Ideas

The Good Ministers of the Silver Screen

Columnist; Contributor

Sure, there are badly-written clergy at TV and the movies. But it’s the good ones that tell us something about what it is to be a minister.

Ron Glass as Shepherd Book in 'Firefly'

Ron Glass as Shepherd Book in 'Firefly'

Christianity Today July 24, 2014

After watching "Two Boats and a Helicopter," the third episode of The Leftovers—HBO's TV show about a small town in the wake of the Rapture—I wrote that the character at the center of the episode, the Reverend Matt Jamison, was "one of the more complex portrayals of a true believer who's losing his grip that I've seen in a while." Others I read and talked with agreed.

Christopher Eccleston as Father Matt Jamison in 'The Leftovers'
Christopher Eccleston as Father Matt Jamison in ‘The Leftovers’

Two days later, I was seeing an advance screening of Calvary, which releases August 1, and has one of the best portrayals of a "good priest" that I've ever seen. (More on that to come.)

What makes both of these characters good, and real, is that they aren't just "good" ministers: they are also real people, with doubts and struggles and screw-ups. Yet they're not portrayed in a bad light, or as hypocrites. They are people who want to follow their calling, and who encounter difficulties. They have histories. They have weak spots. They even do things that are destructive.

But, importantly, they dwell among the messed-up people in their towns, living with them, talking to them, listening to their confessions. They are reviled and trusted, often by the same people. They have what the priest in Calvary calls "integrity," in the way that Christ did: not because they are blameless (they can't be—they're human), but because they falteringly give us a sense of what this means:

Since then we have a great high priest who has passed through the heavens, Jesus, the Son of God, let us hold fast our confession. For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin. Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need.

We're used to seeing (and complaining about) bad portrayals of Christians, and especially clergy, on television. I've seen my fair share. A bad portrayal of a minister is one that "lacks integrity": the minister is portrayed as bad, or hypocritical, or a megalomaniac, or a predator, or even just all "good" in the most irrelevant wet-cardboard way—hopelessly out of touch with what parishioners need. (Unfortunately, this is often true of both Christian and non-Christian portrayals.)

This year, I've seen a number of leaders of Christian ministries that I was involved with as a child and a teen be exposed for abusing their congregants or their power. When I was younger, these people were held up as paragons of virtue and goodness; their "faults" were kept private. They were celebrities, in their way: a type of rockstar who got special treatment and reverence, those whom you dared not question.

Brendan Gleeson as Father James Lavelle in 'Calvary'
Brendan Gleeson as Father James Lavelle in ‘Calvary’

I wonder sometimes how different this would be (or at least, if we'd ask "leaders" for more honesty) if we were accustomed to seeing better ministers on screen. So with that in mind, I asked some of my cinephile friends to come up with some examples of well-written onscreen Christian clergy from about the last ten years of TV and movies. The list isn't extensive, nor perfect, but it's a start. And some of the answers might surprise you.

Mel Gibson as Rev. Graham Hess in 'Signs'
Mel Gibson as Rev. Graham Hess in ‘Signs’

Mel Gibson as Rev. Graham Hess Signs (2002) Wade Bearden (@WadeHance)

As a pastor, I've always felt a connection to Mel Gibson's Graham Hess in Signs. In the film, Shyamalan asks the question, "What happens when the one who's supposed to minister, needs ministry himself?" Losing his faith after the violent death of his wife, Hess has abandoned his post as an Episcopal priest. Throughout the story, Hess wrestles with the idea that a good God can't exist in the midst of seemingly senseless suffering and death. But, just like Hess soon realizes humans are not alone in the universe, he too finds that even though God seems absent and silent, that doesn't mean he isn't quietly working in the background.

Mark Ruffalo as Father Joe in 'Sympathy For Delicious'
Mark Ruffalo as Father Joe in ‘Sympathy For Delicious’

Mark Ruffalo as Father Joe Sympathy for Delicious (2010) Mark Moring

Mark Ruffalo was brilliant playing a morally conflicted priest on Skid Row in Sympathy for Delicious. His character is kind, compassionate, Christ-like toward the homeless. When a paralyzed man on Skid Row suddenly develops a supernatural ability to heal others (but not himself), Father Joseph (Ruffalo) sees an opportunity to raise much-needed money to grow his ministry. His motives seem to be pure, but when his paralyzed friend takes his "healing show" on the road and becomes something of a rock star miracle man, and as the money starts to pour in, Father Joseph's intentions become more muddied and muddled. It's a fascinating character study. I interviewed Ruffalo when the film released, and really appreciated his insights into this nuanced, conflicted character.

Colm Wilkinson as the Bishop in 'Les Miserables'
Colm Wilkinson as the Bishop in ‘Les Miserables’

Colm Wilkinson as the Bishop Les Miserables (2012) Gina Dalfonzo (@ginadalfonzo)

Not only did he play the role of the sacrificial bishop beautifully, but it was such a nice touch to put the original stage Valjean in the role of the man who prompted Valjean's redemption. The film brought him back at the end to greet Valjean as he entered heaven—something that didn't happen in the stage show—which brought the whole story full circle.

Michael C. Hall with Yasiin Bey (Mos Def) as Brother Sam in 'Dexter'
Michael C. Hall with Yasiin Bey (Mos Def) as Brother Sam in ‘Dexter’

Yasiin Bey (Mos Def) as Brother Sam Dexter (2006-2013) Alissa Wilkinson (@alissamarie)

The series about the serial killer Dexter has its high and low points when it comes to religion—though the whole series works well as a look at whether "badness" is in us from the start or whether it's a result of our circumstances, and at whether anyone is truly "innocent." That said, Yasiin Bey (who is, confusingly, credited by both that name and Mos Def in the series) in season six as Brother Sam, the ex-con turned minister to bad guys, is absolutely brilliant. Dexter at first mistrusts him because of his criminal past, but comes to believe, rightly, that he's the real thing. And Sam's life is a testimony to the possibility of hard-won redemption.

Colin Hanks as Father John Gill in 'Mad Men'
Colin Hanks as Father John Gill in ‘Mad Men’

Colin Hanks as Father John Gill Mad Men (2007-present) Alissa Wilkinson (@alissamarie)

He pops up so early in the series that most people seem to have forgotten he was there at all, but the young, dynamic priest at Peggy's family's parish cares about his parishioners' sins and their lives outside the church building. I'll be honest: for his entire story arc, I was sure he was going to turn out to be one of the bad guys; there's rarely, if ever, an unmitigatedly righteous person in Mad Men. But it seems like he might have been one of the few.

Tom Wilkinson as Father Moore in 'The Exorcism of Emily Rose'
Tom Wilkinson as Father Moore in ‘The Exorcism of Emily Rose’

Tom Wilkinson as Father Moore The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005) S.L. Whitesell (@SLWhitesell)

Despite what the film's title might suggest, the star The Exorcism of Emily Rose is not a demon-possessed girl. No, the central character is Father Richard Moore (Tom Wilkinson), the consummate suffering servant. In the opening scenes, he is in the breach when the medical examiner tells Emily's family, "I cannot state conclusively that the cause of death was natural. Your daughter, she . . . " As the doctor trails off, Father Moore sees something unnatural in the family's yard. Cut to outside the courthouse, where reporters are asking Father Moore if he will plead guilty for the negligent homicide of Emily Rose. He won't. His lawyer tells him, "The district attorney doesn't like it when religion puts itself above the law."

And so begins the story of Father Moore, a man of God apparently contending with the wisdom and rulers of this world, but already having lost to the powers of another. In some way it is the story of the Christian faith (with less than perfect theology, to be sure), as the film itself acknowledged with a close-up, near the end, of Emily's gravestone: "WORK OUT YOUR OWN SALVATION WITH FEAR AND TREMBLING." Amen.

Richard Harris as Abbe Faria in 'The Count of Monte Cristo'
Richard Harris as Abbe Faria in ‘The Count of Monte Cristo’

Richard Harris as Abbe Faria The Count of Monte Cristo (2002) Larisa Kline (@larisakline)

Edmond Dantes (Jim Cavizel) meets Abbe Faria when he is thrown in jail. Dantes is being framed and cannot figure out why. Abbe Faria sympathizes with Dantes and teaches him everything he knows. Their friendship enables them to begin to piece together who framed him and why.

Although it can be argued that Abbe Faria is the one who introduces Edmond Dantes to the concept of revenge, which he eventually imparts upon all who crossed him, Abbe Faria also helps Dantes return to his faith. When Dantes is complaining about how Abbe Faria cannot possibly understand the agony of sin, he gives him his ultimate line: "I'm a priest, not a saint."

Javier Bardem as Father Quintana in 'To the Wonder'
Javier Bardem as Father Quintana in ‘To the Wonder’

Javier Bardem as Father Quintana To the Wonder (2012) Martyn Jones (@martynwendell)

Father Quintana (Javier Bardem) quietly suffers through a crisis of faith in Malick's To the Wonder, but by the movie's end, he remains frocked and at home within the Church. As other characters question their commitments to one another in order to pursue pleasures and fulfillment elsewhere, Quintana holds fast to his vocation, even when it seems as though God has disappeared from his life and absconded with his hope. Father Quintana is drawn to resemble other fathers faithful in their suffering; Father Latour from Willa Cather's Death Comes for the Archbishop comes to mind as a clear literary ancestor. May many more follow in their lineage.

Ron Glass as Shepherd Book in 'Firefly'
Ron Glass as Shepherd Book in ‘Firefly’

Ron Glass as Shepherd Book Firefly (2002-2003) Martyn Jones (@martynwendell)

Gray-clad and gray-haired, Shepherd Book joins the crew of Serenity at the beginning of the series, and in the show's pilot episode he is already doing the Lord's work by upending pat assumptions about judgmental priestly mores held by other members of the crew. Warm, good-humored, and surprisingly reliable in high-stakes situations, Book has a mysterious past that gives him a subtle edge. Whedon has said of Book that part of his purpose for the character was to give "a voice for the other side." While none of the other characters would agree with Book's convictions, they respect Book and get along famously with him.

Alan Tudyk as Pastor Veal in 'Arrested Development'
Alan Tudyk as Pastor Veal in ‘Arrested Development’

Alan Tudyk as Pastor Veal Arrested Development (2003- 2013) Cray Allred (@crayallred)

Ann Veal's dad on Arrested Development leads the cartoonish evangelical family that, in my view, is actually a clever nod to how clueless major film and TV are about ordinary Christians. The Veals call everything about the Bluths "secular" (with a spooky tone) and are laughably repressed. Meanwhile the Bluths are shocked that an evangelical could be attractive, and struggle to trade in the most basic Christian language (in reference to a necklace: "It's a cross." "Across from where?"). Ned Flanders is a fairly straightforward joke at do-gooder Christians' expense; I think pastor Veal is a parody of that common joke. My favorite moment is when Pastor Veal compromises his ministry to aid his daughter in getting married—he allows GOB to perform a televised resurrection illusion at the altar, which, of course, turns out to be a horrible idea.

Other entries receiving note from the past ten years were the monks from Of Gods & Men (2010), Athelstan the monk as portrayed by George Blagden in the television series Vikings (2013-present), Sam Childers as portrayed by Gerard Butler in Machine Gun Preacher (2011), and more. And you might check out a piece we published in 2003: "Good, Bad, and Ugly Christians in the Movies," by Jeffrey Overstreet.

This is, of course, not a comprehensive list. So who would be on yours?

Mosul Christian: Thanks for Changing Your #WeAreN Photo

Believers in Iraq rally around label that forced them out of their homes and churches.

Christianity Today July 24, 2014

Editor's note: In the reflection below, a young Christian from Mosul writes about the takeover of her hometown by the extremist Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and the recent international support shown through the #WeAreN campaign on social media. She has been living in the safer Kurdistan Region in the northern part of Iraq for the past few years and works with refugee relief efforts supported by Open Doors International as Mosul's remaining Christians flee north.

I can't believe what's happening now. And it's all happening all so fast. 2,000 years of Christian history and presence is being destroyed. I am confused and sad. Everybody is. On the news I saw the extremists replaced the cross on our church in Mosul with the black flag of the Islamic State. They are doing a call of Islamic prayer from our church. They have turned it into a mosque.

I can't believe it. I wanted to cry when I saw this on the news. This past weekend, the Islamic State gave Christians in Mosul an ultimatum: convert, pay a high tax, leave before Saturday at noon, or die. All Christians chose to leave. This is what we have feared for a long time.

My aunt and her sons were the last of my family to flee from Mosul. They left after the threat of the Islamic State last weekend and are staying with family here in the north now. They are devastated. My aunt kept crying. Her husband died a long time ago, and she has raised her children on her own. She cried, "What do I do now? I have nothing left. They even took my house."

Two other houses of relatives have also been taken. They left one of the houses a while ago. They asked a Muslim neighbor to live in it because they knew it would be protected if a Muslim would live there. But the Islamic State came and stole their house anyhow because somehow they knew it was owned by Christians.

It's a chaotic situation; we don't know what to do or where to go. We have been moving around so much in the past few years. Every time we picked up our belongings and went to the next place. My nephew is 22 years old and was in the middle of his exams when they fled Mosul last weekend. How will he finish his studies now? He is very keen on his studies, and now everything is gone.

That's the general feeling here now: everything is gone. My relatives who fled own nothing anymore. While my niece is happy to take care of her mother and brothers, she needs help from the church. Yesterday my brother went to church to collect mattresses and food for my aunt and her sons and brought them to my niece's house. It's very important to have this support from the church now. The support was given by Open Doors through a partner organization.

Sometimes I feel like crying, but I pray that God gives me strength. Christians in Iraq have shown their support for the most affected Christians by holding gatherings and planning marches.

We also changed our Facebook profile pictures to the letter N for Nasrani, meaning "Christians." In Mosul, this letter was used to mark the Christian houses.

It's encouraging to see that around the world people are supporting us. We are still proud to be Christians. We will always be Christians.

God, LSD, and the Summer of Love

The unusual (to say the least) conversions of four San Francisco hippies: an excerpt.

Ted and Elizabeth Wise were part of the vanguard of Beat-sympathetic free spirits that predated the 1967 Summer of Love in the Bay area. Ted Wise was a native of Lakeport, California, a small community on the shores of Clear Lake, about seventy miles north of San Francisco. When he was a child, his family had moved to Auburn, where he nourished an interest in art and literature until joining the Navy in the mid-1950s. While serving aboard a Navy tender in the Pacific Fleet, he learned how to work with canvas and began learning the sail-making trade; on shore leave in Japan, he experimented with marijuana and heroin.

Even as a child, Wise had been fascinated by the idea of drug use; he cherished a magazine photo of a Mexican peasant with an array of mind-bending mushrooms. As a teenager, he was captivated by the 1955 Frank Sinatra film The Man with the Golden Arm, which he remembered made heroin addiction look attractive: "All you had to do was roll around in agony a bit . . . the worst thing that could happen to me would be to meet Kim Novak."

Upon returning home to Auburn, Wise enrolled at Sierra College. While he continued to nurse his interest in the "jazz musician's smoking preference," he met Elizabeth, a young woman who, like Ted, was interested in art and poetry. At Sierra, they were devotees of an English professor with connections to the Beat scene in San Francisco. The allure of the exciting artistic and literary scene there prompted Elizabeth to move to San Francisco in the summer of 1959 in hopes of starting a career in modeling; Ted followed her shortly thereafter and enrolled in the California College of Arts and Crafts in Oakland. Once in town, they quickly moved into a Beat commune on O'Farrell Street in the city's North Beach bohemian enclave.

"Our basic identity," Wise recalled, "was as beatniks." Life in the commune proved a constant source of new ideas and fascinating discussions, as artists, academics, and literary figures such as Allen Ginsberg and Lawrence Ferlinghetti turned up regularly at dinnertime.

In 1961, the couple married, and a daughter was born. To make ends meet for his new family, Ted found work in the boatyards, eventually landing at Sutter Sail in the "boho-friendly" village of Sausalito, and the Wises relocated across the bay.

Throughout this period, drug use loomed large in the Wises' lives. Marijuana was the foundational drug of choice, but mushrooms of all sorts, mescaline/peyote ("it was amazing"), and amphetamines were all on the menu. But the imagination of many of the people in Wise's circle was fired by what they were hearing about the wonders of LSD, and Wise was no exception. After a failed attempt to secure some of the new mystery drug from "Chemical Buddha" (British philosopher turned Bay Area Zen Buddhist maven, Alan Watts), in late 1964, Wise and friends finally scored a batch of prime black-market LSD that came straight from the labs of Swiss pharmaceutical manufacturer Sandoz. His first trip was an epiphany.

"We tried it, and it was a phenomenal experience," Wise recalled. LSD use became routine; often he would go to work high on acid. "Small doses were very interesting," he remembered, noting that after the initial score, supply was not a problem: "We had a lot of it."

By 1965, Ted Wise's life seemed to be shaping up just to his liking. From his job, he made connections with the owners of racing boats and yachts and spent much of his time on weekends as a crew member for his bosses' customers. Plying a craft he loved, hanging out with interesting people, and using drugs—everything in life seemed to be coming up roses. All in all, he lived what he later claimed "on the outside looked like the coolest life one could have," with a mix of friends that included "beats to yachtsman [sic], jazz musicians, artists and poets . . . America's Cup captains . . . Yogis, Buddhists, Anarchists, [and] Communists."

The Rat in the Basement

The internal reality, however, was apparently less than cool. Wise was regularly working long hours, going out carousing with friends, and sleeping with a succession of girlfriends, while Liz stayed at home with a family that soon included two children. Knowledge of Ted's philandering caused increasingly rancorous relations within the marriage—later, Wise even admitted to plotting to murder Liz. Mercifully, on one of his frequent LSD trips, he began to be troubled by insights into his own character or, more precisely, his lack thereof. He became increasingly convinced that, at bottom, Ted Wise was a self-centered liar, cheat, and thief; as he put it: "I went into the palace looking for the prince on the throne but discovered only the rat in the basement."

Ted, whose exposure to Christianity thus far had been a couple of visits to church with his grandmother and a few mandatory chapel services in the Navy, was antagonistic when his wife began to attend services at First Baptist in Mill Valley, but he noted, "She came back from church just glowing." Eventually, he decided to read the New Testament: "I didn't want to be hypocritical about it; I was always putting it down but [had] never actually read it."

What he found, however, surpassed his mild expectations of finding a new role model in Jesus Christ. "I just got fascinated by Jesus," Wise recalled. As he read, he was particularly impressed by Christ's claims to divinity and Paul's assertions that all people had a need to respond individually to his invitation to be born again. Convinced that Jesus was God, Wise later described his experiences as a Paul-like conversion: "While on my way to my own Damascus . . . I found it necessary to cry out to God to save my life in every sense of the word. Jesus knocked me off my metaphysical ass. I could choose Him or literally suffer a fate worse than death."

Having embraced Christianity, Wise felt his next step was something of a heavenly legal requirement—making a public acknowledgement of his belief in Jesus. One Saturday night in early 1965, he and Liz took a healthy hit of LSD and traveled to Berkeley to visit an old friend, Danny Sands. At the party, they found a house full of pot-smoking people plundering a major score Sands had just brought north from Mexico. Isolated in the midst of the mellow, marijuana-imbibing crowd, Wise began announcing that "Jesus is my Lord," much to his fellow partiers' discomfort and befuddlement.

Leaving the party, Wise, who had driven before while on LSD, experienced a nightmare of a ride back across the Bay Bridge. "It seemed like the bridge was going straight up," Wise remembered years later. Even more disconcerting, he claimed, "it seemed like I was out of the car, somewhere else, [but] conscious of myself still driving the car."

Hearing demonic voices urging him to "Flee!" he prayed and was rationalizing his past behavior when he claimed he heard an audible angelic voice telling him that excuse making was inappropriate when speaking to God: his best option would be to "Shut up!" Eventually, the Wises returned home, and Ted believed that God had rescued him—and had audibly ordered him to attend church the next morning. …

"I Felt Such Happiness"

Jim and Judy Doop (pronounced "Dopp") had first run into Ted and Liz at a neighborhood party and had been intrigued at the way the hip Wise made his newfound Christian "trip" sound relevant and exciting. A native of Des Moines, Iowa, Jim Doop had served a stint in the Marines (primarily as a trombonist in the Marine Corps Band) and was attending Grandview College in Des Moines when he met Judy Marshall, a girl from an upper-class Presbyterian family who once had harbored a desire to become a missionary. Married after a three-month whirlwind courtship in 1959, they headed out to California in 1961 and ended up in Berkeley, where Jim worked for Mills Women's College.

Hoping to pursue his dream of becoming a stand-up comedian in the mold of Lenny Bruce, Jim began working in clubs and strip joints on the weekend as "Jimmy Sand" and picked up a fairly solid weekday job as a full-time factory sales rep for the Philip Morris Tobacco Company.

On the personal side, the Doops' life was a bizarre mix of middle-American respectability and California bohemian hip. Regular attendees at a local Lutheran church—despite the fact that Jim was fairly doubtful about there even being a God—and social hosts for the North Carolina delegation during the 1964 Republican convention (Jim Doop was an admirer of Barry Goldwater), they indulged their wild side with a steady stream of cocktails and were early members of Berkeley's Sexual Freedom League.

This bifurcated lifestyle began to grate on their marriage. "[We were] torn in two directions, free but not free," remembered Judy Doop Marshall. As a result, they found themselves more than open to both the allure of the Bay Area drug scene and a desire for spiritual truth. Both of those paths intersected in their new friends, the Wises.

Jim Doop looked to Ted Wise as something of a father figure, respecting both his biblically infused wisdom and his knowledge of drugs—the latter admiration won by dint of Wise's tales of his own numerous excursions on acid. After experimenting with LSD a couple of times, Doop dropped by Wise's house one evening in October 1966 to visit and smoke some joints.

During their conversation, he reported mixed results with his first encounters with acid—his first trip had been exhilarating, but his second had been depressing. Doop remembered years later that Wise then leaned close to him and shared his own revelatory insight about "the Rat that lives in the cellar of our soul."

Oddly affected by the marijuana, Doop lay down on the floor and began to contemplate Wise's words with Bob Dylan's recently released album Blonde on Blonde playing in the background. While he lay there, he began to meditate on his spiritual condition and came to a profound realization:

I finally got it. I was the rat. And it was my soul that was repenting. I thought to myself, Maybe there is a God. I hadn't considered that possibility in a number of years, when suddenly a peace came over me, my breathing became easier. My chest became lighter. And I said, letting out a long sigh, "Oh Father, forgive me." Immediately the entire weight that was on my chest was gone, and the rush of relief from my heart was one of exultation. . . . My eyes were closed and there was a bright light in front of me. I felt such happiness. I had never known anything like this before. . . .

I understood in an instant that God is my Father and I am His child. . . . The joy, the peace and love that I had on my heart for God and others was just incredible. Never had I realized anything comparable before. . . .

In the days and weeks that followed, Doop's appetite for the Bible was insatiable. "My mind was being blown away by the Bible's brilliance, by its simplicity," he recalled; "the words of Jesus just enlarged my love for God and for mankind. . . . I felt so cool that I [started telling] my friends I was dropping [using] LSD, smoking marijuana and that Jesus Christ was my Lord. . . . I had turned on, tuned in, and Christ was leading me out."

The new spiritual Jim Doop proved very popular in his own household. When he finally sat down with Judy and explained the changes that had come over him, she was ecstatic. Happily, she told him that she, too, had been moving back toward God and that this was an answer to her prayers.

This condensed excerpt is reprinted with permission by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Revival of the Frozen ‘Dead’

The common wood frog is anything but common

"I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies." -John 11:25

Among the wonders of creation are the frogs and insects that suddenly re-appear each spring, even in the coldest of climates. How do they survive the icy tomb of winter? Extreme cold is a tremendous challenge for every living thing. Unprotected, the fragile cells that make up the substance of plants and animals burst like water pipes in freezing temperatures—and this leads to irreversible tissue damage.

God gave humankind the intelligence to protect ourselves in harsh weather, because we are more sensitive to cold than most other creatures. In this sense, we are also more dependent upon our Creator. If our core body temperature drops just 3 or 4 degrees—below 95°F (35°C) —we will die. According to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), hypothermia causes approximately 1,000–1,500 deaths each year in the United States alone.

With this in mind, the survival of the common wood frog of North America (Rana sylvatica) is astounding. It is the only amphibian found living above the Arctic Circle. Unlike most frogs, which hibernate by burrowing into the soft mud of lakes or ponds, the wood frog seeks shelter in the late-autumn ground litter of its forest habitat. This leaves it exposed to much harsher temperatures than pond-dwelling amphibian species, which are insulated by water.

In winter the wood frog freezes solid for two or three months without harm. In the bitter cold its internal organs become encased in ice, and the frog's eyes turn ghostly white as the lenses inside freeze. Not a pretty sight.

Yet in spring it comes back to life. How? Simply put, God has made the wood frog extra sweet. As autumn temperatures plummet in the far north, the liver of the wood frog churns out huge amounts of glucose (a sugar common to the body). Glucose accumulates in the frog's tissues and acts as a type of antifreeze—not unlike the ethylene glycol used in a car's radiator. This enormous amount of sugar allows the fluids inside the frog's tissues to become as thick as maple syrup, and this prevents intracellular ice crystals from forming. The frog is safe as long as ice doesn't crystallize within its cells, which would make them to rupture. Fluid outside the cells, however, can freeze completely without damaging the frog's internal organs.

This incredibly high concentration of sugar—pumped out by the liver—would quickly cause you and me to enter into an irreversible diabetic coma. And it flies in the face of the way an amphibian's body usually works. Normally, the pancreas (a special organ in its belly) releases a protein called insulin when blood sugar rises. Insulin drives the blood glucose level back down by helping the frog's tissues utilize sugar. All this changes in late fall. During winter months, glucose remains extremely elevated. For the wood frog, it effectively prevents cells from exploding in the cold.

As the frog freezes solid like a Popsicle, its heart stops, blood flow and breathing cease, and brain activity disappears. It is clinically dead, and it remains this way for weeks at a time. In spring the frog thaws and miraculously comes back to life, leaping and jumping around only hours after being as stiff as a brick.

God's Antifreeze

Over the past 50 years researchers have discovered many of the organisms God fashioned possess a type of antifreeze in winter. What's fascinating is that the method of cold protection often varies from animal to animal and plant to plant. Our incredibly creative God uses a host of sugars, alcohols, and proteins to shield his creation from the bitter cold.

Several of the insects and spiders found in Alaska, for instance, are laced with antifreeze proteins (AFPs) that allow them to survive temperatures down to −94°F (−70°C).

The beetle Upis ceramboides is unique among Alaskan insects because it is protected by a complex sugar known as xylomannan. But another species, the red flat bark beetle, must be the world champion cryonic insect. In the laboratory these beetles have been exposed to temperatures approaching 238 degrees below zero (–150°C), and they did not freeze!

Fish—including northern cod, herring, and flounder—survive the frigid Arctic Ocean because God created them in such a way that their bodies create special antifreeze proteins that possess an unusual molecular structure with a repeating pattern, not unlike the proteins found in cold-tolerant insects. These cryoprotective proteins bind to tiny ice crystals, thus preventing larger ice crystals from forming and damaging the fish's tissues and organs.

Plants, fungi, and bacteria have also been designed to withstand the ravages of winter through similar methods.

(Incidentally, how would you feel about eating a strawberry laced with beetle protein? You may be interested to know that food scientists are presently attempting to create frost-tolerant fruits and vegetables by inserting into plants the gene for the antifreeze proteins found in certain insects. They are also trying to come up with a smoother ice cream texture using the same insect molecules. The presence of antifreeze proteins prevents ice crystals from forming, which cause grittiness. Just imagine the advertisement— "Our ice cream is made with real bug protein for that smooth taste you've come to love!")

All this is more testimony to our Creator's genius (Romans 1:20). The common wood frog in particular symbolizes our future resurrection in Christ. To be sure, Christ's body didn't just seem dead. He truly died, and thus he truly rose again from the dead. Likewise we will truly die before being raised to new life. But the life cycle of the common wood frog is nonetheless a fascinating natural picture of our future hope.

[Click this link to see a You Tube video of this "natural picture of our future hope."]

Rick Destree is Director of His Creation.

A Behemoth from Winnipeg

How the band The Guess Who inadvertently sounded a gospel note.

Saint Paul said, "God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us" (Romans 5:8, ESV). This is the main thing to know, and the main thing everyone needs to hear, at least before she dies. But we also read that the Lord put forth Behemoth who is "the chief of the ways of God" (Job 40:19, KJV). Behemoth was created to stun an answerer-back with the sheer shattering force of what God can do. Only God's imagination could make Behemoth. You could say that Behemoth was created to give massive corroboration to the Everyman of life that he or she is not God.

I've spent a lot of time over the years in the company of Behemoths, which is to say, in the company of visions and dreams that corroborate God. It's not that you set out to find things that corroborate God. But things come to you. Data find you. Phenomena leap right into your lap.

You see a movie or hear a song, and it's the power of God. You're overcome by God's grace through a symbol. Or you're dazzled by God's control, and not yours, through a parable of grace.

Here is a recent example, or at least, recent for me. It's a Behemoth that is able to bring the message of God into the here and now. Let's talk about The Guess Who.

The Guess Who was a rock band from Canada that had a string of top ten records in the late 1960s and early 1970s: "These Eyes," "Laughing," "American Woman," "No Time," "Hand Me Down World," "No Sugar Tonight/New Mother Nature," "Clap for the Wolfman"—and there were several others. They were the soundtrack of our lives back then, and they live on through their use in television and movies.

But The Guess Who was not just a successful rock band; The Guess Who was a Behemoth. Their work revealed something. It put its finger on something. It pointed to something beyond itself.

There is no better example of what they saw and heard than their song "Pain Train," the opening track of their celebrated performance album, Live at the Paramount (1972). "Pain Train" is for me their signature song. It's about irreparable loss and the oncoming pain of life. It's a scorcher and a rock anthem.

Train comin' too fast Pain, is it really gonna last?

And you still refuse to see You still refuse to see And you still refuse to see

Can you hear it like a Train, comin' too fast Pain, is it really gonna last?

There are dozens of such songs in the track list of The Guess Who that are x-rays of suffering and urgent pleas for aid—even, for God's aid.

Did rock fans of those long-gone days see a Behemoth in their music? I, for one, didn't, though I did pick up the plaintive note in the vocals of the lead singer. Somehow I connected with the pain in his voice. So I bought the records.

The band members were all in their early 20s. They were led by a singer/songwriter Burton Cummings, guitarist/songwriter Randy Bachman, and later guitarist/songwriter Kurt Winter. They spent their whole lives—prior to becoming famous—in Winnipeg, Manitoba (O Canada, I salute thee!). And they rolled out these completely realistic descriptions of life: an oncoming and fast-moving train of pain. Where, at the age of 25, did they get such wisdom? They were a Behemoth.

And there's more. Listen to their biggest hits: "These Eyes," "Laughing," "Broken," "Hang on to Your Life," and "Sour Suite." These songs exist within the country of loss. They were written in suits of mourning and became anguished cries for deliverance. Some of them were addressed directly to God. Here are some Bible-sounding lines from "Three More Days:"

… Looking out the window down the road And I see the same damn thing.

Three days to get it on Three days to get it off And three more days to die.

And I'm six feet down And I'm asking the good Lord up in heaven

Why?

I compare the urgency of these songs to William Cowper's poem The Castaway (1799), wherein the Evangelical poet lays out the desperate case of a drowning man, which concludes:

No voice divine the storm allay'd, No light propitious shone; When, snatch'd from all effectual aid, We perish'd, each alone: But I beneath a rougher sea, And whelm'd in deeper gulfs than he.

A friend recently told me about an illness that took a heavy toll on him. In response to a sermon I preached, he said, "I am well aware that Christ came for me, died for my sin, left this world asking us to love and forgive one another, and promised eternal life. Without any disrespect to the former, which is the message of Christianity, I want to be forced to think about all of these things in a deeper context. I want to hear a sermon that makes me think about Christianity in today's world, and how it affects my everyday life."

I thought, Well, a Behemoth is what's called for—a way to get in, and also a way to salve that "affects my everyday life."

That is what I think The Guess Who were on to. It fascinates me that their great lead singer, Burton Cummings, hits a pure gospel note in his striking recent number, "Invisible." It comes from the 2008 album Above the Ground:

You read it in the Bible You saw it in a storybook Remember from the kindergarten You had it in your first crush You had it with your lost love

You had it when your heart broke You saw it in a baby's smile You saw it in your mother cryin' silver teardrops. Hey, I thought that stuff was invisible And I said hey, I thought that stuff was invisible

You felt it in a heartbeat You heard it in a sermon You felt it at the race track Saw it in the church goin' people. You heard it on the radio.

You got it from behind the iron curtain You felt it in a royal flush Even had the damnedest dreams about it. Hey, I thought that stuff was invisible And I said hey, I thought that stuff was invisible

And I don't know if it's really true How I know, how I know what I'm feeling I've got nothing to compare it to But this I know, this I know, I need healing Yes, I need healing.

This is a word, maybe even the Word. This is me they're talking about. It's what I mean by a Behemoth. God didn't have to make him, but he did. To give a little corroboration.

Paul F. M. Zahl is a retired Episcopal minister. He is dean-emeritus of Trinity Episcopal School for Ministry (Ambridge PA), and the author of Grace in Practice: A Theology of Everyday Life (Eerdmans).

When the Eyes of the Blind Are Opened

New science shows us what exactly Jesus healed in the man born blind.

"Never since the world began has it been heard that anyone opened the eyes of a man born blind," the beggar whose eyes were opened by Jesus told the Pharisees (John 9:32, ESV). He was healed more than you know.

Just as Jesus took mud and placed it on the man's eyes, in the last 2000 years we too have dug into the earth and taken God's good, natural, created world. We've studied it and used the creative minds God gave us in his image when he formed us out of clay. And we've figured out how to open the eyes of others born blind.

There are, of course, many causes of congenital blindness, and one of the most treatable is cataracts. In the U.S. and most developed western nations, such cataracts are removed shortly after they're diagnosed—at birth. Similarly, scarred corneas can be replaced. But globally, treatable forms of blindness go untreated. In India, for example, cataracts account for about 60 percent of cases of blindness, which affects about 1 percent of the population (3 times higher the rate of the U.S.). Less than 20 percent of India's cataracts are treated.

Pawan Sinha grew up in New Delhi, but it wasn't until he'd studied at University of California, Berkeley, and MIT and returned to India at age 35 that he was struck by how many Indians were unnecessarily blind.

Like many other computer scientists at MIT, Sinha has a keen eye for problems and possible mathematical solutions. He once fell asleep during a presentation at an academic conference and dreamed of writing the Bhagavad Gita (a key Hindu sacred text) on a grain of rice. When he woke up, he started calculating how small the text would have to be. Six years later, he and his research associate (and wife) created a five-millimeters-square tablet of the entire text of the New Testament. The letters are about as large as red blood cells.

Sitting in the waiting room of an Indian medical clinic a year later, Sinha considered a blind boy and his impoverished parents. "We don't do free surgeries," the clinic doctor told Sinha when he asked if the boy's cataracts would be removed. Sinha considered the dozens of other blind and begging children he had seen on this visit home.

"I realized that if I were to try to do something just on a personal scale, I would be able to provide funding for the surgeries of a handful of these children, which would be satisfying but would not really begin to make a dent in the larger scope of the problem," he later told the American Psychological Association's Monitor on Psychology. He continued:

And that's when I realized that the scientific question I'd been struggling with found almost a perfect approach in the treatment of these children. If you have a child who's, say, 10 years old, who has been blind since birth, and in this child you are able to initiate sight, then you have an unprecedented opportunity to examine visual development, right from point zero.

Once I had that realization, then the path forward became reasonably clear. As a scientist I know how to define a scientific problem and how to approach scientific grant-making bodies. So I could describe to them the humanitarian crisis and the scientific benefits to be derived by addressing this humanitarian crisis.

It worked. Funders came on board, and so far Project Prakash (prakash means light in Sanskrit) has helped more than 440 children who were born with cataracts to see. Sinha's surgical partners make a small incision in the cornea—about half the length of his microscopic New Testament—and insert a lens that costs about $1.50. That's it—in terms of fixing the eye itself. (Project Prakash has treated another 1,400 children nonsurgically.)

But turning the eyes on, it turns out, is the easy part. Teaching the brain to see, to make visual sense of the world, to distinguish between objects and to gauge their distance is difficult and complex—and increasingly so as we age.

'The World Looks the Same'

Yuri Ostrovsky, one of Sinha's research associates, remembered how, in the early days of the project, they eagerly awaited the moment when the childrens' bandages would be removed and they would be able to use their eyes for the first time.

"We got ready for that moment, and we asked them, 'How does the world look now?' And they said, 'Pretty much the same,'" he told MIT Technology Review. "That was a little surprising and maybe, in some ways, a little bit of a letdown."

But turning the eyes on, it turns out, is the easy part.

Sinha's research is shaping our understanding not just of how we see, but of how we learn, how our brains work, how autistic children process information differently, and how computers can process visual data. One day, it may help adults blinded from birth to be able to process visual information once their eyes are healed. But for now, that's extremely rare.

In a major study published in 1971, one ophthalmologist concluded that "the number of cases of this kind over the last 10 centuries known to us is not more than 20." In his research, he focused on six cases of people who surgically recovered sight after long-term blindness. Two healed after a few years were elated. Two blind for 20 to 40 years, but who had experienced many years of normal vision before going blind, took a long time to reintegrate their ability to see. Eventually, with much effort and after significant bouts of depression, they relearned how to view the world. But two patients blind from infancy were never able to use their eyes well, even after gaining the ability to see. They continued to act blind—and needed more help than before they had sight.

"An infant merely learns," Oliver Sacks wrote in a 1993 The New Yorker profile of a man who gained sight after being blind since childhood. "A newly sighted adult, by contrast, has to make a radical switch … [that] flies in the face of the experience of an entire lifetime."

In 1690, John Locke's An Essay Concerning Human Understanding reflected on a question from fellow philosopher William Molyneux: if someone born blind can feel the difference in shapes, like spheres and cubes, and then he were suddenly given the ability to see, could he tell which was the sphere and which was the cube? Molyneux (whose wife was blind) and Locke thought not. Sinha's research demonstrated that they were right. But children given sight got much better at the experiment, some within a week. Viewing an entire visual field, however, is much more difficult. Where does one object begin and another end? Is a shadow an object?

In the case of Virgil, the man profiled by Oliver Sacks, "in this first moment he had no idea what he was seeing," Sacks wrote. "There was light, there was movement, there was color, all mixed up, all meaningless, a blur. Then out of the blur came a voice that said, 'Well?' Then, and only then, he said, did he finally realize that this chaos of light and shadow was a face—and, indeed, the face of his surgeon."

But Virgil's experience reflected so many similar journeys, Sacks wrote. "After an initial exhilaration, a devastating (and even lethal) depression could ensue."

"Individuals who recover sight after prolonged blindness battle severe mental health problems," an MIT profile of Sinha notes. "Some threaten to tear out their eyes or simply continue to act blind. Some are so depressed they commit suicide."

Sinha hopes his work can one day help adults like Virgil. The brain is much more "plastic" (able to change) than earlier thought, he said. He's seen significant visual progress in teens and even one 29-year-old.

Jesus' Real Miracle

So far there are no cases like that of the man in John 9. When Jesus healed him, he didn't just heal his eyes. He also gave him the ability to see the world clearly. He changed the man—body, mind, soul, and spirit—as Jesus said, "so that the works of God might be revealed."

He did not simply “open the man’s eyes.” He rewired his mind and gave him the world.

Jesus radically changed both the man's eyes and mind so that he could see the world immediately and clearly. He did not simply "open the man's eyes." He rewired his mind and gave him the world.

Still, I find it interesting that even in the midst of revealing light, color, shape, and perspective to the man born blind, Jesus only revealed himself gradually, like those Indian children whose minds have to learn how to see the world for the first time. To his neighbors, the newly-sighted man said, "the man they call Jesus" healed him. Then when the Pharisees start debating, he says, "he is a prophet." Then, after the Pharisees started yelling, he raised it to "he is from God." As the pressure grew, his understanding grew. It wasn't until the Pharisees threw him out of the synagogue that he finally, for the first time, saw Jesus. "Do you believe in the Son of Man?" Jesus asked. "You have seen him, and it is he who is speaking to you."

John records the man's immediate response (v. 38): "He said, 'Lord, I believe,' and he worshiped him."

Ted Olsen is news and online managing editor of Christianity Today and editor of The Behemoth.

Wonder on the Web

Links to amazing stuff

Healthy Habits of Awesome People

You don't have to be a genius to see divine wonders all around us. But it doesn't hurt. This review in the Harvard Business Review looks at Daily Rituals: How Artists Work. Author Mason Curry examines the schedules of 161 painters, writers, composers, philosophers, scientists, and other exceptional thinkers. The most surprising idea came from Ernest Hemingway: stop when you're on a roll.

Another habit of many geniuses is a daily walk. It apparently has some science behind it, as reported in "Walking Helps Get the Creative Juices Flowing," on the Stanford Graduate School Website.

Graces Small and Large

One thing that fills us at The Behemoth with awe is how God manages to rescue all manner of people from all manner of trouble. Like a bank robber suffering from addiction and depression. Among the lines that made us smile: "Prison is not a place for personal growth. But there were small graces."

Survival of the Beautiful-est

One problem with non-theistic evolutionary theory it provides no place for the beauty of the natural world. We read about how living things adapt to their environments and how the fittest survive. But why is the world so beautiful? "Our Generous God" suggests the world is fashioned not just to meet our physical needs, but to enhance our "desires and pleasures."

The Practical Parrotfish

On the other hand, some beautiful creatures of God can do useful and practical things—like balancing delicate ecosystems. The authors of "Meet the Sand-Pooping, Reef-Saving, Hermaphroditic Parrotfish" would not see God's providential hand in Hawaii's reefs, but we do.

Tattoo Trendsetter

Just when Christians think they are on the cutting edge by getting tattoos, along comes the news "Been there, done that." When? About 1,300 years ago. A tattoo of Michael the archangel was recently found on the inner thigh of a Sudanese female mummy. The Telegraph article notes, "The letters on her inner thigh spell out M-I-X-A-H-A, which is "Michael" in ancient Greek. Researchers say that she probably died around A.D. 700 and lived in a Christian community on the banks of the Nile River."

Church Life

Not Another Charity Case

Violence against women calls for an immediate, institution-wide response from Christians.

Her.meneutics July 24, 2014
Michael Knapek / Flickr

Vast amounts of ink have been spilled pointing out how our attempts at charity go about it wrong. TOMS Shoes founder Blake Mycoskie came under fire for his model, which donated a pair of shoes to someone in a developing country for each pair sold, arguably leaving foreign markets flooded with an overabundance of shoes and putting locals out of business. (Mycoskie may be improving his business model these days.) Other criticized aid ideas include cartons of unwanted T-shirts sent to African nations; short-term missions trips, if not planned well; and, generally, any idea that involves a relatively wealthy and privileged person thinking she can use physical resources to stem the tide of a disaster by buying, building, or visiting.

Elizabeth Gerhardt would add to that list our project-based attempts to alleviate gender violence.

Too many Christians, she says, are blind to institutional frameworks — some as close as our own families, churches, and communities — that perpetuate gender violence as Christians go about planning fundraisers and mission trips that, at best, bandage the festering issue.

"Calls to care for the poor and oppressed and to denounce unjust systems that maintain material and physical deprivation are often met by resistance by faithful Christians," Gerhardt says in her new book, The Cross and Gendercide (InterVarsity, 2014). "Philanthropy and charity are often applauded and encouraged while the call for changes in systems that support injustice is met with suspicion and division within the Christian community."

And gender violence is no small problem. According to the World Health Organization, around one-third of all women in the world have experienced some form of physical or sexual abuse from their partners. One-fifth to one-third of women in developing countries reported their first sexual experience as forced.

In addition, many are victims of human trafficking, a crime that overwhelmingly affects women: 79 percent of all human trafficking victims reported in 2006 (the latest year U.N. data is available) were women or girls. According to a State Department report, as many as 27 million men, women, and children are trafficking victims at any given time. The U.N. acknowledges that its data likely underreports the problem and that "criminal justice data do not accurately represent the nature or the extent of the underlying activity any more than a fisherman's catch represents the state of the fish in the sea."

Even in U.S. churches, our responses can perpetuate the problem: Of 1,000 pastors surveyed by LifeWay Research in a recent poll for Sojourners, most vastly underestimated the sexual abuse likely taking place in their congregations. Fewer than half were familiar with domestic violence resources in the local community. Most said they have responded to reports of sexual or domestic violence by recommending couples or marriage counseling, something the poll report points out is a "dangerous or even potentially lethal response."

To have a lasting impact on the flood of gendered violence, Gerhardt suggests, it's not enough to give money — even lots of money — to International Justice Mission, or spend a summer volunteering at a battered women's shelter. In responding to institutional evil, we must first look to cleanse institutions, and the best place to start is close to home.

Rescuing girls from brothels or publicly criticizing acid attacks or female genital mutilation will not stem the tide of gender violence, Gerhardt argues; it will only end when today's church follows the lead of Dietrich Bonhoeffer, a German Christian who denounced his country's official church, spoke out against the Nazi party, and was hanged for participating in a Protestant resistance movement.

Like Bonhoeffer, we should take stands against institutions that create demand and support for the practices. In faithful communities, we should thoughtfully consider how to most effectively resist private and public practices of violence. We should start close to home, Gerhardt argues, by working to educate and inform our own churches and communities about appropriate responses to domestic violence.

C.S. Lewis notes that God "could, if he chose, repair our bodies miraculously without food, or give us food without the aid of farmers, bakers, and butchers; or knowledge without the aid of learned men; or convert the heathen without missionaries. Instead, he allows soils and weather and animals and the muscles, minds, and wills of men to cooperate in the execution of his will."

This leaves the church with tremendous power and accompanying responsibility. Gerhardt provides a guide to think through how to use that power best.

Another book that might help churches start on a path toward action is Justice Awakening (InterVarsity, 2014). In the book Eddie Byun, a pastor in South Korea, walks through basics of human trafficking and theological grounding for the pursuit of justice. The brief chapters, which feature discussion questions and prayer guides, are easily digestible. While Gerhardt might look askance at some of Byun's recommendations, which often involve distant travel, he usually starts with nearby communities, a good way to ensure that your work will be useful and not counterproductive.

The response to violence should be neither callous nor ignorant; instead, we should act, starting in our own communities.

Pastors

Wednesday Link List: Persecution, Inklings, and Painless Communion

Link for the sky…

Leadership Journal July 23, 2014

Each week, I get to write teasers for some great online resources, as well as some quirky ones.

When not coming up with an over-abundance of worship and music links, Paul Wilkinson blogs daily at Thinking Out Loud and C201.

Church Life

Meet the Failed Pastor Who Ministers to Other Failed Pastors

J. R. Briggs sympathizes with church leaders who don’t live up to expectations.

Courtesy of J. R. Briggs

As a dynamic young preacher at a large church, J. R. Briggs felt God calling him to start a church plant. Gradually, the church grew, but its growth eventually stalled out. Disappointment led him to found the Epic Fail Pastors Conference—"a gathering for pastors and leaders seeking to understand how God works through failure"—and to write Fail: Finding Hope and Grace in the Midst of Ministry Failure (InterVarsity Press). Briggs spoke with Drew Dyck, managing editor of Leadership Journal, about redefining the notion of ministry success.

Fail: Finding Hope and Grace in the Midst of Ministry Failure

Fail: Finding Hope and Grace in the Midst of Ministry Failure

IVP

208 pages

$26.57

What attracted you to a topic that most people would rather avoid?

It started with attending pastors' conferences. They featured well-known pastors of large churches, but average pastors were never invited to share their experiences. These events were all about success and getting results. I was in the middle of a painful season of ministry. I needed something that wouldn't discourage me or add to my spiritual vertigo. I wanted to talk honestly. I needed an AA meeting for pastors, but there was no such thing.

Many pastors, ex-pastors, and Christian leaders were desperate for that type of forum. I wasn't trying to create a conference. I simply longed for a space where no one was scared by the shortcomings of other sinners, even if those sinners were also ministry leaders.

Do our issues with failure come from faulty notions of success?

I don't like using the word success when talking about ministry. I'd much rather use words like health, faithfulness, and obedience. Our culture is obsessed with success, and the church is not immune. Pastors are inundated with temptations to chase the wrong things. We need to take a hard look at how we define ministry success and failure—and then measure it against Scripture. Eugene Peterson wrote, "The biblical fact is that there are no successful churches. There are, instead, communities of sinners. . . . In these communities of sinners, one of the sinners is called pastor."

What do you say to pastors who feel like failures?

Mostly I just listen. Pastors rarely have someone who will truly listen in times of deep hurt. Eventually I might encourage them to apply the grace they preach to their own lives. I remind them that our worth is not tied up in what we do or how well we do it. I often remind them (and myself) that Jesus won't say to us, "Well done, good and successful servant." I also encourage them to camp out in the Psalms. I've found praying the Psalms to be incredibly healing.

How transparent should pastors be about their failures?

Balancing wisdom and courage is crucial. Leaders should wisely and courageously model transparency for those we're called to serve. Henri Nouwen wrote that pastors are the least confessing people in the church. Few pastors have close relationships where they can have honest conversations, where nothing is off-limits.

It's been said that if you preach out of your weakness, you'll never run out of material. More important, grace, not the pastor, takes center stage. Instead of having people remark, "That preacher is so funny" or "He's such a charismatic leader," they start saying things like, "Wow, God is gracious" and "God's love is so extravagant!"

For many, a failure means the end of ministry. Others pull through and become more effective. What makes the difference?

My friend Stephen Burrell did his dissertation on amoral ministry failure. He did hundreds of interviews with pastors and former pastors who failed in ways not involving moral failings. While we all handle failure differently, Burrell noticed patterns among those who responded in healthy ways.

Some habits were not surprising: They had support systems and mentors, and they pursued God through prayer, solitude, and Scripture reading. But there were three surprising factors. First, the majority didn't bounce back immediately. They took time to grieve and heal. Second, they developed significant relationships with non-Christians before reconnecting with the Christian community. These friendships seemed to assist the healing process. Finally, they experienced a spiritual breakthrough. They could look back to one powerful moment when they strongly sensed the Holy Spirit at work. These experiences enabled them to let go of bitterness, forgive, and begin to hope.

Richard Rohr talks about "the authority of those who have suffered." Does failure create better ministers?

Pastors with deep wounds tend to be more gracious and tenderhearted. Failure is a clear invitation to deeper forms of grace. It can make us better ministers, but only if we handle it with grace and truth. Our response matters. Part of the role of pastor is to handle pain faithfully in light of the Cross.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube