News

Singapore Convicts Megachurch Leaders of Fraudulently Funding Evangelism

During Sunday service, pastor apologizes after court rejects how building funds were diverted to wife’s pop music career.

Christianity Today October 26, 2015
Michael Chan

On Sunday, the senior pastor of Singapore's second-largest megachurch bowed three times to his congregation and apologized.

Last week, Kong Hee and five other leaders of his 17,000-member City Harvest Church (CHC) were foundguilty by Singapore's charity commissioner of siphoning $35.9 million in church funds to support the singing career of Kong's wife and church co-founder, Sun Ho, in the United States and Asia. The megachurch maintains that Ho's pop music was intended as a form of outreach to non-Christians.

“[I am] sorry for the pain you all have had to endure under my leadership and watch … but hopefully, that season in the life of our church is in the past,” said Kong, according to CHC.

"As was the case throughout these past three years of court trial, and the earlier two years of investigation, we have placed our faith in God and trust that whatever the outcome, He will use it for our good (Romans 8:28)," Ho told CHC members last week [full statement below].

The trial of the six church pastors, board executives, and accountants lasted 140 days. CHC is Singapore’s second-largest megachurch and preaches a lucrative version of the prosperity gospel. With 50 affiliate churches and 30 associate churches in the region, CHC nets almost 59,000 in total attendance, according to its 2014 annual report.

Ho’s secular music career was launched in 2002 as a “Crossover Project,” meant to reach non-Christians and expand the church. Ho, who was not charged, is still the megachurch's executive director.

But the funding of the Crossover Project wasn’t straightforward, and in 2012, the six leaders were arrested and charged with misusing church building funds to promote Ho’s career. The Commissioner of Charities accused Kong of diverting funds under the guise of contributions to a sister church in Kuala Lumpur, and one witness testified that building funds were used to buy investment bonds in church-owned companies that promoted Ho’s music career. (The BBC offers an assessment.)

The megachurch also purchased $500,000 in unsold albums to boost her ratings before her American debut.

Lawyers for the defendants argued that the funding of Ho’s career was legitimate, since it was a ministry the church had agreed to support.

“In every aspect, we’ve never felt that we’ve done anything unauthorized,” said deputy pastor Tan Ye Peng, who was found guilty of criminal breach of trust, "round-tripping" of church funds, and falsifying of accounts. The CHC congregation doesn’t feel like it has been deceived, he told the court in March, according to AsiaOne.

“Til today, church members come to me and say, ‘Pastor, hang in there,’” he said. “No one says, ‘Pastor, we've been deceived.’"

Ho has five albums in Taiwan, and appeared in a few hip hop albums in the United States beginning in 2003. The Crossover Project was “always about the church” and not about herself, Ho told the court in May, according to The Straits Times.

The judge disagreed.

“Evidence points to a finding that they knew they were acting dishonestly, and I am unable to conclude otherwise,” presiding judge See Kee Onn told a packed courtroom.

“Naturally, we are disappointed by the outcome,” Ho wrote on the church’s website. “Since 2012, we have had a new management and a new Church Board running the operations of the church. Therefore, let’s stay the course with CHC 2.0. God is making us stronger, purer, and more mature as a congregation.”

Kong and his fellow church leaders will be sentenced next month.

A. R. Bernard, founder of the Christian Cultural Center, New York City’s largest evangelical church, said that part of the problem is cultural. Church-sponsored outreach projects—like films or crossover artists performing both religious and secular music—are “strange” in Singapore, he told the Washington Times in February.

Bernard preached on Saturday and Sunday from Proverbs 17:17.

"I can tell you bluntly that the public was waiting to see if this church would collapse," said Bernard. "Guess what? I'm here. You're here. Every tree the Heavenly Father plants, no one can pluck out. You've been faithful, you've been consistent, you're going to reap the harvest."

CT noted when CHC leaders were first arrested and the progression of the trial.

Here is CHC's full statement:

Trial Verdict: A Statement from the Church Leaders

Dear Church Family,

The judge has rendered his decision and, naturally, we are disappointed by the outcome. Nonetheless, I know that Pastor Kong and the rest are studying the judgment intently and will take legal advice from their respective lawyers in the days to come.

As was the case throughout these past three years of court trial, and the earlier two years of investigation, we have placed our faith in God and trust that whatever the outcome, He will use it for our good (Romans 8:28). This protracted season has been extremely difficult, not just for the six, but also for all their families and friends, as well as for our congregation.

In spite of these challenges, City Harvest Church has an unshakeable calling from God. Recently, Pastor Kong has exhorted us to focus on our core values, and serve the purpose of God with greater effectiveness and sustainability. Since 2012, we have had a new management and a new Church Board running the operations of the church. Therefore, let’s stay the course with CHC 2.0. God is making us stronger, purer and more mature as a congregation.

Thank you for your unwavering faithfulness in loving God and loving one another. More than ever before, let’s have a unity that is unbreakable. We are not alone as many of our friends and churches around the world are also interceding fervently for us. God knows the way that we take; when He has tested us, we shall come forth as gold (Job 23:10).

Pastor Kong and I are humbled by the tremendous outpouring of love and support shown to us during this time. We thank you for your prayers. Please continue to pray for Pastor Kong, Pastor Tan, John Lam, Sharon, Serina and Eng Han.

In Christ’s love, for His glory,

Sun Ho
Co-Founder/Executive Director
On behalf of CHC Management Board

News

The Southern Baptist S(p)ending Crunch

The missions agency of the largest US Protestant denomination faces a $21 million deficit. Could it spell the end of the full-time missionary?

Thomas Graham / IMB

David Platt makes no small plans.

When the 36-year-old pastor and Radical book author became president of the Southern Baptist Convention’s International Mission Board (IMB) in 2014, the agency had about 5,000 missionaries. Platt hopes to someday have 100,000.

He just has to figure out how to pay them.

This summer, Platt announced that the 170-year-old agency will cut between 600 and 800 staff due to a financial crisis. One of the largest missionary organizations in the United States, the IMB had a $21 million deficit for 2015 and had overspent by $210 million since 2009, draining its reserves.

Among those targeted for cuts are missionaries and other staff over age 50, who are being offered voluntary early retirement. When the dust settles, the IMB will likely have its fewest missionaries in 20 years.

That’s not the outcome Platt had hoped for when he was elected.

“The financial realities are clear,” Platt told Christianity Today. “[I]n order to get to a healthy position for a future like I’ve talked about, we have to get to a healthy place in the present.”

Even with reduced staff, the IMB will remain a powerhouse in Protestant foreign missions, with a $300 million budget and more than 4,000 professional missionaries.

Those IMB missionaries have long had an advantage over missionaries in other denominations: Until recently, they haven’t had to worry about money.

IMB’s $300 million budget comes from two main sources: the Lottie Moon Christmas offering (named for the famous 19th-century missionary to China), which brings in about $150 million per year; and the SBC’s Cooperative Program, which pools money from the approximately 40,000 Southern Baptist churches in the United States.

This means that, unlike other missionaries—who rely on “faith model” fundraising—IMB missionaries don’t have to raise their own support by mailing letters to friends and family. The IMB’s centrally funded model means they don’t have direct financial support from any single church. When this two-tier financial system works, it’s powerful, says Platt.

“It’s pretty awesome when I step back and look at churches that together are giving hundreds of millions of dollars every year for the spread of the gospel,” he said.

But now it’s unclear whether that model is sustainable.

Victim of Success

The IMB was founded in 1845 as a way for individual churches to pool money to send missionaries. It’s based on the model of the Baptist Missionary Society, founded by William Carey and other preachers in 1792. (The group was first known as the Particular Baptist Society for the Propagation of the Gospel Amongst the Heathen.)

“The Southern Baptists were the largest evangelical mission agency that did not have an individual support-raising system,” said Craig Ott, professor of mission and intercultural studies at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Deerfield, Illinois. That they have to lay off so many staff “is a very dramatic warning sign that they have to change something.”

In some ways, the IMB is a victim of its own success. The agency experienced remarkable growth in the decades following World War II. In 1950, the IMB had 803 missionaries in 24 countries with $8.3 million in income, according to Southern Baptist annual reports. By 2007, it had grown to 5,271 missionaries, a $289 million budget, $256 million in reserves, and hopes of sending 8,000 missionaries.

But the finances did not keep up with the growth; the IMB was not drawing enough in giving to support its on-field missionaries. By 2010, the agency faced a $17.6 million deficit and was contemplating cutting 600 missionaries.

A mix of short-term funding increases (in the Lottie Moon fund), fewer missionary appointments, and the sale of overseas properties helped forestall drastic cuts in the number of missionaries. Previous IMB leaders hoped that slow attrition would eventually reduce the number of missionaries to a manageable level.

But this year, time and money ran out for the IMB.

Ted Esler, president of Missio Nexus, a nondenominational network of mission agencies, says many agencies became accustomed to growth. If they had more missionaries every year, that was a sign of success.

“You built this expectation that year in and year out, you would be a little bit bigger,” he told CT. That’s not sustainable.

Along with the budget shortfall, the IMB also has to cope with the fact that sending missionaries is a costly business. In addition to travel, salaries, and housing, mission agencies face rising costs for overhead, including accounting, security, tech support, member care, and fundraising, among others. Then there’s the red tape involved in working in a globalized world.

That overhead can sometimes run as high as 14 percent of money raised for missions, says Elmer Lorenz, head of operations for TEAM (The Evangelical Alliance Mission).

Many agencies are trying to reduce overhead by hiring staff overseas and, in some cases, sharing back-office expenses, such as accounting and HR. But when it comes to paying for overhead, “I don’t think anyone has found a silver bullet,” said Lorenz.

Ott says the IMB’s financial woes are rooted in the bigger issue of denominational loyalty. Christians used to give to their denomination to do mission work overseas. Now they have more choices for where to send mission dollars.

“People want to support someone they know,” he said. “Churches want to support something they know.”

That’s in part why many nondenominational missions use what’s known as the “faith model” or “faith-promise model” of fundraising, wherein individual missionaries help raise their own funding, and churches sponsor specific missionaries.

Esler says that today, the personal approach works better than the centrally funded model.

Most mission agencies have at least two funding streams, he said: the funds raised directly by missionaries from churches, friends, family, and other donors; and direct donations to the agency.

Right now, he said, the IMB lacks that first funding stream. So when hard times come, it’s easier for SBC churches to cut missions giving, because they aren’t invested in individuals.

Esler said most mission leaders aren’t surprised by the changes at IMB. Platt, whose former megachurch had a thriving missions program, is a very different leader from past IMB presidents. Many of them have been former IMB missionaries or other SBC insiders; the most recent president, Tom Elliff, was 67 when he was elected. Platt is 36.

“You don’t bring in a leader like that and not anticipate some substantial changes,” Esler said.

Along with addressing the financial crisis, Platt has two goals. The first: Convince lay Southern Baptists that missions isn’t a profession, but a calling for every Christian and every church.

Many mission organizations tend “to look at missions from the top down and say, Just send us money. Send us people. We’ll take care of this for you,” he told CT earlier this year. “I don’t think that’s biblical or wise.”

Instead, Platt argues, local churches have to “own missions.” It’s not a job they can outsource. Missionaries won’t succeed unless local churches grasp the urgent need for spreading the gospel, Platt told CT in a follow-up phone interview.

“The greatest injustice in the world is that thousands of people groups, representing billions of people, are on a path that leads to an eternal hell, and no one has even told them how they could go to heaven,” he said. “We don’t believe that is tolerable.”

A few days before speaking with CT, Platt talked to the pastor of a small congregation. His church of about 30 people doesn’t have a building. Yet they are sending one of their families as missionaries.

“Praise God for a pastor who is prioritizing getting the gospel to the nations, even over getting a building,” he said. “Every church has opportunities to pray and give and go for the spread of the gospel.”

For inspiration, Platt looks to the Moravians, a German Protestant group in what is now the Czech Republic, known for their missionary zeal in the 18th and 19th centuries. Many took the gospel to the Caribbean, North America, and even as far as Tibet and Australia by taking jobs overseas. That model can work in today’s global economy.

“You look at the globalization of today’s marketplace, and there are opportunities for Christians to work all around the world in the [midst] of unreached peoples,” said Platt.

The Moravians inspired Platt’s recent call for “limitless” numbers of Baptist missionaries.

His strategy is to combine IMB-supported full-time missionaries with teams of lay volunteers—professionals working overseas, retirees, and students—all working together to start new churches (an IMB priority since the late 1990s) and spread the gospel. So instead of 4,000 or even 8,000 in-field missionaries, Platt wants to see 100,000.

“We have to start thinking that way,” he said. “Missionaries are not just those people who leave their job and go move somewhere else. Missionaries also include those who leverage their jobs to spread the gospel in other places, who leverage their opportunities for work, and who leverage their retirement.”

Platt has already made it easier for more Christians to join the IMB. In the past, the mission board had a rigorous screening process aimed at recruiting full-time missionaries. Their rules banned those who had been divorced or those who spoke in tongues. Those restrictions were loosened this summer.

New candidates must agree with the Baptist Faith & Message—the SBC’s primary statement of faith. That’s nonnegotiable, says Platt. But they don’t have to be full-time missionaries to work with the IMB. And candidates who have been divorced or who speak in tongues are no longer disqualified by default.

Platt wants to allow as many people as possible to partner with the IMB, as long as they share its core beliefs.

“I want to be a part of a Moravian mission movement among God’s people—where we stop seeing global missions in the church as a compartmentalized program for a select few people who are called to it,” he told CT. “Instead, we see global missions as the purpose [for which] we have breath on the planet.”

Which leads to Platt’s second big idea: Even though all Christians are missionaries, we still need full-time professional ones.

No one church is big enough to fulfill the Great Commission, so mission boards like the IMB still play a key role in coordinating churches’ support. They have the experience and skills to make local churches more effective.

“We want to bring good information to bear, to inform praying,” he told CT. “And we want to provide outlets for giving … and we want to provide support and training for those who are going to the nations, and facilitate what this church is doing and that church is doing, to effectively reach unreached people.”

Churches also need the IMB and similar boards because the task before them is so difficult, said Platt.

For a long time, groups like the IMB focused on those who seemed receptive to the gospel. That left billions of people unreached, wrote former IMB president Jerry Rankin in a 2014 paper for the Evangelical Mission Society.

“Resources were not to be wasted among the resistant peoples where baptisms and churches would not result,” Rankin wrote. “Hence, large concentrations of missionaries flowed into Latin America and Africa, while massive areas of the world were neglected.”

In the 1990s, the IMB switched course to reach those neglected people groups. It’s a much harder, less results-based task.

“Unreached people are unreached for a reason,” said Platt. “They are difficult to reach; they are dangerous to reach.” According to IMB statistics, 3,114 people groups, or about 1.26 billion people, remain completely unreached today.

The difficulty of the task means that churches need to work together.

“Whenever churches are serious about getting the gospel to those who’ve never heard it, we’ve got to have perseverance … sometimes not seeing numbers that we’d like to see,” said Platt. “We are confident that the gospel is going to prove powerful unto salvation for that people group. So we press in and we do it—even when we face costs, even when people’s lives are threatened—we still press through.

“This is what we see in the New Testament. We have to have that kind of resolve.”

News

Will Success Spoil Cuba’s Revival?

With relaxed travel rules, Cuban leaders wonder whether Americans will dampen their churches’ zeal.

Eddos Estudio

Right at the point where Havana’s ocean promenade meets the historic forts that guard its harbor, a crowd of young Cubans has gathered on a Thursday night. They are next to a dozen floats parked in preparation for Cuba’s summer carnival. But when one float starts blaring salsa music, the group does not welcome the rhythm; one member turns and holds his palm out in disapproval.

As a lighthouse shines overhead, the young crowd finishes singing a slow chorus about wanting their lives to be “like perfume at your feet.” They then launch into a boisterous call-and-response:

Yo soy Cristiano Para que tú lo sepas No me falta nada Mi vida está completa

“So you know it, I am a Christian. I don’t lack anything. My life is complete.”

A tourist from the United States approaches the crowd.

“Hablas inglés? Are they talking about Jesus?” he asks. He spent the past week in central Cuba on a missions trip. “I knew there were Christians here, but I didn’t expect to see them like this.”

Next, a pastor has the crowd turn and face Habana Vieja, the heart of the capital’s tourism quarter, across the street. They raise their cell phones in the air in flashlight mode and shout, “Yo soy luz en medio de la oscuridad.” “I am light in the midst of darkness.”

Christianity Today traveled to Cuba the same week Secretary of State John Kerry reopened the US Embassy on Havana’s Malecón promenade. CT attended an exclusive meeting of theological educators discussing how to capitalize on La Apertura—the new diplomatic and economic opening between Cuba and the United States.

Christians on both sides of the 90 miles of Caribbean water that separates Cuba from Florida were surprised by the opening. This year, Barack Obama and Raúl Castro announced the end of cold war enmity and the easing of travel and communication. (A full reversal of the US trade embargo requires a congressional vote.) Many residents hope—and tourists fear—that the island will no longer be “frozen in time.” Reflecting on the island’s economic difficulties, one pastor told CT, “The absurd is our reality.”

To be sure, many legacies of the Cuban Revolution will linger. But even before the US flag was raised in Havana for the first time in 54 years, the Stars and Stripes could be spotted on men’s T-shirts and women’s Capri pants around the capital. Christians openly watch a satirical sketch of the US–Cuba negotiations set to hit pop songs by Shakira and Enrique Iglesias. Seminary leaders, surprised at how openly critical a leading Cuban sociologist is of the island’s antiquated education system, ask her, “How did you get your thesis approved?”

Living a Miracle

At the end of a local shopping boulevard, a large crowd has gathered at midnight. They are not in line for Cafeteria Vera, the barren blue-and-pink corner store, which has more seats for customers than goods for sale. Instead, Cubans sit perched on every nearby bench, planter, stoop, and curb.

All their faces are aglow—but not from Cuban cigars. Screens of smartphones, tablets, and laptops light up the crowd. Some 35 public hotspots came to Cuba’s major cities in July. A card with an hour of Wi-Fi access can be purchased for 3 Cuban convertible pesos (about US$3). Many users browse Facebook, while others video chat.

“This is the happiest the people on the street have ever been,” explains a 29-year-old card vendor sporting an American flag T-shirt, a Virgen de Guadalupe necklace, and a Gemini forearm tattoo.

“It is part of the miracle that we are living,” says a leading pastor’s wife.

A taxi driver says the first time he ever used the Internet was 20 days ago. He called his wife’s family in Italy. For the first few minutes, no words were exchanged. Everyone was too choked up to talk.

Today, tourists coming to take photos of Havana’s harbor on Sunday mornings will stumble upon one of the most unexpected sights in Cuba: a full-blown evangelical church service, complete with loudspeakers and choreographed dancers.

When CT last reported from Cuba in 2009, Alcance Victoria—a church that reaches youth caught up in gangs, drugs, and prostitution—did street evangelism on weeknights. Now the church meets on Sunday mornings in one of Havana’s most public places: La Punta, where the Malecón meets the harbor mouth.

Pastor Abel Pérez Hernández says his 13-year-old congregation now numbers 500, with 42 house groups meeting weekly.

Next to the big cannons aimed at the harbor’s mouth, half the congregation clusters under sun umbrellas whose panels feature images of classical paintings. The church sings salsa and reggaeton worship songs as 10 youth do choreographed dances in front of the seawall, scrawled with graffiti professing eternal love. Assisting is a short-term missions team, not from the States but from Brazil. It is the group’s fourth visit, and they paid twice as much to come this year because of a recent currency devaluation.

“This shows how important this is to us, to be together,” says Filipe Santos, director of missions at the 13,000-member Baptist megachurch near São Paulo.

Almost every Christian leader CT interviewed shared three sentiments: they are hopeful for better lives, economically and politically; worried about the coming “avalanche” of ideologies and material goods; and convinced that neither American nor Cuban Christians are properly prepared for the rapid changes under way.

Avalanche of Outsiders

On the pessimistic side, Christian leaders wonder whether US visitors will destroy Cuban culture with their materialism and lifeless nominalism—or whether Cubans will destroy themselves.

“Our mindset is very Marxist, even though we haven’t had the ability to consume for 50 years,” says Alfredo Forhans Hernández, director of the Holguín campus of New Pines Evangelical Seminary. “Now the United States could make our consumerism a reality. We are not prepared.”

Cuba’s Christians have thrived despite the island’s politics and poverty. Their improbable, decades-long revival is often described as being rivaled only by China’s. “It’s incredible. People just come on their own, looking for God,” says a Western Baptist leader. (Baptists in Cuba have two conventions, Western and Eastern.)

But the opening raises a concern: Will the revival be appreciated once Cubans have resources? One seminary leader worries that “the huge growth of the church, despite our limited resources, will no longer be a distinction.”

Another challenge: the avalanche of outsiders coming to help. “There are many birds who want to land in Cuba,” explains Eduardo González del Río, rector of Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary in Santiago de Cuba—“people who want to bring in their doctrine to help us.”

“Cuba has been closed, and now the doors are opening,” says Yaniel Marrero Báez, president of the Cuban Evangelical School of Theological Studies in Placetas. “In the past, there were so few opportunities for visitors that we took in everyone. But now the Cuban church will have options to choose from.”

For example, Cuban Christians are now circulating CDs by Guatemalan megachurch pastor Cash Luna and other prosperity gospel teachers. “It’s a war of the media,” says González. “Sadly we don’t have good Christians who are doing this.” The Cuban government still restricts Christian publishing and media access.

Overall, Cuban church leaders are eager to collaborate with more American churches. But they want respect, despite disparities in size and wealth.

“Our problem is when foreigners come to tell us what we need to do. We’ve been here for many years, we’ve spread the Word under many difficulties, and we’ve been able to succeed,” says a Western Baptist leader. “We love the idea of collaboration, but not imposition.”

“We are in a special context. We can’t copy what the rest of the world is doing,” says Enoel Gutiérrez Echevarría, president of Methodist Evangelical Seminary in Havana. “Of course we are not perfect. But we are experts on Cuba. The Cuban church is an example of revival for the world. What others have to offer shouldn’t interrupt what we are doing.”

González is happy with the arrangement his church has with its main benefactor in Dallas. The focus has been on leadership training, not funding. “If they gave us lots of money, people would attribute our church’s success to US funding and not God,” he says. “It’s important for Americans to not come as a dollar bill with arms and legs.”

Money obviously does help, and there are ways to use it wisely. (“Help fill our libraries,” one pastor suggests.) One sociologist says that a physician she knows makes three times as much working as a busboy than he does at his official job. But multiple leaders told CT that what they want most is leadership training on teamwork.

“Even though you can help financially, the thing we need most is to learn how to work in groups,” says one seminary leader. “Most pastors are seen as bosses and do everything. There are few committees.”

Partially for good reason, given the surveillance culture of the Castro regime. “We don’t know whom to trust in groups. Who in this very room might be on the other side?” explains the leader. “The mistrust of others is in our blood. Collaboration is what we lack.”

However, Cuban Christians have never felt bolder. Eduardo E. Pérez Ramos uses his burgeoning Eddos photography studio to connect churches throughout Cuba. He tries to capture and circulate events that show a strong Cuban church, such as a recent gathering in the city of Holguín, where thousands of Christians demonstrated in the street. His favorite photo, titled “One Island One Heart,” captures the national gathering of the Liga Evangélica de Cuba at a Methodist camp in Santa Clara. The group forms the exact shape of the island, with each person standing in their home province.

Evangelicals have made greater strides in distance learning—a need and strategy CT highlighted in 2009—via CENCAP, a program started by Los Pinos Nuevos, a leading indigenous denomination. Now in its fifth year, CENCAP has trained more than 51,000 pastors and leaders from 21 denominations. It recently shifted from how pastors can better run their churches to how churches can better serve their communities.

Protestants in Cuba are not known for social work. (To be fair, they tried after four hurricanes hit the island in 2008, but officials ordered them to stop, saying it was the government’s job to rebuild.) CENCAP is working to address this, partnering with the government to help feed children and the elderly. This warms the government to other activities and shows churches they can “share the gospel without preaching,” explains a millennial Cuban PK. He has just received a big shipment of fortified rice. He and several other young men form an assembly line, moving boxes from the back of a dump truck into the church’s multipurpose room, then the sanctuary. They finish at 3 in the morning.

Prepare for ‘Something Large’

The chapel of the Western Baptist seminary in Havana boasts a carved wooden map of the world. Prominent arrows leave Cuba in every direction. It’s tempting to read them as the emigration of Cubans, but they actually speak of a deep desire for missions.

Cuba was once feared as an exporter of Communist revolution. Now it is poised to export Christianity.

This spring, the Baptists sent out Cuba’s first full-time missionaries in 54 years. First was Ecuador, where a husband and wife, so inspired by Nate Saint and Jim Elliot, named their home group after End of the Spear. Next up is Africa: teams are preparing for Senegal and Equatorial Guinea. The ultimate goal is the Middle East and the 10/40 Window.

Government restrictions on travel had prevented churches from sending missionaries, so churches settled for informal medical missions (given that Cuban doctors are one of the island’s most popular exports). “Now the doors have opened,” says a Western Baptist leader, “and we are very excited that we can freely satisfy our dream.”

But money remains a barrier. “We don’t have the financial resources to send people out, but we do have the human resources,” says González. “We believe God is preparing something large for us.”

The Baptist missions program, Cubans to the Nations, has 250 people in training, says director Karell Lescaille. “We want to learn how others have done world missions and put our Cuban salsa [flavor] on it.”

González says that at the Southern Baptist Convention’s annual meeting in June, attendees discussed the “spiritual crisis” in the United States and how Cubans could help. “Maybe Cuba could bring a revival to the United States,” he says. “The United States brought Protestantism to us, so we do have a debt.”

Overall, leaders are grateful for La Apertura. Now they pray God helps them prepare for the unpredictable changes to come.

“If you want to see what someone is really like, give them money and give them power,” says a seminary leader. “Now we are going to see what kind of Christians we are.”

Jeremy Weber is CT associate editor, news.

News

Tiny Homes with a Heart

A snapshot of Christian witness in the world (as it appeared in our November issue).

Larry McCormack

This summer, six brightly colored tiny homes found their way to Nashville's Green Street Church of Christ. But the occupants aren't fashionable trendsetters. Instead, they are homeless folks who once lived in tents. In addition to four walls and a roof, the 60-square-foot dwellings include Murphy beds, laminate flooring, and a door that locks—all for a modest price to build.

Books

My Top 5 Works of Religious Satire

From Screwtape to Swift, Terry Lindvall recommends books that tickle the funny bone—and prick the conscience.

iStock

Terry Lindvall’s latest book, God Mocks, traces the development of faith-based humor from biblical times through today. Here, he thinks back through his research to pick the 5 best books of religious satire.

In Praise of Folly, by Desiderius Erasmus

In this classic pre-Reformation broadside, the Dutch scholar and gadfly Erasmus creates an ironic persona, Dame Folly. Her praise of her own traits calls to mind the medieval church’s abuses and corruptions. Erasmus’s quiet, even droll manner of unmasking the church’s vices and stupidities contrasts with that of his contemporary Francois Rabelais, whose bawdy satires make South Park look tame. Where Rabelais offers loud, raucous laughter at religious pretense, Erasmus’s quintessential work of fool-literature makes us chuckle at the foolishness we somehow regard as wise.

The Screwtape Letters, by C. S. Lewis

Showcased on the cover of Time, Lewis appeared with his horned devil, Screwtape, perched fiendishly on his left shoulder. The diabolical wisdom in Uncle Screwtape’s letters to his junior tempter, Wormwood, reveals a satiric mirror of selfishness. Lewis explained that the source of his insights emanated not from a study of moral theology, but from examining his own wicked heart. By confessing his sins, he exposes and convicts our hearts, too.

The Little World of Don Camillo, by Giovanni Guareschi

Guareschi, a 20th-century Italian humorist, has his hot-headed priest, Don Camillo, butt heads with his nemesis and friend, the Communist mayor Peppone. Camillo also debates with Christ on the cross over how to treat Peppone. By offering us a wonderfully flawed man of God, impatient and sarcastic, Guareschi invites readers to see themselves at their worst, but still under the grace of God. Laughter, we learn, can be a sign of humility and forgiveness.

The Devil’s Dictionary, by Ambrose Bierce

Though not as famous as fellow satirist Mark Twain, Bierce poked at the eye of hypocritical Christians. His pithy, stinging quills drew blood with acerbic wit. Like Elijah mocking false prophets, Bierce takes on the pretend piety of his smug neighbors. He makes his readers writhe in anguish rather than merriment. This precursor to Screwtape was an avenging angel to religious posers (whom he dubbed “birds of pray”). His calling was to “lash rascals,” which he did with ferocity.

A Tale of a Tub, by Jonathan Swift

Three churchmen—Peter (the apostle), Jack (Calvin), and Martin (Luther)—divide and decorate the coat given by their Father. Here, Swift strikes at the longstanding divisions within the Western church. As he proposes in his classic, Gulliver’s Travels, “Men are never so Serious, Thoughtful, and Intent, as when they are at Stool.” For Swift, himself a clergyman, the best symbol of the sin of solemn bishops is what they produce as they sit and make new doctrine.

Books

New & Noteworthy Books

Compiled by Matt Reynolds

Awe: Why It Matters for Everything We Think, Say, and Do

Paul David Tripp (Crossway)

At the beginning of his latest book, Tripp, the popular ministry leader, confesses to an “Epicurean” delight in some of life’s finer pleasures. Beautiful artwork and delicious cuisine would call forth feelings of awe. But for him, they didn’t lead to awe for God. In chapters touching on the church, the workplace, the family, and other fundamental arenas of life, Tripp shows how time spent “gazing on the beauty of the Lord” transforms our attitudes and behavior. “No other awe,” he explains, “satisfies the soul. No other awe can give the heart [the] peace, rest, and security that it seeks.”

75 Masterpieces Every Christian Should Know: The Fascinating Stories behind Great Works of Art, Literature, Music, and Film

Terry Glaspey (Baker)

Many Christians, writes Glaspey, are “unaware of how many of the great masterpieces—works universally admired—were created by people who share our faith commitment.” Here, Glaspey issues a “fistful of invitations” to explore classics of Christian inspiration (“Amazing Grace,” the Chronicles of Narnia series, Handel’s Messiah, Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel); others that wear their faith more lightly (Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice, Vincent Van Gogh’s Starry Night, Frank Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life, U2’s The Joshua Tree); and plenty of more obscure works that many readers will likely encounter for the first time.

Brand Luther: How an Unheralded Monk Turned His Small Town into a Center of Publishing, Made Himself the Most Famous Man in Europe—and Started the Protestant Reformation

Andrew Pettegree (Penguin Press)

As we approach the 500th anniversary of the Reformation, Pettegree—a Reformation scholar and specialist in the history of communication—shines light on an overlooked talent of its main progenitor, Martin Luther. Luther leveraged revolutionary printing technologies to cultivate his “brand.” “Within five years of penning the 95 theses,” writes Pettegree, “[Luther] was Europe’s most published author—ever. How he achieved this was the most extraordinary of the Reformation’s multiple improbabilities.” Brand Luther shows how Wittenberg’s most famous son took keen interest not only in the content of his books, but also in how they were manufactured, designed, and marketed.

Books
Review

A History of Faith and Flatulence

Terry Lindvall leads a tour of irreverent poems, bathroom jokes, and other running gags of religious satire.

Brian Taylor

If your Facebook feed is anything like mine, you know nothing unites your friends (aside from political debate and celebrity gossip) like a juicy link from The Onion, America’s most popular satirical news site. Because I have so many Christian friends, Onion articles that touch on religious themes tend to garner the most “likes” in my feed.

God Mocks: A History of Religious Satire from the Hebrew Prophets to Stephen Colbert

A couple of years ago, when a story appeared with the headline “Christ Reluctantly Enters Area Man’s Heart,” it dominated my feed for days. Its appeal was its wink-wink honesty about the foibles of Christians. It skewered our judgmental moralism. When Jesus is quoted in the article as saying, “To be honest, before Derek confessed his sins, repented, and sought my grace in pious supplication, I was really looking forward to sitting on my throne and judging him,” we’re meant to chuckle at our own sanctimonious reflection—and mend our ways.

Terry Lindvall, the C. S. Lewis Chair of Communication and Christian Thought at Virginia Wesleyan College, has written what might be deemed the backstory to The Onion. His book—God Mocks: A History of Religious Satire from the Hebrew Prophets to Stephen Colbert (NYU Press)—leads readers through the comic savagery that believers have perfected over the centuries. From the time of the prophet Elijah, who derided the god Baal as taking too long on a toilet break (1 Kings 18:27—according to literary scholar Raymond Anselment, “the most popular illustration of divinely sanctioned ridicule” in religious history), to the sorts of modern-day Christians who tweet and favorite links from sites like The Onion, Lindvall’s book unfurls a delightfully variegated tapestry.

Stories of Mockery

Some predictable names and tales appear. Monty Python, G. K. Chesterton, and Jonathan Swift have cameos. And of course, reformer Martin Luther (1483–1546) is prominent. Luther satirized the countless dubious relics in the Middle Ages, making a list of ones he expected the Catholic Church to trot out next: “Three flames from the burning bush on Mount Sinai . . . A whole pound of wind that roared by Elijah in the cave on Mount Horeb . . . Two feathers and an egg from the Holy Spirit.” Sprinkling his rhetoric with ample references to anal emissions, Luther could even turn his mockery back on himself: “I resist the Devil, and often it is with a fart that I chase him away.” Luther wanted to puncture religious pretense wherever he found it, including among his own ranks. He wasn’t above passing gas to do so.

Alexander Pope (1688–1744), the English poet, makes a memorable entrance in one of Lindvall’s chapters. Pope once made fun of clergymen committed to being nice above all else, refusing any and all boat-rocking: “To rest, the Cushion and soft Dean invite / Who never mentions Hell to ears polite.” As an Anglican, I feel the bite of this zinger, and can picture a few of its contemporary exemplars.

Readers will also meet satirists they may have heard of but never bothered to read. The poet Hilaire Belloc (1870–1953) is for some reason under-appreciated among evangelical readers, despite his close association with heroes like Chesterton. An ardent Catholic, Belloc displayed his zany yet rapier wit in public debates with prominent atheists such as George Bernard Shaw. I’m looking forward to reading his Cautionary Tales for Children to my godsons when they get a little older: “Jim, who ran away from his nurse, and was eaten by a lion”; “Matilda, who told lies and was burnt to death.” It’s the kind of dark humor that the Coen brothers might enjoy. For Belloc, it was aimed at keeping kids in the Christian fold.

I was also delighted to see Lindvall describing one of my favorite episodes from the now-finished TV show The Colbert Report. When psychologist Philip Zimbardo went on the program and proposed that God was ultimately responsible for evil in the world, Stephen Colbert shot back that Satan, not God, ushered woe into Paradise. Zimbardo chuckled, “Obviously you learned well in Sunday school,” to which Colbert yelled, “I teach Sunday school, [expletive]!”

A Book for the Nightstand

In his memoir Surprised by Joy, C. S. Lewis writes that the perfect book to read while eating a meal is “a gossipy, formless book that can be opened anywhere.” By that standard, God Mocks would be ideal for leaving on your breakfast table for a couple weeks. You could dip into it while sipping coffee before work, reading a snippet here and there. Or, maybe better, given its scatological subject matter, you could keep it in your bathroom for those times when you are . . . seated. As for me, I plopped the book on my bedside table: It’s ideally read in small doses, like the pages of a calendar that you peel off every day.

At the same time, this menagerie structure is the book’s chief weakness. By styling itself as a grab bag of anecdotes and icons of religious mockery, Lindvall’s book dispenses with the need for an overarching narrative.

True, he does propose a template for evaluating each of his subjects—a “Quad of Satire.” A vertical axis plots the distance between “Humor” and “Rage,” while a horizontal axis charts the length between “Ridicule” and “Moral Purpose.” Someone like the jaded Lutheran Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855) would occupy the upper-right-hand quadrant, scoring high on “Moral Purpose” (he needled organized religion for the sake of winning genuine faith) and “Humor” (he donned pseudonyms and lampooned establishment figures). Meanwhile, the apostle Paul—who once advised Christian advocates of circumcision to let the knife slip and slice more than just skin (Gal. 5:12)—would score high on “Moral Purpose,” but would belong farther down the vertical axis in the “Rage” zone.

As helpful as this tool is, Lindvall doesn’t use it to explore the theology of satire. He hints at, but doesn’t develop, the reasons why satire is so important for Christians to appreciate and practice. There are lots of little stories in this book, well worth enjoying and returning to. But there’s no large-scale, capital-s Story that puts in place all the puzzle pieces. God Mocks reads more like an encyclopedia than a coherent narrative of how—and why—religious satire has developed over the years. I wanted Lindvall to venture an overarching Christian theory of ridicule, but he never did.

The Laughter of Faith

According to Lindvall, satire “aims not just to slice and dice, but to correct and reform.” I agree with that as far as it goes. But I’d like to return to one of Lindvall’s subjects and, with his help, propose my own theology of mockery. Luther, whose potty humor Lindvall displays in its full glory, understood that mockery could indeed accomplish exposure. It could lift the veil on human arrogance, self-importance, and religious preening.

Luther also understood, though, that such wounding of human pride had no salvific power in and of itself. Mockery is the voice of God’s perfect law: It skewers and condemns but has no ability to save. Borrowing some words from Paul, we might say that satire “works wrath” (see Romans 4:15). It can stir people to try doing better, but it can never fully deliver on that promise. To achieve lasting reform, what’s needed is resurrection—the gospel of new life as a free gift, received through the laughter of faith. However much the wit of a Chesterton or a Colbert may point out our social ills and personal peccadilloes, it is ultimately powerless to change our behavior.

This is why, for my money, the most important scene of religious mockery in the Bible isn’t Elijah’s poking fun at the prophets of Baal. Instead, it is God’s poking fun at the ridiculous overconfidence of death: “Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?” (1 Cor. 15:55). Only God’s mockery can lead to our eternal life. When God mocks, his words are effective, securing what they intend to accomplish. Our own satire, no matter how artful and well-executed, can take us only so far.

Wesley Hill is assistant professor of biblical studies at Trinity School for Ministry in Ambridge, Pennsylvania. His most recent book is Spiritual Friendship: Finding Love in the Church as a Celibate Gay Christian (Brazos).

Books
Review

Listen Up if You Want to Be More Like Jesus

How we imitate Christ by practicing the art of listening.

Ksenia Ragozina / Shutterstock

The first thing we learn about God from the Bible is that he has a voice. Yet most of us never hear it. We read the Bible and pray, but our conversations seem one-sided. We appear to be doing all the talking. What are we to make of this?

The Listening Life: Embracing Attentiveness in a World of Distraction

In The Listening Life: Embracing Attentiveness in a World of Distraction (InterVarsity), Adam McHugh wants us to know that our God is also a God who hears. We should not mistake divine silence for disinterest. “Listening begins when we learn that our heavenly Father listens to us,” writes McHugh. “The pattern of human life may be to listen first, but with the Lord, we are always heard before we hear.” God’s apparent silence is not a mark of his absence. It means that we have his full attention.

The same should be true of our dealings with one another. “This book,” McHugh explains, “is predicated on the assumption that most of us are not good listeners.” As an ordained Presbyterian minister, McHugh has often served as a hospice chaplain. Presented with occasions for listening, he would instead seize the chance to speak: “I considered a moment of pain, crisis, or unfiltered emotion an opportunity to impart my insight, to rescue someone from their weakness, to correct distorted thinking, to evaporate the pain.”

McHugh eventually realized that this habit was devaluing the patient’s perspective. What is more, his efforts to fix others with words were really a desperate attempt to keep feelings at arm’s length: “Sometimes I tried to argue them out of the feeling, sometimes I tried to divert it with humor, sometimes I offered up quick reassurance like ‘Don’t worry, I’m sure it will all work out,’ and at other times, I tried to pray the feeling out of them. I was a feelings exorcist.”

Then, McHugh’s supervisor modeled a different kind of listening during a chaplain internship. “She listened to me so intently that I would get uncomfortable talking about myself for so long,” he writes. “I would try to turn the conversation toward her, but she knew to redirect it back to me.” The experience was transformative. McHugh experienced a new kind of peace and a new level of energy for ministry. He learned how to listen. In The Listening Life we learn how to listen to God, Scripture, creation, and others.

You might think that listening is easy. After all, what does it require besides silence? But true listening demands much more. For too many, listening is merely the dead space between remarks, as we wait for the other person to stop talking. Under the guise of silence we’re busy formulating a reply. But real listening is an act of servanthood. McHugh characterizes listening as a practice of presence and an act of humility and surrender. It’s an act of hospitality and a way to imitate Christ.

McHugh is an engaging writer with a gift for metaphor and analogy. Occasionally this gives way to overstatement. “I am concerned,” he writes, “that restricting God’s self-communication to words written on papyrus thousands of years ago opens our faith to becoming as dusty as some of our study Bibles.” He adds, “Giving the Bible an esteemed place cannot mean muzzling God’s personal word that he continues to speak to the church.”

Does this imply a canon beyond the canon? McHugh describes the Scriptures as a “tuning fork,” which attunes our ears to hear God’s voice. Should “sounding like” the Bible be the primary test of what counts as God’s voice? Or should “God’s voice” correspond with what has already been written? Our interactions with God are not like those with flesh and blood. Jesus puts a face on the divine. But in our present experience, it is not a literal face. Unlike the first disciples, we do not hear his voice or feel his touch. We read his words.

When McHugh refers to God’s voice, he is talking about those inner impressions that seem to come from him: the still, small voice that “creeps up on us like a heartbeat in the dark.” This voice is not arbitrary or random. Indeed, McHugh believes that we can discipline ourselves to hear it: “The Holy Spirit, it turns out, is not a hapless talk show host nattering about everything under the sun, hoping that a few people will tune in to the right frequency. Instead, God’s word comes most often to a certain kind of person seeking to lead a certain kind of life.”

Hearing is the first sense we develop and the last to go in death. But listening is not a natural capacity. The Bible is clear on this point. We do not automatically listen to God, others, or even ourselves. McHugh’s book can change the way you approach your daily conversations. It may even change your life. You should listen.

John Koessler is chair of the pastoral studies department at Moody Bible Institute. He is the author of a forthcoming book, The Radical Pursuit of Rest: Escaping the Productivity Trap (InterVarsity Press).

Books

John Danforth: I’m Not Absolutely Right, and You’re Not Absolutely Wrong

The former senator and United Nations ambassador says religious people should be the leading voices for political compromise.

Americans are bitterly divided on a host of political and cultural issues. John Danforth regrets that religion has often been deployed to deepen our divisions rather than to seek the common good. In The Relevance of Religion: How Faithful People Can Change Politics (Random House), the former Episcopal priest, Republican senator, and United Nations ambassador argues that communities of faith can restore a spirit of civility to our longstanding disagreements. Jake Meador, the lead writer at Mere Orthodoxy, spoke with Danforth about the possibilities—and pitfalls—of faith-based activism.

What do you mean when you talk about “the proper place” of politics?

Politics is not the realm of, “I am absolutely right and you are absolutely wrong.” It’s the art of compromise. It depends on civility and a degree of interpersonal forbearance. People practicing politics have to show some degree of respect for their adversaries. Putting politics in its proper place means seeing that it’s not, to use the language of Paul Tillich, a matter of “ultimate concern.”

You encourage religious believers in politics to work for the common good. But one lesson from recent debates over same-sex marriage and the Planned Parenthood videos is that different groups have very different ideas of what the common good is. How can we pursue the common good when we disagree on what it is?

People who are pro-life and have traditional views on marriage often think their beliefs are no longer politically viable, particularly since the Supreme Court has decided these matters. It may be, however, that the best way to advance those positions is in the broader society, as opposed to lobbying the government.

In the book, I mention Loretto Wagner, a woman from St. Louis who died recently. She was a major pro-life advocate who made an impact in her community by creating relationships with pro-choice citizens. This resulted in some constructive, practical achievements, in areas like teen pregnancy and support for pregnant women. If you’re fighting a battle that’s bound to be a loser politically, it’s good to rethink where you are best able to advance your values.

But with abortion, what about the wave of state-level restrictions we’ve seen enacted? Doesn’t this suggest that political progress is possible?

I don’t think a frontal assault on Roe v. Wade has any chance of success. But there are piecemeal reforms even the most ardent pro-choice supporters could get behind, especially limiting access to abortions in the second half of pregnancy. Overall, though, I would encourage making the moral case for the sanctity of life and assuming, as a matter of law, that abortion will remain available.

How can religion help strengthen communal ties in a fragmented society?

In the book American Grace, social scientists Robert Putnam and David Campbell see a strong relationship between participation in a religious congregation and connectedness to the community. It isn’t a matter of theology, liturgy, or quality of preaching; it simply has to do with being there, with being part of the faithful community.

With geographical separation, the automobile, and the ability to travel long distances to go to the church of one’s choice, it’s essential for congregations to emphasize things that build community: not just worship but also a Bible study or bingo in the church basement.

Do evangelical Christians, as opposed to religious people in general, have anything special to contribute to politics?

Evangelicals have an active faith and are inclined to be active in the public square. They have a deep knowledge of the Bible as God’s Word, but ultimately they understand that while faith relates to all of life, politics is not religion.

Wendell Berry was once asked if he felt like he was standing in front of the locomotive of history, waving his arms and yelling “stop!” He responded that “you can do that very comfortably if you’re willing to be run over.” How can religion give us resilience in the face of partisan ugliness?

Faithful people have to become much more active, but my understanding of “action” differs from activists on both the Right and the Left. Activism isn’t about piling up wedge issues. It’s about saying, “Let’s make government work.”

I once had a conversation with a senator whose office receives between 30,000 and 40,000 pieces of correspondence every month. One month, the office investigated how many of those letters were calling for compromise. The answer was: barely any, fewer than 100.

The conventional wisdom among many politicians is, “Don’t compromise, or else you’ll be challenged in a primary.” The loudest, most insistent voices say, “We’re on the right side, and everyone else is wrong, so don’t give an inch.”

Where are the other voices? People of faith should be the voice affirming that politics is not absolute, and that we’re not on this earth simply to grab as much as we can.

John F. Kennedy’s inaugural speech happened over half a century ago. Who today tells us to “ask what you can do for your country”? By and large, politicians talk about us versus them. My hope is that religion can restore to politics a sense of our bonds to one another.

Ideas

A Church Welcome for the Tired, the Poor

Columnist; Contributor

How the refugee crisis makes for a beautiful gospel witness.

Jon Krause

The global refugee crisis reveals not only the dangerous plight of millions of men and women, boys and girls, but also the troubling moral plight of America. It also provides an opportunity for Christians to shine the light of Christ’s love brighter than ever.

As for our country’s moral plight: We once prided ourselves on endorsing the words of poet Emma Lazarus, who wrote the famous sonnet inscribed on the Statue of Liberty: “Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp! . . . Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

Yet the more we learn about our history, the more we recognize this is more hope than reality. Examples abound, but here are two: the Oriental Exclusion Act (1924), which prohibited most immigration from Asia, including foreign-born wives and the children of American citizens of Chinese ancestry; and United States vs. Bhaghat Singh Thind (1923), in which the Supreme Court ruled that Indians from the Asian subcontinent cannot become US citizens.

The entire picture is complex, to be sure: For example, nearly 6 million immigrants were welcomed between 1911 and 1920.

Unfortunately, US immigration policy today grants only about 1 million permanent visas a year (with about 70,000 for refugees). This might sound like a lot, but it represents but 0.3 percent of our population of 321 million. Between 1911 and 1920, when the total population hovered around 100 million, the United States welcomed an average of 600,000 immigrants each year. This means that over the past 100 years, immigrants and refugees have become a declining portion of the overall American population.

In short, our nation has become increasingly stingy about welcoming the tired, the poor, the huddled masses yearning to breathe free.

This becomes especially apparent and scandalous when we compare the US response to that of other nations. In September, Germany announced it will welcome some 800,000 refugees this year. Chancellor Angela Merkel said, “The right to political asylum has no limits on the number of asylum seekers.” And, “As a strong, economically healthy country, we have the strength to do what is necessary.”

But here, in the wealthiest nation in world history—with a population four times the size of Germany’s—we debate whether to up the number of refugee visas from 70,000 to 100,000 per year. Despite ill-advised comments from leaders like evangelist Franklin Graham (“We should stop all immigration of Muslims to the [United States] until this threat with Islam has been settled”), most evangelicals are committed to the sojourner in our land—Muslim or Christian, documented or not, immigrant and refugee alike.

According to a recent LifeWay Research study, 60 percent of us believe our nation should find a way to help undocumented workers gain citizenship or some form of permanent residence. When it comes specifically to the refugee crisis, a subhead on the webpage of World Relief DuPage/Aurora, Illinois, which serves 5,500 immigrants and refugees a year, describes evangelical reality: “We welcome refugees.”

That’s the only conclusion one can reach given the myriad of Christian nonprofits helping, or advocating on behalf of, refugees. The evidence shows that countless believers in local churches greet refugees at the airport, deliver welcome packets, furnish apartments, find jobs, teach English and reading, and visit and befriend newcomers for months.

In some quarters of American life, evangelical Christians are viewed as fearful and xenophobic—afraid of “the other.” Perhaps in a few cases, which happen to make the news. But in fact, US evangelical churches are refugees’ best friend. If anyone looks fearful and xenophobic, it is the federal government and its broken immigration policies.

This is not to deny the real political, social, and economic challenges of welcoming more sojourners. This is not to suggest that we open our borders without any security checks. It is to refuse to let the gods of fear and security dictate how we respond.

Nor do we mean to suggest our churches are doing all they can for the sojourner. Our resettlement agencies, here and abroad, need more money, more volunteers—more sponsorship from local churches—to face the burgeoning refugee crisis.

This is an unparalleled opportunity to love neighbors here and abroad, and to showcase the beauty of the gospel that proclaims good news to the poor, liberty for those stuck in refugee camps, and a new life for those fleeing from oppression, so that those “yearning to breathe free” can breathe easily.

Mark Galli is editor of Christianity Today.

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube