The Potential And The Vacuum

Let Europe Hear: The Spiritual Plight of Europe, by Robert P. Evans (Moody, 1963, 528 pp., $5.95), is reviewed by Dwight Wadsworth, European representative of Torchbearers (an international missionary fellowship), Obernhof/Lahn, West Germany.

People seeking insight into the complex religious status of Free Europe and desiring factual information about the true spiritual climate of this most densely populated continent on earth will be grateful to Robert Evans, founder and European director of Greater Europe Mission, for this concentrated result of his many years of first-hand experience and observation. He has constantly woven significant statistics into the fabric of the report, and his mature assessment of the prevailing situation is well supported by extensive quotation of authorities representing a broad range of thought. The results of wide reading and real research are to be found in this work, which has as its principal thesis that the Christian culture and history of Europe may not be accepted as proof of its evangelization. That the Church has been a factor in European life is recognized, but Evans points out, with compelling logic, that North Africa once had a thriving church as well. If one accepts his premise that the inhabitants of any continent have a right to hear the good news of the Gospel in understandable terms, one must concede that the evidence presented is a mighty argument for a new missionary assault against this bastion of superstition, demon worship, diluted theology, and aggressive atheism.

Much that Evans has to say about the sixteen nations of Free Europe will come as a surprise to Americans: the superficiality of much that took place in the Reformation; the number of pagan elements still to be found within the Church; the extent to which Communism may be called the product of the spiritual bankruptcy of “Christian” Europe; the amount of activity by modern sects to capture the minds of Europeans; the inexplicable blindness of missionary leaders to the strategic importance of this continent; and such baffling statistical facts as the comparison of missionary activity in Italy to that in Brazil (Brazil has 10,893 Protestant churches and 948 missionaries, Italy 724 churches and 60 missionaries—yet they are about equal in population).

Some readers, inevitably, will feel that certain phases of the immense subject Evans has chosen should have been treated more fully, but many more people will be pleased at the opportunity this single volume affords to survey the European scene and comprehend many of the factors contributing to its spiritual darkness. The author manifests real ability to condense and illuminate. Although centuries of development among peoples of most diverse characteristics are contemplated, he briefs us competently regarding historical background, pertinent theological influences, philosophical trends, and nationalistic coloring, and does so from the standpoint of a man who appreciates and loves Europeans with a discerning love.

Here is a readable volume that deals with an extremely important matter with such brevity that “he that runneth may read,” but with enough detail that the “runner” may be considerably informed. May the book alert all Christendom to the vast potential and spiritual vacuum that is Europe.

DWIGHT WADSWORTH

Luther And Barth?

Luther’s View of Church History, by John M. Headley (Yale University Press, 1963, 301 pp., $6.75), is reviewed by Paul Woolley, professor of church history, Westminster Theological Seminary, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Church history begins with the records in the Old Testament. Luther and Headley recognize this fact. This book is a study of how Luther interpreted the history of the Church. But the first hundred pages ask what history is and how it is related to the Bible and to the Word of God. Headley contends that for Luther the Word came to man through Scripture, the Church, and the sacraments. There is an important and illuminating section on how Luther interpreted Scripture. Was he Neoorthodox? It is hard to tell from this volume. Time and again one is almost ready to conclude that he anticipated Barth on Scripture by over four centuries—and then Headley reports something that appears to rescue Luther.

Luther’s doctrine of the Church comes through more clearly. It is “the community of believers” (p. 30), for example, based on faith rather than, with Augustine, on election. History as action is God’s work. It derives its authority and veracity “from its agreement with Scripture” (p. 44). Written histories are rational proofs. Sacred history, found in Scripture, stands apart from other histories. But sacred history is not confined to Scripture. It is the history of “the hidden people of faith in all times and places” (p. 54).

When Luther was faced with the extra-scriptural authorities of post-apostolic revelations, oral tradition, and the canon law, he sought to recover the authority of the original tradition and to dissociate Scripture from competing authorities (Vatican Council II please note).

There are some soft spots. Did sola scriptura as a critical principle reject only what was contrary to Scripture? Did the original impulse of the Reformation have “nothing at all to do” with moral corruption?

The major portion of the book is wordy and ill-organized. Luther sees the Church as passing through three epochs: the epoch of the patriarchs, the epoch of Abraham and the law of Moses, and the present epoch of persecution. This last is eschatological. “The end of the world begins immediately after the resurrection of Christ” (p. 144). As against Rome, no additions to the content of the faith are to be made in this period. Here, the ecumenical movement is really faced with a problem. Is it going to hold to this Protestant principle?

If Headley had reached his epilogue sooner, the book would have been better. But it does keep one thinking. Do you follow Augustine or Luther as a historian? What idea of verbal inspiration can be in Headley’s mind to lead to the two statements about Osiander and Bucer on the next-to-the-last page?

Luther “rejected the Aristotelian explanations” for the brightness of “the evangelical light” (p. 234); we may do likewise.

PAUL WOOLLEY

The Getting Out Is The Problem

Our Life in Christ, by J. K. S. Reid (Westminster, 1963, 148 pp., $3.75), is reviewed by James Daane, editorial associate,CHRISTIANITY TODAY.

This book probes for the meaning of the biblical phrase “in Christ”; its chapters, slightly modified, were the 1960 Princeton Seminary Warfield Lectures.

The significance of this phrase, says Reid, professor of Christian dogmatics at the University of Aberdeen, was thrust into the center of theological concern seventy years ago by Adolf Deissmann’s Die neutestamentliche Formel ‘in Christo Jesu.’

Although the idea of being “in Christ” appears in the Gospels, the phrase itself appears only in Acts, First Peter, and the Johannine writings, from whence Paul borrowed it and made it into a technical term.

The singular importance of the term is indicated by the mere fact that no other name can stand after and be governed by the word in. But what does it mean? Reid rejects Deissmann’s spiritual-mystical interpretation forged by his virtual identification of Christ and the Spirit. It does less than justice, Reid says, to the Incarnation.

In Paul’s basic usage the “in Christ” points to an objective truth, contingent on neither the action of the Spirit nor the faith of man, the truth that Christ is the ground and determination of a man’s being as a Christian. The phrase connotes a gracious divine determination, a determination of a man’s being as a Christian and the life that emanates from this determination. This means salvation by grace alone, pre-estination, and the exclusion of Pelagianism and all forms of syncretism.

However, since the “in Christ” has reference to a divine determination grounded in that Incarnation in which Jesus assumed our universal, common human nature and in it died for all men, all men are in Christ.

How do Christians share in Christ? Not by an existentialist response as in Bultmann or Tillich, for existential theology leaves the sinner to his own resources and devices, which are not equal to the demand. Nor by a conditional theology which says, “Christ is yours, if you accept him.” Nor by obedience, for that raises the problem of sin rather than a solution which is redemptive. Nor by imitation, for some forms of imitating Christ would be of the essence of sin, and even in legitimate imitation, “imitation” is far too superficial a concept to describe the life and experience of the Christian. The concept of “participation” best describes how the Christian shares in the life of Christ.

The concept of participation is of course particularly felicitous for an “in Christ” which is grounded in the Incarnation, but it leaves Reid with the difficulty of avoiding a necessary universalism. Why any man is a Christian finds its explanation in the gracious predestination of God. But there is no rational explanation, says Reid, which accounts for those in Christ who do not become Christians, or, as Reid also puts it, for a man’s not being what he is, one who is in the Christ who died for him. There can be on the Christian position no good, rational reason for evil and unbelief. Reid rejects Calvin’s ambiguous use of praedestinatio duplex as an explanation for the persistent unbeliever, as he does the Augustinian-Calvinistic understanding of the sinner as a substantialized, independent center of opposition to God which, says Reid, led to the second error, the substantialization of an omnipotent grace regarded as something separate from God.

The closest Reid comes to “explaining” the possibility of being in Christ and yet lost is his reference to the fact that in sin, man, while remaining man, is something other than an authentic man.

Reid presents a serious and studied attempt to deliver Christianity from a subjectivistic, activistic, individualistic interpretation which infringes on the objective, organic, and gracious character of man’s redemption, a threat which has ever haunted the classical Reformed theological tradition. It would be too much to say that he succeeds, though he does grapple in a stimulating way with the problem. Many evangelicals will challenge his view of Scripture, and some will challenge his theological method, which allows his Christology to put content into his anthropology (particularly since he insists, “Of the Christ who was before the incarnation takes place, it cannot be said that we are in him”) and which, on the other hand, allows his anthropology to throw light on his Christology (we may construe Christ as one who is able to function “as the one in whom man can be said to be”). But all this calls for a closer analysis than can be given here. Here it must suffice to say that man as the imago dei is, according to Reid, one for whom the destiny of being in Christ is possible, and Christ must be Christologically so construed as to be one in whom it is possible for man to exist. Reid constantly skirts the ontological question of Christ as the ground and reality of man’s existence, yet he never deals with it explicitly—and therefore (perhaps) once quotes but never deals with the Pauline assertion that “we are created in Christ Jesus.”

JAMES DAANE

Quick Survey

Theories of Revelation, by H. D. McDonald (Allen & Unwin, 1963, 384 pp., 37s. 6d.), is reviewed by Gordon H. Clark, professor of philosophy, Butler University, Indianapolis, Indiana.

As indicated by the subtitle, An Historical Study 1860–1960, this volume surveys the views of biblical critics on a number of important points.

The first two chapters are philosophic and scientific, describing the unsettling effect of Darwin, Spencer, Clifford, Freud. Tillich, Brunner, and Bultmann on belief in the Bible. The third chapter surveys higher criticism. The author then discusses the significance of Christ’s appeals to the Old Testament, and the critics’ theories of accommodation, kenosis, and “religious” versus “historical” intention. The remaining chapters run over the various views on the Scriptures and the Word, biblical inerrancy, biblical inspiration, biblical authority, and revelation and authority.

The chief defect of the book is no doubt its chief merit: it is a quick survey of a century of criticism. The historical development is competently spread before the reader, and the material is well worth having. Obviously the author is extremely well informed. Some 600 authors are mentioned, but of course only briefly. It might have been better to omit two-thirds of them in order to treat more adequately the more important writers. As it is, one tends to tire of the continuous cataloging.

The author has expressed his own views in another volume. Here it is hard to discern precisely what they are. He is very keen in uncovering the weaknesses and inconsistencies of the destructive critics; he exposes their persistent misrepresentation of the Reformation view of the Bible, and treats the orthodox scholars with reasonable respect. Then, too, it is clear that he demands objectivity in revelation. The subjectivity of Schleiermacher, of Harnack, of Barth is repudiated. Christianity cannot be based on experience; there must be a verbal message from God.

But the author does not clearly state that this verbal message is entirely true. In the Introduction he contrasts the view of revelation as a body of divinely communicated truths with the view that revelation existing ab extra is the wickedest of all follies. The impression left at the end of the book is that there must be some compromise between the extremes of objectivity and subjectivity.

GORDON H. CLARK

Illustrious Triumph

Christ’s Witchdoctor, by Homer E. Dowdy (Harper & Row, 1963, 241 pp., $3.95), is reviewed by R. Kenneth Strachan, general director, Latin America Mission, San Jose, Costa Rica.

It is encouraging to see the number of books on the missionary movement in Latin America gradually building up. Thanks to Homer Dowdy and Harper’s, a new chapter has been added to the story of the work among the lowland Indian tribes. As seen through North American eyes, this account of a witchdoctor’s conversion, resulting in the amazing transformation of the life of the Wai Wai in British Guiana, is another thrilling illustration of Gospel conquest.

Back of that story is another that begins on the plains of Texas in the life and ministry of a radio evangelist and his wife. It was their lives and vision that sent the brothers Hawkins—Neill, Rader, and Bob—to the jungles of the Amazon.

Christ’s Witchdoctor brings home to the reader the wonder and joy of God’s reproductive design in the missionary call. It’s worth reading.

R. KENNETH STRACHAN

Old Doctrine, New Frontiers

The New Evangelicalism, by Ronald H. Nash (Zondervan, 1963, 188 pp., $3.95), is reviewed by James M. Boice, editorial assistant,CHRISTIANITY TODAY.

Ever since the emergence of the new evangelicalism in the 1950s and its subsequent history of expanding impact upon the current religious scene, there has been a need for a scholarly and sympathetic assessment of the evangelical movement as a historical phenomenon and as a revived presentation of orthodox theology. The New Evangelicalism, by Congregationalist minister and teacher Ronald Nash, fills this need and more. It examines the causes leading to the rise of the new evangelicalism; elucidates the doctrines of the movement, finding them squarely in line with Protestant orthodoxy; and sets forth the evangelical frontiers in the areas of biblical inspiration, Christian unity, and philosophical apologetics.

The author has examined the writings of Edward J. Carnell, Carl F. H. Henry, Bernard Ramm, Gordon Clark, Harold John Ockenga, and others and has found them in harmony with early fundamentalist doctrine, before an unwarranted preoccupation with dispensationalism and particular details of eschatology led to a reduction of the Christian Gospel within the fundamentalist movement. The author agrees with Dr. Ockenga that the new evangelicalism is distinct from neoorthodoxy in its complete acceptance of the inspiration and authority of the Bible, from modernism by its embrace of the full orthodox system of doctrine, and from contemporary fundamentalism by its belief that biblical doctrine and ethics must be applied to the social scene as well as to the individual man.

Nash finds the cornerstone of the evangelical position to be its doctrines of inspiration and revelation. He rejects as a misunderstanding the neoorthodox claim that the evangelical doctrines imply dictation or bibliolatry. He rejects the fundamentalist critique that evangelicals are surrendering the truth of verbal inspiration. Instead he finds a belief which identifies written sentences and propositions with special divine revelation, yet denies neither the necessary subjective appropriation of God’s truth nor the significance of certain divine acts as revelation. Such belief, he feels, is not only the historical Christian view but also an indispensable element in a proper biblical theology.

What Nash finds most characteristic of the new evangelicals is not their renewed struggles with old problems but their refreshing eagerness to open new frontiers. Among the areas of advance: an examination of the nature and function of biblical language, development of a valid biblical basis for Christian unity, formation of a metaphysical grounding for Christian doctrine, and creation of an evangelical alliance based upon mutual understanding and cooperation within the orthodox fold. It is a tribute to this book that the author himself advances the causes for which he calls.

His effort to be constructive does not bar the author from a vigorous polemic. He is particularly irate at neoorthodox and fundamentalist spokesmen who berate the evangelical position without taking the trouble to investigate or understand it. He notes with candor the areas in which the evangelicals themselves disagree. And in the final chapter he offers a challenge to the neo-evangelical movement itself—to perpetuate its academic and spiritual insights to its posterity.

Who should read this book? Everyone who would pretend to speak either for or against the evangelical cause! Many of the latter would at least find the issues sharpened, and many, perhaps to their surprise, would find that they are more truly new evangelicals than they would have previously believed.

JAMES M. BOICE

After Fifty-Seven Years

A Grammar of New Testament Greek, Volume III, by James Hope Moulton, Syntax by Nigel Turner (T. & T. Clark, 1963, 418 pp., 60s.), is reviewed by J. Neville Birdsall, lecturer in theology, University of Birmingham, England.

The English-speaking New Testament scholar has waited long for an adequate grammar of New Testament Greek: the work begun by J. H. Moulton in 1906 (third edition 1908) has met with many setbacks through the untoward deaths of Moulton himself and of his successors, W. F. Howard and H. G. Meecham. Now at last the long-awaited third volume, containing the matter which all but the philological specialist most need and desire, namely, syntax, has appeared, having been brought to a successful conclusion by Dr. Nigel Turner.

No one can write a treatise on the structure of a language without revealing his views concerning its nature and origin. The Prolegomena of Moulton was one of the classical documents of that phase of the study of New Testament Greek in which scholars emphasized its identity with the Koine, as revealed in the recently discovered papyri, and the continuity of modern demotic Greek with these phenomena. Similarly in the course of a syntactical exposition Dr. Turner presents his conclusion that this emphasis was one-sided and that New Testament Greek presents certain features explicable only by the influence of the Septuagint and, in other cases, of Aramaic: that is to say, he upholds the concept of a biblical Greek distinct in some measure from other forms of contemporary Greek. It is of interest and importance to have such a discussion. A striking feature of this is the stress laid upon the preponderance of the optative mood in biblical Greek when contrasted with relevant documents, which shows among other things the influence of religious aspiration upon linguistic usage.

Turner naturally deals with syntax in the traditional and logical way, i.e., analysis and treatment of the use of parts of speech comes first, the sentence as a whole last. But a refreshing feature and one evidently designed to help the expositor who is not a professional grammarian is Turner’s inclination to avoid technical terms of Latin derivation for a more natural Germanic structure (e.g., “building up the sentence” instead of “sentence construction”). The work is intended for both the theorist and the man who in the pulpit or schoolroom must apply the findings of scholarship. It is inevitable that one aspect should suffer, however slightly: it seems to the reviewer that because of this latter emphasis, very salutary and necessary as it may be, this has become a somewhat different book from the two preceding volumes whose work it completes.

A longer space would give opportunity to discuss many points of detail, but it is good to have to conclude not with the minutiae with which grammarians must concern themselves, sometimes to the despair of others, but with the expression of praise and thanks for a work which scholars and preachers will find stimulating and illuminating in the task of opening up the lively oracles of God.

J. NEVILLE BIRDSALL

Book Briefs

Principles and Practices of Pastoral Care, by Russell L. Dicks (Prentice-Hall, 1963, 143 pp., $2.95). A world of good sense and advice, with an occasional breakthrough of bad theology.

The Way of the Cross, by J. Ralph Grant (Baker, 1963, 173 pp., $2.95). Popular, readable short sermons on redemption by the way of the Cross.

Sons of the Prophets, edited by Hugh T. Kerr (Princeton University, 1963, 227 pp., $5). Biographies of a selection of significant people associated with Princeton Theological Seminary over the years, whose lives throw light on the history of the seminary. Included are C. Hodge, W. Lowrie. J. L. Hromadka. Excluded, strangely, are B. Warfield and John Mackay, both of whom did more to shape Princeton than did some of those included.

Josiah Royce’s Seminar, 1913–1911, edited by Grover Smith (Rutgers University, 1963, 209 pp., $7.50). Of interest to students of Royce.

The Marriage Climate, by Ernest Ligon and Leona Smith (Bethany Press, 1963, 240 pp., $4.75). A skillfully presented discussion of the dynamics that make or break a happy marriage and home. With Christian motifs, humorous text, and line drawings. As down to earth as mama’s sudden bad mood, or papa’s wrath over burnt potatoes.

Did the Early Church Baptize Infants?, by Kurt Aland (Westminster, 1963, 120 pp., $3.50). German university professor argues against the case for infant baptism on the basis of biblical sources and the early church fathers. He contends that infant baptism was not practiced before the third century.

Global Odyssey, by Howard A. Johnson (Harper & Row, 1963, 448 pp., $5.95). Canon of the Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine of New York tells of visiting the Anglican communion in eighty countries. The well-told story is studded with perceptive insights and evaluations. Good reading.

Pen-ultimates, by Martin E. Marty and Dean Peerman (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963, 110 pp., $2.95). A collection of essays which jibe at the contradictions between Christian claim and Christian practice. The pen-ultimate essays running weekly in The Christian Century are frequently ironical and witty, sometimes only clever, often perceptive, at times almost sacrilegious, and cometime, we trust, will add hurt to humor, so that the contradictions become more tragic than ironic.

The Conservative Affirmation, by Willmoore Kendall (Regnery, 1963, 272 pp., $5.95). A definitive statement of the differences between political conservatism and liberalism; the roots of conservatism are traced to the Founders’ views expressed in the Federalist Papers, the roots of liberalism to the European egalitarian revolt of the last century.

The Books and the Parchments, by F. F. Bruce (Revell, 1963, 287 pp., $4). A substantial, excellent study of all the matters of language, canonicity, versions, apocryphal books, and much more that played roles in the process by which we got our Bible. If as the Preface to the first edition declares, this book was written for “non-specialists,” then Kant wrote for the kindergarten.

The Need To Be Loved, by Theodor Reik (Farrar, Straus, 1963, 276 pp., $4.95). One of Freud’s early students muses hither and yon on the many facets of sexual love, and by sexegetical techniques presents some “way out” biblical interpretations.

Isaac Backus: Pioneer of Religious Liberty, by T. B. Maston (American Baptist Historical Society [1100 S. Goodman, Rochester 20, N.Y.], 1962, 150 pp., $3.25). Abridgement of a doctoral dissertion written for Yale University on the life and work of an eighteenth-century Baptist preacher, with special emphasis on his contribution to liberty of conscience and the political ethic of church-state separation. In a style often prosaic.

Christ for the World, compiled and edited by G. Allen West, Jr. (Broadman, 1963, 146 pp., $2.95). Fourteen challenging mission sermons by as many Baptists.

Creeds of the Churches, edited by John H. Leith (Aldine, 1963, 589 pp., $7.50). A selected group of the major creeds from the Bible to the present. Each creed is introduced and its place indicated in the movement of theological development.

The Apostle Paul: Christ’s Supreme Trophy, by Roland Q. Leavell (Baker, 1963, 128 pp., $2.95). Short, compact, well-drawn presentation of the life of Paul. For individual reading or group study.

The New Testament in the Language of Today, by William Beck (Concordia, 1963, 459 pp., $4.75). A translation so clear and readable that the naive-sounding jacket claim; “What before may have been dark and puzzling—even cumbersome and archaic—is now joyously, immediately clear,” is almost wholly justified.

The Book of Revelation, by Merrill C. Tenney (Baker, 1963, 116 pp., $2.75). A brief, practical, evangelical exposition.

The Existentialist Theology of Paul Tillich, by Bernard Martin (Bookman Associates, 1963, 221 pp., $5). A Jewish rabbi gives a competent philosophic critique of Tillich’s philosophical theology.

Living Obediently, by J. Allen Blair (Loizeaux Brothers, 1963, 190 pp., $2.75). A heart-warming, practical, evangelical interpretation of the Book of Jonah that sometimes make points that the Book itself does not.

The Cross and the Switchblade, by David Wilkerson (Geis, 1963, 217 pp., $4.95). A revealing narrative of a country preacher gone “big city”—his grappling with teen-age delinquents and through the power of the Spirit guiding them into Christian life. Useful for workers with teen-agers.

Paperbacks

The Limits of Nuclear War, by Paul Ramsay (Council on Religion and International Affairs [170 E. 64th St., New York 21], 1963, 56 pp., $.50). Whether the reader agrees or disagrees, he will be enlightened and provoked to think about the great political and moral questions which flow from the rise of modern nuclear weapons.

A Manual of Simple Burial, edited by Ernest Morgan (Celo Press [Burnsville, N.C.], 1962, 64 pp., $1). Information about such subjects as memorial societies and bequeathal of bodies to medical schools and eyes to banks. The bereaved are warned against elaborate, expensive funerals which overemphasize the body, and clergymen against throwing away spiritual opportunities by use of religious language.

Agenda for Anglicans, by Dewi Morgan (Morehouse-Barlow, 1963, 167 pp., $1.75). An Anglican looks at the Anglican community (a family of forty million), telling what he sees and how he evaluates it.

The Wild Goats of Ein Gedi, by Herbert Weiner (Doubleday. 1963, 312 pp., $1.95). The author digs into the spiritual landscape of modern Israel and records a number of religious interviews and encounters with the people of the land.

To Hunger No More, by I. W. Moomaw (Friendship, 1963, 163 pp., $1.95). A Church of the Brethren agricultural missionary tells what is being done to meet a physical need that causes 10,000 people to die by starvation every day.

Man Reaches Out to God, by Herbert C. Jackson (Judson, 1963, 126 pp., $1.75). Within the commitment that the purpose of Christian missions is to convert people to Christianity, a onetime missionary, now a professor, urges that the Church must study the non-Christian religions of the world, especially in view of their current resurgence.

The Bible in the Local Church, by E. H. Robertson (Association, 1963, 107 pp., $1.25). An analytical study of the place the Bible actually plays in the life of local congregations.

The Soul Winner, by Charles Haddon Spurgeon (Eerdmans, 1963, 319 pp., $1.75). An explication of how to win souls so that we “might by all means save some.” Brief foreward by Helmut Thielicke.

Concerning the Ministry, by John Oman (John Knox, 1963, 248 pp., $2.50). Sagacious advice, with a homespun quality, from a theologian of stature to those who minister in the Church. First published in 1936.

Reprints

The Christian Opportunity, by Denis De Rougemont (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1963, 185 pp., $4.50). Perceptive, incisive observations about many things in essays delightful and sophisticated. First published in 1944.

Wrestlers With God, by Clarence E. Macartney (Baker, 1963, 207 pp., $2.95). Devotional readings on the prayers of David, Abraham. Elisha, Lot, and others. First printed in 1930.

The Letters to the Seven Churches, by William M. Ramsay (Baker, 1963, 446 pp., $4.95). An authority on the life of Paul and the early Church indicates the place of the seven letters in the Book of Revelation. First published in 1904.

The March of Eleven Men, by Frank S. Mead (Revell, 1963, 236 pp., $2.95). With swift stroke and colorful style the author conveys the pageantry of Christianity’s march through the centuries. First printed in 1932.

Pirates And Presbyterians

A devout band of twenty-nine Cuban Presbyterians who escaped to the Bahamas fell victim to a kidnapping assault by Castro’s gunboats last month. Nineteen of the refugees were seized and returned to Cuba by armed troops who landed on the British island of Anguilla Key. Others hid behind rocks or buried themselves in the sand. The refugees said their group included no revolutionaries, “only humble God-fearing people.” Said one: “Our only arms were Bibles.”

Convention Circuit

Delegates to the thirty-seventh biennial convention of the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod voted 138 to 28 to withdraw from the 91-year-old Lutheran Synodical Conference, oldest association of conservative Lutherans in America. The action was described as a protest against the largest member of the conference, the Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, which was charged with doctrinal deviations.

The Mennonite Church’s biennial General Conference adopted a new “Confession of Faith,” marking the denomination’s first revision of beliefs in more than forty years. Also approved was a “Brief Statement of Mennonite Doctrine” for liturgical use.

The National Association of Free Will Baptists assailed the Supreme Court ban on public school devotions in a resolution adopted unanimously by some 2,000 delegates.

Appointment of a committee to conduct ecumenical conversations was approved by delegates to the 151st annual Seventh Day Baptist General Conference. The action was in response to an invitation from the American Baptist Convention to engage in conversations exploring the possibility of interdenominational cooperation and merger.

Miscellany

The Greek Orthodox Church is renting space in the New York World’s Fair pavilion being erected by the Protestant Council of the City of New York. In deference to Orthodox participation, the pavilion, previously named “The Protestant Center,” will now be known as “The Protestant and Orthodox Center.”

The World Council of Churches is appealing for $500,000 for relief work in quake-stricken Skopje. A development of 100 prefabricated homes is planned. Church World Service has already dispatched tons of drugs and clothing.

Foreign missionaries are forbidden to proselytize under a sweeping new legal code promulgated by King Mahendra of Nepal, where Hinduism is the state religion.

National Presbyterian Church in Washington was sold last month for $2,575,000. It will be torn down to make room for a new office building. A new church will be constructed along Massachusetts Avenue by the local congregation. An adjoining Presbyterian Center will be established by the United Presbyterian General Assembly.

Retired ministers are entitled to reduce their taxable income by the rental value of homes they occupy, provided that the dwellings in effect constitute compensation for past services, according to a ruling by the Internal Revenue Service.

New bishops were consecrated by the Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese in the United States and Canada despite charges that a reorganization was Communist-inspired. Bishop Dionisije of Libertyville, Illinois, has refused to recognize his suspension by the church’s council of bishops last May in Belgrade, Yugoslavia. He said the action was “under the pressure of Tito’s Communist regime of Yugoslavia.”

The Brazilian government is considering a suggestion that it issue a series of stamps honoring Yemanja, voodoo water goddess, at the end of the year.

Personalia

Dr. Robert D. Rasmussen appointed director of the Commission on the Ministry of the American Baptist Convention.

Dr. C. James Krafft, Dallas pediatrician, elected president of the Christian Medical Society.

The Rev. Tom Allan named editorial director of The Christian, an evangelical British weekly. He will continue also as minister of St. George’s Tron Church in Glasgow.

The Rev. Rex Burdick elected president of the Seventh Day Baptist General Conference.

The Rev. Arthur Blazall, 72-year-old Anglican clergyman, will stand trial in South Africa on charges of violating the Suppression of Communism Act.

The Greek government refused to allow re-entry to the country of the Rev. Argos Zodhiates, for seventeen years the pastor of Katerini Evangelical Church, the nation’s largest Protestant congregation. Zodhiates is a Greek from Cyprus and a British subject.

Worth Quoting

“The test ban could, in the future, be as important for humanity as the birth of Christ.”—General David M. Shoup, commandant of the Marine Corps.

“I am convinced that we are spiritual beings and only in a very secondary sense physical. Also, I think with our limited capacities we know practically nothing. But the future is resplendent with light.”—Dr. Earl Douglass, noted Bible commentator, on his seventy-fifth birthday.

“We need a time frequently when we think about something besides a dollar or a nickel or another cigarette.”—Former President Eisenhower, in urging a prayer room for the Eisenhower Center at Abilene, Kansas.

DEATHS

DR. JESSE M. BADER, 77, general secretary of the World Convention of Churches of Christ (Disciples); in New York City.

DR. EDWARD D. KOHLSTEDT, 88, retired Methodist Church official and former president of the Home Missions Council of North America; in Menlo Park, California.

GUISEPPE MOSCHETTI, 55, one of the world’s leading church organists, a former Roman Catholic priest most recently director of music at St. John’s Lutheran Church, Allentown, Pennsylvania; in Allentown.

THE REV. W. REGINALD WHEELER, 74, former secretary of the Presbyterian Board of Foreign Missions; in New York City.

DR. EARLE W. GATES, 54, past president of the International Society of Christian Endeavor; in Buffalo, New York.

CHRISTIANITY TODAY assigned four of us to cover the massive civil rights demonstration in Washington on August 28. Our job was to analyze the religious element of the march. An abundant sprinkling of piety was promised, and organized religion seemed eager to assume a major role in the day’s activities. But did the religious element have a genuine spiritual under-girding, or was it a mere form of godliness with the power thereof implicitly denied?

We met at the office at 8 A.M., although one of us had sacrificed sleep to observe the arrival at the Washington Monument grounds two hours earlier of American Nazis headed by George Lincoln Rockwell. The Nazis immediately drew a cordon of police and the attendant international publicity. They had been refused an official permit for the grounds and were forbidden to make speeches. Rockwell seized the opportunity to complain via radio and television that his rights had been denied him. His impatient deputy later tried to make a speech and was carted off to jail.

Following our office meeting we fanned out over the downtown Washington area. One headed for a breakfast meeting of 200 denominational leaders at the Statler Hilton, another for the New Bible Way Church where 200 Washington ministers held an interdenominational service.

On Capitol Hill, various Congressmen were receiving the ten leaders of the march, a group which included three clergymen: Dr. Eugene Carson Blake, stated clerk of the United Presbyterian Church in the U. S. A. and vice-chairman of the National Council of Churches’ Commission on Religion and Race; Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Baptist minister and founder-president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference; and Rabbi Joachim Prinz, president of the American Jewish Congress. Catholics were represented on the presidium by a layman, sociologist Mathew Ahmann, executive director of the National Catholic Conference for Interracial Justice.

By mid-morning crowds were pouring into the monument grounds, but not as quickly as police had expected. Some feared the turnout might be disappointing.

Although numerous key religious figures discreetly shunned the demonstration or were non-committal, few voiced any public protests. One exception was Dr. Carl McIntire, of the American Council of Christian Churches, who expressed strong opposition to the march and disappointment that he had been refused an interview with President Kennedy.

We met again on the monument grounds shortly after 11 A.M. to coordinate our activities for the remainder of the day. By this time a sea of humanity had descended on the area. The melancholy chants of Joan Baez and Peter, Paul, and Mary could be heard for blocks.

Somewhat ahead of schedule the crowds began to move down Constitution Avenue toward the Lincoln Memorial. Many lined up to purchase bag lunches provided by the NCC. The lunches were originally to have been provided out of Church World Service relief funds. However, it was subsequently decided to sell them at 50 cents each, a price described as “below cost.” Each lunch contained a white bread sandwich with two slices of cheese (American), an apple (Macintosh), and a piece of cake (chocolate ripple).

Meanwhile, a number of Washington area churches were holding services or keeping their doors open for special prayer sessions. Some had conducted all-night prayer vigils.

The only serious controversy of the day developed when Roman Catholic Archbishop Patrick A. O’Boyle, who was to deliver the invocation at the Lincoln Memorial program, saw the speech text of John Lewis. The prelate threatened to boycott the ceremony unless Lewis, chairman of the Students Non-Violent Coordinating Committee, revised his remarks, which he did. The original text of the Lewis speech read: “We will not wait for the President, the Justice Department, nor Congress, but we will take matters into our own hands and create a source of power outside of any national structure that could and would assure us of victory.” Lewis agree to delete the passage and another which referred to “cheap politicians” in Congress.

This was the most apparent evidence that participation in the march by religious groups helped substantially in keeping the proceedings remarkably peaceful.

One marcher died after being stricken with a heart attack.

The day was mostly bright, with temperatures in the eighties. Washington’s notorious humidity was somewhat offset by a fresh breeze and scattered clouds in the afternoon.

Highlighting the afternoon ceremony was the great oratory of King, who cried again and again, “I have a dream.” But as if to prove that people doze despite the best of preachers, hundreds stretched out on the grass and slept most of the afternoon away. Another temptation was the cool water of the Reflecting Pool, and other hundreds kicked off their shoes and stockings to dangle their feet over the edge. At least two persons fell into the shallow pool.

A. Philip Randolph, 74-year-old elder statesman of civil rights in America and the son of a clergyman, was among several speakers who appealed to religious precedent. Randolph, program emcee and chairman of the national march committee, reminded the vast throng of more than 200,000 that “we are leading the multitudes in the streets just as … Jesus Christ led the multitudes in the streets.”

NAACP leader Roy Wilkins, seeking to perpetuate the fervor of the day, said:

“You got religion here today. Don’t back-slide tomorrow.”

Blake declared that Negroes “have mirrored the suffering of Jesus Christ.” He quoted Romans 12:1 as a helicopter whirred high overhead.

These were only a few of the religious overtones of the demonstration. We reassembled at the office early in the evening to discuss their significance and to compare notes. Some reporters recalled that during his U. S. visit four years ago atheist Khrushchev had regularly cited Scripture and invoked the aid of deity.

MARTYR MEDGAR EVERS

The black man fell and helpless lay,

A gaping wound upon his back,

A witness to the savage way,

A beast had made his foul attack.

His wound puked out his noble blood.

His blood sank deep in freedom’s soil …

“My God,” his wife cried out, “My God!”

Is t-h-i-s reward for freedom’s toil?

“Where is the justice in this land?

That loudly tolls the freedom bell,

While tyrants rule with a free hand

Committing all the sins of hell?”

Ole glory’s tarnished with his blood,

For having shabbily allowed

A noble son to be downtrod

Because he was both black and proud.

We were agreed, however, that Communists had no appreciable influence in the March on Washington. Bayard Rustin, Randolph’s assistant, says he left the Young Communist League in 1941. Reliable sources estimated that 135 Communists led by Gus Hall had come from New York for the march, but they apparently regarded themselves as mere spectators. March leaders said they would repudiate the support of any subversive groups.

Through the course of the day we had interviewed scores of marchers, trying to get at basic motivations.

One of us, attempting an overall tally, gave this description: “It was like a church picnic. Not as much food, but more speeches.”

But how spiritual is a church picnic?

Going a step further, it seemed quite obvious that many of the marchers were devout Christians. Some had prayed long and hard for a peaceful march.

Many composite appeals to religion, on the other hand, seemed little more than feeble attempts to put in a good word for God. A placard of the United Auto Workers read, “Be one with God—Speak Out for Freedom.” A delegation of Kansas City Presbyterians clapped its way to the ceremonies singing “When the Saints Go Marching In.” (Civil rights demonstrators have appropriated numerous gospel selections, giving temporal meanings to spiritual themes.)

In one bit of frivolity, members of the Washington clergy committee for the march wheeled a casket titled “Jim Crow Diehards” to the Washington Monument. Perhaps the most moving display was a poem (see above) lettered upon the slats of a Venetian blind.

There were hundreds of clergymen among the marchers, most of them Protestant. The word was out among those participating under the NCC banner that they were to wear their clerical collars. For some it was the first time in years.

Disappointing to many freedom-loving Americans was the fact that the leadership of the march had allied itself so closely with federal legislation proposals. The leaders did not bother to face the full implication of giving personal rights priority over property rights. They did not suggest how federal statutes might be enforced.

The civil rights march, although orderly, involved nonetheless some civil wrongs. Perhaps the most pointed irony, however, was that the nation’s capital took on the earmarks of a garrison state to enable a freedom rally to be held. Some 1,500 National Guardsmen were mobilized and stationed throughout the downtown Washington area. Another 4,000 Army troops stood by in readiness, and thirty helicopters were flown in to carry them should trouble develop.

Taking Stock

The world’s largest Pentecostal denomination, the Assemblies of God, regards itself less as an organization than a movement of the Spirit. Nevertheless, its thirtieth biennial General Council in Memphis last month was devoted largely to recapturing the Spirit and renewing and implementing “the Pentecostal experience.”

Daily business meetings were chiefly concerned with such organizational changes, election of such officers, and the laying of such soul-winning plans as would return the glow and power of the Spirit that marked the Assemblies in an earlier day. Doubtless the felt duty of constantly re-experiencing a fresh outpouring of the Holy Spirit has as its underside the continuing, restive implication of spiritual inadequacy. Concern was expressed over a confessed loss of evangelistic zeal, departure of evangelists from the field of duty, and the quality of the churches’ evangelists. The attempt to correct this situation by effecting and implementing fresh movements of the Holy Spirit does not come easily to a church which believes that organization, programming, and devised techniques tend to encumber the free movement of the Spirit. Delegates tended to view every proposed corrective device as a step toward bureaucracy and centralization which would infringe on the Spirit’s movements in the local congregation. The Assemblies have a traditional pattern of self-government within the local congregation.

In a major action, the council eliminated its department of evangelism and transferred its functions to the office of the general superintendent, the church’s highest office, held by the Rev. Thomas F. Zimmerman. Zimmerman is also chairman of the Executive Presbytery, General Presbytery, General Council, and Central Bible Institute. Some delegates denounced the transfer as a move toward centralization. Comments from members of the department itself seemed to indicate that the motivation was less a desire for centralization than the inability of the department to discover any distinctive function for itself in a denomination where evangelism is regarded as the chief function of all its departments.

Early in the council’s sessions the church’s popular and efficient general superintendent was reelected for his third two-year term. He received 94 per cent of the votes, compared with 97 per cent two years ago.

In the keynote address Zimmerman pleaded for a militant Christianity and warned against placing too much emphasis on education. He recalled earlier days when “a convert wanted to immediately begin preaching in a church, on the street,” and he added, “We need that same zeal today, and need it more than ever.” The Rev. Frederick H. Huber of Linden, New Jersey, also urged that Pentecostalism is being threatened by intellectualism, as well as by materialism and worldliness. “Emphasis on things, knowledge and pleasure have always been the foes of God’s spiritual people, but there is an intensification of their attack today.” But the Rev. C. C. Burnett, president of Bethany Bible College in Santa Cruz, California, voiced concern because fewer young people in the Assemblies are studying for the ministry in the church’s theological institutions.

No biblical text arouses more response from the membership of the Assemblies than the prophecy: “… in the last days, I will pour out my Spirit upon all flesh.” The all-white council of the nearly fifty-year-old denomination, whose headquarters are in Springfield. Missouri, met under a huge banner carrying the inscription: Upon All Flesh.

Zeal marks the Assemblies of God. They have a U. S. membership of half a million, and an even larger membership in seventy-two foreign countries. They firmly believe that Pentecostalism is no historical accident of the twentieth century and that they are a special creation and choice of God in the last days to tell the Church and the world of the power inherent in the Pentecostal experience of the Holy Spirit for holy living and for proclaiming the early return of Christ. On the ethical problems of social life they are remarkably silent.

Pentecostalism is proof that the new wine of the Spirit tends to burst the old wineskins. The Assemblies of God are proof that fresh creations of the Spirit can themselves become occasions where it is difficult “to hold that fast which thou hast”—to use the words of one of the council’s speakers. At a time when the Spirit is moving in new and strange ways even within the old-line denominations, the largest church of the Pentecostal movement is finding it difficult to recapture and retain its earlier measure of the power and presence of the Holy Spirit within its own denominational wineskin. This might rightly be heard as the Spirit’s speaking to the churches, warning each of them against too easily assuming that it is God’s special choice to assume a special task not given to others—a warning against the presumptive assertion made in reference to ecumenical churches by one of the Assemblies’ top leaders: “I have no time to take counsel with those who do not have the same evangelical zeal that we do.”

J.D.

“… What we are really asking for is the rebirth of the Anglican Communion.…”

Out of Toronto last month came a 6,500 word manifesto making bold suggestions to the Anglican communion. Aim: to strengthen relationships among the world’s eighteen autonomous Anglican churches and to achieve a more unified approach to pressing issues.

The plan, which seemed to strike a largely responsive chord among the 1,500 clergy and lay delegates to the third world Anglican Congress, had been conceived at a much more private meeting of bishops 100 miles away—in London, Ontario—a few days prior to the Toronto meeting.

The manifesto said that “we must undertake a comprehensive study of needs and resources throughout our communion, to give us up-to-date, tested data on actual work now going on, resources in manpower (clerical and lay), training facilities, financial resources and their distribution, and the unevangelized areas which still confront the church.”

The message quickly added, however, that “we cannot wait for the results of such long-range studies. We ask each church to join now in an immediate commitment to increased financial support, amounting to at least $15,000,000 in the next five years, over and above our existing budgets and engagements …”

Appointment of eight “regional officers” to assist the communion’s chief executive officer, Bishop Stephen Bayne, also was urged. Bayne denied that this was a move towards “a new central curial power.” They will be the very opposite,” he said. “They will serve the churches in their area as the executive officer serves them, multiplying him … and making local initiative possible … of each church in each region.”

The specific suggestions in the document, entitled “Mutual Responsibility and Interdependence in the Body of Christ,” now go to the Anglican churches for study. The only Anglican meeting empowered to pass legislation of worldwide scope is the Lambeth Conference (next scheduled for 1968).

Wording of the manifesto left the impression that drastic ecclesiastical adjustments are necessary:

“We are aware that such a program as we propose, if it is seen in its true size and accepted, will mean the death of much that is familiar about our churches now. It will mean radical change in our priorities—even leading us to share with others at least as much as we spend on ourselves. It means the death of old isolations and inherited attitudes. It means a willingness to forego many desirable things, in every church.

“In substance, what we are really asking for is the rebirth of the Anglican Communion, which means the death of many old things but—infinitely more—the birth of entirely new relationships. We regard this as the essential task before the churches of the Anglican Communion now.”

Challenge And Response

Christians had to look to their laurels at the Mount Allison University Summer Institute held in Sackville, New Brunswick, last month. The institute usually deals with contemporary economic, social, and political problems. But this year, under the direction of Professor I. L. Campbell of the university’s extension department, it turned attention to contemporary Christianity.

The program showed the influence of Arnold Toynbee in that its pattern consisted largely of “challenge and response.” Protestants and Roman Catholics had dialogues with each other, then in turn had to face the challenge of agnosticism, Judaism, and other religions such as Islam. Genuine efforts were made to provide an understanding of the new position in which Christianity finds itself vis a vis these revitalized opponents.

Among those who criticized Christians vigorously for their unwillingness to deal with intellectual problems of the day were Dr. Paul Goodman of the Institute for Policy Study in Washington, a sociologist and a professed anarchist, and Professor Gordin Kaplin, a biologist from Dalhousie University and an agnostic. Philosophy Professor Emil Fackenheim of the University of Toronto showed, on the other hand, more sympathy with Christians, although he held that Christianity faced serious difficulties in its failure to come to terms with modern science, in its particularistic interest in the individual, and in its exclusive claims to the true knowledge of God.

To these attacks the Christians provided no united resistance. Roman Catholics stated a clear position, but seemed at times so anxious to show themselves tolerant that some felt they did not quite state their true views.

Theologians Donald Mathers and John B. Hardie of the United Church of Canada held to a rather mediating position in most discussions.

Two Presbyterians, Dr. Andrew Thakur Das of the United Presbyterian Church in the U. S. A. and Professor W. Stanford Reid of McGill University, stressed the Reformed position, insisting that only through man’s personal self-commitment to Jesus Christ as revealed in and through the Scriptures could Christianity meet the challenge of this present world.

W.S.R.

TARNISHED ANGEL

Another crisis brewed in England last month when the Rev. Frank Trundley, vicar of Braintree, forty-five miles from London, saw a new sign adorning the outside of The Angel, a local pub. The sign depicted a white angel holding a pint of bitter—with the halo over the beer. Finding it was no slip of the brush, the vicar lodged an immediate protest, exclaiming: “One has only to look at the poor wrecks of humanity seeking rest at night in our churchyard to realize they are in that position because they have placed a halo above their beer.”

The publican, Mr. Bill Cave, mildly suggested that the local citizenry might not appreciate that crack about the churchyard being full of drunks. It turned out, however, that he had his own misgivings. “The angel’s got long black hair,” he said. “I never came across an angel that looked like that.” Mr. Cave admitted that the Salvation Army had taken the whole thing badly.

Nor did the artist, 43-year-old Len Ragon, administer soothing balm when he suggested that through the ages the church and the inn have always been together. Quoted one man darkly: “They who drink beer will think beer.” If Washington Irving was right in this, the efficacy of being on the side of the angels is now anything but clear. Altogether, the issue bristles with theological pitfalls.

J.D.D.

This report was prepared by Dr. Sherwood E. Wirt, editor of Decision:

As the Billy Graham Southern California Crusade passed the halfway mark in the Los Angeles Coliseum, signs pointed to an all-time mark in the history of evangelism for the past 1,900 years.

In nine meetings over a third of a million people passed through the turnstiles of the huge bowl where some of America’s most famous football games have been played. As All-American star player Donn Moomaw, now a member of the Graham team for this crusade, expressed it, “Victories are being rung up every night such as no one ever dreamed would take place in this stadium.”

Some came running to the platform. Some stepped gingerly and hesitantly. Some could not wait for the invitation but came and knelt early. Some came with heavy hearts, some with a note akin to gaiety, some with vast relief. Some came in impeccable dress, others in wild southern California attire. They hung their heads and confessed their sins, and waited for God to work.

“A Syrian counselor is needed. A Spanish counselor. Someone who can speak Hebrew. Chinese. Filipino. Dutch. Children eleven and under behind the platform, please.”

Astonishing to many an onlooker was the model behavior of the crowds. Billy Graham had asked for quiet, and he got it. There was no heckling. Even on youth nights, with a stadium half-filled with a highly volatile congregation, there were no whistles, no braying, no ploys designed to gain attention. The respect commanded by the man seemed supernaturally guarded.

“Manasseh was the wickedest man who ever lived, but God forgave him and blessed him.… Samson was a delinquent for twenty years, but he is in heaven today. There’s hope for you! You can repent and turn from your sins, and receive Christ, and be born anew. You can do it now!” So he preached and so they listened. Night after night the message sounded out from the platform in midfield. Night after night the appeal was given and the crowds streamed down to the grass under cloudless skies, as the thousands in the choir hummed the invitation hymn.

Forgotten were the ghosts of Eddie Tolan. Big Ben Eastman, John Lujack, Bob Waterfield, Frankie Albert, Paul Hornung, and other sports immortals who brought the coliseum crowds to their feet in years gone by. Forgotten were the major-league games in Chavez ravine, the surfing, the tarpon fishing, the splashing of Marineland, the squeals of Disneyland, and the daily murders that blazoned their way across the city’s newspapers. Forgotten were political affiliation, residential district, level of education, color of skin, and the other endless distinctions of men.

One thing mattered: Was the soul right with God? Would I one day see Christ? Would that which has borne the image of the earthly also bear the image of the heavenly?

And as the evangelist preached, thousands of men, women, and young people were “slain of God” and made fit for his eternal fellowship through the blood of his Son.

How many? At the end of a week and a half 14,396 persons had made the overt act of commitment to Christ. Total attendance was 338,192, with the greatest crowds expected for the days ahead.

Youth nights drew the largest attendance. 45.796 and 47,655 respectively, with 6,017 inquirers on these two nights alone! Probably never in the history of southern California has there been such a concentration of teen-age youth—or fewer unhappy mementoes of the same. The buzz of anticipation before the meeting reminded some of a classic athletic event. The scene at the invitation reminded one of stories of the Great Awakening.

Evangelists and team members preaching in the churches of the area reported a warmth and liberty that betokened a genuine revival atmosphere. A special section in the coliseum was set aside for business and professional people and for screen and television personalities. And while it was too early to report results, some startling conversions were apparent.

Five of the services were televised for release after September 9 over some 200 stations in the United States and Canada.

A Hyperbolic Paraboloid

The adjoining photograph shows a new type of tent designed by a Roman Catholic priest who says it has weathered several windstorms.

The tent, which takes a form known geometrically as a hyperbolic paraboloid, was being used for a summertime preaching mission in the Appalachian mountain regions by the Glenmary Home Missioners of Cincinnati, Ohio. National Catholic Welfare Conference, which released the photograph, noted that, like St. Paul, the missioned join tentmaking with preaching.

The tent was designed by Father Patrick O’Donnell, editor of Glenmary’s Challenge, to replace an “old gospel type tent.” It measures 60 by 48 feet and needs no interior supports. Its frame is aluminum tubing, and the covering is nylon plastic. It can be erected in two hours.

The Potter’S House

To the curious Washington tourist who entered The Potter’s House last month the coffee shop was almost as unlikely a locus of religious vitality as the potter’s workshop of Jerusalem in which God spoke to the prophet Jeremiah. From the outside it was unpretentious. From the inside it exuded a tranquil atmosphere of dim lights, roughly paneled walls, soft music, modern paintings, and a menu on which no item was priced over a dollar.

But appearances were deceiving. To the seventy members of the non-denominational Church of the Saviour, sponsor of this endeavor (many more persons attend the services who have not yet completed the church’s rigorous catechetical program), The Potter’s House is a successful example of the Church in the world—learning, listening, and living the reality of the Christian faith.

The idea of a coffeehouse ministry originated with Southern Baptist minister N. Gordon Cosby, founder and minister of the progressive and self-styled “ecumenical” church. Noting that there was more life in a New England tavern over which he slept one night in 1958 than in the church where he preached that morning, Cosby began to consider a “tavern-like” ministry for his own church in the nation’s capital. He suggested the idea to a class on Christian vocations. The idea caught on. And after a year of planning, renting an unoccupied storefront at 1658 Columbia Road, installing an air conditioner and $2,300 of professional lighting, and hiring a manager, the coffeehouse opened in April of 1960 in a predominantly Negro district.

The Potter’s House staff does not seem bothered that three years later there is surprisingly little of the immediate Negro world within The Potter’s House. The clientele is mostly white, mostly churchgoers. To those who voluntarily contribute their services this situation does not indicate failure. Of primary significance is the mere fact that the Church is there, not irrelevantly locked up within granite walls.

A soft-sell approach also characterizes the work of individual personnel who use the twenty-four evening hours each week just to be with customers. Mrs. Esther Dorsey, The Potter’s House manager, terms the work “more a ministry of listening than of talking.” She finds that people ask few theological questions but that many are lonely and need companionship. Mrs. Dorsey is slow to stylize procedure: “We don’t try to do anything; we are there to be people in the midst of people. You might say that we play it by ear—under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.” In pursuit of God’s guidance, the staff meets for prayer one hour before the opening of the coffeehouse each evening.

In light of its concern for encounter rather than evangelism as traditionally understood, it is not surprising that The Potter’s House is reluctant to point to its “successes” in reaching the un churched. By “embodying the concept of the Church as a servant body,” states Elizabeth O’Connor, who chronicles the history of the Church of the Saviour in the book Called to Commitment, the members of the coffeehouse reach people as people, presenting not the Gospel but an embodiment of the Christian life. One does not point to “conversions.” One learns and shares experiences. As a result of such contacts a number have enrolled in the church’s two-year catechetical course in Christian living.

Those who run The Potter’s House would not suggest that other churches necessarily imitate their newly discovered form of ministry. But the idea of coffeehouse evangelism has caught on nonetheless. Directly descended from the original experiment in Washington are The Lodge of the Fisherman in Lynchburg, Virginia, and The Edge in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. Other coffeehouses have sprung up in Massachusetts, California, and Texas. Evangelical observers may hope that those responsible will also imitate the staff of The Potter’s House in its devotional life. Similar prayer for guidance and a careful seeking after God’s will might go far to insure that encounter will not exclude the Gospel and that coffee will not replace Christ whenever two or three are gathered together in His name.

J.M.B.

The little red schoolhouse seems an unlikely place for a showdown on major national issues. But the American race controversy has had many a classroom climax in recent years. This fall, a new cause for furor in the schoolhouse was to be found in the U. S. Supreme Court’s ruling against compulsory devotions.

It was not termed defiance as such, but as pupils resumed classes there were large pockets of resistance to the court ban.

Seventy per cent of the American public disapproves of the court’s decision, according to a Gallup poll published a few days ago. Only 24 per cent approves. Six per cent gave no opinion.

In Idaho, the practice of daily Bible readings was scheduled to continue as usual, according to D. F. Engleking, state superintendent of public instruction. Engleking said he saw no reason to change, “unless some court tells me otherwise.”

The Delaware State Board of Education, guided by an opinion of State Attorney General David P. Buckson, announced that Bible reading and recital of the Lord’s Prayer would continue in the state’s public schools. Buckson said the Supreme Court’s decision of June 17 banned religious exercises only in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Florida.

The attorney general of Arkansas, Bruce Bennett, also advised the public schools of his state to continue devotional exercises. He said Arkansas law is permissive and “a far cry from that which was considered in the notorious Abington [Pennsylvania] case.”

Public school officials in Alabama were ordered by the State Board of Education to establish daily readings of the Bible as part of a prescribed course of study.

One of the most detailed analyses of the Supreme Court ruling came from Attorney General Edward Brooke of Massachusetts. Brooke’s twenty-two-page opinion contended that mandatory prayers, Bible reading in the form of a devotional rite, and compulsory religious ceremonies or exercises are unconstitutional. But he held that a voluntary period designated for “silent meditation”—not a “silent prayer”—would be consistent with the court’s stand. He stated that voluntary prayer, meditation, and even Bible reading not under official auspices, could be permitted in the schools.

“Students may gather in the classroom before supervised activities begin for the purpose of discussion, inspiration, or for other orderly purposes,” he said. “If entirely on their own initiative, these [students] decide to utilize that free time in devotion, that is their right.”

In other states, meanwhile, Bible reading and recital of prayers were eliminated without qualification. One such action was in Vermont, where four of the Board of Education’s seven members said they opposed the court ban but saw no alternative.

In Pennsylvania, group Bible reading and prayers were banned in public schools by Attorney General Walter E. Alessandroni. He said the practices would be illegal even if they had the approval of local school boards, teachers, or parents and even if children participated on a voluntary basis.

In the District of Columbia, Superintendent of Schools Carl F. Hansen said the idea that Bible reading is out of line “seems to me to be very clear.” He declared that opening exercises would consist of the Pledge of Allegiance “and suitable inspirational readings from poetry or good prose writings.” He said he would invite teachers “to help us prepare an anthology of suitable writings.”

Among the assortment of adustments was a decision by the board of education of Bloomingdale, New Jersey, to substitute the fourth stanza of “The Star-Spangled Banner” for the reading of the Lord’s Prayer in public schools. That stanza ends with the words, “In God is our trust.”

Earlier in the summer, state governors, gathered in Miami Beach for their annual meeting, voted 38 to 1 in favor of a resolution urging Congress “to make clear” the right of public schools “to have free and voluntary participation in prayer.” The single negative vote was cast by Democratic Governor Karl F. Rolvaag of Minnesota.

There appeared little hope, however, that Congress would pass any enabling legislation for classroom prayers. Some fifty-seven bills asking for constitutional amendment to permit public school devotions are bottled up in the House Judiciary Committee. A discharge petition designed to force discussion on the House floor now has about seventy-five signatures. To override the committee, 218 are needed. Democratic Representative Emanuel Celler, committee chairman, having indicated firm opposition to such an amendment, has refused to call public hearings.

The Supreme Court decision seems to have given atheism in the United States a new lease on life. Mrs. Madalyn J. Murray, avowed atheist and a chief litigant in the Bible reading-prayer case, says she now heads a group called Other Americans, Inc., which will build and operate an atheistic center near Stockton, Kansas. She says the center will include a university, radio station, publishing house, and home for the aged. It is to be built on an eighty-acre tract donated by Carl Brown, described as a nudist, atheist, and former Kansas legislator.

Mrs. Murray has charged that Roman Catholic nuns are teaching in some Kansas public schools. She says she will start litigation to halt the practice.

In Protestant ranks, meanwhile, there is a lingering measure of grass-roots unrest over the attitude of church leaders toward current church-state trends. In Pittsburgh, a group of twenty-one United Presbyterian churchmen, including several prominent ministers, issued a joint statement of concern.

“The recognition of God is a principle that the church should defend rather than oppose,” the statement declared.

The statement charged that the 175th United Presbyterian General Assembly “was in error in urging that Bible reading and public prayers be omitted as religious observances from public school programs.”

Choices are like the fork of a road. There is a point where there is no discernible difference between one road and the other, but once the decision is made and one is chosen it leads off to a different destination.

There is not a day but what all of us make choices—most of them of no great importance, necessary but not determinative to any great degree.

We all know that in creating man after His own image God gave to him the right of choice. No automaton, man has the privilege of decisions, even to the point of disobeying God’s commands.

But with this right of choice there exists man’s gravest responsibility. On choice human destiny depends. The Holy Spirit woos, the Gospel calls, the circumstances in which we find ourselves all combine in their effect, but man chooses, and from the human standpoint the die is cast.

We are all familiar with Lot’s choice. Confronted with the necessity of separating from Abraham because of a conflict of interest, and offered a choice between the rocky hills of the west or the well-watered and fertile valley of the Jordan, he chose the latter. This was based on personal advantage. Water has always been a problem in Palestine and an abundant supply, even to this day, difficult to come by.

But in the Jordan valley there is water in abundance, and the land brings forth an abundance of anything planted. For a herdsman this was like an oasis in the desert. It offered every material advantage. The one disadvantage was the wickedness of the men of Sodom.

Lot’s choice was obviously the one to make if personal advantage was to be the determining factor. He may have considered the evils of Sodom, but they did not deter him. In fact, he moved his family to the very outskirts of the city, later becoming a resident and apparently one of the “city fathers.”

Thanks to the record in Second Peter we know that Lot was a “righteous” man and became greatly distressed by the licentiousness of those about him.

But Lot’s choice did not affect him alone. The biblical account makes it clear that his children were deeply affected by the evil all about them; and his wife’s backward look was certainly in part an unwillingness to leave her home.

When did this family debacle begin? The day Lot made a decision based on personal advantage despite the moral dangers involved in that decision.

Centuries later the aging Apostle Paul, in a letter to Timothy, spoke of his former companion in labor: “Demas hath forsaken me, having loved this present world, and is departed unto Thessalonica” (2 Tim. 4:10a).

Demas made a choice, a choice between staying with the imprisoned servant of God and sharing in the opprobrium, hardships, and dangers of that situation, or exercising his freedom of choice and movement and going to the safety and attractions of the worldly city of Thessalonica. He chose the latter.

Many of our choices today are made at the point of personal pleasure. There is a way which seems narrow and there are crosses of self-discipline which, when looked at in the context of the immediate, seem so unnecessary. And there are so many attractive things in the world, things which appeal to the appetites and senses and which are indulged in by most of the people around us.

There are advantages which come solely from money, and we are often confronted by a choice which means more money and less of spiritual values; the decision becomes even more difficult if we sense a need for our children to have these advantages.

“This present world” probably dictates most of our choices. Seen from the standpoint of immediate advantage and without consideration of the ultimate effect, so many of our decisions seem natural, even “smart,” to the world; but they are utterly foolish in God’s sight.

Many choices are made on the basis of status—the regard and influence which will accrue to us whereby our place in the world will seem more important in the eyes of others. This can be a deadly choice because self-glory and not the glory of God becomes the dominating influence in our lives.

Choices are as varied and as numerous as the individuals who inhabit the world. While many avenues of choice fall into familiar categories, each person is confronted by the opportunity or necessity of making decisions which are personal. That the ultimate effect involves his relationship to God makes the matter of choice of such vital importance.

The Bible is replete with stories of those who exercised their right of choice, some to their undoing and others to their eternal good.

Basic to the matter of choice is the attitude of the individual. If the attitude is one of obedience to God’s revealed will, the choices will be for His glory and for our good. But if self comes first, choices can have a devastating effect.

The Apostle Paul points out how true Christians can make grievous mistakes of choice. Writing to the believers in Corinth he likens his own ministry to the work of a skilled master builder.

He affirms his own task as preaching Christ, the only foundation.

Then he speaks of the kinds of lives men can and do build on that foundation: “gold, silver, precious stones,” all materials which stand the stress of time and the testing of fire. Or “wood, hay, stubble,” none of which have any permanence in themselves, and all of which are subject to destruction by fire.

Paul then looks forward to the final day of testing and tells how some will be found to have constructed buildings which will endure, while others will have a life’s work wiped out even though they themselves are saved by the grace of God.

The far-reaching effect of choices will never be fully known this side of eternity. But it is our privilege to know the God of eternity and follow his revealed will.

Central to our decisions is the attitude of obedience. The first sin came through disobedience, and we dishonor God and amplify our own problems by the same route.

God has not left us without guidance. He guides through our prayers, his Word, the indwelling Spirit, circumstances—in a multitude of ways we can hear him saying, “This is the way, walk ye in it, when ye turn to the right hand, and when ye turn to the left” (Isa. 30:21).

If we will be honest with ourselves we will admit that the spiritual problems we now face usually stem from wrong choices. We have not listened to God’s revealed will. We have permitted a multitude of secondary considerations to influence our choices. Again and again we have looked back to a time and place in which we disobeyed God and went our own way.

Fortunately the grace of God is so great that even now we can make another choice—to repent, confess, and turn again to Him who can yet make all things new.

Washing Out A Few Things

A book that has had a good sale (and it is hard to figure out why) is The Sand Pebbles by Richard McKenna. It is light summer reading about a gunboat on the China rivers; one gathers from the blurbs that McKenna, having served on such a boat, knows what he is talking about.

The great thing about the story is how the crew regained its self-respect by being forced to do its own work, and this under the pressure of a life-and-death situation. Among other things, when all the Chinese cheap labor had run away the sailors had to do their own washing, and McKenna has a nice touch when he tells of the deep satisfaction the men had in folding up and putting away the washing which they had done themselves. I think there was a therapy in this little accomplishment which was a kind of turning point for the whole story. If there is one thing more than another wrong with our society, it is that we have lost too many therapies. This is the point at which the gifts of our machines can be a curse. It is no surprise that institutions put us on “hand work” when our nervous systems have fallen apart. The pity is that so much of this is “busy work.”

A preacher friend of mine tells me he would like to take a job laying bricks for about a year so as to get again a sense of clear-cut accomplishment—so many rows of brick laid in so many hours. Lacking bricklaying, he seeks out little definite things to do in his broad and crushing ministry as his own private therapy.

Everybody is after us to think about world problems, to solve issues in the large, to worry ourselves practically insane over troubles we can’t do a thing about. This is not to say that we can be unconcerned about the large issues. It is to say, however, that it is possible to hold very wise opinions on large issues and be senselessly negligent about our own front steps.

“If any man would be my disciple, let him take up his cross.…”

The way to pull the crew together is for everyone to wash out a few of his own things.

EUTYCHUS II

Challenge Of Latin America

I want to write expressing my very great appreciation for the July 19 issue as it deals with the Latin American missionary endeavor. It has been very helpful.…

Our society began work in the Province of Cordoba in 1909, and has had a continuous missionary service in that land since that time. Our most successful work in Argentina has been during the last ten years. We have some twenty different missionaries serving, with four families in the Buenos Aires area. We have some twenty-five different congregations. We have had a very successful Bible institute for many years, presently located at Almafuerte. We have some very successful radio broadcasts. Just recently the large station in Buenos Aires told our missionaries that we have received more mail from the listeners than any other program on the station.

In Brazil, we have had a very successful missionary program in the lower Amazon valley. This dates back about ten years. We hate successful work at Macapa, Icoaraci, Capenema, and on several islands in the mouth of the Amazon River. We have three Christian day schools functioning and with a very effective ministry.

General Secretary

Foreign Mission Society

The Brethren Church

Winona Lake, Ind.

In your article on “Latin Americans in the United States” it is stated that “there are eighteen Protestant refugee centers, all related to Church World Service.” Our church has maintained such a center in Miami since the beginning of the refugees coming to that city, and our center is not related to Church World Service.

This issue of CHRISTIANITY TODAY is outstanding.…

General Director

Board of Home Missions

National Association of Free Will Baptists

Nashville, Tenn.

Your editorial concerning “Evangelical Coordinating Agency Needed for Spanish Work” was brought to my attention since I staff the Committee on Spanish American Work in the Division of Home Missions of the National Council of Churches.

A study undertaken by the Bureau of Research of the National Council, a few years ago, concerning Spanish American Work … gathered most of the facts, including the number of congregations or mission stations of most of the Protestant communions (both those belonging to NCC and non-NCC). This data was classified state by state. The researchers recognized in the introduction to the study the data difficulties mentioned in your editorial, but insofar as Hispanic peoples could be identified from social data, this information was also listed for each state. Only 100 copies of the study were printed from page proofs, since the pre-publication inquiries indicated little demand for the information. However, although the 100 page-proof copies, unbound, sold for $6 each, they have all been gone now for some time.

The missionary education “home theme” for 1964–65 is “The Spanish American in the U. S. A.” This mission study program is developed by the Commission on Missionary Education of NCC. Study books are prepared for each age level on the selected theme. The study will be introduced at twelve World Mission Study Conferences next summer which are held in a number of places throughout the country (North-field, Massachusetts; Silver Bay, New York; Evanston, Illinois; Williams Bay, Wisconsin, etc.).

I have read advance copies of all of this study material and can assure you that this study will surely accent item 3 of your editorial suggestion. On the basis of past experience, the Commission on Missionary Education expects to print and sell 150,000 books on the home theme.

You are perhaps aware of the existence of the Council on Spanish American Work which accents the concerns of the Southwest; this council has been in existence for fifty years. The Protestant Latin American Emergency Committee (P.L.A.E.C.), now officially related to the Miami Council of Churches, is giving very much attention to the Hispanic population in Miami (both Cuban refugees and other Spanish peoples)

Assoc. Exec. Secy.

Div. of Home Missions

National Council of Churches

New York, N. Y.

Sincere thanks for your excellent reporting and unusually perceptive analysis of the Latin American evangelical church.

Danforth Gospel Temple

Toronto, Ont.

Your issue on Latin America is terrific—one of your best issues ever.

Religion Editor

The Miami Herald

Miami, Fla.

I was impressed with the introductory article … by W. Dayton Roberts. In speaking of the “Challenge of a New Day” in Latin America he declares, “Protestant Christians cannot in scriptural conscience wash their hands of the enormous social problems facing Latin America.” Again he says, “… the Latin American is discovering that he cannot be unmoved by the problems of social justice.”

These observations are significant in the face of the character of those churches which are dominant in the evangelical movement in Latin America. These churches are those which in Protestant America have been most vocal in decrying the concern of “theological liberalism” for social reform. Perhaps their insight of their responsibility in Latin America will awaken them to their social responsibility in Protestant North America.

Director

United Presbyterian Center

Frenchburg, Ky.

My sincere congratulations on the excellent issue dealing with Latin America. Mr. Dayton Roberts and his colleagues have done a masterful job summarizing the conditions and developments in Latin America. We can only hope that churchmen, especially pastors and mission leaders, will realize the value of the material presented here and keep it available for study in the churches.

We thank God for this encouraging picture of this great area to the south.

The Committee on Spanish American work of the NCC Home Missions Division has been making a real effort to do something about the situation as far as their own missions are concerned. As far as I know, this has not touched any of the evangelical agencies, and these are considerable, perhaps as many or more than the NCC has. So I would think that the suggestion by CHRISTIANITY TODAY is justified. Evangelicals ought to get together in the home missions framework and set up such a council. I will make a suggestion of this at our joint retreat between IFMA and EFMA this fall.

Public Affairs Secy.

National Association of Evangelicals

Washington, D. C.

Black, White, And Gray

Thank you for your editorial on the murder of Medgar Evers, and the article by Dr. Bell on “Christian Race Relations” (July 19 issue). The politicians and others, on both sides, who have an axe to grind are distorting the whole thing and are likely to create more problems than they solve.

I am aware that Christianity has little to do with what is going on. But Christians have a special guilt. We have been saying that we must not do justice, because we feared that evil would come of it. Now this is a strange position if we believe in a God who loves the good and hates the evil. For we have been perpetuating an evil, and praying that good would come of it.

It seems to me that throughout, there has been a failure to distinguish between civil rights which are impersonal and inclusive, and social rights which are personal and exclusive. I fear that our failure to recognize this distinction, and to act accordingly, is going to exact a terrible price in loss of liberty and in social confusion.

Charlotte, N. C.

Concerning Dr. Bell’s article … in which integration is encouraged if not advocated, do you not know that President Lincoln, when speaking to a delegation of free Negroes in Washington, said to them that because of the great difference existing between the black and white races (greater than between almost any other two races) it would be well for them to keep separate?

In the light of Lincoln’s words, here and elsewhere, spoken truly and kindly, those who today desire to live separate from Negroes are not, I submit, justly chargeable with hate, prejudice, or discrimination.

Integration all too often has resulted in intermarriage and the undermining of race integrity, with unhappiness and tragedy for those concerned, and, therefore, is undesirable for both blacks and whites.

Long Beach, Calif.

L. Nelson Bell … supported the Life magazine symposium on race relations’ statement. This statement proclaims that “… all Christians are brothers in Christ,” as well as “… the urgent necessity of removing all barriers to spiritual fellowship in Christ, without at the same time trying to force un-natural social relationships.” This dichotomy between “spiritual fellowship” and “social relationships” is a tragic misunderstanding of the nature of the Gospel and is surely responsible for the “civil rioting” which Mr. Bell deplores. If “Brothers in Christ” are to serve their Lord, they must love and accept each other fully in all dimensions of their existence. It is as impossible to separate “social” and “spiritual” unity in the Lord as social and spiritual unity between marriage partners. The local Christian fellowship, as the family of God, is called to nothing short of complete openness and acceptance of all individuals, regardless of the color of their skin. The Christian layman is called to express the spirit of Christ’s love and reconciliation in his total life in the world. To fully accept one’s brother in all the varied aspects of human existence is “integration.” To love one’s brother as well is to be a “Brother in Christ.”

East Harlem Protestant Parish

New York, N. Y.

Mrs. Murray’S Indictment

Last evening I read in your “Worth Noting” (News section) in the July 19 issue a statement attributed to Mrs. Madalyn Murray.… Her words are an indictment against me and against too many other Christians. We have railed at her and other unbelievers for what they are trying to do. But we haven’t spent comparable time and effort asking God to convict her of her sin and save her soul. Or if we bothered to think along these lines at all, it was for the purpose of ultimately preventing her from changing the status quo rather than concern for her personally.

Bergenfield, N. J.

Neoorthodoxy And Its Progeny

Neoorthodoxy is not to be assessed merely for its weak view of Scripture. It is a philosophical unity which can logically be expected to bring forth certain consequences. Nor has it come from nowhere. Theologically it was the choice of desperation after the old type of liberalism became bankrupt. Yet it is not related only to what theologically preceeded it. When old types of philosophical rationalism failed, the currents of philosophy proper had previously entered this cycle. Art forms had already followed the same road; and even law had come to the same place in the United States in the twenties by the rise of “legal realism” with its pragmatic, relativistic legal emphasis. Thus, existential theology was the laggard discipline and had only walked the same road that philosophy proper and the art forms had already taken. Even the current application of the word “fundamentalist” in economics should remind us of the related curves in all these fields of thinking. It is well to be academically orientated in the differences among Barth, Brunner, Bultmann, Niebuhr, Tillich, Richardson, Robinson, Fuchs, Ebeling, and others. But to know the differences without seeing the flowing stream is to sleep on the pillow of academic scholasticism. It is like knowing the differences in Roman Catholic theology among the different Roman Catholic orders at the time of the Protestant Reformation without knowing there was that which could be called “Rome,” and as such rejected with clear words as a unit by the Reformers. The Reformers certainly understood the differences between the orders, but their faithfulness to God rested upon the comprehension of the fault of the whole.

Equally, ambivalent judgments are not in place concerning neoorthodoxy. For anyone to think of neoorthodoxy as even a “halfway” return from liberalism shows no comprehension of neoorthodoxy’s heritage or direction.

The philosophic unity which neoorthodoxy is has natural “practical” results—ecclesiastical, cultural, and political. Should we not all long ago have known that neoorthodoxy would bring forth, with its relativistic, subjective base, what it is bringing forth in moral, psychological, and sociological areas? Should we not equally have known that it would bring forth in the denominations in which it is in control that which it recently has been bringing forth? Nor is this the case only in the United States: it can be observed across the whole international ecclesiastical, and Protestant and Roman Catholic ecumenical, spectrum.

Nor has this failed to have an influence on those evangelicals who have stayed in the denominations in the United States that are largely controlled by neoorthodox and post-neoorthodox thinking. It would seem to me that much of the organized and unorganized general evangelical framework, based on disowning or minimizing the principle of the purity of the visible church, has moved from its ecclesiastical contacts and practical contacts such as evangelism, to theological bridge-building that first accepts neoorthodoxy as a third force between orthodoxy and liberalism, and then champions the neoorthodox conjunction of “biblical authority” with “biblical errancy.” In this sort of an atmosphere it is not surprising that institutions and organizations which have been known as evangelical are now in a position where the full inspiration of Scripture has been minimized or set aside.

Huemoz sur Ollon, Switzerland

The Enlisted Man

Re your May 24 issue which attempted to cover, more or less adequately and realistically, the problem of ministering to the military: There was not one article or statement of positive testimony, or critical analysis by an enlisted man.… I fully realize that the military is not a democratic community and that it has long been standard operating procedure that testimonies of enlisted personnel are unnecessary, unlearned, and irrelevant (as well as sometimes irreverent). Yet to neglect totally the voice of the enlisted ranks in your issue is, it seems to me not only inaccurate, but evangelistically and evangelically unconscionable.…

Nine weeks at Fort Slocum does not prepare the average chaplain for ministering to enlisted men in a realistic manner. If the chaplain is to “minister unto” his men concerning Jesus Christ, how is it that denominational and military authorities do not require training in the enlisted ranks? If Jesus Christ came and suffered as one of us and became as we are that he might redemptively sympathize and empathize with us, as well as forgive us, how is it that the chaplain retires so discreetly from this life of identification?… Surely, a two-year tour of duty as an enlisted man, with all its frustrations, harassments, etc., is not too much to ask of a young man who takes his vocation as chaplain seriously.

Editor

The Northern Light

Northern Baptist Seminary

Chicago, Ill.

Description Disputed

In his letter in the April 12 issue, Prof. Martin mentions two books: Color Blind by Margaret Halsey and Without Magnolias by Bucklin Moon. Of the first he says, “The book Color Blind also contains obscene passages.…” Now, I defy Prof. Martin to cite one single passage, one single sentence, that could not be printed verbatim in CHRISTIANITY TODAY. The fact is he could not, although CHRISTIANITY TODAY would probably prefer to abstain from using the common word for an illegitimate child which occurs once in Color Blind.

Without Magnolias is a different matter. It is an adult book written about adult problems and relationships. But it does not even come close to obscenity, and Prof. Martin’s characterization of the book as “… sheer, unmitigated pornography …” is ridiculous and absurd. The language is somewhat coarse in a couple of passages but not nearly as coarse as the language which the real-life characters would have used. The usual four-letter words which characterize obscenity are completely absent. The few love scenes in the book are most restrained, and details are left almost entirely to the imagination of the reader. In this respect, the book is in very good taste.

Both books are, however, guilty of what some people consider a sin. They are guilty of being critical of and antagonistic toward the policies of white supremacy and racial segregation. To the distorted vision of an individual who sees obscenity in a Negro man dancing with a white girl, Color Blind would appear obscene. But I doubt that the majority of us in this country share this view, regardless of our individual attitudes toward integration. Certainly the courts do not.

Berkeley, Calif.

On The Horns

The Rev. Mr. Bustanoby’s discourse, “The Right to Die” (May 24 issue), lent new intensity to the heat of the ethical and practical problem of the medical care of those persons who have been in one way or another deprived of their endowments of personality, intelligence, and self-knowledge. As a recently qualified physician seeking to practice the tenets of my faith in medicine the problem is intensely real to me.

I commenced to read the article in hope that he might expound a principle on which the Christian physician might [stand] in the face of this problem. I was disappointed. He very ably stated his personal philosophy, but I rather doubt that any doctor cognizant of his human limitation would even dare to exercise the prerogatives of judgment which the enactment would require. The burning bedside question would be, “Is this person any longer useful in Christian service?” And the theological sequel is another question: “If he is no longer useful to Christ on earth, then why does not God call him home? Is the Master forgetting about his worn-out servants nowadays, so that we physicians find it necessary to hasten the heaven-bound traffic?”

On the other hand, what shall we do about the ever-growing quantity of human husks: the bodies bereft of personality and self-awareness whose dying we are bound to delay because we dare not assume the judgmental function of the Creator?

I should like to think that my Christian commitment would give me a position of practical insight, but on this problem it has not thus far, and in fact, has only pinned me on the horns of a dilemma.

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

Whenever Bishop Azariah received candidates for membership in the Church of South India, he had them place both hands on their heads and say, “Woe to me if I do not preach the Gospel”—a dramatic reminder that each new member of the Christian church is to be also a messenger of the Good News.

Ever since the Madras Missionary Conference Christian leaders have been increasingly preoccupied with the meaning of Mission and Church. This concern reached its climax last fall with the publication of two significant books, The Missionary Nature of the Church by a Dutch theologian, Johannes Blauw, and Upon the Earth by an Asian Christian leader, D. T. Niles.

Conceived at Willingen ten years ago, these books reflect not merely the thinking of two church authorities but the wrestling of conference groups and consultations in many cities of the world. Evangelical readers will object to a few things, such as the soft-peddling of eternal punishment or the statement that only a few verses in the Old Testament have missionary significance. But such matters aside, the double-barreled thrust of these books is biblically oriented.

At the present time new books on mission theology are not hard to come by: they float like cream among the top echelon of the Church. But application of their truths is needed at the congregational level, both at home and abroad. Such “homogenization” calls for some drastic changes.

The concept of the local congregation must be transformed. Principal C. H. Hwang of Taiwan aptly describes the prevalent pattern as the “active pastor, passive sheep structure.” Often evangelistic emphases have contributed to this misunderstanding. People are led to believe that they are saved to be served. This “only believe” theology does not build sound churches.

On the other hand, the suburban-type church has bred the go-getter, do-it-yourself kind of minister, who is jovial and an excellent mixer, and who can balance the budget besides. The sheep are curried and petted. But Jesus never recommended a “sheepfold mentality.” “Go your ways,” he said; “behold, I send you forth as lambs among wolves” (Luke 10:3).

A church true to the Bible, then, is a visible fellowship of people in a given geographical locality who have banded together because they have been saved from sin by Christ and are committed to sharing this salvation with all men everywhere. Through those who have become His, the indwelling Christ ministers to the world.

What God can do through congregations in which each member is a minister remains yet to be discovered. Pioneering in what a ministering congregation can do is the exciting prospect of those churches and ministers who heed the call to this new kind of missionary obedience.

The missionary congregation will be a ministering one. Christ shows compassion to the multitudes through such a congregation. It is there to help whenever someone is robbed and beaten on the Jericho road. Distant disasters or local trouble will find these ministering members sensitive to Christ’s leading.

The new congregation will be a witnessing congregation. Within witnessing distance of every believer in the United States are thousands of lost souls. To bring them to Christ is the job of each church member.

The entire church membership will become a missionary society, also. Together all members form a special kind of community like that of First Peter 2:1–9, a community of holy, kingly, priestly people who belong to God himself and exist primarily for broadcasting the excellencies of him who has called them out of darkness into his marvelous light.

That there are 42,250 Protestant missionaries at work abroad is no reason for boasting. Of these, 27,219 come from North America. In other words it takes the efforts of eleven churches—2,596 Protestants—to send out and support one missionary. A more desirable gauge of a congregation’s vitality, it is suggested, ought to be one missionary per forty wage-earning believers. Budget-wise, a good starting point is to spend no more for “us” than for “others.” Were the congregational pattern of missionary concern to operate in this way, there could be 422,500 missionaries at work overseas.

A New Image Of The Ministry

When everyone in the congregation becomes a minister, what happens to the pastor? He will be needed more than ever, but in a completely new role. Instead of ministering to a congregation in the usual way, he becomes its teacher and leader.

First of all, the minister in his new situation will use all his gifts of preaching and teaching to create a new image of the ministering congregation. Then small groups of convinced members will form for further guided Bible study and self-education in person-to-person witnessing. Next, each lesson will be applied to concrete situations in the community, and there will follow gatherings in which the experience thus gained is shared and discussed. Concurrently Christ will be indicating opportunities of service and calling attention to fields in urgent need of harvest hands.

Another form of fruitful activity is that of mothering new churches. Every town knows churches which are old enough to be mothers but which remain barren. While some are fifty years old and can point to no daughter church, many younger churches have already “mothered” a dozen daughter churches. Sheep which do not reproduce soon become mutton.

One way a congregation reproduces is by subdividing. Dinosaur churches are too ponderous to be effective ministering congregations. They need to subdivide. Groups of members in outlying areas begin to meet locally. They form a study unit or a prayer cell. Soon a Sunday school is organized, and the group grows into a ministering congregation.

Many local churches, however, will find that they cannot make such a beginning. Members and even ministers will agree with Hendrick Kraemer when he says, “Let us frankly say, by using the title of a well-known book, the first requirement for the problem of evangelism is ‘not a conversion of England, but a conversion of the Church.’ “Where people have no faith to communicate, they need first of all to hear the Gospel themselves. These are the sheep—sometimes whole flocks—who have strayed and need to be brought back to the joy of obedience.

The theological education of the trainer-minister will also be different. Missions courses, if they exist, are usually found on the last page of the seminary catalogue. What courses there are, are usually lumped with other optional classes. Now that missions is belatedly found to be a master of the house, however, it demands its rightful place at the center of study. At this point much prayer and prodding will be needed, for it is here that the low priority of missions in the local congregation has its genesis. No general upsetting of seminary chairs is called for, but rather, that all courses be taught from the point of view of the mission of the Church. Faculty meetings and forums need to concentrate on putting Mission at the heart of the curriculum.

To be effective in his new role, however, the minister-trainer will want special training in the techniques of the ministering congregation. He himself needs to become adept in personal evangelism. He must have courses in adult and Christian education, and must also acquire a knowledge of the theology, methods, and principles of the contemporary missionary movement. These are no longer electives; they are core subjects for every parish minister.

The impact of evangelical forces overseas is undeniable when contrasted with that related to the World Council. This strength can be traced directly to the missions emphasis in our Bible colleges and institutes. Moody Bible Institute alone accounts for 2,700 missionaries now on the field, and Prairie Bible Institute for more than 1,000. Much care should be exercised lest the current trend towards accreditation—while good—lead to a weakening of missions departments.

Worldwide Cross-Fertilization

The problems of leadership education are not confined to North America. Along with other patterns, we have exported also our image of the active pastor and his passive sheep. So even in the younger churches abroad the transforming of congregations into ministering and witnessing missionary churches must have first place on the agenda, and their ministerial training programs must move missions from the periphery to the center of study.

At present at least 411 members of the younger churches have left their native lands to become missionaries. Eighteen countries have not only sent but have also received such missionaries. This marks the beginning of a great Christian cross-fertilization. American churches likewise are using more and more ministers from overseas.

That such cross-fertilization can take place is due to the remarkable spread of the secularistic revolution. A leveling of culture peaks and an upgrading of valleys by popular education is making urban centers all over the world more alike than ever before in history. So long as the Christian has learned to make technology serve the cause of Christ (and the average suburbanite has not), he is a good candidate for a foreign tour of service. He will be able to bring a message of hope to those whose religion and culture cannot cope with the revolution. Christ calls those who know him as Saviour to go to those who have lost their moorings and are adrift. Unless they go promptly, millions of God’s children will be lost in a miasma of cults and ideologies.

Our present ratio of one Christian worker to 21,000 of the population is not nearly enough. Only as local congregations in city, town, and countryside are reborn in obedience to the Great Commission can Christ’s longing for souls be satisfied.