Pastors

Behold Your Mother

Why we need to teach Christians how to care for aging parents.

Leadership Journal October 13, 2014

Our culture's propensity to forget the elderly and weak is particularly disturbing when forsaking is a family matter. Here's PARSE regular Daniel Darling with a much-needed call to encourage compassionate care of parents among Christians. – Paul

“Yeah, well, we’re leaving tomorrow for vacation.”

This was the stunning response I received from the adult daughter of an ill and elderly church member when I called to let them know her father was in the hospital, hanging on to life.

These were otherwise professing, faithful, generous believers who, nonetheless, seemed dismissive about their parents.

I wish I could say this was a rare exception, but I’d be lying. When I pastored a mostly elderly congregation, I was shocked at the cavalier attitude of their Christian children. These were otherwise professing, faithful, generous believers who, nonetheless, seemed dismissive about their parents.

I’m not referring to the very difficult decision many face of whether to personally care for parents in the home or to find them a facility where their needs can best be met. This is always a complex and difficult decision and it’s not the same for every family in this situation. What is clear, however, is the responsibility of children to stewardship, oversight, and compassion for parents in their twilight years.

I know some children who found this kind of care a sacred honor, even though the hours were often filled with thankless tasks and sad realities. Elder care can be a grueling and lonely grind.

What disturbed me were the others, too many of them, who offered a “not my problem” approach, a kind of blame-shifting, pass-the-baton attitude that leaves family members without the resources to live the last years of life with dignity.

Sometimes this responsibility was shifted to the church. A refrain I often heard was “Isn’t this the church’s problem?” There is some truth here. Christ’s body is supposed to look out for the marginalized, particularly those in their advanced years. I was always amazed at the level of care and generosity exhibited by our small congregation. But there are some levels of care and decision-making that even the most resourced, well-meaning churches can’t provide, such as power-of-attorney, difficult housing decisions, and medical decisions. What’ s more, the church shouldn’t enable abdication of responsibility by family.

A theology of parental care

So where does this indifference come from? Why does this exist among Christian children of elderly parents? There are likely quite a few complex factors, but I wonder if some of this lack of compassion stems from a failure to adequately teach the biblical ethic of “honoring father and mother,” given by God as law in the Pentateuch (Exodus 20:12) and continued in the New Covenant (Ephesians 6:2).

To "honor" in ancient times meant more than what we think that word might mean. It carried with it a commitment for children to care for their parents in their infirm years. This was a countercultural idea, both in the ancient Near Eastern context of Israel and the first century world of the Church. It might be just as countercultural today, in an increasingly utilitarian society. Health care experts are writing, more persuasively, about the elderly’s lack of societal usefulness.

Care for the elderly is not simply “the right thing to do” but a vivid portrait of the gospel story.

This is why care for the elderly is not simply “the right thing to do” but a vivid portrait of the gospel story. The Holy Spirit in us renews our self-centered motivations, reminding us that Christ cared for our spiritual disability while we were spiritually dead and “yet sinners.” Witness Jesus’ words to his beloved disciple John, from the cross. Even while suffering cruel injustice and bearing sin, he made sure his mother Mary would have her physical needs met. “John,” he said, “Behold your Mother.”

We often read Jesus’ final words here as a sign and symbol of the New Covenant, where Christ is calling out a new people with new allegiances. He’s creating a new family, made up of the redeemed from every nation, tribe, and tongue. So John has a new mother and Mary has a new son. Two thousand years later the Spirit is still creating new mothers and new sons in the family of God.

But there is also something else at work here. Jesus was fully human, a real son from a real mother. His submission to the Father’s will in going to the cross didn’t release him from the earthly responsibilities to the one who had wrapped him in swaddling clothes and laid him in the manger, who nurtured him, provided for him, and cared for him as a child.

What does Jesus’ example offer for his followers? It reminds us that honoring our parents isn’t simply payback for their care for us in childhood. It’s not a reward dependent on how well they parented us. Care for your parents is a reflection of what we believe about the gospel.

It seems we need to recover this ethic in church life. I fear that our good desire to reach the next generation becomes an obsession with youth so much so that we often leave behind the aging. I wonder if we’ve imbibed too much of our culture’s pragmatic utilitarianism that discards people when they are no longer at peak usefulness.

I wonder if we’ve imbibed too much of our culture’s pragmatic utilitarianism that discards people when they are no longer at peak usefulness.

Care of parents, particularly in the latter years, is difficult, grueling, and offers little tangible reward. The elderly seem like speed bumps on the road to relevance. But if we really believe each human life was made in the image of God, if we really believe that every human has intrinsic worth, regardless of utility, we’d do better at embodying this ethic when it comes to equipping our people to care for their elderly parents.

We can do this in several ways. First, we can preach the biblical texts on honoring parents and include the elderly in our preaching on the sanctity of human life. Second, we should be more intentional about fostering intergenerational relationships so the younger see the value of engagement with senior saints. Third, we need to be more intentional about challenging those tempted to abdicate their responsibility to their parents and affirm those who willingly take up the task. Lastly, the church can connect our people to helpful resources in the community that offer help and wise counsel.

Most of all, however, the church must embody the ethic of Jesus on the cross, who embodied the holistic nature of the gospel, which doesn’t only say, “Father forgive them,” but also, “Mother, here is your son.”

Daniel Darling is vice-president of communications for the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission. He is the author of several books, including his latest, Activist Faith.

Culture
Review

Whiplash

A film about art, discipline, and the benefits of someone who cracks the whip.

Miles Teller and J.K. Simmons in 'Whiplash'

Miles Teller and J.K. Simmons in 'Whiplash'

Christianity Today October 13, 2014
Daniel McFadden / Sony Pictures

One of the reasons why jazz is often considered a uniquely American art form is the way that it straddles the line between individual glory and collective responsibility. A jazz band is only as good as the sum of its parts, each member playing a role and keeping the right tempo.

J.K. Simmons in 'Whiplash'Daniel McFadden / Sony Pictures
J.K. Simmons in ‘Whiplash’

And yet jazz builds in space for individuals to improvise and claim the solo spotlight. It’s an art form that values freedom and wildness, but within bounds; pitch, meter, tempo and technique still matter. It’s the tension between order and chaos. Jazz is very much about bringing order out of chaos, as all art is; yet it’s also about riffing on chaos. Born as it was in the transition years between Victorian-era orderliness and the fragmenting deconstruction of modernism, jazz finds beauty in the blurry space between order/meter and disorderly life.

Whiplash, written and directed by 29-year-old Damien Chazelle, is a film about jazz that reflects these tensions well. It follows Andrew Neiman (Miles Teller), a gifted jazz drummer aspiring to greatness while studying under an intense teacher named Terence Fletcher (J.K. Simmons) at a fictional, Juilliard-esque music school in New York City. Fletcher is kind of like the Professor Snape of college jazz band teachers. He hurls insults (and sometimes chairs) at his students and often makes them cry. He shames, manipulates, and emotionally abuses his pupils, all with the vocabulary of a sailor skilled in stringing together profanities in creative ways.

Like Snape, Fletcher directs extra measures of wrath on the pupil with the most promise. Andrew is his Harry Potter. And while they are enemies for much of the film, they also need each other. Fletcher’s relentless whip-cracking and apparent villainy turns out to be just the sort of tough-love discipline Andrew needs to make the most of his gifts.

One of the things Whiplash is about is the necessity of discipline and accountability in a world where kids grow up—emboldened by shelves of participation trophies and constant “you can do anything!” pats on the back—thinking world-changing greatness is just a Kickstarter campaign away. It’s a world where many aspiring artists, including many Christians, skip that whole “tireless, decades-long training to master the craft” part, jumping straight to making the “masterpiece” that they are then surprised to see get trashed by the critics.

No, in order to be a legend, in order to make a difference as an artist, one must accept the indispensability of mastering technique. In order to be a good improviser, one must first excel within limits. Prior to “breaking the rules” in a brilliant and influential way, artists must study the greats and be great. Before Jackson Pollock was in a position to convince anyone of the excellence of his abstract expressionism, he had to first train in representational technique (he did in part under Thomas Hart Benton). Terrence Malick could have never made a formally bonkers film like To the Wonder had he not first established his credibility with more traditional fare like Badlands.

So it is for young Andrew under the tutelage of Fletcher, a man who maintains that the most harmful two words in the English language are “good job.” Andrew is brought to literal blood, sweat and tears repeatedly in the film, as the Hegelian collision between his drive and Fletcher’s punishing temper gradually produces something brilliant. Andrew’s father (Paul Reiser) is nurturing and outwardly loving; he’s there to hug his son when a concert performance doesn’t go so well.

But Fletcher provides something fatherly that Andrew desperately needs: discipline. One minute Fletcher encourages Andrew and the next he’s slapping him in the face. One minute Andrew is Fletcher’s go-to drummer and the next he’s kicked out of the band. But it’s not bipolar as much as it’s two faces of the same love—a love that includes both grace and discipline, both mercy and judgment. When Andrew comes to realize this, he may as well be reading Hebrews 12:5-6: “My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord, nor be weary when reproved by him. For the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives.”

True growth requires limits, chastisement, listening to the hard truth—not just hugs and pats on the back. And yet growth often happens in fits and starts; three steps forward, two steps back. Whiplash gets its title from a prominent song in the film but also from its own stop-and-start time signature. The characters in the film experience alternating highs and lows, moments of loud rage and quiet reflection. Tempo changes and modulations happen frequently in span of a single scene. Characters’ emotions and temperaments toward one another fluctuate just as wildly. Whiplash indeed.

Miles Teller in 'Whiplash'Daniel McFadden / Sony Pictures
Miles Teller in ‘Whiplash’

The film’s form reflects its content, with jazz-like bursts of quick cuts and intense montage balanced with quieter, slower moments and longer takes. Musically, the film teases us with short, wonderful bursts of jazz performance (and especially drumming) for most of its running time, keeping true to the start-stop-start motif. Only in the film’s final scene do we get an extended, uninterrupted performance, and it’s breathtaking. The final concert scene reminded me of the final scene of Roman Polanski’s The Pianist (2002), which felt similarly cathartic and almost transcendent.

Miles Teller and J.K. Simmons are both phenomenal in their parts, playing off each other as brilliantly as one horn to another in a jazz ensemble. Both should receive Oscar nominations, as should the film itself, which won the audience and grand jury prizes at this year’s Sundance Film Festival.

In a film of many standout moments, one that lingers is a rare scene of emotional vulnerability for the otherwise impenetrable Fletcher. He pauses a class session with his jazz ensemble to play a song that reminds him of a former student, who he’d just learned died in a car accident. Fighting back tears, he describes how the former student was the best he’d ever taught and had been rising the ranks in the jazz world when he died. The somber scene captures a sense in the film that artistic brilliance is a fleeting thing—stars burning brightly, but briefly, before they’re gone. Andrew himself admits that he’d rather die young but be remembered as a great (Charlie Parker great, perhaps) than live to be 90 but only have family members remember him. Certainly the intensity with which Andrew throws himself into his aspirations could cause him an early demise. It almost does at one point in the film.

Whiplash raises familiar questions about art and the personal costs of striving for greatness. Kurt Cobain, Heath Ledger, Janis Joplin, David Foster Wallace and a hundred others we could list right now are all testimony to the costs that come with giving one’s life to an artistic pursuit. But does it have to be this way? Must serious, game-changing artists sacrifice things like healthy interpersonal relationships and domestic stability?

Andrew seems to think so. He has no friends and doesn’t seem to care for his family or even the girl who catches his eye (Melissa Benoist). For him, attachments get in the way. The only person he really connects with in the film is Fletcher, and then only because he sees in him the same wild-eyed, reckless passion for jazz that he himself has.

J.K. Simmons in 'Whiplash'Daniel McFadden / Sony Pictures
J.K. Simmons in ‘Whiplash’

The film made me think of a famous passage in Jack Kerouac’s On the Road, itself a jazz-inspired narrative: “The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow Roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars . . . ”

What’s so wrong with occasional yawns or “commonplace” things? Isn’t there something to be said for the mundane structures and foundations of life that provide order and safe parameters for the Roman candle explosions? Indeed, as we’ve already seen, jazz itself isn’t pure madness but rather ordered chaos, energy channeled through and working within rhythmic, tonal, dynamic boundaries. So it is with any art or passion we might pursue. Whiplash happens when we pit our rocket ambitions in opposition to the sturdiness and steadiness of foundations, when the reality is true flourishing needs both.

Caveat Spectator

Whiplash is rated R for language, and oh boy does it deserve it. The Fletcher character spews out profanities and mean-spirited sexual references like it’s his job (he thinks that it is), and the other characters occasionally fire back. The language in the jazz band practice room could easily contend with a football practice field or military bootcamp for the title of most profane training environment. Filmgoers with low tolerance for profane language should probably avoid this film. In addition to language the film has a very visceral intensity that includes a good bit of bloody hands (from frenzied drumming) and one fairly violent car accident scene. Let’s just say images of blood dripping on a snare drum is one of the film’s most recurring motifs. The “blood, sweat, and tears” mantra of hard work is very literally expressed in the film.

Brett McCracken is a Los Angeles-based writer and journalist, and author of the booksHipster Christianity: When Church and Cool Collide (Baker, 2010) and Gray Matters: Navigating the Space Between Legalism and Liberty (Baker, 2013). You can follow him@brettmccracken.

History

The History We’d Prefer to Forget

Why we pass on pain to the next generation.

Her.meneutics October 13, 2014
J.D. Thomas / Flickr

The recent round of protests in Colorado over a proposed change to the Advanced Placement American History curriculum has illustrated for me the challenge in our culture about what it means to remember well.

The College Board, the organization that administers Advanced Placement tests that allow high school students to earn college credit for their studies, recently recalibrated the framework of the AP American history course. This decision set off a recent, fiery round of protests in Jefferson County, Colorado, just west of Denver.

The new College Board framework includes instruction about the colonial-era conflicts between Native Americans and European settlers (a view that also comes up each year around Columbus Day and Thanksgiving) and an exploration of hot-button issues shaping current events. The conservative majority in charge of the Jefferson County School Board joined a handful of other districts around the country in expressing concern at the shift in content and tone of the new curriculum.

Those opposing the new guidelines insist schools should help develop good citizens by giving their students a strong sense of American exceptionalism. Those supporting the College Board’s new framework have the same goal, but see the benefits of studying of some of the difficult chapters of our country’s exceptional but imperfect history. The wars and discrimination, the hostile takeovers and lynchings: These things happened in the land of the free and the home of the brave as well.

While the Colorado debate has surfaced all sorts of educational issues, including concerns about implementing Common Core standards, the discussion about what it means to remember and how we pass those memories on to the next generation has important application for all of us.

Those who view the past through a rose-colored filter or selective recall may think they’ve discovered a workaround to George Santayana’s famous observation that those who don’t remember the past are condemned to repeat it. After all, they’re not forgetting the past. They’re simply remembering more comfortable version of it.

God asks us to recall the past, too. But the kind of remembering to which his followers are called is not a passive act of recall, nor does he ask us to filter the unpleasant bits of the story as we consider the past. This kind of remembering the past is meant to form us into people who walk humbly with him in the present tense, reflecting his character as we act justly and love his mercy.

As someone who has experienced anti-Semitism, a chill goes down my spine when I hear a world leader steadfastly refuse to remember history, preferring instead an alternate version of reality. I live with the knowledge that my faith in a Jewish Messiah would not have spared me or my family from the gas chambers of Auschwitz had I been living in the Europe controlled by the Third Reich during World War II.

I felt it essential that my children understand the difficult parts of our ethnic-religious history as they were growing up, as they were going to be living in a world where anti-Semitism continues to be an issue. (The remembering and teaching of the darker moments in history to children needs to be age appropriate, of course. I am not advocating showing Shindler’s List to six year-olds as a way to tell them about the Holocaust.)

We can probably all understand the impulse to skip over painful histories, whether in our personal lives, our country, or our people. After all, our hope is that our children will secure a better future. But, especially as they grow up, these histories hold important lessons for them—in the good and the bad. The many unvarnished discussions my family had over the years about the troublesome, painful parts of our world’s history served two important purposes: they gave them a vocabulary for signs of both personal and systemic injustice and a voice they could choose to use on behalf of another.

The bit of verse attributed to German pastor Martin Niemoeller, who survived years of imprisonment in Nazi concentration camps during World War II, has been used to motivate many to social responsibility. These words offer a unique call to those of us who bear God’s name in this world:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

A version of the past that avoids the unfavorable will not form kingdom-hearted members of society who recognize injustice, or discover how to use their voices on behalf of the marginalized. Through these painful histories, we as followers of Jesus develop a greater empathy for the stories of others.

Sometimes, using our voice on behalf of someone who has been marginalized means not saying a word. We can engage in the ministry of listening to hear and know the stories of those who have been treated as “less than” members in our society and sometimes, in our churches: immigrants, the mentally-ill, minorities, the disabled, the poor.

Rather than stopping the conversation with remarks like, “Why can’t you just move on? The past is the past,” “I’m not responsible for what your people experienced,” or “You’re stuck in your victimhood,” we can simply listen. The fruit of the Spirit flowering in us will express the compassion of God for the others he’s placed in our lives. God’s love is a far more powerful filter than rose-colored lenses any day.

News

Hong Kong Christians Lead Protests for Democracy

As the island city braces for another week of gridlock, faith is in the foreground.

Christians pray during a demonstration outside the government headquarters in Hong Kong.

Christians pray during a demonstration outside the government headquarters in Hong Kong.

Christianity Today October 13, 2014
Xaume Olleros / Getty Images

Chinese Christians are playing a leading role in protests that have seen tens of thousands of people shut down the streets of Hong Kong.

Protestors are angered by Beijing’s decision to control the list of candidates for the island city’s top leader in its first free election, slated for 2017.

Some of the top leaders of the protests are Christians, including the teenage leader of the main student group and two of the three Occupy Central leaders. Cardinal Joseph Zen, 82, said he will spend his nights with the protestors until “we are either dispersed or arrested.”

Churches are also playing a role, supporting the protests with food and shelter. Though several of Hong Kong’s major churches have publicly taken a neutral stance, others are providing first aid, snacks, or refuge to protestors. Christian symbols are highly visible, as demonstrators form prayer groups, carry crosses, and openly read their Bibles.

While the Hong Kong protestors are demanding democracy, “there is an undercurrent of another, much older tension: between Christianity and Communist China,” noted the Wall Street Journal. (Former Hong Kong resident Dorcas Cheng-Tozun explains that tension to CT readers over at Her.meneutics.)

Christian churches have been sprouting in Hong Kong since the British took control in 1841. About 43 percent of the island’s 7.2 million people claim a religion—about 320,000 of them are Protestant Christians.

“Christians in Hong Kong, they see that economic development has not brought more religious tolerance in China,” Joseph Cheng, a political-science professor at City University of Hong Kong, told UCA News. “So despite economic development, despite improvement in living standards and opening to the external world, tolerance of Christianity especially has not been improving; in fact, in the recent two years persecution has strengthened.”

For their part, Chinese officials have grown increasingly wary of churches as their influence on the mainland grows. The government has physically removed crosses from dozens of church buildings and reduced a brand-new $3.2 million church to rubble. One Chinese pastor told the Guardian that party officials often use the dismissive expression yang jiao, or “foreign teaching,” to refer to Christianity.

It makes sense that party officials would be wary of Christianity, according to China Source, since the religion came to China in the wake of European ships full of opium. The colonial period in China (from about 1839 to 1949) was a time of deep shame, China Source’s Mark Totman writes.

“This period of humiliation also saw a sharp increase in foreign missionary activity in China as well as a significant increase in the number of Chinese believers,” he said. “To the Chinese government (and many Chinese) foreign intrusion and the Christian faith came to be seen as basically inseparable—two sides of the same coin, as it were.”

The expansion of the church may be adding pressure to that distrust. The steady growth of Christians means China is on pace to outnumber Christians in any other country in 15 years, according to the London Daily Telegraph.

That growth may signal to officials that Christians and their churches are now “key constituents” who can play a significant role in society, but can also pose a real and powerful threat to the country’s atheism and Marxist ideology, according to the Lausanne Movement's Thomas Harvey, Paul Huoshui, and David Ro. That uncertainty is reflected in the government’s response—to tear down crosses but not shut down services.

An all-out campaign against Christians is unlikely, because of Christianity’s growing power within the country and international pressure, they wrote.

But growing tensions are likely, especially when an expanding church ignites fears of the potential weakening of party power, Loyola University professor Carsten Vala said in a Brookings Institute panel. (Foreign Policy looks at whether "Christians make good rebels.")

“Maybe one way to understand Chinese Christianity and the relationship with the party state is to think in terms of different levels,” he said. “There's a party center and there's an ideology about the fear of Christianity, and then there's the local reality where local officials get to know church leaders and they find them very useful to do good works.”

Chinese Christians can make an impact socially, as individuals, as long as they don't become too high profile, he said. “When they become too prominent, that is when the party state is more likely to step in and to crack down.”

CT often covers China, including the recent cross removal or demolition of some churches, the complex reasons behind the high-profile demolition of Wenzhou's Sanjiang Church, and interviews with ChinaAid’s Bob Fu and China Source’s Brent Fulton on China’s intentions toward the church.

CT also noted the proposal of a multimillion-dollar megachurch planned for—and then halted—in the hometown of the ancient Chinese philosopher Confucius.

Pastors

The Love of Letting Be

What if we stopped trying to rationalize God … and other people?

Leadership Journal October 13, 2014

The world is changed by listeners.

And people are almost alarmed when they are actually listened to. “Being heard is so close to being loved,” wrote David Augsburger, “that for the average person, they are almost indistinguishable.”

I guess good listening begins with how we listen to God.

I guess good listening begins with how we listen to God. Smack dab at the beginning of Numbers 3, I recently found myself introduced to two characters of the Bible I knew nearly nothing about: Nadab and Abihu, the two priestly sons of Aaron. Perhaps you’ve never heard of them either—I’d be shocked to find that either character is a household name in even the most pious of Jewish or Christian homes. With their subtle anonymity they are given a brief introduction and a dreary conclusion. One verse is devoted to their demise:

“Nadab and Abihu … died before the LORD when they made an offering with unauthorized fire before him in the Desert of Sinai.” (Num. 3:4)

They were priests who died before the Lord. Leviticus offers a little more explanation, telling us what took place, but not much (Lev. 10:1-2). What became of both remains shrouded in a good deal of mystery. Of course, we could go into the normal historical, cultural, or even biblical contextual rigmarole to explain away why they died, but that would eventually let us readers off the hook. Why? Such incidents happen quite often in the Bible. That is, God does rather mysterious things like letting people fall dead in (even partially disobedient) service to him. There’s Uzzah, and Ananias and Saphirra, among others.

Explaining mysteries

As I think about the writings of the Bible from the perspective of a writer, I am left wondering why it is exactly that the literary genius behind the book didn’t pause, think, and add a clear footnote as to why Nadab and Abihu died.

God’s mysteries aren’t cleared up with explanatory citations all the time.

No explanation.

No rationale.

No footnote.

And, it should be said, such ambiguity comes with much of the mystery of the Almighty. God’s mysteries aren’t cleared up with explanatory citations all the time. Sometimes, the stories just don’t have explanation. Sometimes, it just is what it is; end of story. For a moment, I want to give a little attention to that little emotional reaction one might have to such a “hard saying” as it is often called.

Pay attention to your soul as you hear about such stories. Do you want to explain the story away?

I am learning that one of the greatest skills of the best preachers is that they refuse to iron out the “unironables” in the Bible.

I certainly do. But that lurking desire to explain mystery can lead to some rather comical explanations. For example, I read some time ago of a scientist named Immanuel Velikovsky who theorized that Nadab and Abihu had found some oil and put it in their censer. Unaware of what it was, they lit it on fire only to experience a massive explosion that was interpreted as fire from heaven.[1]

God is a mystery. And God’s mystery is a terrible beauty.

Wrinkled mysteries

People are no different. The human person is a complex, high-touch, nuanced being that is created in the image of God. As God is mysterious, so is God’s creation. At times, I stand before people hearing their stories and wondering why it is that they are. What makes them tick? Why do they continue to do the same silly, mysterious things over and over and over again?

We welcome embracing a God that fits, logically, culturally, and sensibly, into our own sensitivities. But, the minute God colors outside our lines, we bounce.

As a preacher, I am learning that one of the greatest skills of the best preachers is that they refuse to iron out the “unironables” in the Bible. They don’t seek to explain away the stories of Nadab and Abihu—they just let them be. I think that the same goes for the people in my life who have loved me with Christlike persistence. These are people who, like the best preachers, don’t themselves try and iron all of me out on their own.

When I was in my doctoral program, a New Testament Ph.D student told me something I’ve held on to. He said: “An oppressed Bible oppresses people.”

When we malign, quiet, or manipulate the holy words of the Bible, we can use it for whatever means we want. Frankly—and I want to stress this—I think the same stands for our relationships with other people. Oppressed people oppress people. At the very place we ourselves are not loved as we are, we will refuse to do the same for others.

On their turf

I often hear Christians, when facing biblical stories like Nadab and Abihu say things like “I couldn’t follow a God that could do that!” The core of such a sentiment toward God is the same as our sentiment toward others. We refuse to love God for who God is on God’s own terms. We welcome embracing a God that fits, logically, culturally, and sensibly, into our own sensitivities. But, the minute God colors outside our lines, we bounce.

We are guilty of this in our love toward others, too.

I think Jesus wants me to be that way—to have a pathology of irrational listening. Of sitting in the stories of others, and just letting them be what they are.

Jesus’ words were actually true: Love God with all your heart, soul, and strength … Love your neighbor as yourself. Our love of neighbor is a shadow of our love for God, and vice versa.

Just as a Christian is invited to love God on God’s terms, neighbor is invited to love neighbor on their turf.

Richard Baxter, a Puritan father, once wrote that if it fit into a spoon, it isn’t the ocean. His point? God can’t fit. Never has, never will. God’s mystery destroys the spoon. People are similar. Being a neighbor is not expecting others to “fit” into my rational spoon. It is entering into their world, jumping into their pool.

Two weeks ago, I had the chance to spend two hours with a very famous New Testament scholar—all to myself. I planned on spending the time asking this person question after question. But they would have none of it. For two hours, this worldwide-acknowledged, famous scholar spent time asking me questions about my family, my studies, and my ministry.

The professor entered into the mystery that was me!

I want to be that way. I think Jesus wants me to be that way—to have a pathology of irrational listening. Of sitting in the stories of others, and just letting them be what they are.

God is a mystery. Others are a mystery.

And it’s a mystery how we all think we’re the spoon.

1. Immanuel Velikovsky, Worlds in Collision (New York, NY: Doubleday & Company, 2009), 72-73.

Dr. A.J. Swoboda is a pastor, writer, and professor in Portland, Oregon. He is @mrajswoboda on Twitter.

Copyright © 2014 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal.Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

My Strange Life as a Pastor’s Wife

The unexpected blessings of a role I never wanted.

Leadership Journal October 13, 2014
Prixel Creative / Unsplash

"She was a Plain Jane minister's wife type—you know what I mean."

That was how one of our parishioners described a visitor they'd had in church while my husband and I were away on vacation. Did I know what she meant? Did I want to know? After all, I am a minister's wife. I was hesitant to ask.

"Some ministers' wives are good at it, some aren't."

This remark came from a friend and mother-to-be. She was confined to home near the end of her pregnancy, and I brought her a gift, thinking it might cheer her up. Her offhand comment caught me off guard. Did what I see as a simple act of friendship—bringing a baby gift to lift a friend's spirit—bolster my credentials as a pastor's wife? Or maybe she didn't appreciate my visit at all and meant that I wasn't "good at it"—this pastor's wife thing, I mean.

"How did the two of you ever get together? I mean you're so different."

I was helping set up tables for the annual church bazaar and this question hit me out of the blue. It wasn't asked with the intent of getting to know me better, or inquiring about my life's story. It was more of a "That's weird that he's married to you" kind of statement. I found myself trying to defend my husband's and my compatibility, realizing our marriage was under scrutiny by this woman who really didn't know either of us on a personal level.

What is a "pastor's wife" anyway? Is it a profession? Certainly more than a few parishioners see it that way. And if my experiences are any indication, there are certain physical and personality characteristics in a pastor's spouse that people in the pew consider desirable, if not essential.

An unsought role

I've known at least three women in my life who told me they'd "always wanted to be a pastor's wife." Not me! When I was young, I swore I would never marry a minister. I didn't see myself as having the qualities I felt were necessary in a minister's wife. I had no musical ability—didn't sing in the choir or play the piano. I was quiet and introverted, but when I spoke I was blunt and direct. And I wasn't the submissive type. I figured God had given me a brain and I was going to use it, and that all of Scripture was as much for me as for any man.

I've known at least three women in my life who told me they'd "always wanted to be a pastor's wife." Not me!

When I entered seminary in the fall of 1983, I went with my guard up. I would not marry a minister. But before the end of my first semester at Gordon-Conwell, I fell in love with a fellow student who was studying for the ministry. And he was definitely called to be a pastor. It didn't take me long to realize that God had brought the two of us together. Therefore I had no choice but to conclude that God was indeed calling me to be a pastor's wife. Well, not to be a pastor's wife—but to be this pastor's wife, the wife of Dale Edwards. And Dale Edwards is a pastor.

Early on, I learned the hard way that a pastor's spouse is neither clergy nor laity. The small church my husband pastored while we were in seminary was trying to decide which color to paint the sanctuary. Like any good Baptist church, the matter was brought to a congregational vote. And like any good Baptist, I sat poised to raise my hand when my preferred color came up. Just as I got ready to put my arm in the air, my husband placed his hand on mine. He leaned over and whispered, "We're not voting on this." I acquiesced but brought the matter up on the ride home. Dale reasoned that if I voted it would appear that I was expressing the opinion of my pastor-husband. And my pastor-husband correctly surmised that the color of the sanctuary was not an issue important enough to take a side on in a congregational vote.

Over the years I saw the wisdom in this approach, when at a women's meeting or Christian Education meeting I would express an opinion only to see the discussion shut down. I tended to underestimate the weight my words held, even when I thought I was just stating my personal opinion along with everyone else.

I also learned being a pastor's wife requires more flexibility than I ever imagined. Dale and I joke that our life is always on flex time. You can never predict when someone is going to need to see their pastor—life's stresses and tragedies don't follow a regular timetable. Dinners get delayed or cancelled altogether. Sleep gets interrupted. Death stops everything—and not just for the person who stopped breathing. Vacations get put on hold, sporting events get missed.

Early on, I learned the hard way that a pastor's spouse is neither clergy nor laity.

A pastor's wife has to be a strong person. I won't get into the whole complementarian / egalitarian debate here. I've come to see that as long as couples are being kind to one another, putting the needs of the other before their own, and seeking to live their lives in obedience to Christ, the debate becomes less important. But a pastor's wife needs to be strong, because it's no easy task to be a "helpmeet" for a pastor. It's often my job to take care of this person who pours out his life taking care of others. I have to look out for him because no one in the congregation will—that's not their job. The sheep cannot be expected to take care of their shepherd, however well-intentioned they might be. I'm often serve as gatekeeper and even Sabbath-keeper. Sometimes it's better for my husband's ministry if I'm the one to say "no" rather than put him in that position. I'm sure people have said things like, "Laurie doesn't let Dale answer the phone on Monday's. She makes him take the day off." And that's okay by me—it's true!

Unexpected blessing

As a pastor's spouse, you are being watched. Like it or not. And your marriage is being watched. And your children are being watched. The key is to keep on living your life, not like the church or the community is watching, but like God is watching you. Because ultimately he is the one who matters most. We worked hard to make sure our kids were free to be kids. They weren't expected to behave a certain way because their father was the pastor, but we made it clear that following Christ involved living lives of obedience to him.

When we allowed our daughter to wear her big brother's oversized basketball shorts on Sunday morning, she was asked by parishioners if her parents let her dress that way to church. She looked at them and proudly answered "Yes!" We learned to choose our battles; we'd rather have our kids in church of their own volition than get in arguments about the clothes they wore there. Did my kids sometimes raise some eyebrows? I'm sure they did, but they each grew up to be their own person.

As a pastor's spouse, you are being watched. Like it or not.

Though I wasn't enthusiastic about the role initially, being a pastor's wife has been a source of amazing blessing. And I have come to see that God has gifted me for ministry in ways I couldn't see before.

Oddly enough, none of the three women I know who always wanted to be pastor's wives ever became one. And a couple of friends of mine who I felt were wonderful pastors' wives ended up hating it, and were relieved when their husbands left the ministry. And here I sit, 30 years later, thinking I never could have imagined a better life than I have.

God calls us all to serve him with our whole hearts wherever he puts us. As it should be in the life of every other Christian, pastors' wives are called to a life of love, service, and obedience. I am responsible to live out my faith wherever I am today, trusting and honoring God.

Am I a "Plain Jane minister's wife" type? Possibly. Am I good at it? I have no clue, but I hope so. Would I have my life any other way? Never!

Laurie is a writer and substitute teacher. She is also the wife of Dale Edwards, who recently stepped down as pastor of First Baptist church of Lebanon, New Hampshire, and now serves as executive minister of American Baptist Churches for Vermont and New Hampshire.

Copyright © 2014 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal.Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

Pastors

Make Room for Me

New research reveals what Millennials like—and don’t like—about churches, and what we can do to reach them.

20 May 2014 --- Low angle studio portrait of five young adults looking upward --- Image by © JPM/Corbis

When Heather Stevens was a junior in college, she discovered that, according to Barna research, six out of ten of her 20something peers who were "spiritually active" in their teens had stopped going to church once they got to college. She saw it happening all around her. Troubled by this, Heather wrote a blog post in July 2013:

"If you are a church leader, this data should stop you in your tracks. It should make you think, 'What the heck am I doing wrong?' "

Shawn Williams, a pastor at Community Christian Church in Naperville, Illinois, understands Heather's angst. "It feels like every generation asks what to do about the 18- to 20-somethings who have left the church. There's something about that age that pulls them away from the church," he says. "The church was asking the same question about Generation X. It's not a new question, but there are some unique factors with Millennials we need to consider."

Stevens turned her frustration about the church's future into action. She enlisted the help of two friends, Taylor Snodgrass and Maria Martin, to find out what churches are doing to reach her generation.

The threesome set out on a cross-country road trip to visit 10 churches that "seem to be doing something right" in making space for Millennials. The plan was to visit each church anonymously—experience worship, learn all they could about the church and its role in the community, and then blog their findings (20schurch.tumblr.com).

Forty churches later (their list grew!) Stevens, Snodgrass, and Martin saw six attributes—community, relatability, authenticity, challenge, hospitality, and empowerment—played out again and again in the churches that were reaching and serving Millennials well, attributes that look strikingly like what Jesus did while he ministered to and mentored disciples in the early church.

Authenticity

Millennials are looking for authenticity. What does it mean for a church to be real?

"Our generation has been advertised at our whole life, and even now on social media," says Snodgrass. "Consequently, if a church isn't giving you the whole story, if it's sugarcoated or they're onstage putting on an act, 20s see through this. It causes us to leave. We're good at seeing when people are lying."

Brian Coffey, pastor of First Baptist Church-East in Geneva, Illinois, himself the father of four Millennial sons, says, "Millennials can hear honesty. They have a radar for that."

Jeff Frazier, Coffey's co-pastor, has launched a new worship service this fall. Called New Word and Table, the service is simple. "We meet twice a month, and we have tables for people to share communion. It features one person on piano or guitar. It's not driven by the worship leader or praise team but by the content," he says.

"The single voice is plaintive and honest," says Coffey. His hunch is this new "ancient-modern" service will draw former Catholics, Millennials, and people who want a more natural, contemplative worship.

Visual Clarity

"Millennials want to be able to answer the questions 'Where am I?' and 'What's expected of me?' by looking for cues in their surroundings," says David Kinnaman, president of Barna Group.

"Visual clarity is huge," says Snodgrass. "On our church road trip, we walked into a few churches that didn't have good signage, and we wandered around. We weren't sure where to go. We just want to go in and experience the space without having to ask someone."

Many of today's young adults haven't been raised in the church. Their only exposure to church may be the Hollywood portrayals they've seen. So churches that don't look like churches may simply confuse.

"We don't want to feel stress when we go into church," Snodgrass says. "The biggest thing is to create a welcoming space that isn't confusing."

As part of Barna's study on Millennials and church architecture, they brought two groups of 20-somethings to modern churches, and then to cathedral-style churches. In the cathedrals, "they felt it was a space for serious activities such as prayer, coping with tragedy, and communing with God. They sensed the spirituality of the place," says Kinnaman. "At the same time, they were concerned about how they would fit in—If I visit, do I need to wear dressy clothes?—and a few participants, especially unchurched people, felt intimidated by the spiritual intensity of the space."

In the more casual megachurches, this same group found inviting common areas to connect with others (armchair seating in an open lobby). However, there was no place conducive to connecting with God.

"Overall the 'un-churchy' atmosphere, which had more of a corporate vibe, failed to suggest transcendence," said Kinnaman. "A modern church is designed to host activities, and these activities point the people to God. But strip away those activities and you might as well be at a community college, a performing arts center or, heaven help us, an airport terminal," he said.

The challenge is to design for clarity. Good design makes it crystal clear where you are and what you're here to do.

There is no cookie-cutter solution for welcoming Millennials to your space, but there are questions to keep in mind as you build to include the whole church body:

4 Questions Your Church Can Ask About Making Space for Millennials

  • What visual cues do our facilities present? Can people easily answer "Where am I?" and "What's expected of me?"
  • How do our facilities offer respite from the outside world? Can people find a place of peace that is accessible and inviting?
  • Do our facilities connect people to God? What symbols or design elements evoke a sense of the sacred and tell the story of God's actions in the world?
  • How do our facilities integrate elements of nature? How can we bring the outside in and take the inside out?"

—From the Barna/CKN study, "Making Space for Millennials," available at Barna.org.

Nature

One way churches can help point people to God regardless of the architectural style of their facility is by bringing nature into the church. Nature is an element that Millennials say helps them connect with God.

St. James Cathedral in Chicago built a tiny courtyard, lush with plants and a small labyrinth, just steps from a bustling downtown street. The Millennials loved the peaceful nature oasis. Many said that if they worked or lived nearby, they would visit this church regularly to pray, meditate, or reflect quietly.

"Most of our modern churches have excellent areas set aside for corporate worship, group learning and community-building. But they leave something to be desired when it comes to personal reflection and prayer," says Kinnaman.

"Many churches think of their facility as everything inside the walls, but it is worth considering how we might make better use of our external spaces," says Kinnaman. "Instead of using landscaping simply as a frame for the building, could we use it as a legitimate ministry space—a sacred place in its own right?"

Respite

Millennials, perhaps more than any other generation, have a deep need for peace and quiet; they long for a sanctuary.

"Our culture is fragmented and frenetic, and there are few places to take a breather to gain much-needed perspective," says Kinnaman. "Ironically, most churches offer what they think people want: more to do, more to see. Yet that's exactly the opposite of what many young adults crave: sacred space."

Our churches are places of action, not places of rest; spaces to do rather than spaces to be. The activities, of course, are designed to connect people with God and each other—and some Millennials hope for that, too—but many just want an opportunity to explore spiritual life on their own terms, free to decide when to sit quietly on the edges of a sacred space and when to enter in.

Give them Jesus

At Clear River Church in Lafayette, Indiana, near the campus of Purdue University, 80 percent of the church is under 40 years old. Pastors Tony Ranvestal and Zach Miller have a clear focus.

"We don't schedule lots of activity," says Ranvestal. "We call people to follow Jesus. If you follow Jesus, this leads to serving and justice. You should shovel a neighbor's driveway, but it's not a program. It's disciples in relationship." All who attend worship are encouraged to join a small group. That's it.

Miller, a Millennial, says, "I appreciate the clear understanding of what is expected and what I can do. We're not going to overwhelm you with choices. We think you should follow Jesus, and here's one or two ways to learn to do that."

Building relationships and learning about Jesus are two central reasons why Millennials stay connected to church. Barna's research shows that young adults who remain involved in a local church beyond their teen years are twice as likely as those who don't to have a close personal friendship with an older adult in their faith community (59% vs. 31%).

Praise be to God, there are churches finding ways to include Millennials.

When Millennials were asked to choose words to describe what they saw as the ideal church, a two-thirds majority or greater picked the following words:

COMMUNITY_78% 22%_PRIVACY
SANCTUARY_77% 23%_AUDITORIUM
CLASSIC_67% 33%_TRENDY
QUIET_65% 35%_LOUD
CASUAL_64% 36%_DIGNIFIED

© 2014 Barna Group

Marian V. Liautaud is director of marketing for Aspen Group, a design/build firm for churches.

Copyright © 2014 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal. Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

News

Brazil’s Values Voters

An Assemblies of God member makes a strong showing in the Catholic nation’s presidential race.

Ueslei Marcelino / Reuters

BRAZIL: Protestants are projected to make up the majority of Brazilians by 2050. But they won’t have to wait until then to influence the world’s largest Catholic nation. The strong showing by a Bible-reading Assemblies of God member, Marina Silva (above), in this year’s presidential race highlighted their increased political clout, leading to new partnerships with Catholics on social issues. “Now we have a voice,” said Marcos Simas, editor of Cristianismo Hoje. “Society must listen to us.”

Light-Bulb Moments

Seeing connections between today’s Mideast church and the first church.

Philip Jenkins has been preparing to write this issue’s cover story (p. 36) for a long time. Starting in 2002 with The Next Christendom: The Coming of Global Christianity, Jenkins, distinguished professor of history at Baylor University, has published books on global Christianity, lost Christianity, and wars fought in the name of Jesus—each one shedding fresh light on our faith history.

But nothing could have fully prepared him to write about what has happened in 2014. The rise of the Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL) has all but extinguished the Christian presence in Syria and northern Iraq, where believers have lived since the first century. Jenkins is skilled at exposing readers to the big picture, explaining the history underneath news headlines, and offering a glimpse into the future. During years of study on ancient churches of the Middle East, he’s had many of what he calls “light-bulb moments.”

“My favorite was discovering the Church of the East and its 15th- to 16th-century list of its early leaders and prelates,” he told me. These leaders, he believes, were preserving the memory of the church founded in Antioch, which later moved to Edessa (modern Turkey). The Church of the East was then led by two men who owed their authority to their descent from Joseph, the husband of Mary. “What we see in the modern world, with the Assyrians, Chaldeans, and the rest, is a direct descendant.”

Another light bulb went off for Jenkins in August 2004, when the Zarqawi network car-bombed several active churches in Baghdad and Mosul. “I was dumb enough to ask, Don’t they realize what they are doing here? But of course they knew very well. That sickening event certainly shaped my approach.”

To complement Jenkins’s essay, editors have compiled a timeline of 14 centuries of Christian–Muslim encounters. According to Islamic tradition, in the 7th century, Muhammad turned to a Christian relative for insight into his first vision. Jenkins invites us to try to locate today’s events on a divine timeline. This echoes CT’s editorial view on the Middle East nearly 60 years ago, in November 1957:

It is difficult to interpret God’s mysterious hand in history, and even more difficult for us to understand the relation of immediate events to his ultimate plan. At the same time, we should always confess that the sovereign God watches over people and nations and that all are subject to his judgment.

The body of Christ in the Middle East will survive the current conflict. And, if the global church embraces the Ephesians 4 call to unity and maturity in Christ, it may very well thrive.

Timothy C. Morgan is senior editor for global journalism.

News

Gleanings: November 2014

Important developments in the church and the world (as they appeared in our November issue).

Evangelicals’ favorite heresies

Heretics are “alive and well,” LifeWay Research and Ligonier Ministries found after measuring the “theological awareness” of more than 550 self-identified American evangelicals. The good news: More than 9 in 10 believe that Jesus rose from the dead and that heaven and hell are real. But many either agree with unorthodox teachings on the Trinity, salvation, and other doctrines, or are uncertain about their soundness.

Iran: Persecuted Persians get new Bible translation

This fall, Iranian Christians marked two milestones—one somber, the other sweet. More than 500 prayer vigils were held worldwide for Saeed Abedini, an Iranian American pastor imprisoned now for two years. He is one of at least 60 Christians jailed on increasingly serious charges. The same week, Elam Ministries released a new translation of the Bible into modern Persian, giving the first copies to family members of martyrs. Hundreds of leaders from 40 countries attended the New Millennium Version’s dedication, said Elam’s David Yeghnazar. “The meeting was a magnificent proclamation of the global church’s commitment to the Bible.”

InterVarsity 'reinvents' California ministry

InterVarsity Christian Fellowship faces a “considerably more costly” task this year but sees a silver lining. After the nation’s largest public school system, California State University, derecognized 23 chapters for requiring student leaders to be professing Christians, InterVarsity has been “developing a new style of campus ministry” that “doesn’t rely on established campus structures.” It also remains encouraged by record participation and conversions on 616 other campuses. Students “raised in an age where churches aren’t teaching creeds” are refusing to drop doctrinal standards in order to maintain campus access, national field director Greg Jao told CT. “Students understand there is an irreducible biblical and theological core to their Christian faith. They’re choosing to stand for it.”

Calvary Chapel founder’s children split over lawsuit

Chuck Smith, founder of the influential Calvary Chapel movement, received a hero’s sendoff when he died in October 2013. But near the first anniversary of his death, Smith’s eldest daughter sued his successor (her brother-in-law) over how the church treated Smith, his widow, and their intellectual property. Janette Manderson, who filed on behalf of mother Kay Smith, 87, claims that Brian Brodersen, now senior pastor at Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa, “schemed” to seize control of Smith’s The Word For Today ministry and his stockpile of sermons. She also accused Brodersen of commandeering Smith’s $1 million life-insurance policy for the church. Her brother, Chuck Smith Jr., publicly disputed the lawsuit as “groundless, deplorable, dishonoring to our father,” and said it would “quickly disintegrate” in court.

Gordon College faces accreditation scrutiny

The New England Association of Schools and Colleges discussed whether Gordon’s prohibition on “homosexual practice” conflicts with the association’s standards on nondiscrimination. The association, which reaccredited Gordon in 2012, asked for a report in September 2015 “to ensure that the College’s policies and processes are non-discriminatory and … foster an atmosphere that respects and supports people of diverse characteristics and backgrounds.” The school says its 12-15 month “period of discernment” is discussing pastoral response, not changing its policy. In June Eastern Mennonite University decided to delay a decision on its ban on same-sex behavior, pending denominational debate.

United Kingdom: Scottish Christians seek unity after referendum

Christians lacked consensus on whether Scotland should separate from the United Kingdom. As did Scots overall, with a narrow majority (55 percent) rejecting independence in a historic and heated referendum. Instead, the Evangelical Alliance Scotland was more concerned that Scots “unite and build a new Scotland with Christian values at the heart.” National director Fred Drummond asked Christians to model reconciliation between Scottish nationalists and British unionists. “It is time to show grace and kindness to the other side,” he said. “We must love our neighbor.”

James MacDonald: We disciplined elders unbiblically

Harvest Bible Chapel founder James MacDonald confessed to his 13,000-member congregation that he and his elder board were wrong for denouncing three former elders as “false messengers” in September 2013. “Our church discipline of a year ago was a failure in many respects,” said MacDonald, in part due to a “complete lack of a biblically required restorative component.” The megachurch has “lifted all discipline” from the elders, who were accused of seeking division and told to stay away from Harvest after they spoke out against a “culture of fear and intimidation” and a lack of financial transparency. “Our discipline condemned them,” said MacDonald, asking forgiveness. “We lost sight of the biblical priority of seeking a redemptive solution to our differences.” He said the groups have reconciled.

'Back to the Bible' defends firing pastor

Shortly after a series of media interviews as Ebola survivor Nancy Writebol’s pastor, John Munro was removed as a radio Bible teacher and placed on paid leave by his North Carolina megachurch amid separate investigations. Charlotte’s Calvary Church soon cleared him of an employee handbook violation, which Munro described as “an innocent error of judgment.” But Back to the Bible stood by its decision to fire its lead Bible teacher for undisclosed behavior “detrimental to [its] mission of leading people closer to Jesus on a daily basis.” CEO Arnie Cole disputed “harmful” rumors that it was “being unfair” to Munro, assuring supporters that it had “prayerfully followed biblical as well as legal principles.” For now, past host Warren Wiersbe has returned to the 75-year-old program.

Christian college lets divorcing president keep his job

After trustees from one of the largest Christian colleges “agonized with the decision,” they agreed that president Phil Schubert could remain at Texas’s Abilene Christian University even though his wife filed for divorce due to “irreconcilable differences.” The board explained to faculty and staff that while it believes in the “covenant of marriage,” it also believes “strongly in the power of grace in a broken world and the call to be peacemakers.” Many Christian schools have strict guidelines that only permit employees to keep their jobs if they divorce for a spouse’s adultery or desertion.

Israel: Private Christian schools threaten strike after cuts

Christian educators publicly stated they would strike over sharp cutbacks (up to 35 percent) in government funding and other “oppressive steps” by Israeli education officials. The Jewish state recognizes the private schools, which serve primarily Arab Christians, but has said its primary responsibility is to public schools. The funding decline may force some of the 50 Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant schools, which serve approximately 30,000 students (including non-Christians), to close; some have been open for 400 years. Administrators said the schools “meet a need that the state has not fulfilled,” and warned the Ministry of Education, “Don’t stop us from carrying on our mission.” Botrus Mansour, head of Nazareth Baptist School, told CT the schools “provide a great education” that “helps to keep the Christian presence and mission in the Holy Land.”

Wheaton College stops studying evangelicals

After more than 30 years and 30 books, the Institute for the Study of American Evangelicals at Wheaton College will shut down December 31. Founded by historians Mark Noll and Nathan Hatch in 1982, it examined topics such as the impact of foreign missions on North America, the financing of American evangelicalism, and evangelicals’ relationship to mass media. While funding played a role in the decision, spokesperson LaTonya Taylor said, the “history and influence of evangelicalism in American life was [once] understudied,” but today “more scholars and institutions have come to understand [it] as a valid subject of academic study.”

“It’s only hors d’oeuvres for heaven.”

Lecrae to pastor Louie Giglio regarding his success. His Billboard chart–topping blends of hip-hop and Reformed theology led Jimmy Fallon to make him the first Christian rapper to perform on The Tonight Show. Religion News Service.

MINISTERS’ MENTAL HEALTH

1 in 4 Protestant pastors who say they have “personally struggled with mental illness,” such as clinical depression, bipolar disorder, or schizophrenia. About half say they were diagnosed.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube