospel.”

The day after the camel strode in with New Testaments for the Rendille people, a Samburu woman who has traveled more than 400 kilometers down bandit-lined roads walks to the front of the Rendille church. She has come to witness how the Word of God is now spoken by her neighbors and to confess: “God forgive me, I was jealous yesterday—I was jealous that you had God’s Word in your language, and I wanted God’s Word in my language.”

Clutching their brand new red and gold embossed New Testaments, Rendille men, women, and children nod their deep understanding.

Just over 2,000 language groups are still waiting to have God’s Word spoken in their mother tongue, and it is the collaborative goal of a coalition of Bible translation organizations to have a translation started in every language on earth by the year 2025.

When the Samburu woman walks away from the Rendille, the seed-like beads of her necklace rattle like the possibility of more resurrections coming.

Esther Havens is a Texas-based photographer. Ann Voskamp is the Canadian author of various best-selling books, including One Thousand Gifts. Seed Company provided funding for their travel to Kenya.

* * *

The Rendille come from the line of the Cushite people, whose traditions date back thousands of years and resemble certain Old Testament Jewish practices. They are nomadic pastoralists in arid northern Kenya, building circular villages that move frequently—sometimes just a few yards.

* * *

Rendille women are coming to know Jesus through a literacy program that teaches them to read and write through the use of Bible stories. Many take what they learn and travel to other villages to preach.

* * *

Pastor David Gargule was born and raised in the Rendille community. “The Lord called me back to my own people,” said Gargule, who runs a Christian school for Rendille youth. “I have passion for nomadic ministry. You can’t reach nomads in a modern setting. You have to go to them, be with them, stay with them. I’m a nomad and serving nomads.”

* * *

Laban Eysimkeele, left, and Joshua Galimogle spent countless hours translating Scripture for the Rendille people. They tested each verse with the community, then flew to Nairobi to connect to the internet and send the translations to consultants. “My hope is that my children will know the Lord through his Word,” Galimogle said.

* * *

Rendille women sing praise songs they wrote for the day of the Bible dedication: “We give thanks to the Lord. The Word of God is like a pillar in our life. We give thanks to the Lord for this day for it is the first time we have the Bible in our own language.”

* * *

“I am very happy that the Bible is now in the Rendille language,” said Lucy, who stands outside her home in Northern Kenya. “Before the Bible, we still tried to teach the Word of God and many got saved, but now we’re hoping that many more will be saved.”

* * *

A woman carries her New Testament Bible in Rendille to church on Sunday.

Have something to say about this topic? Let us know here.

Books
Excerpt

Fleming Rutledge: John the Baptist Points to the Real Hope of Advent

We’re not awaiting a helpless baby, but a righteous and powerful judge.

Tom Barrett / Unsplash

It would be hard to say which is more alien to our contemporary ideas of getting ready for Christmas, the season of Advent or the figure of John the Baptist—the man who greeted the Pharisees and Sadducees by calling them a “brood of vipers” (Matt. 3:7, ESV throughout). How would you like to get that on a Christmas card?

Advent: The Once and Future Coming of Jesus Christ

Advent: The Once and Future Coming of Jesus Christ

Eerdmans

426 pages

$14.49

This unlovable figure is very much out of sync with our times, yet he is one of the foremost figures of Advent, at least in the preaching calendar followed in my own Episcopal Church tradition. Like John the Baptist, Advent is out of phase with its time, with our time. It encroaches upon us in an uncomfortable way, making us feel somewhat uneasy with its stubborn resistance to Christmas cheer. To be sure, we have done a pretty good job of domesticating Advent, and I am by no means above this sort of thing myself. Every year, I used to buy Advent calendars for my children with cute little doors that open and show cute little pictures. I have yet to find an Advent calendar that has a picture of John the Baptist. We really don’t know exactly what to do with him; he doesn’t fit into anything.

But here he is by the river, dressed in the fashion of the wilderness and assaulting the crowds that come out to hear him: “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?. . . Even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire” (Matt. 3:7, 10).

Jesus the Judge

In all four gospels, John the Baptist sets the tone for the proclamation of Jesus Christ. His language is apocalyptic; it signifies the arrival of God. Even if we thought we could fit the baby Jesus into our scheme of things at Christmastime, there is no way to get rid of the recalcitrant figure of John the Baptist announcing “the wrath to come.”

I have an Advent wreath in my dining room, but it does occur to me from time to time that the soft, romantic glow of candlelight fails to do justice to the conflagration announced by John the Baptist. The extremely odd thing about Advent, in spite of its reputation as a season of preparation for Christmas, is that its emphasis really does not fall on the coming of Jesus as a baby in Bethlehem, but rather on the coming of Jesus as the Judge of all things at the end of time.

John does not proclaim Jesus as a captivating infant smiling benevolently at groups of assorted rustics, potentates, and farm animals. Instead, he cries out, “He who is coming after me is mightier than I. . . . His winnowing fork is in his hand, and he will clear his threshing floor and gather his wheat into the barn, but the chaff he will burn with unquenchable fire” (Matt. 3:11–12).

A characteristic liturgical petition of Advent is Maranatha—come, Lord Jesus! It is certainly not a prayer for Jesus to come again as a helpless baby; it is the longing cry of God’s people for him to return in power and glory, when “every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord” (Phil. 2:10–11).

Why do all four Evangelists introduce their gospels with John the Baptist? What is the purpose of making everyone’s hair stand on end during Advent? It has occurred to me that the image of Jesus as the cosmic Judge who will ultimately come again to put an end to all sin and wickedness forever is not so frightening to the poor and oppressed of the earth as it is to those who have a lot to lose.

If your loved one is in the habit of buying you expensive Christmas gifts, you might not be so crazy about the idea of Jesus coming back before Santa Claus gets here. But suppose you had been a Christian in prison in the Soviet Union. Or suppose you had been a black person in Apartheid-era South Africa directed to pack up your meager belongings and take them to a so-called homeland that wasn’t your home and that wouldn’t offer you dignified employment. Suppose you were elderly and handicapped in the South Bronx and had just been robbed and terrorized for the third time. In circumstances like those, you might say Maranatha and really mean it.

Even today, John the Baptist’s lonely, austere style of life bears witness to a reality that is coming, a reality that will expose all worldly realities, all earthly conditions, all human promises as fraudulent and transitory. His appearance on the scene at this time of year exposes our pretensions for what they really are. Never have we needed him more!

When John the Baptist—probably the most single-minded person who ever lived—said, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand” (Matt. 3:2), his whole being, his entire existence, was on fire with the reality of the One Who Comes. He was in the grip of what I call apocalyptic transvision—that vision given to the church that sees through the appearances of this world to the blazing power and holiness of the coming of the Lord. John the Baptist is the ultimate embodiment of the apocalyptic character of Christian faith—faith that is oriented not to the past but to the future, not to the repetition of religious exercises but to the person of the Messiah, not to arrangements as they are but to an utterly new authority and dominion.

A Power from Outside

In the most extraordinary way, John is truly our contemporary; he stands at the very precipice of the collision of two forces, at the juncture where the world’s resistance to God meets the irresistible force of the One who is coming—“the axe is laid to the root of the trees.” There he is, and there he will be until the trump sounds, forever summoning us to rethink and reorder our lives totally, orienting ourselves to an altogether new perspective—the perspective of God.

Consider the way God sees us: Does he care if I have a matched set of Gucci luggage? Will he judge me by the degree of recognition given to my name when it appears in the playbill or on the letterhead or in the list of trustees and patrons? Will he even judge me by my performance as a mother or a husband or a friend or a neighbor? What will he judge me by?

As John preaches, “Every tree that does not produce good fruit will be cut down and thrown into the fire.” So the criterion of judgment is the fruit that is characteristic of repentance. And repentance does not mean just being sorry. We experience this when we hear a person say “I’m sorry” once too often, and we explode with anger and frustration and say, “I’m sick and tired of hearing that you’re sorry! I don’t want you to be sorry! I want to see some changed behavior!” The Greek word metanoia means to turn around, to reorient oneself in another direction. It means to receive a new start altogether.

If I am told over and over to repent, to change, to orient my life to God, nothing will ever happen. I will cling to the Gucci luggage—not that I could afford it—and the earthly status symbols more desperately than ever. I don’t need to hear exhortations to repent. I need power from outside myself to make me different.

In his Pensées, Blaise Pascal wrote, “Comfort yourselves. It is not from yourselves that you should expect grace; but, on the contrary, it is in expecting nothing from yourselves, that you must hope for it.” Exactly. That is the place where a repentant person takes up his or her position on the frontier of the ages. No previous commitment or identity will have any ultimate meaning; no human ancestry or allegiance, no ranking or claim, will be of any consequence, for, as John the Baptist instructed the religious elite, “Do not presume to say to yourselves, ‘We have Abraham as our father,’ for I tell you, God is able from these stones to raise up children to Abraham” (Matt. 3:9).

A power from outside is coming, a power that is able to make a new creation out of people like us, stones like us, people who have no capacity of ourselves to save ourselves. The power that is coming is not our power—not the power of our deeds or our inner strength or our spiritual discipline or our faith or even our repentance. It is God’s power that gives good deeds and inner strength and spiritual discipline and faith and repentance. We are able to repent and bear fruit because he is coming.

We cannot trust any of the powers of this world to make us children of Abraham. We cannot presume to tell ourselves we have better genes or better morals or better theology or better attitudes or better humility or better repentance. It is God who is making children of Abraham—making people new for his kingdom, making them out of stones.

This means that we are being changed. It means we are going to be weaned away from our possessions and oriented toward being everlastingly possessed by the love of God. It means that we will become less interested in receiving personal blessings for ourselves and more interested in making Christian hope known to those “dwelling in darkness” (Matt. 4:16). It means that we will become more and more thankful as we become less and less self-righteous. It means that we will gradually become less preoccupied with our own privileges and prerogatives and gradually see ourselves more and more in solidarity with other human beings who, like us, can receive mercy only from the hand of God and not because of any human superiority.

These changes have political consequences as well as individual ones. Repentance will mean seeking after the good of all, not just the comforts of a few, and the knowledge of the coming of the Lord means that there will be hope—in the light of his power—of his intervention in the affairs of nations, that the efforts of the peacemakers will somehow, miraculously, be blessed.

The Preacher Is Nothing

John the Baptist is the model Christian preacher and witness. By the grace of God alone, all Christian preachers stand in the line of this strange, unattractive man. During the Advent season, we shine a spotlight on his preaching. But the spotlight is not, in fact, on the preacher. John himself is the spotlight. When we watch someone preach on stage, we don’t actually see the spotlight. What we see is the beam of light and the object that is illuminated. John himself disappears. The preaching is the beam, and the light falls on Jesus only.

Yet even this simile fails us, because, as the Fourth Evangelist writes, “There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. . . . He was not the light, but came to bear witness about the light” (John 1:6, 8).

The witness is from God; the light is from God; the preaching is from God—all for the purpose of revealing Jesus, Immanuel, God-with-us. The preacher is nothing; the Word is everything. Jesus is everything. He comes; he comes at the end of the ages, and he comes in the hearts of all human beings who even now relinquish all human claims in the face of the God who is coming in power.

Fleming Rutledge is an Episcopal priest and a bestselling author. This article is adapted from a sermon republished in her book, Advent: The Once & Future Coming of Jesus Christ (Eerdmans).

Are we right about this? Off the mark? Share your feedback here.

Books
Excerpt

Missionaries Live in Difficult Places, and They Need Your Prayers

We’re familiar with the idea of culture shock, but we often overlook the impact of culture stress.

Timur Samofeev / iStock / Getty

We’re all familiar with the term culture shock. But when it comes to missionaries, we often neglect the impact of culture stress: the regular (and continual) stressors that consciously and unconsciously hit a person living in a different culture. Culture stress can lead to many different ailments such as anxiety, insecurity, fatigue, lack of joy, illnesses, discouragement, fears, anger, irritability, resentment, and homesickness.

Praying for Your Missionary: How Prayers from Home Can Reach the Nations

One place I experienced culture stress most vividly was Guinea, Africa, where several of my friends were serving as missionaries. Guinea is one of the poorest countries in the world. Before pulling out, the French destroyed plumbing lines, water wells, and all the paved streets, basically crippling the country into poverty and forcing it to start from square one.

From the moment I arrived for a visit, wave after wave of stressors hit me. People warned me that it was common to have luggage stolen. The intense heat and humidity hit me like a thick cloud. Every part of the city where we stayed was extremely crowded, and everyone was asking for money, since they saw our team as “rich foreigners.” Guinea is a Muslim nation, and the Muslim prayers spoken throughout the day became “surround sound” wherever I went. Those prayers would wake me up late at night and early in the morning.

The roads were so bad that sometimes a mere two-block drive took over 30 minutes! Our final drive from a rural village back into the city took 20 hours. On our final day there, my friends took us to a beach. It was a refreshing break from the challenges of the past two weeks—until a gang of 40 men surrounded our group and demanded we give them money or else.

After the beach incident, we couldn’t wait to get to the airport and head back home. But then it hit me. I could leave, but my missionary friends were living there for the long haul. While I couldn’t bear the thought of staying there any longer, I was surprised to see how much these missionaries loved it there. When I mentioned how challenging it must be to live there, they said, “Yes, it is a challenge.” But they also said the only way they could survive each day was to pause daily before God. Their only way to handle the stress of each day was to close their eyes to their surroundings and be still and know that the Lord is God.

It’s so easy for us to get up and going with the day-to-day tasks we face. But this story is a crucial reminder for us to pray that missionaries will be able to pause before God often and let his presence in prayer become their home. That kind of praying becomes a great gift to missionaries. We must never forget that intimacy with God is what strengthens our weary bodies and souls.

Taken from Praying for Your Missionary by Eddie Byun. Copyright © 2018 by Eddie Byun. Used by permission of InterVarsity Press, P.O. Box 1400, Downers Grove, IL 60515.

Ideas

How to Tell the Difference Between a Prophet and a Crank

Columnist; Contributor

Truly biblical prophecy strengthens the church—without adding anything to the Bible.

On the day the church went public, it was laughed at. A noisy rabble was spilling out into the streets of Jerusalem, declaring the works of God in all kinds of languages, and while some responded with genuine amazement, others simply ridiculed it: “They have had too much wine” (Acts 2:13). Peter, famously, answered their snark in two ways. He pointed out the time of day—“It’s only nine in the morning!”—and he quoted Joel’s prophecy that “your sons and daughters will prophesy” (2:15–17). Prophecy, both old and new, was used to defend the church against the charge of being ridiculous.

These days, in the West at least, the boot is usually on the other foot. For many Christians, prophecy makes the church look more ridiculous, not less. The biblical prophets were a curious bunch of confrontational outsiders, fiery eccentrics, and hairy lefties, and their oracles of judgment and eschatology are much harder to understand than the logical, linear letters we prefer reading. But at least they are in the Bible. Not so with modern “prophets,” who are either political activists in disguise, perpetual protesters overdosed on Amos, or maverick charismatics who make outlandish claims and even more outlandish salaries. Prophecy, it seems, has fallen on hard times.

What accounts for the difference between Peter’s response (“these people aren’t crazy, they’re prophesying”) and ours (“these people are prophesying, so they are crazy”)? Are we using the word in different ways? Elsewhere, we find that Paul saw no conflict between wanting believers not to “go beyond what is written” and seeing them “eager to prophesy” (1 Cor. 4:6; 14:39). For him, in other words, the pursuit of prophecy did not undermine the sufficiency of Scripture at all. Yet for many today, it does. Are we misconstruing what New Testament prophecy actually was?

Consider Paul’s teaching in 1 Corinthians. Prophecy is given for “strengthening, encouraging, and comfort” (14:3). It brings unbelievers to a place of conviction and worship (v. 24–25). It should be given in turn, weighed by the church, and eagerly desired by everybody (v. 29–32, 39). Definitions are tricky, but we can at least say that prophecy is Spirit-prompted public speech that reveals God and strengthens the church.

That may seem vague. What about specific examples from the Book of Acts? What might it look like for speech to reveal God and strengthen the church without being written down and added to Scripture?

On the day of Pentecost, prophecy involves “declaring the wonders of God” (Acts 2:11). Subsequently, Agabus foretells a famine, prompting the church to give to the poor (11:27–30); the prophets in Antioch hear the Spirit tell them to send Barnabas and Saul on mission (13:1–3); Judas and Silas encourage and strengthen the churches while delivering a letter (15:30–35); Paul is redirected from Asia to Europe (16:6–10); and Agabus warns that persecution is coming (21:10–14). Sometimes people prophesy without being recorded at all (19:6; 21:9). None of these revelations add anything to the gospel, let alone conflict with Scripture. Instead, they encourage and equip the church to fulfill the mission it already has: serving the poor, building one another up, and reaching the nations.

For a historical illustration, consider the Baptist preacher Charles Spurgeon. He writes that on at least a dozen occasions, he felt moved by the Spirit to pause while preaching, point at someone he didn’t know, and describe that person’s situation—so accurately that people left in amazement. He told one shoemaker exactly how much money he had pilfered during the previous week. Yet nobody, least of all Spurgeon himself, thought he was eroding the sufficiency of Scripture. In applying the challenges of Scripture so specifically to people’s hearts, he bore witness to its truthfulness and glorified the God who inspired it.

We can argue about whether this aligns with the New Testament definition of “prophecy.” Personally, I think it fits the descriptions in Acts and Paul’s letters beautifully. But hopefully the phenomenon itself—of Spirit-prompted insight that exposes the hearts of unbelievers, builds up the church, and reveals the presence of God—is something we can agree on. We might even get back to eagerly desiring it.

Andrew Wilson is teaching pastor at King’s Church London and author of Echoes of Exodus (Crossway). Follow him on Twitter @AJWTheology.

Have something to say about this topic? Let us know here.

Books

New & Noteworthy Books

Compiled by Matt Reynolds.

Surviving the State, Remaking the Church: A Sociological Portrait of Christians in Mainland China

Li Ma and Jin Li (Pickwick Publications)

Some accounts of Christianity in China are pessimistic, emphasizing government persecution. Others are more hopeful, emphasizing the post-Mao revival of religious movements and the flourishing of underground house churches. Scholars Li Ma and Jin Li, who interviewed around 100 Chinese believers and observed dozens of unregistered churches for this book, say that neither story does justice to the underlying reality. “Portraying churches in China as either persecuted or revived captures facets of the truth but also obscures the complexity and fluidity of the whole picture,” they write. “It is our hope that this book will acquaint readers with the real lives of Chinese Christians in their authentic context.”

Remember Death: The Surprising Path to Living Hope

Matthew McCullough (Crossway)

To experience more joy in life, think more often about the fact that you are destined to die. This is the counterintuitive advice of Nashville pastor Matthew McCullough, who points out that ignoring mortality dulls the force of Christ’s promise of eternal life. “Before you long for a life that is imperishable,” he writes, “you must accept that you are perishing along with everyone you care about. You must recognize that anything you might accomplish or acquire in this world is already fading away. Only then will you crave the unfading glory of what Jesus has accomplished and acquired for you.”

Cosmology in Theological Perspective: Understanding Our Place in the Universe

Olli-Pekka Vainio (Baker Academic)

Since the dawn of time, human beings have gazed at the stars and wondered what (and who) else might be out there in the universe. In Cosmology in Theological Perspective, Finnish theologian Olli-Pekka Vainio reflects on how the discovery of alien life might influence Christian understandings of divine creation and human significance. He insists that questions about our place in the universe shouldn’t be left to scientists and astronomers alone: “I argue,” he writes, “that philosophy cannot be divorced from cosmology. . . . Therefore, cosmology, no matter how it is done, will always have (at least) one foot in a religious stream.”

Books
Review

The Culture Wars Are Ancient History

Today’s fights over the religion in the public square are replays of fights from two thousand years ago.

Jon Krause

In The Idea of a Christian Society (1939), T. S. Eliot saw a conflict between Christianity and paganism shaping the 20th century. Steven D. Smith’s Pagans and Christians in the City applies Eliot’s map to today’s culture wars, especially in the United States.

Pagans and Christians in the City: Culture Wars from the Tiber to the Potomac (Emory University Studies in Law and Religion (EUSLR))

It’s common to portray the culture war as a battle between people who favor a public role for religion and people who want to keep religion locked securely in the private realm. Smith argues, however, that our frameworks and language obscure a deeper reality: The real fight isn’t between religion and secularism, but between two kinds of religion. His book makes the case that today’s culture war shares much in common with the culture war that rocked ancient Rome.

The Romans were pragmatic and worldly, yet they believed their greatest strength was devotion to the empire’s gods. This was evident in public rituals, architecture, the role of divination, and the military. Rome, in short, was a “city of the gods.”

The paganism of Rome treated the world itself as sacred. But Christianity introduced a radically different perspective. Christians—while affirming the world’s goodness—located the sacred in another world altogether. In other words, paganism was an immanent form of religiosity, while Christianity embraced the transcendent.

Take, for instance, their competing approaches toward sexuality. For the Romans, sex provided pleasure and progeny, but they also viewed it as a divine imperative that shared in the energy of the universe. (Some pagan religious festivals included sex shows.) Christians did not claim that sex and reproduction were wrong, though Augustine and others insisted that sexual desire in its earthly form was deeply disordered. Yet having pledged their loyalty to a different world, they thought it idolatrous to make earthly sexual fulfillment the highest good; even reproduction and family weren’t ultimate goods. Christianity demanded a degree of sexual control and renunciation that was nonsensical to many pagans.

The Romans were, in some ways, tolerant of this new transcendent religion. But over time they came to regard Christianity as incompatible with Roman values. Christians refused to pledge allegiance to the emperor. By rejecting Roman religion, Smith writes, Christians “actively and affirmatively subverted” the foundations of Roman order, the “social contract” between the empire’s gods and its people. Christians “defied and insulted the gods,” a desecration Rome could not tolerate. Christian morality, especially its sexual morality, was resented for interfering with Roman liberties.

Rome did make Christians a counter-offer: If they would be reasonable and keep their faith a private affair, they could live in peace. Christians rejected the bargain, and Roman tolerance evaporated into sporadic but bloody persecution. Christianity exposed the fact that the Romans were tolerant in theory but not in principle.

A Pagan Public Square

Smith doesn’t attempt to adjudicate historical debates about the causes of Christianity’s eventual triumph. He’s more interested in the kind of triumph Christianity achieved, and the degree to which it extinguished paganism. Christianity won in that it eventually shaped the symbols and norms that defined public life. Yet paganism persisted in art, in periodic renaissance movements, and in nostalgia for the shimmering glow of the ancient gods or resentment against Christianity’s suppression of pagan exuberance.

Modern secularism understands itself as an immanent movement that relegates religion to a purely private role. Political secularism attempts the virtually unprecedented experiment of establishing political order without reference to God or, in theory, any form of sacred. Philosophical secularism claims that rational scientific explanations of the world have made religion obsolete. If Max Weber is to be believed, we inhabit a disenchanted world.

But Smith isn’t buying it. Somewhat like Charles Taylor in A Secular Age, he sees pagan forms of religiosity popping up in surprising places. The late legal theorist Ronald Dworkin, for instance, endorsed a pantheistic “religion without God,” and writers like Sam Harris and Barbara Ehrenreich advocate modes of re-enchantment.

In two chapters about “counterrevolution,” Smith examines the internal tensions of contemporary American law, sexuality, and religious freedom. Why, for instance, are Christian symbols purged from public spaces while “sacred” national symbols (like the flag) are permitted? Why can we only tolerate public religious expressions that have lost their religious significance (in the view of what former Justice Sandra Day O’Connor called a “reasonable observer”)? Once they’ve won their civil rights, why can’t LGBT activists permit Christians their religious freedom?

In each area, Smith’s pagan-versus-Christian template proves more illuminating than the secular-versus-religion framing favored in most “culture war” analysis. The Constitution isn’t a battleground between secular and religious interpretations but between transcendent religion (Christianity in particular) and immanent religion. Transcendent religious expressions are excluded, but immanent religiosity is permitted.

Thus, for instance, during the 1990s, the Supreme Court abandoned “accommodation” as a justification for religious freedom. The standard of accommodation assumed the possibility of religious truth, protecting the right to “obey God rather than man” (within limits, which didn’t include polygamy). Recent religious liberty decisions instead pay homage to the individual conscience while treating any symbols that still imply transcendence or accountability to God, like “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, as constitutionally suspect.

In example after example, Smith shows that Eliot was right. We don’t have a naked public square. We have a pagan public square from which transcendent appeals and symbols, even implicit ones, are excluded.

The Scandal of Particularity

Smith’s book is strongest in the final chapters, where he writes about his specialties, constitutional law and religious freedom. His pagan-versus-Christian framework uncovers a logic behind the apparently arbitrary court decisions of recent decades.

But weaknesses crop us as he skims the surface of many centuries. He doesn’t always clarify the difference between pagan persistence and pagan revival, and he doesn’t attend sufficiently to the various ways Christianity has transformed paganism by assimilating many of its dominant ideas and symbols. (Thomas Aquinas, for instance, drew heavily on philosophical frameworks inherited from Aristotle, and a great deal of Christian art has incorporated pagan imagery.) Smith tends to treat paganism as an unchanging essence, which prevents him from doing justice to Taylor’s insight that our secular age has produced fresh forms of religious life and experience, neither strictly pagan nor strictly Christian.

But the most fundamental problem with Smith’s book is his shaky deployment of the terms immanent and transcendent. Christianity, he says, is transcendent, in that it locates human fulfillment in a world beyond “this world,” while paganism is an immanent religiosity that seeks fulfillment in the here-and-now.

The terms are misleading at best. For pagans, the human world is marred by mortality, while the gods are immortals who transcend this vale of tears. Olympus is beyond this world, where the gods feast on ambrosia. On the other hand, “transcendence” is hardly the whole story for Christianity, which affirms that the Creator took frail flesh to live a human life and die a human death. It was the unthinkable immanence of the Christian God that posed a stumbling block for pagans, as well as for early Christian heretics.

Along similar lines, treating Christianity as “transcendent” obscures the inherently socio-political character of Christianity; that is, it fails to do justice to the church. One of Christianity’s prime novelties was the formation of a new kind of social body—similar to Judaism but not ethnically defined, universal as the empire but entirely independent of it, a polis that was not confined to a single location, a this-worldly communion that also encompassed the heavenly assembly.

Treating Christianity as an instance of a more general category, like “transcendence,” doesn’t capture its novelty. It glosses over Jesus, the message of the gospel, and the formation of a church. Smudging these specifics, Smith’s framework stumbles over the scandal of particularity.

Why does Smith rely on the distinction between immanent and transcendent religion, given these historical and theological problems? In The Idea of a Christian Society, Eliot distinguished between concrete forms of religion—paganism versus Christianity. That better describes the conflict in the US, where the representatives of “transcendent religion” are overwhelmingly Christian. Why not just say so?

Two answers occur to me. First, Smith’s inclusive terminology is more legally and politically viable. To argue for the legitimacy of public Christian symbols runs afoul of contemporary constitutional interpretation. In a political environment more pluralistic than Eliot’s, the generic category enables Smith to make common cause with adherents of other “transcendent” religions.

Second, the inclusive language deflects the worry that Smith might be arguing for a specifically Christian political order. He claims that “modern Christian society would be open to transcendence,” but without sponsoring “any official account of what transcendence is and requires.”

That sounds like the classical liberal settlement regarding religion: Religions, including transcendent ones, have a robust place in the public square, but no religious truth-claims set the rules of the game. But—if I’ve decoded Smith’s hints accurately—this runs contrary to his historical analysis. American religious liberty, Smith shows, is an outgrowth of a specific religion, not generic transcendence. We can’t wish away the necessity of ground rules, which inescapably assume and imply certain beliefs about God and his relevance (or irrelevance) to politics. They assume either that Jesus is, or is not, Lord.

The polity Smith appears to imagine is literally utopian: It has existed nowhere. For all Christendom’s limitations and flaws, the same cannot be said of the idea of a Christian society.

Peter Leithart is president of the Theopolis Institute in Birmingham, Alabama. He recently authored a two-volume commentary on Revelation for the International Theological Commentary series (T&T Clark).

Do you agree? Is this missing something? Share your feedback here.

Books
Review

Paul Got a Personal Preview of the Judgment Day

Which is one reason “the day of the Lord” figured so prominently in his letters.

Source: Wikimedia Commons

These days it is out of fashion to talk about judging and judgment. Ours is a much more “tolerant” age—or so we’re told. But as biblical scholars Matthew Aernie and Donald Hartley point out in The Righteous and Merciful Judge, the idea of God coming in judgment to right all wrongs and settle all scores is at the heart of Scripture.

The Righteous and Merciful Judge: The Day of the Lord in the Life and Theology of Paul (Studies in Scripture and Biblical Theology)

The ancient heresy of Marcionism still haunts the church, especially when we divide Scripture into two parts and imagine that the first is dominated by justice and wrath, while the second emphasizes mercy and grace. As Aernie and Hartley make clear, such mischaracterizations undermine the unity of Scripture and subvert the true story of God in the world. Some of the most wonderful passages of forgiveness, restoration, and grace are found in the Old Testament; some of the most unsettling about justice, wrath, and judgment are found in the New.

The Righteous and Merciful Judge considers the theme of “the day of the Lord” in Paul’s letters. While Aernie and Hartley stop short of placing this theme at the center of Paul’s theology, they argue that “every aspect of [it] was in some way affected by the concept.” Their book sheds light on an ignored and marginalized feature of Paul’s thought.

Aernie and Hartley pursue their task chronologically, asking first: Where did this concept come from? Scholars can’t pinpoint how and where the notion of “the day of the Lord” entered into Jewish consciousness. Some think it came from Israel’s holy-war tradition, others from enthronement ceremonies when YHWH was installed as King. Some think it came from within Israel itself; others imagine it was adopted and adapted from the Canaanites or the Babylonians.

The starting point remains elusive. What is clear, however, is that the Old Testament throbs with certainty that God will visit the nations, including Israel, in judgment, power, and restoration.

While the phrase “the day of the Lord” doesn’t appear in the books of Moses, the authors demonstrate how the underlying theme sits just beneath the surface in passages that portray God visiting his people through blessings and curses. Only later, among the Old Testament prophets, did the phrase evolve into a technical term denoting the day of final judgment.

Before the coming of Christ, periods of famine, scarcity, war, and ultimately exile could be construed as preliminary “days” of judgment that foreshadowed the final judgment to come. When that day comes, God will make the world right. In the final verdict of history, anything wrong in Israel or the nations must be judged. All that is right is destined to be redeemed and restored. These patterns are found throughout the Old Testament, but they are also present in later Jewish writings such as the Pseudepigrapha and the Dead Sea Scrolls. This was the symbolic world that Paul inherited.

One of the more interesting features of the book is how Aernie and Hartley interpret Paul’s Damascus Road conversion as “a proleptic day of the Lord.” In other words, Paul experienced his own day of judgment when he encountered the risen Christ. Instead of getting what he deserved—God’s wrath—he found mercy. Instead of being marked out for destruction, he was transformed and sent on a new mission. In this encounter, a vicious persecutor exchanged the false identity of Jesus he had developed for the true identity as Messiah, Son of God, and Lord. Afterward, he began to think that the final judgment for all was closer than he ever imagined.

The last portion of the book looks closely at how “the day of the Lord” worked its way into Paul’s epistles. For Paul, “the day of the Lord” would become “the day of our Lord Jesus Christ” (1 Cor. 1:8) or, more simply, “the day of Christ” (Phil. 1:10). Words like coming, revelation, and appearing season his writings, as he likens the coming of Jesus to judge the living and dead to various manifestations of God in the Scripture.

The Righteous and Merciful Judge offers an important corrective for the academy and the church. The current Western mood is to avoid anything that smacks of judgment. We want a merciful, forgiving, anything-goes kind of god, not one who demands something of us and will ultimately judge us. We cannot adequately deal with Paul’s life, mission, and theology without grasping his conviction that history was headed toward a particular destination. The next thing we await is the final, definitive coming of Christ in glory, power, and judgment.

David Capes is dean of the School of Biblical and Theological Studies and professor of New Testament at Wheaton College.

Do you agree? Is this missing something? Share your feedback here.

Books

Eugene Peterson Wanted to Know Your Name

How, the late pastor asked, can you shepherd a flock you don’t know?

Source: Simon / Lightstock

Eugene Peterson—who died in October at age 85—is best known, perhaps, as the author of The Message, his vernacular paraphrase of the Bible. But for many pastors and church leaders, Peterson was also a mentor who taught them to be shepherds rather than CEOs—in large part by modeling that approach himself. Drew Dyck, acquisitions editor at Moody Publishers, spoke with Peterson in 2017 as one of his final books (As Kingfishers Catch Fire) was published. They spoke about recent developments across the ministry landscape, the seriousness of the pastoral calling, and how The Message sprouted from his desire to truly know and listen to the people in his ministry. Pieces of that interview appear here for the first time.

As Kingfishers Catch Fire: A Conversation on the Ways of God Formed by the Words of God

In the preface of As Kingfishers Catch Fire, you write that the Christian life is “the lifelong practice of tending to the details of congruence.” What does that look like in a pastor’s life?

As pastors we’re interested in getting people to live a life that is congruent with the gospel. One of the things I realized from day one is that I needed to listen to congregants and not just put things into their heads. This is one of the wonderful things about being a pastor. You get the time and the opportunity to make connections with the everyday lives of people in your congregation. You can’t just treat Christianity as a pile of ideas from which to add and subtract.

You grew up in farming country, and your father was a butcher. Did that environment shape you as a pastor?

By all means. People who work with the soil and with animals learn to respect what they’re doing and the subjects of their work. My dad had one man working for him who he would send to the farms or ranches. In the store, we called him “the killer,” because that’s what he did. He was the one who got them down. But he was so respectful of the animals. He might have been a killer, but he was not a murderer. That soaked into me, and by the time I got out of college, I’d absorbed something important about the Christian faith and its understanding of creation.

If you were training as a young pastor today, in what context would you be looking to minister?

It would be local, relational. If you’re content to stay with one congregation for a while, you could have a congregation of four, five, six hundred, and still know everyone. I had a congregation of 600, and I knew everybody’s name.

I don’t think you can help anyone live a congruent life without knowing their name. How can you be personally involved in someone’s life and not know who their children are, who their spouses are, or the trials they go through every day? It just doesn’t work.

When I was at Seattle Pacific College, we had a student body of about 500. As student-body president, I determined to learn the name of every person on that campus. And I did. I didn’t like the pastors who didn’t know my name. “Hey, you,” they would say and never bother to get acquainted.

I remember one of my teachers in the English department. I was writing a column for the student newspaper, and I began with a careless reference to the poet Chaucer. My professor called me in and said, “Eugene, have you ever read Chaucer?” I said, “No.” And she pulled a book off the shelf, put it in my hand, and said, “You start reading this and don’t come back until you’ve finished it.” Well, I had no idea that Chaucer was such an interesting person!

That stuck with me. Don’t think you understand someone just because you know about them.

As you know, community has become something of a buzzword in the church today, yet in some ways we have less of it even though we talk about it more. Why is that?

Probably because many people in churches today don’t have a sense of community, and in order to get a sense of community, church leaders start gathering people up and giving them jobs. We’ve lost a talent for relationship and showing interest in the other person. We don’t have community because we skip over the critical part: being in relationship with the people, knowing their kids, knowing their jobs, knowing the neighborhood.

When I was starting up for my first church, we met in the basement of our home because we couldn’t afford anything else. There was a low ceiling, cement walls. And one of the high school girls who was worshiping with us came out one day and said, “Oh pastor, I love coming here. I feel just like one of those early Christians in the catacombs.” Pretty soon all the young people in the church were calling it Catacombs Presbyterian Church. I liked that.

Pastoral ministry is a weighty call. How can pastors stay lighthearted in the midst of it?

I’m not sure you can stay lighthearted. Being lighthearted doesn’t mean you’re oblivious to or innocent of the difficulties in a person’s life. Sometimes being lighthearted means not taking somebody seriously.

What have you said “no” to consistently?

I suppose anything that verges on the superficial. I had a friend in my first parish whose strategy was to take all the kids in the neighborhood to football games. But he didn’t know any of these kids. He didn’t know their names. That struck me as odd. There’s a lot more opportunity in taking people to see a football game than just getting them out there to see it.

We live in a time when people are very skeptical of religion. They may even see it as dangerous. In that context, how can church leaders wield any sort of spiritual authority in a way that is faithful and credible?

You have to start small. Invite people over for a meal, and just keep at it. People in our culture tend to be a little suspicious of anybody who takes interest in them. What are they trying to get out of me? We’re trying to find quick solutions for something that takes a lot of time. We’ve dug ourselves into a hole, and we’ve got to start filling the hole by forming relationships with our neighbors.

When I was in Baltimore in the 1980s, there were riots and murders. Things were a mess, and some members of my congregation started buying guns. I have nothing against guns, but in that context, it didn’t seem very smart. So I started to preach on Galatians, Paul’s angriest letter. And I told my congregation, “Look, Jesus wants you to be free of this kind of stuff.” But they didn’t pay much attention.

After a few weeks, I started a Bible study for men. I wanted to teach them Galatians so they could understand freedom in Christ. I always got there early and made a pot of coffee. And during the study, they just sat there stirring sugar into their coffee.

I went home and told my wife, “I think I’ll teach them Greek. If they can learn Greek, they’d really get it.” And she said, “Yeah, that would really empty the place out fast.” So instead I translated—if you want to call it that—the text into the American vernacular. I’d been with these people for several years, and I knew how they talked and what they talked about. After using this approach for a couple of weeks, I would come back to clean up afterwards, and all the cups were full of cold coffee. No one had drank their coffee. So I just kept doing that, and much of it ended up in The Message.

Did this interview resonate with you? Let us know here.

Church Life

He Led Churches in the World’s Largest Refugee Camp. Now He Waxes Floors.

But in his spare time, a leading refugee pastor is mentoring immigrant ministry leaders across the country.

Ackerman + Gruber

Nobody naps on Saturdays in the Gatera family.

If anyone has a right to, it’s Jean Pierre Gatera. Most weekdays the 43-year-old drives his wife, Appoline, to her tomato-packing job in Minneapolis at 6:30 a.m. Then he sends their kids—Joel, 15, Emmanuela, 12, and Deborah, 8—off to school and does a few hours of work for his degree, a master’s in leadership from Bethel University. He preps some rice and meat for dinner, since Appoline is usually exhausted when she gets home. Then, at 4:20 p.m., he leaves for work: waxing floors for a janitorial company until 1 a.m. He sleeps about four hours a night.

But if he’s fatigued on a Saturday afternoon in July, Jean Pierre does not show it. He and the kids pile into the family van and one of them says a prayer for safety before heading to the Hosmer Library, just south of downtown Minneapolis. He leaves them at the stately, hydrangea-framed historic building to kill a few hours while he drives to Jonathan House, a ministry in neighboring Saint Paul where immigrants seeking asylum can stay for up to six months while they find their feet.

Jean Pierre stands waiting at the door of the small, forgettable white structure, unornamented except for some gray shutters. He is about 20 minutes late for a 1 p.m. appointment with Gabriel Wilson, an immigrant from Liberia. But Wilson is still asleep. He works nights too.

Asylum seekers like Wilson have almost no safety net; they are not eligible for welfare cash assistance or other government benefits. Which is why Jean Pierre is here today, to see to it that Wilson never needs a net.

Still groggy, Wilson shows Jean Pierre into the front room, where they review several goals they’ve set together for Wilson: get a driver’s license, find a better job, and save up some money. Goal setting is crucial, Jean Pierre says, so that when Good Samaritans do offer help, they can just “push you along the track.”

In Liberia, Wilson drove trucks. America faces a shortage of truck drivers in the era of online retail, but Wilson can’t get one of those higher-paying jobs until he takes a five-week, $6,000 class for his commercial driver’s license. For now, though, he still needs a basic driver’s license to get to other jobs and job interviews—like one this week with FedEx. Jean Pierre asks Wilson how he plans to get to the interview. Wilson, who only has his driver’s permit, sheepishly admits it would be at least 45 minutes by bus but only 15 in his car. “Ok, so 45 minutes then,” Jean Pierre decrees, a not-so-subtle warning to play by the rules.

When Wilson gets home from work each morning—he, too, waxes floors—he showers and collapses. Then his phone blows up with messages from family back in Africa, accusing him of being ungrateful and not sending enough cash back home.

Jean Pierre tells him a Swahili saying: “If you can’t stand, you can’t dance.” They can ask you for whatever they want, but you have to establish yourself first, he says. A sign on the wall in the Jonathan House shouts encouragement in all capital letters: “Take pride in how far you have come and have faith in how far you can go!”

Jean Pierre’s face might as well be on the sign, the admonition wrapped in a speech bubble. On September 11, 2016, he left Kakuma Refugee Camp in northwestern Kenya, where he had lived for 20 years and worked his way up to serve for a decade as chairman over a network of dozens of churches. From the soaring heat of Kakuma, at one time the world’s largest refugee camp, Jean Pierre and his family arrived on a pleasant late-summer day in Minneapolis, wearing layers of clothes because it was the easiest way to bring them. It was the second time in his life he would start over from scratch in a land that was not his own.

Jean Pierre spends every spare moment doing exactly what he did in Kakuma: exhorting refugee leaders and refugee churches that they are too rich to live stuck in some helpless-immigrant narrative.

Jean Pierre quietly began rebuilding life in Minneapolis with his family, learning to drive and working his night job. Ordained in Kenya by the International Pentecostal Holiness Church, Jean Pierre does not lead a church but still uses the title of “pastor” in all correspondence. Everyone seems to address him that way, even his own pastor, because Jean Pierre spends every spare moment doing exactly what he did in Kakuma: exhorting refugee leaders and refugee churches that they are too rich to live stuck in some helpless-immigrant narrative.

It’s hard to imagine the man running out of steam. When Jean Pierre speaks, he sometimes snaps his fingers to make a point. He believes that in any environment, God has already supplied everything necessary to survive. “You need only to identify these resources,” he says. “When you share what you have, it will attract other sources. If you don’t use your gift to shine, then nobody will come for it.

“If you sit down, you will lose everything,” he says, wiping his hands for emphasis. “Wasted time.”

As someone who built a ministry career in one of the world’s most desperate places while waiting two decades for the UN to decide his fate, Jean Pierre is especially annoyed that anyone would see him as just sitting, waiting for help.

The family did receive assistance during their first three months in America, as many refugees do. But Jean Pierre is still bothered by one particular moment during the resettlement journey: A hotel manager offered the family some leftovers from the kitchen, assuming they didn’t have the ability to pay for food.

“There is this idea [among Americans] that being a refugee is begging,” he says. “I want to grab that idea from them.”

Jean Pierre was born in Rwanda in 1975. In 1994, while he was 19 and away at school in another province, his country exploded in violence as Hutu soldiers and civilians massacred hundreds of thousands of Tutsi men, women, and children and re-ignited a simmering civil war. Jean Pierre’s parents fled the genocide, unable to send word to him. He wandered both geographically and spiritually, with no possessions or documentation, traveling mostly alone in a region beset by conflict.

After checking a refugee camp for his family, Jean Pierre was jailed by Rwandan authorities who assumed him a rebel. At one point he fled on foot from violence in the Rwandan capital of Kigali, walking more than 180 miles in a week out of Rwanda and eventually landing in a refugee camp in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. At another point, when Jean Pierre was at a refugee camp in Tanzania, the government began forcibly removing refugees. He hid in the bush as officials hunted them like animals.

Jean Pierre crossed into Kenya after a 300-mile walk, during which he subsisted on water, salt, and sugar that he’d gotten from the Tanzanian camp and edible plants found along the way. In Nairobi, he learned about Kakuma and was able to get there in 1998.

Officials strategically chose to locate Kakuma in remote northwest Kenya, close to the border of South Sudan—a country which alone has produced 2.4 million refugees. The camp has no walls, and inhabitants can move freely in and out until curfew, but pervasive banditry in the wilderness outside the camp has turned the region into Kenya’s Wild West. It is consistently windy, dangerously dusty, and always hot.

Kakuma Camp, Northern KenyaCourtesy of Tom Albinson / IAFR
Kakuma Camp, Northern Kenya

When Jean Pierre arrived at Kakuma, he lacked documentation, which made it difficult to qualify for UN rations. He was taken in by a church leader who, at a revival meeting one evening, shared his testimony. The leader had been left for dead in a mass grave and was rescued by passers-by.

“He shared his story, then I realized my problems were not big,” says Jean Pierre, who responded to an altar call after that. He marks that night as a major shift in his perspective—from negative to positive, from hopeless to hopeful. He says it was then that God became real for him.

Jean Pierre started high school in the camp at age 25 and got heavily involved in his church, which provided him food and shelter until he received official refugee documents. (“I did not sit down,” he says.) He met his future wife, Appoline, who had also fled Rwanda. She attended his school and also sang in his church choir. They were married in 2001, the year Jean Pierre obtained his papers, and lived together in Kakuma for the next 15 years.

It’s not unusual to spend long periods of time in a refugee camp. Most refugee-producing African conflicts have been going on for 20 years or more, and estimates on the average length of stay in a camp vary from 9 to 25 years or more. World Bank experts say that as of the end of 2015, half the world’s refugees had been in exile for four years or more.

Which is why refugees often struggle deeply with identity issues. Living in Kakuma didn’t make Jean Pierre Kenyan, but he had nowhere else to go. In Kakuma he settled into something resembling a normal routine. Along with 75,000 other people in the camp at the time, however, he and Appoline also lived in constant tension: putting together a life while waiting for government officials to decide when and where their next life would begin.

“The people there are stuck,” says Tom Albinson, president of the Minnesota-based International Association for Refugees (IAFR). “They’re in a space; they’re not in a place.” Jean Pierre, for his part, had resigned himself to the idea that his family of five might never get out.

Kakuma, like other refugee camps, has structurally evolved as a result of such long stays. Families might live in tents but might also have a home with mud walls, patched over time. The UN distributes corrugated metal sheets for use in construction, but refugees must make their own mud bricks.

A mini-economy has emerged as Kakuma has sprawled (walking across the camp could take two or three hours). Residents use cell phones to spend and bank money through Kenya’s mobile transfer system, called M-Pesa. Hotels have popped up. Residents congregate in bars and coffee shops as they would anywhere else. In other words, camps like Kakuma that were originally constructed to be impermanent are becoming quite the opposite.

Churches form naturally in camps when refugees live there for so long. Kakuma had at least 67 when Jean Pierre was starting his family and ministry career there. But partnerships between camp churches are uncommon. That’s according to Albinson, who says African churches are often quite competitive.

In 2002, as a newlywed in his late 20s, Jean Pierre accompanied his pastor to a morning meeting where several pastors wanted to resolve an ongoing conflict.

Two years earlier, a nonprofit had given some musical instruments to the then three-year-old United Refugee Churches (URC), an umbrella association for several dozen Protestant churches in the camp at the time. Churches fought bitterly to use the donated drumset and keyboard, prized luxuries in a place where dances form around crude shakers made from foil and gravel. The instruments were so divisive that, only a year later, the nonprofit took them back. But the damage was done.

Looking around the room for a mediator, the leaders of the meeting picked Jean Pierre—he was not involved in the URC and the only one there with no prior allegiances. Jean Pierre dissolved the dispute and went on to improve other processes. He revamped the URC’s communication methods and resolved a denominational argument about baptism.

The association promoted Jean Pierre to chairman. He got a cell phone for work use and built relationships with outside groups, including the National Council of Churches of Kenya.

Jean Pierre’s descriptions of the URC in his early time there harken back to early infighting among the tribes of Israel, before Jethro confronted Moses about his lack of leadership structure. They were God’s people, trying to seek God—but also foreigners with little pastoral oversight, in a foreign land, wasting time and energy on squabbling. Jean Pierre set up networks for better management and communication—six churches would report to one pastor, another six to another pastor, and so on.

According to Jean Pierre, URC churches began operating more smoothly and the association flourished. He helped identify and pool church resources for group use. If one church had a great evangelist and another had a great set of musical instruments, he taught them to swap. Some congregants had a desire to go to Bible schools, and others had already been; soon a newborn ministry school, Kakuma Interdenominational School of Mission (KISOM), flourished—even if within a condemned, abandoned primary school with collapsing walls. The association itself did not plant churches but did provide assistance for those who wished to.

Soon, the pastors felt that God wanted even more from them.

Just outside Kakuma roam nomadic people groups, the Turkana. The Turkana are considered part of the “host” community but not in the American sense of the word.

Kenya has forgotten the Turkana, Jean Pierre says. They’re “behind even the refugees,” because they aren’t eligible for the UN rations that camp residents receive. Turkana groups, frequently in dispute over livestock and grazing territory, are allowed into Kakuma to sell goat meat and firewood, but not to stay. Many Turkana resent the steady stream of visitors bringing donations to Kakuma residents, who construct fences from thorns around their homes to prevent theft.

Brian Doten pastors Northwood Church, the Gateras’ home church in Minneapolis, and has traveled twice to Kakuma. He first watched Jean Pierre preach in the camp at a pastors conference in 2013. Jean Pierre stood in front of a chalkboard with a large chart drawn on it. Passionately, and in Swahili, he explained his proposal: If all the churches pooled their UN rations of rice, oil, salt, and soap, they could have enough to give to the Turkana people. He was asking them to tithe.

“There is this idea [among Americans] that being a refugee is begging,” Jean Pierre says. “I want to grab that idea from them.”

If each church sets aside $1, Jean Pierre told the pastors, the association could have a budget of $70—no small amount in Kakuma. “It has to start with you. Are you tithing? If you’re not tithing—if we’re not tithing—nobody will do it,” Albinson, who was traveling with Doten, remembers Jean Pierre saying.

Doten says Jean Pierre regularly spoke this way to churches in Kakuma when they complained they didn’t have what they needed to do ministry. With a commanding presence, “he had a way of holding pastors accountable” that made people listen.

“His message was, ‘We can’t wait for resources from the outside. What has God put into our hand?’ ” Doten says. “He was always trying to challenge people not to see themselves as poverty-stricken and as ‘just’ refugees.”

Sarah Miller, a regional director with IAFR who oversees the Jonathan House in Saint Paul and also now oversees Jean Pierre’s ministry in America, has worked in refugee ministry since 1992. She says the kind of sacrificial giving Gatera promoted is not unheard of in refugee camps—she met a congregation at a camp in Malawi that tithed enough rice rations to start an orphanage. “God’s people who have so very, very, very little still want to reach out and help others, to be a part of what God is doing in the world,” Miller says.

Gatera teaches pastors at a training conference in Kakuma.Courtesy of Tom Albinson / IAFR
Gatera teaches pastors at a training conference in Kakuma.

In Kakuma, relationships between churches inside and outside the camp improved so much that several Turkana churches have joined the URC. Jean Pierre amended the URC’s constitution to create the United Refugee and Host Churches (URHC), creating trust in a place full of misinformation and suspicion.

“The distrust ran so deep,” says Jamie Aten, director of the Humanitarian Disaster Institute (HDI) at Wheaton College, which studied the URHC in 2012. He cites an incident where a goat had been killed outside the camp. One tribe blamed another, retaliations escalated, and soon churches were facing a major tribal conflict. Through church partnerships, pastors learned to cut off such sequences prior to another retaliation.

“People no longer fear moving between camp and host community churches since they have become one community,” the researchers wrote in a recent article for the Christian Journal for Global Health.

Even on smaller, denominational disputes, like one over baptism, Jean Pierre stressed unity in Kakuma—something he would also stress in his ministry in America.

“The main thing,” he says, gesturing in a circle to connote commonality, “is salvation. If it is the church . . . we are one. There is no kind of superiority. We can come together and do Jesus business together.”

Kakuma defies many refugee stereotypes. The #IAmKakuma hashtag on Twitter showcases inspiring stories, like a class of girls learning computer programming. Earlier this year, Kakuma hosted the first-ever TEDx talk held within a refugee camp.

Still, depression runs high in refugee camps. Suicide rates are going up in Kakuma, according to Jenny Hwang, managing director of HDI. Sometimes, she says, people suffering from depression—especially if they have been traumatized—display a phenomenon known to psychologists as learned helplessness. “If a series of circumstances keep telling you that your own responses won’t succeed, you just kind of lose hope.”

Albinson never saw any helplessness in Jean Pierre. They first met in 2011, in Kakuma, when Jean Pierre had already been leading the URC for some time. “The first surprise, always, is someone finds you a cold Coca-Cola,” Albinson says. “We’re sitting on plastic chairs in a mud building, with a dirt floor. He starts to tell me what they’re doing.”

What really surprised Albinson: Jean Pierre wasn’t asking for help or to partner with IAFR. “They were telling me, ‘If you want to partner with us, we’ll consider that.’ He wasn’t asking me if there was something he could do with me,” Albinson says.

Many NGOs visit Kakuma and offer donations or other assistance. Often, they don’t return.

In an effort to create a healthy boundary for pastors and churches, Jean Pierre explains, the association started “screening” visitors. Each Friday, visitors would meet with a committee to plan their week. That committee held the power to decide how visitors could help, matching skills and resources with needs in the camp. (This was also a way to screen for false teachers, Jean Pierre says.)

“Our default [as humans] is to be transactional: ‘What do you need from me?’ ” Albinson says. But in Kakuma, “they are leading.”

Albinson kept coming twice a year, and Jean Pierre finally started sharing some needs and ideas.

Saturdays are when Jean Pierre’s cell phone is “open,” when the eight refugee pastors he mentors through IAFR know they can reach him.

Once when his phone rings, Jean Pierre answers with a “Yes, Pastor!” and a cheery “Hello, Pastor!” greets him on the other end. He chatters in Swahili for a while, then hangs up. A Congolese pastor is facing a conflict at his church in Fargo, North Dakota: A young minister in the congregation wants to strike out on his own. Jean Pierre has advised the pastor not to be threatened but to help the young man go. “Keeping him is keeping trouble,” Jean Pierre says.

With his passion for leading other ministry leaders, it’s tempting to speculate: Had Jean Pierre been born in the United States, would he be heading a megachurch by now?

He strongly dislikes the idea. He calls the megachurch model unbiblical, especially the practice of simulcasting sermons: “If on a Sunday I preach to 20 churches, what is the work of the pastors there?”

Jean Pierre says a pastor’s job is to find what he calls manifestations of the Holy Spirit within the congregation. Without identifying those, he says, the church becomes little more than a social gathering. “It’s the work of a leader to expose the potential of a subordinate,” he says. “Otherwise you find people are only sitting.” He mimes putting a DVD in a player and leaning back, arms folded.

It’s possible to imagine a correlation between Jean Pierre’s seemingly boundless—even restless—apostolic energy and his nomadic history. Refugee advocates at World Relief, for example, readily point to other refugee pastors whose stories and initiative mirror his: A Sudanese man threatened for his faith now juggling a church, family, part-time job, and an online degree program in the Chicago suburbs. Another pastor, leading a church just a few miles down the road, who also fled Sudan and held Billy Graham–style crusades in South Africa before coming to an American seminary.

According to Jean Pierre, refugee ministry leaders are naturally on the move. “That,” he says, wiping his hands, “is automatic.”

A series of minor miracles brought the Gateras to Minneapolis.

Even if the UN deems a refugee family eligible for resettlement, the family can’t move without an invitation from a specific country willing to resettle them. When Jean Pierre and Appoline were first married in 2001, the UN briefly offered them tickets to Australia. But Australia at the time was prioritizing the most vulnerable for resettlement—especially single women and children—and as young, healthy newlyweds, the Gateras never got called.

In 2008 the UN took up their case again, and the Gateras applied to go to both Canada and the United States. Jean Pierre says he felt God telling him their US application would move faster, and it did—if one can conceive of eight years as fast. Finally, a Minneapolis-based group called Arrive Ministries, a World Relief affiliate, put in a request to bring them to Minnesota.

The Gateras prepared to leave Kakuma in 2016 for the United States, after seeing one last miracle. The year before, Jean Pierre had finally embraced his father—for the first time since he was a teenager. They had reconnected on Facebook. Jean Pierre learned that his mother had perished during the attempted escape from Rwanda in 1994, but his children met their grandfather, at least, in Kakuma just months before they left it behind.

In the end, Albinson, Doten, and other Americans who had visited Kakuma met the Gateras at the Minneapolis-Saint Paul airport. Doten says that for people at Northwood Church, it was like meeting a celebrity. When the Gateras arrived, exhausted, in their new apartment to a takeout dinner from a nearby East African restaurant, enthusiastic Northwood families just wanted to sit around and watch them eat.

The Gateras arrived at the Minneapolis airport in 2016, when they were resettled in the US after 20 years of waiting in Kakuma.Courtesy of Tom Albinson / IAFR
The Gateras arrived at the Minneapolis airport in 2016, when they were resettled in the US after 20 years of waiting in Kakuma.

The Gateras were among 78,761 resettled by the United States in 2016, according to UN statistics. It was a peak year due to the Syrian crisis, up from an average of 51,000 in previous years. Even though the United States still takes in more refugees than any other country, the numbers are falling precipitously. In 2017, the government accepted just 24,559; by the end of this year, experts expect the number to shrink to 22,000. And in September, the administration lowered the ceiling on refugee admission for next year to 30,000, the smallest cap since the 1970s.

Through the Evangelical Immigration Table, 400 pastors and local leaders have urged the administration to reconsider this number, pointing out that it puts persecuted people of all faiths at risk.

“Seeing yet another drop in refugee numbers should be a shock to the conscience of all Americans,” said Russell Moore, president of the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, in a statement following the announcement.

Resettlement, Jean Pierre says, was like getting thrown into the sea. But his strongest memory of that first winter isn’t the frigid temperatures. It’s the time Appoline missed her bus stop and got lost in the Minneapolis public transit system.

Refugees in America often cite loneliness as their hardest initial struggle. Without transportation, or neighbors dropping by, as is more common in African countries, refugees are often stuck in their apartments for weeks without human contact. Northwood had resettled a few families prior to the Gateras’ arrival and gave the family a list of church members to call for help with almost anything.

“If you have a car problem, you call Joel. If you have problems with the kids’ education, you call Kristi,” Doten says.

One church member drove an hour each way to take the Gatera kids to youth ministry events. And once Jean Pierre had his driver’s permit, he told the church he needed practice time behind the wheel. “I told them, ‘This is where I have reached, and I need you to come in and be helpful to me,’ ” he says. Someone volunteered to teach him, and Fridays—once the day he passed out ministry assignments to visitors in Kakuma—became his day to practice turn signals and highway exits.

Church members have also assisted the Gateras with their $7,500 travel debt. But just as he drew boundaries around the URHC, Jean Pierre draws a line around his family when well-intentioned friends take a little too much direction—like giving his kids cash or clothes. “Freedom isn’t freedom without healthy boundaries,” he says. He feels no need to grasp at straws, perhaps because God has already answered one of his biggest lifelong prayers: not to allow his children to wander the earth like he did. “That is why my aim is for them to get citizenship,” he says.

On a hot Sunday morning in July, the day after Jean Pierre’s visit with Wilson, the Liberian asylum seeker, he and Appoline harmonize exuberantly to “Holy, Holy, Holy” at Northwood. If the Gateras were looking for an American church that embodied their personal “no sitting” philosophy, they have found it. Music leaders caution attendees: Don’t let this become a “listening” service. The pastors commission a team of youth about to leave for a summer trip to a Kenyan orphanage.

Jean Pierre hopes to go back to visit someday. “I still have Kakuma DNA with me,” he says. “Kakuma is my home.” Among other places, he’d like to visit the KISOM ministry school he helped launch, which has prepared over 1,000 men and women for ministry since 1999 using teachers from Kakuma communities.

Jean Pierre has no official leadership role at Northwood but preaches occasionally. He focuses mainly on his studies and on the eight refugee pastors that he mentors. On any given Saturday, he might be driving to Iowa City to meet with more pastors or traveling to Denver to help a Sudanese pastor understand the legalities of marriage in America. “Gatera’s full wattage is mind-blowing, how much that guy can do,” Albinson says.

After the service at Northwood, someone in the church invites the Gatera kids over to swim. Jean Pierre says maybe later that afternoon—first, he has carved out some time for the family to spend together. They leave to pack lunches at a food pantry for a couple of hours.

Laura Finch is a freelance writer based in the Chicago area.

Did this story resonate with you? Let us know here.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube