Pastors

Build a Better Board

Create a healthy team to grow a healthy church.

Leadership Journal June 20, 2001

We all want a healthy leadership team, but where do you start in building one? We asked Larry Osborne, pastor of North Coast Church in Vista, California, a regular contributor to Leadership, and author of The Unity Factor (Owl’s Nest, 2001), a book about creating healthy elder boards.

Q: What made you write a book about church boards?

A: My interest in a healthy church leadership team came out of experiences I had growing up. I watched my dad as a deacon in a church experience long and frustrating nights and look forward to the day that he got off the board. Something didn’t seem right with that picture. Then, when I came to North Coast Church, a small church about a year-and-a-half old, I assumed that everybody was ready to charge the hill. Instead, I found real people with real hurts, and I made the mistake of not focusing on meeting their needs, but saying, “Come on, let’s go meet the needs of the world out there.” We only grew by one person the first three years. That was a difficult time for me, and it dawned on me that we were never going to be healthier than our leadership team. So I switched my focus to the inner group God had given me. That started with our elder board.

Q: What exactly did you do?

A: We shifted where and when we met. I got involved with deciding who would be on the board, and, most important, I began to train them. I realized that no one trains leaders for the task of leading the church. We take our church leaders and give them more theology. Often they’re some of our best people theologically and spiritually anyway, and what they need to know is how to lead the church — just like a Sunday school teacher needs to understand the differences between age groups and the various dynamics involved in teaching.

Q: What do you teach them?

A: I expose them to things I learned in seminary and in conferences and journals for pastors. I teach them everything from church growth principles to group dynamics. We talk philosophy of ministry. My goal was to help them to think like pastors think, with the focus on what it means to lead a volunteer organization. Most people tend to lead the church like a business. The church is not a trucking company. The church is completely different.

Q: When building an elder board, what do you look for?

A: First, we make sure potential elders don’t have glaring weaknesses as described in 1 Timothy 3 and Titus 1. First, we look for the biblical qualifications. Second, we look for a fit with our philosophy of ministry. Just because someone is spiritually mature and attends our church doesn’t mean he has a right to completely change the direction of our church. A lot of churches fail to consider that when selecting church leaders. Third, we look for team fit. We ask, What does our leadership team need right now? That changes. It’s like a sports team. You can’t win a championship with five Shaqs. Somebody’s got to bring the ball up the court.

Q: How can a leadership group work as a team?

A: First, make sure your group is the right size — I suggest somewhere between five and twelve. If you have too many people, there’s no way to keep the lines of communication flowing. Frankly, it’s the slightly-too-large board that often gets the time-bomb member — because the board is trying to fill that last slot or two. Second, spend time together. The more time we spend together, the more we like and understand on another. Too many boards gather, quickly pray, do business, and go home. I look for ways to have some play, socialization, time together. Third, create shared experiences. That’s what training does. We get a common lingo, a common background that helps us — not necessarily to agree, but to understand our disagreements better.

Q: What is the purpose of a board? What should members see as their function?

A: That changes as the church changes. In a smaller church, the purpose is usually helping a pastor get the job done. In a larger church it’s helping a pastor make and communicate good decisions. In the largest churches, a board’s primary function is to be the brakes of the organization, the accountability, people who can stop anything. The board is also wise counsel, because a larger church is staff-led, so the board is more wise counsel than hands- on leaders. They also serve as a crisis team in waiting.

Q: What do you do when your team isn’t functioning like one?

A: Pray. All the leadership understanding and insight in the world can’t make up for making sure the Lord’s hand is guiding you in what to do. Also, if the relationships are really a struggle, bring in an outside consultant — one that both parties feel comfortable with. When people are not communicating well, just talking more doesn’t usually get anywhere.

Q: How can you keep a board healthy?

A: Remember that you are a unit — whether you’re the pastor or a board member. I’m a strong leader, but when my board says no, it’s no.

From BUILDING CHURCH LEADERS, published by Leadership Journal © 2001 Christianity Today International. To reply, write Newsletter@LeadershipJournal.net.

Sign up for the Church Leader’s Newsletter and receive a new article plus useful information in your inbox every week!

Copyright © 2001 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal.Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

THE WOMB BOMBER

Books & Culture June 13, 2001

Chapter1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23

Rose had heard enough of the news to know that Stannie was missing. Driving South on Wednesday morning, she listened to Senator Jim Colfax’s comments on National Public Radio.

“Young Stan has been a full and beloved member of the Colfax clan, and all I have to say about him is that I wish he were home. Right now. As do his mama and daddy and sisters and cousins, and all others who love him. Now I have to admit I don’t know whether this article he’s written in this magazine about his birth mother is based on truth: I don’t know all the circumstances of Stannie’s adoption. And you know what? I don’t care. If Stannie’s birth mother has been in contact with him, or if she chose to terminate a pregnancy, that’s none of my business, none of the American people’s business. That’s the main point. It’s a private thing. And Stanley Colfax supports a woman’s right to choose and he doesn’t mind saying it. Not to capitalize on a thing like this—I would never want to do that—but you know it says something about the whole Colfax clan. We don’t pussyfoot around. We tell it like it is, even if it ain’t pretty. The Republicans think they have a corner on the hard truth, and they don’t. But this is not political, this is about my nephew. And I won’t rest till he’s home.”

Ordinarily Rose didn’t read Stannie’s columns. Today was a different kind of day: she bought herself a new copy of Tops in a grocery store in Montgomery, Alabama and read it while sitting in a hot car on a hamburger strip off I–65, not too far from Ernetta’s hometown. The column appeared under the subheading, “Come Home Soon, Stan. All Your Friends Are Praying for a Safe Return.” Rose read and re–read the part about herself (how she hadn’t returned his phone calls and the joke about him threatening to cut off his ear: very funny). She sat still in the car for a few minutes afterwards. Evidently she hadn’t known Stannie any better than he’d known her. She’d slept with him, she’d argued with him, she’d flirted with him and resented him—all in the same day—but she’d never thought she could hurt him. They’d remained strangers.

Not—NOT!—that she felt guilty about it. He hadn’t deserved any better than he got. She was crazy not to have dumped him the day that whore answered his phone in a Texas hotel. But once he’d hurt her, she’d settled down and made herself just so very comfortable.

“You’re cold,” she growled to herself. “You’re detached and cold, and you don’t give a damn if Stannie Colfax ever shows up in the world again.” Which maybe proved the whole point of his column, that his life hadn’t meant much to anybody, and that maybe, if you judged people by the standard Stannie assumed—by how much they meant to those around them—a lot of people (maybe including me, Rose thought) really would have been better off not getting born at all. The world might have done better without them.

Something about this bothered her immediately, but she was in a strange mood. She felt dreamy and drizzy from the heat: the asphalt in front ofher curled and bent like a curtain of snakes. She was afraid to start driving again for fear of falling asleep. She took a piece of paper from her purse and wrote down everybody who had ever seemed important in her life, really indispensable:

My mother and father
My sister
My high school boyfriend
My niece and nephew
My two best friends from UNICEF
My best college art professor

She stared at the list for a long time, wondering if she’d been honest, wondering if she should scratch out the professor (he’d groped her once in a darkroom). Really, she could have done without any of them except the original two, her mother and father, and she hadn’t actually seen her father in years. Why should her opinion count, anyway? The opinion of another person who hadn’t contributed that much, hadn’t loved anyone that much, hadn’t sacrificed for anyone? How could anybody’s feelings be the measure of another person’s importance? She got back on the road again, sweating and wondering how she could possibly argue with Stannie, tell him that he was wrong and that his life was worth something even if he didn’t believe it and she, his former lover, didn’t want anything to do with him.

By the time she got to Le Crane, she was drunk with the heat. Her air conditioner had stopped working, but she hadn’t thought to roll down the windows. Salty sweat ran down her cheeks like tears. Now she knew what else had been bothering her. It was the idea that Ernetta Duckworth—ERNETTA DUCKWORTH!—had once been given the chance to pass judgment on STANNIE COLFAX, someone so utterly remote from her (whatever their biological relation), with a life and a mind of his own. One particular woman had lifted the gavel over one particular man’s life at his moment of greatest vulnerability, had held the imaginary gun to his head and decided whether or not the world would ever know him. So what if the world really might have been better off without Stannie? How could people be allowed to exercise such power over each other? How could lives be so intertwined and yet so individually vulnerable?(If in fact this story about Stannie’s birth wasn’t all a mistake, and Rose was still pretty sure that it was.)

And then suddenly she knew that by ridding herself of Stannie she was doing the worst thing a human being could do to another—turning away, putting him to death in her heart. It was a necessary evil: she had to get away from Stannie, no doubt about that. But when she considered that she didn’t even feel moved, that she didn’t feel anything for him or for almost anybody else … it was just like she’d been aborting people every day of her life, wiping them out and walking away without regret. She had a vision of children’s faces in her camera lens, dead faces asking to be brought to life again, eyes pressing in and searching for her. Damn!

A little less than an hour later she knocked at Ernetta’s front door. She waited in the quiet shade of the porch, her heart pounding. A dog barked down the block. A moment later, the door opened slowly, just as ithad so many times the summer they’d met.

“Ernetta?”

“Yes?” The woman standing across the threshold had changed. It was Ernetta all right, but skinnier and bent over, as if all the life had been sucked out of her in only a few months. She looked like she’d been crying.

“Ernetta?” said Rose again. “Remember me?” A blank second passed. “I’m Rose.”

Ernetta’s face suddenly lit up.

“You! Oh Lord, I’m sorry—”

“I came back to see you.”

“Lord, yes!” Ernetta threw out her cool, bare arms and hugged Rose tight. The hug felt good. “You come back!” she said. “I never thought you’d come back and see me!”

“I told you I’d get down here again sometime.”

“But I thought you’d be too busy! And I saw my picture in a magazine, so I knew your book come out.” Ernetta pulled her over the threshold, into the dark living room. A TV was blaring from somewhere in the house, probably the kitchen. Rose took an unconscious inventory of everything she’d liked so much before: the ivy, the Jesus picture on velvet by the door, the bright red lamp by the faded gold brocade chair in one corner.

“You saw the review in Tops?” she asked nervously.

Ernetta pushed a pile of newspapers off the chair. She wasn’t listening.

“I feel so good now,” she said in a breathless voice. “It’s going to be OK.”

“Did you see it in Tops?”

“What?”

“The picture from the book.”

Ernetta stopped and frowned.

“Yes, that’s where I saw it. Sit down here in this chair. I’m sorry it’s messy. I been in the kitchen all day,watching the news.”

Rose settled into the recliner and fished in her carry bag.

“Ernetta, I brought you a copy of the book. I hope you’ll like it.”

“Oh Lord!”

“What?”

“I better turn off that TV.”

“Sure, take your time.”

Ernetta hustled away. The house became suddenly quieter. Rose heard the squeal of truck brakes outside and then the dog barking again. “Shut up before I kill you!” shouted a male voice.

“Oh my!” said Ernetta, hurrying back in with a glass of ice water. “I’m embarrassed my house is so hot. And it’s not even summer yet.” She turned on an oscillating fan, then sat down on a folding chair next to it, huffing and puffing.

“Have you been watching the news?” said Rose, as the fan oscillated past her. It blew a loose hair out of her butterfly clip. Ernetta’s face tensed up.

“Yes.”

“Well, there sure is a lot of news to keep up with.”

“Yes.” They both sat quietly for a moment, while the fan raked across Ernetta’s curls and turned back toward Rose. “A lot of news,” mumbled Ernetta.

Rose took a sip of her ice water and sighed.

“I’ve missed taking pictures.”

“You missed it? What were you doing instead?”

“Research and writing. But if the book sells I’ll go back to pictures. I’m not sure how it will do—”

For the first time, Ernetta smiled widely. “Probably not too good, with my face in it. I told you to take some pretty flowers if you want to sell books.”

“It’s not true, Ernetta!” Rose laughed and then stopped and listened to the dog barking outside. She pushed her hair out of her face: more and more of it was falling into her eyes. Why bother with the clip anyway? She pulled it from the back of her hair and stared at it; it looked like a pair of clenched hands.

“You want a hair net?” asked Ernetta.

“No thanks.”

“You’re a good photographer, Rose, I have to say that. It’s just I warned you how I might look—out there in the dirt with my shirt coming open.”

There would never be a good time to ask about Stannie. Rose looked up and winced.

“Will you please tell me something, Ernetta?”

“What?”

Rose hesitated.

“I want to know what’s happened to you recently?”

“What?”

“I can see it in you. Something’s happened to you.”

Ernetta put her hand up to her hair.

“Do I look bad?”

“No, not that.” Rose smiled. “You look fine, Ernetta. It’s just that I know something’s been going on. I’ve been in Washington. I heard you visited a friend of mine, Stannie Colfax.”

Ernetta’s mouth opened slowly. “Stannie Colfax?” She sat that way for along time, rubbing her hands together. It was impossible to tell what she was thinking.”You know Stanley?”

“Yes. I haven’t talked to him, but I heard about this.”

“You know, it was because of that picture of me in his magazine. I went to see him.”

“And you thought he was your son?”

Ernetta nodded.

“He is my son. Might not want to be, but he is.”

“Maybe you think it’s none of my business.”

The old woman stood up and stretched out her hands.

“I don’t think nothing! I don’t know about his life!”

“I don’t know much either. And he’s been—he’s my fiance.”

“What? He didn’t tell me!”

“Actually, that’s dishonest.” Rose frowned. “No, we weren’t like that. But I am worried about him. I thought I’d talk to you.”

Ernetta sat back down and leaned forward.

“I’m worried too. Do you know what’s happened to him?”

“No, I have no idea. I hoped you would.”

“I don’t!” The old woman burst into tears. “But I’m just worried sick. I done told the police all about it, everything I could. And there’s a lot to tell.”

Rose nodded slowly. “Will you please tell me some of your story,Ernetta?”

“I’ll tell you the whole thing if it’ll help. I’ll even tell you about Arvin. Oh, I don’t care no more about Arvin.”

* * *

At her home in Hollywood, Brett Bordley–Young was still trying to pick a gown for the Oscars. She’d bought and discarded five sure bets already. At the moment she was having herself glued into a Roberto Napoli original in the presence of Roberto Napoli, himself. She had no qualms about stripping down to nothing in order to have various parts of this crazy thing glued to various parts of herself. The only thing that worried her was what Roberto REALLY thought about her angel–wing tattoos (just above the shoulder blades) as he made slow, deliberate circles around her like a search–and–rescue plane. Did he think she had juvenile taste? No taste at all? Well, she was trying to have taste. At least she’d ditched the navel ring and the Christina Aguilera hair, and she’d recently made totally decent chitchat with Jack Nicholson at a majorly boring dinner party. She kept a regular journal and she was even considering a role as a special ed teacher for a TV movie. Did that sound juvenile? “I don’t think so,” she said to herself.

Roberto frowned at her and folded his arms across his barrel chest. Why, she wondered, could a fat Italian designer get away with wearing a tight black tank top and black leather pants? He looked like an eggplant. The phone rang just then. Brett gathered a few sheets of gauzy material around her front parts and went to answer it.

“Hello?”

“Hello, this is Stan Colfax.”

“Who?”

“Stan Colfax. I’m a writer for Tops Magazine.”

“I didn’t tell anybody to have you call me.”

“It was my own idea. We were supposed to present an Oscar together.”

“Oh yeah! OK. You’re that writer guy. What an asshole.”

“Hey, can we talk? I’m in the area, I’d like to come over.”

“Aren’t you supposed to be missing?”

“Can I come over?”

“I said aren’t you supposed to be missing?”

“I am missing. Nobody knows where I am.”

“Well don’t change a thing. And don’t call me again, or I’ll tell the police you’re stalking me.” She slammed the phone down.

Outside the house and down the long driveway, on the other side of the electric fence, Stannie was parked in Ernetta’s truck. “Bitch,” he said,and threw down the phone.

The sky overhead was a whitish blue, the color of Stannie’s truck. A half an hour later, he slipped over the Hollywood hills like a pale cloud, following the black limousine from a distance. Past pepper trees, avocadoes, oaks. The bright sun felt good on his bare arm. He was listening to his new Brett Bordley–Young CD on his portable player:

I’m yours baby,
Wherever you are
Just like a brand new car
Believe it ’cause it’s true
Put your hand on my wheel
I’m yours boy
Press the pedal to the floor
I need more more, more
Of this love,
Take me everywhere
You go,
Woah woah woah

He pulled out his earphones and fished his cell phone from the briefcase behind the seat. He dialed the number of his producer pal.

“Hey, it’s me.”

“OK, Stan. Where are you now?”

“I need her cell number.”

“Did you try her at home?”

“She hung up on me. Now we’re on the road.”

“Stan, what the hell are you up to? Everybody in the world thinks you’re dead or something and you’re out chasing a teenager.”

“I’m not chasing her, I’m stalking her.”

“Don’t tell me that. I didn’t hear that.”

“I just want to talk to her.”

“What’s the point? Leave her alone before you get arrested. Why don’t you drive over to my house, chill for a while by the pool, get whatever you need, and then check into a hotel. Or even stay. Hey you’re here till Saturday anyway, right?”

“I’m not going to the awards.”

“Are you kidding? After all this Bobby Fischer stuff you’ve pulled? Everybody in America’s going to tune in just to see if you show up, Stannie.”

“So give me her cell number and I promise I’ll go.”

“I don’t have it. I really don’t. Goodbye, Stan. You know where I live if you change your mind.”

“I’ll keep this phone on. Get that number and call me—aw, man, I’m going to lose her.”

The limo turned down an alley in the middle of downtown Hollywood: a gate closed behind it and Stannie made three circles around the block, staring from building to building, trying to decide where she might be,what she might be doing.

He went around the block once more and then drove back the way he’d come, all the way to the house, which seemed as good a place to wait as any. He parked under an acacia tree, lay down across the front seat, and propped his feet up on the steering wheel. The sun lit up the pink membranes between his toes like jewels. He picked up the phone again and started thinking about the message he’d like to leave for Brett Bordley–Young before he drove back to Washington.

Before he started dialing the phone rang. He flipped it open.

“Yeah? You got that number for me?” A slow whine drifted through the phone, a long, rubbery squeak of a breath.

“Hello?” said Stannie.

“What number am I calling?” said a muffled voice.

“Who’s this?”

“Guess.”

“Cut the crap,” said Stan. “Who’s this?”

“Ain’t no crap here. I want you to guess.”

“Who is it?”

After a pause, the man said, “Ed.”

“Ed Who?”

Another couple of wheezes.

“Ed from Florida. I been trying to call you, boy.”

“Oh, Ed!” Stannie relaxed. Who had he been thinking it was, anyway? “That was too weird. I’m fine, Ed. Tell them I’m fine and to leave me alone.”

“I read your letter in your mother’s magazine. She was reading it all day.”

“Like she gives a shit.”

“I told her it’s not her fault, it’s not her you’re asking for.”

“That’s right. You tell her that. I’m not asking for anybody down there, I’m through with that family. I don’t owe anybody anything.”

“I tried to tell her that. I’m the one you want, you’re looking for.”

Stannie waited for a second, and then laughed cautiously.

“Yeah. Me and you.”

“That’s exactly … ” He sputtered excitedly. “I knowed it, boy. I knowed you seen it too.”

“I was joking.”

“But it is you and me, ain’t it?”

“Old man, I don’t want to be rude. You’ve been hanging with drunks too much.”

“I’m just answering your question.”

Stannie smiled to himself.

“What question was that?”

“About your life means something. You’re a chosen man, chosen and brung into this world for a purpose. And I’m here to tell you what it is.”

Stannie sat quietly looking at his feet in the sunshine.

“Ed, listen to me. I want you to go back to your basement, sit for a minute, and bring your core body temperature down a few degrees. And I’m hanging up now.”

“Your real mama!” Ed shouted. “Ernetta! She came to see you, didn’t she? She tell you about me and the baby–killers? About old Arvin? Killed his giants.”

Stannie sat up and put his feet on the floor.

“Your real name’s Arvin Jr. I call you A.J.”

Stannie licked his lips but couldn’t say anything.

“Hey A.J. A.J. Sound of that, I like. I been watching you almost your whole life, almost ever since the sister brought you here.”

“What sister are you talking about? My aunt?”

“Sister Judas Jacob and Jezebel, she’s a liar. Cut my balls right off ever time I ask for nothing— I hate her worse than dead babies.”

“Ed—” Stannie started. “I don’t want you to bring this up again.”

“You owe me your life twicet over. Twicet over you owe it to me.”

“Did you really do it, Ed?” Stannie said, slowly. “It was you who bombed those places? Are you the one?”

“They think I got killed in New York, but I ain’t dead. And this time you’re going to help me.”

“What?”

“I’ll tell you in a hour. Keep your phone on.”

Ed was gone. Stannie lay back against the seat, looking up at the acacia tree swaying against the sky.

Copyright © 2001 by the author or Christianity Today/Books & Culture Magazine.Click here for reprint information on Books & Culture.

Pastors

Because Pastors Prayed

Leadership Journal June 13, 2001

“After they prayed, the place where they were meeting was shaken. And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God boldly. All the believers were one in heart and mind.” Acts 4:31-32

One part of the Columbine story hasn’t been widely told. What happened before the shootings at the high school in Littleton, Colorado?

We know what happened afterward. The carnage, the crosses, the testimony, the conversions to Christ, the dramatic rise in church attendance in the region. But what happened before? One pastor said, simply, “We prayed.”

The unity among the churches after the crisis was remarkable. Pastors from all denominations came together to minister, and attenders of all kinds of churches embraced to comfort a grieving city.

In the months after 15 people were slain, the churches together sought guidance from ministers in other communities where violence had shaken schools and taken lives. The churches offered counseling for victims and families. The pastors helped each other and shepherded each other’s sheep when necessary. Their unity was evident in the first memorial service. And that it continued is even more remarkable.

It continued because the pastors were praying, even before the crisis.

Three years before the shots rang out, a few pastors answered a call to prayer. A handful of pastors had met for prayer regularly for seven years. Only a handful. Then, one pastor took the lead in bringing more of his colleagues into the fellowship.

The prayer group in southwest metro Denver grew to 30 or more each week. The pastors of the same 30 churches that led the recovery ministry found, in the three years prior to their crisis, that their hearts were bonded together in true love. In prayer they learned to care about each other and each other’s ministries. In prayer they learned to trust each other. And when the testing came, they were ready. Because they prayed.

It’s a shame that it takes a crisis to prove the value of the pastors’ prayer meetings. But in the wake of Columbine, I found myself wishing I had taken my ministry relationships more seriously. Busy with my own flock, I found reasons to miss too many meetings of the associations. The pastors with whom I developed a praying relationship moved, and finding and encouraging new friendships took time, sometimes time I didn’t have. In retrospect, I see one prayer partnership that was truly nourishing, and several that I should have fed. Most pastors want that kind of koinonia — they just need someone to take the lead and keep at it.

Prayer works when we have unity in the Body of Christ. And when we have unity, we are ready to meet whatever trial may come. But if we are at odds with others in the Body, or simply too busy to keep in contact, we cannot expect God to answer our prayers. Even less can we expect him to use us in some great way for his kingdom.

One key to the success of the church at its first century birth was its unity. No, it wasn’t easy. There were serious disagreements over serious matters. But somehow, God brought these people from all different backgrounds, with different angles on their newfound faith, together. And unity came when they prayed.

And when they prayed, God answered.

Eric Reed is editor of Leadership journal. To reply, write Newsletter@LeadershipJournal.net.

Sign up for the Church Leader’s Newsletter and receive a new article plus useful information in your inbox every week!

Copyright © 2001 by the author or Christianity Today/Leadership Journal.Click here for reprint information on Leadership Journal.

News
Wire Story

Presbyterians Launch ’Confessing Movement’

Conservatives threaten to withhold money if national leadership doesn’t agree with affirmations

Conservatives within the Presbyterian Church (USA), upset with their denomination’s liberal drift on human sexuality and biblical authority, are circulating a three-point pledge to member churches, and some conservatives are threatening to withhold money if the national church leadership does not also sign on.

A burgeoning “confessing church movement” is calling Presbyterians to affirm that “Jesus Christ alone is Lord of all and the way of salvation” and that the Bible is “the Church’s only infallible rule of faith and life.” The document also calls for sexual purity within the confines of marriage between one man and one woman.

The movement began at Summit Presbyterian Church in western Pennsylvania, part of a regional presbytery that last year said liberals and conservatives had reached an “irreconcilable impasse.” Organizers say in the first few weeks since the document’s release, as many as 1,000 churches have expressed interest or support. So far, 70 churches in 24 states have passed resolutions in support of the movement. John Adams, editor of the Presbyterian Layman, a theologically conservative newspaper, says there is no link with the Confessing Movement of the United Methodist Church, another mainline denomination undergoing doctrinal disputes.

Among other issues, conservatives are upset by the defeat of a constitutional amendment that would have banned same-sex unions. Parker Williamson, executive director of the Presbyterian Lay Committee, described the situation as a “powder keg,” and conservatives insist that the church reaffirm historic Christian doctrines—and enforce them.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and UPI have also profiled the growing “confessing church movement.”

The Confessing Church Movement site offers more links to news stories, commentary pieces, and other resources.

In an August 11, 1997, Christianity Today article, James Edwards compared today’s struggles within the PCUSA to that in the German church in the 1930s —which launched the original “Confessing Church” at Barmen.

Other Christianity Today articles on tensions within the Presbyterian Church (USA) include:

Presbyterians Vote Down Ban on Same-Sex Unions | Opponents say vague wording led to defeat. (Mar. 29, 2001)

Editorial: Walking in the Truth | Winning arguments at church conventions is not enough without compassion for homosexuals. (Oct. 30, 2000)

Presbyterians Propose Ban on Same-Sex Ceremonies | Change to church constitution, which passes by only 17 votes, now goes to presbyteries. (July 5, 2000)

Presbyterians urged to allow liberals to leave over homosexual ordination | The general assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA), will be asked to consider a series of resolutions declaring that “irreconcilable” differences exist over the ordination of gay clergy. (Feb. 28, 2000)

Presbyterians Support Same-Sex Unions | Northeast Synod rules 8-2 in favor of continuing church’s “holy union” ceremonies (Jan. 10, 2000)

Fidelity Clause Retained | Homosexual ordination under study until 2001. (Aug. 9, 1999)

Leaders Retain ‘Chastity’ Vow (May 18, 1998)

Assembly Favors ‘Integrity’ Not ‘Chastity’ for Leaders (Aug. 11, 1997)

Presbyterians Endorse Fidelity, Chastity for Ordained Clergy (Apr. 28, 1997)

News
Wire Story

Indictments: Indictments Handed Down

“Five former Baptist Foundation of Arizona officials plead not guilty to theft, fraud, and racketeering”

Five former Baptist Foundation of Arizona (BFA) officials could face prison if convicted of crimes alleged in a 32-count indictment. Three other former officials pleaded guilty to reduced charges in exchange for turning state’s evidence at an initial criminal hearing in Phoenix.

Five defendants pleaded not guilty at the May 4 hearing in Maricopa County Superior Court. They are William Pierre Crotts, the foundation’s former chief executive officer; Thomas Dale Grabinski, ex-general counsel and vice president; Lawrence Dwain Hoover and Harold DeWayne Friend, former members of the foundation’s board of directors; and Richard Lee Rolfes, an accounting consultant.

Charges stemming from a two-year investigation by Arizona’s attorney general include theft, fraud, and racketeering. It is one of the largest fraud cases associated with an affinity group—in this case a religious denomination—in American history.

Sentences for the different counts carry prison terms of between 8 and 12 years. If convicted as charged, the former officials could also be forced to pay restitution to 13,000 defrauded investors. If they are convicted of racketeering, the court could go after their personal assets.

Three others targeted in the probe—former treasurer Donald Dale Deardoff; another officer, Edgar Allen Kuhn; and former board member Jalma W. Hunsinger—accepted a plea bargain in exchange for cooperating with prosecutors.

Deardoff pleaded guilty to two counts of fraudulent schemes. Kuhn confessed to three counts of facilitating fraudulent schemes and Hunsinger to three counts of illegally conducting an enterprise, less-serious felonies carrying sentences of 6 to 18 months. Sentencing for the three was delayed until after the case ends.

Attorneys for two of the defendants, meanwhile, told The Arizona Republic that the charges are unwarranted and that their clients are innocent. About $22 million was invested by churches, according to a 1999 report. Most of the BFA’s top officers were drawing six-figure salaries.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

The unabridged Associated Baptist Press article above is available at the news service’s site.

Christianity Today‘s other coverage of the Baptist Foundation of Arizona collapse includes:

Elderly Investors Target Accountant | But Baptist Foundation of Arizona victims will have to wait in line. (May 17, 2001)

Baptist Foundation of Arizona Declares Bankruptcy | Troubled agency, accused of lawbreaking, offers restructuring plan. (Nov. 9, 1999)

Baptist Foundation Faces Investment Fraud Charges | Freeze on redemptions leaves pensioners in a pinch. (Oct. 25, 1999)

The weekly Phoenix New Times, which first exposed the fraud, has its full award-winning investigative series “The Money Changers” online.

The Arizona Republic, a major Phoenix daily, also has numerous BFA articles in its archives, but charges a $2 fee to read each of them. However, many of these articles are also available free at BFAFraud.com, a lengthy, opinionated, and very informative unofficial site maintained by two articulate and angry BFA investors. BFAFraud.com has also posted the “smoking gun” letters and memos from BFA’s own whistleblowers, which were ignored and dismissed by its disgraced former management.

Mainly for investors, the BFA Liquidation Trust (successor to BFA itself) has many reports, press releases, and other documents.

The counsel for the state class action suit maintain a detailed site with regular updates.

The Arizona Corporation Commission‘s Securities Division has many documents about its actions against BFA and Arthur Andersen:

Hundreds of pages’ worth of the complete court filings in the BFA bankruptcy case are available at the District of Arizona Bankruptcy Court site.

The Investors Committee appointed for the bankruptcy case has regular BFA updates on its site as well.

There is even a dedicated BFA discussion-chat forum, where investors and others commiserate, rail, pray, and speculate daily about the chances of getting their money back and putting the culprits behind bars.

News
Wire Story

Rainbow Ministry: Summit Equips Leaders for Ethnic Outreach

Religious organizations targeting immigrant populations seek to make the church an embassy.

Though English was the group’s common tongue, the service at the National Ethnic Workers’ Summit at Biola University near Los Angeles started with a prayer in Spanish and later gave way to the lively tones of an Andean flute.

“The Holy Spirit is bringing to us across the entire globe,” Fuller Theological Seminary Professor Charles Van Engen said earlier in the day. The closing session seemed tangible proof of the professor’s words.

Drawing more than 500 people over three days in late April, the summit was sponsored by the Ethnic America Network, a group of evangelical Christian leaders concerned with the challenges and opportunities of the mushrooming ethnic diversity in the United States. The network belongs to Mission America (MA), a broad coalition of evangelical churches and church organizations. It works with groups that “consider themselves immigrants,” according to Corkie Haan of MA.

“Our purpose was to get as many people working in the same area together so we could get to know each other,” said Nick Venditti, international director of the Des Moines, Iowa-based Institute of Theology by Extension and a member of the summit’s organizing committee.

“It’s to connect,” said Allen Belton, so “people know who is doing ethnic work and in a way that ethnics can relate. So many times, the intention is to get the word out, but it’s done in a fashion that is culturally insensitive.”

Belton, who is director of the Department of Urban and Global Mission at University Presbyterian Church in Seattle, cited a unique dimension of the summit: equipping evangelical workers for ministry who are themselves members of ethnic minority groups.

Russell Begaye, summit chairman and head of the multiethnic church-planting unit of the Southern Baptist Convention’s North American Mission Board, said workers who are minorities don’t have to worry much about building cultural bridges. But within their own group, he said, they are often held to a difficult standard, with the community scrutinizing the slightest hypocrisy in these bearers of what is often an unusual message in their culture.

The summit’s numerous workshops were designed to provide help for ministries that meet the needs of ethnic groups. “It’s not just sharing God’s word with them; it’s friendship,” Don Apgar said of his work as a regional mobilizer with International Students Inc. (ISI).

Headquartered in Colorado Springs, Colorado, ISI matches international university students across the country with “friendship partners” recruited in evangelical churches near the students’ schools.

Asked how he felt about Christian attempts to evangelize ethnic populations, Orange County Muslim leader Hussam Ayloush said, “I don’t see a major problem if it comes with good intentions.” Hussam is executive director of the southern California chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations.

For Fuller Seminary’s Van Engen, evangelicals must present the Christian church as an “embassy,” a safe haven where people of varied backgrounds put aside conflict, even if they don’t abandon their particularity. “This is not multiculturalism. This is not cultural relativism,” he said. “It’s a completely new reality.”

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

The Ethnic America Network site has information about the network, its sponsoring organizations, and its conferences.

Ethnic Harvest has photos from the summit and loads of demographic information and other resources.

International Students Inc‘s site offers stories from students who’ve been in the program and other information about the organization.

Mission America has a bare-bones site.

News
Wire Story

Islam Muslims Report Steady Growth

“Both American mosques and their attendees are young, study finds”

Muslims in the United States are a thriving and growing community, increasingly active in American life, a new survey has concluded.

“This study shows that Muslims and mosques are strengthening the American fabric,” said Nihad Awad, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, whose organization cosponsored the study.

Awad said that mosques “are not only centers for spirituality, they are now bases for political and social mobilization.”

The nationwide survey of 416 randomly selected mosque leaders found that 77 percent said mosque participation had grown within the past five years, and 61 percent placed that increase at 10 percent or more, according to lead researcher Ihsan Bagby, a professor at historically black Shaw University in Raleigh, North Carolina.

The mosques surveyed were also fairly new, with 30 percent established in the last decade and 32 percent established in the 1980s. “The last three decades have been the decades of mosque-building,” Bagby said. “A full 80 percent of all the mosques were started since 1970.”

Most mosques are situated in the Northeast and in urban areas, Bagby said. “Mosques, for the most part, are an urban phenomenon,” he said, estimating that 6 million to 7 million Muslims live in the United States.

Samuel Naaman, director of the evangelical South Asian Friendship Center in Chicago, told Christianity Today that most Muslim growth in America comes via immigration and the conversion of African-American men. Naaman, however, said there is not enough ministry geared to Muslims.

“When I hear those numbers [of Muslim immigrants], I praise God,” said Naaman, a native of Pakistan. “We need to be grateful and thankful that God is bringing these people. This is the best country where they have an opportunity to hear the gospel.”

The report found that most mosques participate in some sort of outreach activity, with at least 60 percent offering programs for the needy or incarcerated. More than one-fourth of those surveyed offered full-time schools with an average attendance of about 126.

The study also found that over two-thirds (68 percent) of Muslim converts are male, and just under two-thirds (63 percent) of last year’s converts came from the African-American community. Over one-quarter (27-percent) of converts were white, a fairly recent development, Bagby said.

“I don’t think this would have been true a few decades ago,” Bagby said. “As the horns are taken off Islam and people begin to seriously consider it, Islam becomes more acceptable in the minds of all American people.”

Nearly half (47 percent) of those who attend mosque regularly are 35 or younger, while a slightly lower percentage (29 percent) are converts to Islam. Three-quarters (75 percent) of regular attendees are male, the study found.

Most of those surveyed supported Muslim involvement in American society, the study found, with 89 percent agreeing that Muslims should participate. Within the past year, a majority of the mosques surveyed had members of their community in touch with a political leader or a journalist.

The mosque serves as “a springboard for Muslim involvement in American society,” Bagby said. The report was also sponsored by the Islamic Circle of North America, the Islamic Society of North America, and the Muslim American Society. The Ahmaddiya movement, the Nation of Islam, and other groups often considered outside orthodox Islam were not included in the survey.

The report was part of the Hartford Seminary’s Faith Communities Today study, which surveyed more than 14,000 religious congregations in 41 faiths. The Muslim study’s margin of error is five percentage points.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

Christianity Today earlier took note of the Faith Communities Today study (which is available at Hartford Seminary’s Web site) in our article, “New Study Reveals Which Churches Grow | High standards are key, says new survey from the Hartford Institute for Religion Research” (Apr. 5, 2001)

Christianity Today‘s earlier coverage of Islam in America includes “How Islam Is Winning Black America” and Wendy Murray Zoba’s “Islam, U.S.A.”

Islam, U.S.A. | Are Christians prepared for Muslims in the mainstream?

Islamic Fundamentals | Christians have a responsibility to understand our Muslim neighbors and their beliefs

How Muslims See Christianity | Many Muslims don’t understand Christianity—especially the idea of salvation by grace through faith.

Engaging Our Muslim Neighbors | The Church faces a challenge not just to understand Muslims, but to befriend them.

The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, The Baltimore Sun, Chicago Tribune, Detroit Free Press, The Detroit News, Reuters, BBC, and ArabicNews.com also took note of the survey.

Culture
Review

Three Chords and the Truth

Christian singer-songwriters take their faith into the culture of chiming guitars and protest songs

American folk music developed on the periphery of popular culture during the 1940s and 1950s before being brought to center stage in the 1960s by Bob Dylan and others, including Peter, Paul, and Mary. Unlike most pop music, folk’s stripped-down music and complex lyrics explore interpersonal relationships, social inequities, and even faith. Folkies of today rarely make the Billboard charts. Their concerts aren’t staged in massive stadiums or arenas, but in smaller clubs and bars where their often painfully confessional lyrics create a powerful bond between performer and listener.

What many evangelicals do not know, however, is that some of today’s most acclaimed folk artists regularly wrestle with key Christian themes, though many would question the folkies’ theological orthodoxy, their left-of-center politics, or their refusal to join the contemporary Christian music (ccmCCM subculture. Artists like David Wilcox, Carrie Newcomer, and Over the Rhine are not shy about saying that Christ has touched their lives and transformed their music. These three musicians will perform this July at SojoFest 2001 (www.sojo.net), a 30th anniversary celebration at Wheaton College of the Sojourners community and its magazine.

Eclectic Influences

Husband-and-wife team Linford Detweiler and Karin Berquist are the heart and soul of Over the Rhine, the critically acclaimed Cincinnati band that Billboard magazine said was best known for “intensely personal lyrics that offer an elixir for life’s wounds.”

The songs on Films for Radio, the band’s eighth and most sonically alluring album, fit the bill. “This collection of songs is about internal worlds, about the dialogue that runs inside all of us, conversations we have with ourselves,” says Detweiler. “We hope that anyone who hears these songs will find some fresh language and maybe a soundtrack of sorts for the stories we’re all writing every day with our lives.”

Detweiler is an accomplished multi-instrumentalist and son of an itinerant Amish minister who forbade the family to have a piano in the house but did allow one in the chicken coop. Pop music was also forbidden, so Detweiler, who was being groomed for the mission field, listened to Mahalia Jackson, the Cathedral Quartet, and Korean orphan choirs. The missionary training stuck.

“It’s more of a seed-planting mentality for me now,” he says. “If I’m on a mission, it’s first of all to discover the foreign places inside of me, shine the light around, and tell my secrets.” Detweiler has shared the band’s secrets with some pretty big audiences over the years, as Over the Rhine toured with mainstream act Cowboy Junkies and performed at the alterna-rock Lilith Fair. Sitting on a bench in Boulder, Colorado, before a recent performance at one of the college town’s many music clubs, Detweiler says he wants people who hear the band’s music to walk away more alive.

“I love the image in the Bible of someone throwing a big banquet,” he says. “He invited all the people you would normally invite, but for some reason they weren’t interested. And the way I look at what we do is we throw these banquets all over the country for people from all walks of life.”

A Doctrine-Free Childhood

David Wilcox’s soft, rich voice; crisp, subtle guitar work; and probing, reflective lyrics make clear his folkie credentials. And as one can plainly hear on What You Whispered, his ninth and latest album, many of his songs reflect his deep and thoughtful Christian faith. But don’t dare call his work “Christian music.”

“Christian music is all about marketing something, aiming at a demographic, and making that comfortable for them,” says the singer, who grew up “absolutely doctrine-free.”

Wilcox will not be corralled, but he has ventured closer than most folkies to CCM territory, touring with the band Jars of Clay (band members returned the favor by singing on What You Whispered) and routinely performing at Christian venues like Calvin College.

What You Whispered overflows with songs about family values (“Start with the Ending”) and God’s healing grace (“The Broken Places”). “I want my music to help people to come alive more fully,” says Wilcox, “to wake up hearts and give people strength to be themselves.”

A Quaker Lights Candles

Carrie Newcomer, who attends Quaker meetings in her Indiana hometown, knows what she’s about.

“What I aspire to is the unconditional love and compassion that comes from the teachings of Jesus,” she says.

Her music is equally purposeful. “I’m lighting candles,” she says. “I’m trying to create a music that first and foremost is good art, because sometimes people sacrifice quality for a message. But more than that, is it something that’s going to heal and help, or is it something that’s going to tear down?”

Influenced by “singing poets” like Dylan, Joni Mitchell, and Cat Stevens, Newcomer was also inspired by pioneering Christian musician Bruce Cockburn. “He was a spiritual writer who brought Christian themes into his music in a way I felt was inclusive,” she says.

She is also indebted to Woody Guthrie, the Dustbowl folkie who wrote “This Land Is Your Land” and chronicled the plight of America’s poor.

“Loving God means you love people, too,” says Newcomer. “I’m very much an activist. I believe it’s important that you try to do as much as you can.”

Steve Rabey is a writer based in Colorado Springs. His latest book is Celtic Journeys: A Traveler’s Guide to Ireland’s Spiritual Legacy (Citadel Press), written with his wife, Lois.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

David Wilcox’s official site has his bio and lyrics. Listen to tracks from What You Whispered at mp3.com.

Carrie Newcomer’s site has videoclips and photos, news, and Carrie’s reccommended CDs.

OvertheRhine.com includes testimonials for Films for Radio, a FAQ, and stations playing their albums.

Amazon.com offers David Wilcox’s What you Whispered, Carrie Newcomer’s Age of Possibility and Over the Rhine’s Films for Radio.

Sojourners‘ July 26-29 SojoFest 2001 is a 30th anniversary celebration of its mission and Sojournersmagazine.

Folk traditions are still alive in music … and online. Folkies of today cite Folk music influences from Bob Dylan, Peter, Paul and Mary, Joni Mitchell, Cat Stevens and Woody Gutherie.

Christianit Today.com’s music section has a folk/acoustic area.

Christianity Today articles packaged for Bob Dylan’s 60th birthday include:

Watered-Down Love | Bob Dylan encountered Jesus in 1978, and that light has not entirely faded as he turns 60. By Steve Turner (May 24, 2001)

Has Born-again Bob Dylan Returned to Judaism? | The singer’s response to an Olympics ministry opportunity might settle the matter once for all. (Jan. 13, 1984)

Bob Dylan Finds His Source | A call into the bars, into the streets, into the world, to repentance. By Noel Paul Stookey (Jan. 4, 1980)

Not Buying into the Subculture | Slow Train Coming reveals that Bob Dylan’s quest for answers has been satisfied. By David Singer (Jan. 4, 1980)

Bob Dylan: Still Blowin’ in the Wind | Christianity Today reviews Dylan’s work before the singer’s conversion to Christianity. By Daniel J. Evearitt (Dec. 3, 1976)

The Man Who Ignited the Debate

An interview with I Kissed Dating Goodbye author Joshua Harris

No book on dating has generated more heated response than Joshua Harris's I Kissed Dating Goodbye (Multnomah, 1997). In addition to enormous sales (nearing a million), four years later, many young Christians are passionately for it or against it. Though Harris has subsequently gotten married and written Boy Meets Girl: Say Hello to Courtship (Multnomah, 2000), it is his first book that still provokes the most discussion among singles. CT managing editor Mark Galli sat down with Harris to ask him about the book's genesis and the ongoing controversy surrounding it.

What prompted you to write I Kissed Dating Goodbye?

I was editing New Attitude, a national magazine for homeschooled teens, and relationships was a big issue. At the same time, I had been going out with a girl in my youth group, and I was acting like a typical high-school Christian kid. I knew sex before marriage was wrong, but I was involved in this dating relationship where we were pushing the line, and we were being dragged down spiritually. Many homeschoolers talked about the concept of courtship, but I basically wrote it off. I remember my youth pastor saying how he hadn't kissed his wife until he got engaged, and I just laughed at that: "Oh my goodness. Get real!"

At that time, God began to do a work in my life. I ended that dating relationship and began to ask some serious questions about my lifestyle. I had wasted two years of my life—in terms of time, emotional investment, and energy. That relationship had been my focus. I realized I had promised my former girlfriend a lot of things—and I hurt her because I was the one who broke off the relationship. And so I started to look at these ideas about courtship.

I wrote an article, "Dating Problems, Courtship Solutions," that generated a lot of letters. I was seeing a number of books with titles like How to Date as a Christian, How Not to Go Too Far, and Why Wait? The more I thought about the issues, the more I realized there is something wrong with the way we do things. At the same time, I was having some questions about the courtship model advocated by homeschoolers. It was legalistic; it wasn't biblical; and it wasn't very practical in our culture.

As I read the book, I didn't think it was ultimately about dating.

What most people don't know is that when I wrote I Kissed Dating Goodbye, I was the liberal dating guy in the homeschool community, because I was saying, It's not about courtship rules or structures; it's your attitude. I chose to not use the word courtship in that book because I saw people getting caught up in figuring out the rules of courtship. I wanted people to examine their hearts and see what they were living for.

That's true!

So what is it ultimately about?

Dating is the hook; it's an issue that every single person is thinking about. But if you go up to a single person and say, "You need to stop being selfish; you need to see your life as being lived for God," they're not going to read the book.

Why do you think the book has been so popular?

The reason we went with the title is because we wanted it to be different from all the other books that assumed that dating is necessary. I wanted to grab people's attention. But ultimately it's a book about trusting God, living for him, viewing your whole life in light of what the Bible has to say versus what culture has to say. Dating is one expression of that trust.

I think people are looking for a different outcome in their relationships. The reality of the gospel should have some effect on our relationships. But you look at a Christian couple in a dating relationship, and you'd be hard-pressed in a lot of cases to see the difference between that couple and a non-Christian couple.

What do you think are the biggest misunderstandings about the book?

A lot of people think I'm saying don't date and then just walk up to somebody and say, "Hey, the Lord told me we were supposed to get together." I'm not saying dating is sinful, and I'm not saying a guy and a girl should never spend time alone together. I'm saying let's wait until we can be purposeful, so there's a reason behind our relationship, and we're not just stirring up passion for the sake of a good time.

So what are some of the problems with dating?

Other people must assume I'm even against marriage. When they discover I have a wife now, they say, "Oh, you're married!"—as if I had broken some promise.

Take my own mistakes: I separated the pursuit of romance from the pursuit of commitment. I think that's the root problem. We've bought into the idea that romance is in itself something we all need when we're young. We need to be able to pick the right spouse, so we need to experience multiple relationships, so it's fine to pursue romance and that kind of passionate, intimate relationship even if you have no desire or intention of becoming more committed.

Some people say, "What's the big deal? You go giddy and then you fall out of love, and that whole process is a lot of fun."

Yes, but where does that mentality stop? Sure, you can learn from making mistakes. But the emphasis in Scripture is on being obedient to God in the first place. Proverbs tells us to listen to what wisdom has to say, listen to the pain that you can avoid if you do the right thing.

You relate a story in your first book about a woman's deep disappointment when she discovers her husband had numerous dating relationships before their marriage. She says, "I thought your heart was mine." This is presented as one reason to avoid dating. But isn't this woman being selfish to expect that her husband, even before they had met, would have reserved his heart for her alone?

We've got to become aware of our habits: the way we view the opposite sex, the way our hearts can get involved and then disengage. All these things we learn in high school we will carry with us into marriage. One woman wrote me and said, "I used to be really flirtatious with guys. And I thought that would just turn off after I got married, but it doesn't."

I included that story because most people don't realize the emotional ties that are formed in those early relationships if they share that kind of intimacy with different people. There is something that's taken away from their future marriage—the degrading of intimacy.

Some in the Christian community think of this only in terms of sex. But we don't take the next step and say, "No, if I'm going to be married to someone one day, is it really being true to pursue all these emotional relationships when I know I'm not going to be with that person, when I'm just doing it for the sake of the moment?"

Some say that your philosophy works for youth, for those who are emotionally immature, but by the time people reach their mid-20s, they should be mature enough to handle dating relationships.

In my latest book, I challenge people to have a godly perspective on sex, but I also talk about grace in accepting a partner who hasn't been pure. Both my wife, Shannon, and I had regrets about how we lived before we met each other, but we've experienced God's redeeming love.

In a certain respect, there's a different application of the book when you're 25. It may be true that people in their 20s and 30s are able to have the friendships with the opposite sex and not get involved emotionally.

But if you're older and pursuing a relationship and have no intention of commitment, and you're making unspoken promises to the person, and you're getting emotionally and even physically involved, it doesn't matter how old you are. I've been surprised by the number of letters I get from 30- and 40-year-olds and up. That astounds me because (1) I didn't expect they would read the book, and (2) I would never pretend I can speak to their lives, because I haven't lived through what they've lived through.

Some people say, "It's all well and good for you to encourage the rest of us to swear off dating when you obviously dated all through high school and into college."

I talked to one woman who was divorced and got remarried. She said that when she read the book, a part of her was saying, "Hey, I'm a big girl now, and I know the ways of the world." Then she realized, "If I really knew the ways of the world—and really knew the consequences—then I'd be running from them!" So I don't think any of us should ever feel we're grown up enough to toy with compromise.

I totally understand that. And that's where it all comes to: this can't be forced onto you by somebody else. It has to be an attitude change, a heart change that is expressed in your own lifestyle. I really wish that I hadn't dated, because it led to things I wish I hadn't done. And if I could go back, and God could give me the chance to either obey him or disobey him, I would choose to obey him. It's always better to take him on his Word in the first place than to learn the hard way by sinning and then trying to turn things around.

People have strong reactions to your book. They either say "Yes!" or "Forget it!" (And the latter is often said by people who haven't even read the book but simply object to the title.) Why is that?

Maybe someone they know read it and is applying it in a self-righteous way, being arrogant about it instead of being humble about their convictions. That would annoy me, too.

I also think it's an area of our lives that many don't want touched by God: "I really don't want to have to give something up, and if there's even the slightest possibility that it's true, I'll do whatever I can, whatever mental gymnastics are needed, to disprove it."

Randy Alcorn has written a book, Money, Possessions, and Eternity. I read the book, and it's changing my life. Yet my flesh fights against me picking it back up to read it again, because I don't want to have to be reminded, Are you living for eternity? How are you doing that with your money? Are you giving sacrificially? Those are all things that I would prefer not to face on a daily basis. And when you're single, dating is an area in which you'd really like to keep doing what you're doing.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

In articles appearing online earlier this week, Lauren F. Winner examined the church's ministry to single people while Margaret Feinberg reported on evangelism efforts targeting singles. Yesterday, Amber L. Anderson took to the Internet for a look at modern online dating for Christians.

Multnomah Publishers features an info site on Joshua Harris and his books including I Kissed Dating Goodbye. There's also streaming audio and video excerpts and promotional materials.

Christianbook.com offers a selection of I Kissed Dating Goodbye in paperback, audiocassette or CD. Also available: study guides. Harris' latest, Boy Meets Girl: Say Hello to Courtship is also available.

The official Josh Harris site has updated news, FAQ, reviews, and a summaryfor I Kissed Dating Goodbye.

New Attitude Ministries, directed by author Joshua Harris, is affiliated with PDI Ministries, a church-planting and oversight ministry based in Gaithersburg, MD. The PDI Store features resources from Joshua Harris and New Attitude.

A series of commentary at Breakpoint Online look at Harris' beliefs and advice: "Smart Love," "Designed for Failure," "Guarding Purity," and "Principled Romance."

ChristianityToday.com's singles area has articles from many Christianity Today sister publications of interest to unmarried Christians. It also includes Camerin Courtney's "Single Minded" column, which once examined dating books.

Harris and his books have also been profiled in First Things, USA Weekend, Touchstone, and other publications.

Christianity Today's earlier coverage of Christian single life includes

Sex and the Single Christian | What about the unmarried in their postcollege years? (July 7, 2000))

Women Churchgoers 'Face Growing Difficulty in Finding Partner | British magazine says church is out of single men, especially older ones. (June 7, 2000)

Cover Story

Solitary Refinement

Evangelical assumptions about singleness still need rethinking

I sat down in church on a recent Sunday, flipped through the bulletin, and saw that the readings for the day were about marriage: Genesis 2:23-25 and Matthew 19:4-6. I groaned. After a still-fresh breakup with a boyfriend, the last thing I wanted was to sit through another sermon on the joys of matrimony. That sermon might apply to the 9 a.m. service, I thought, but here at the 11:45 service there are lots of single professionals.

To his credit, my pastor tried to make the sermon relevant to those of us who weren’t married. And as I listened, I became persuaded that maybe I had something to learn. After all, I’m not a thief, but I can usually find something valuable in sermons about stealing. He spoke about the responsibility of the community to support people’s marriage vows; I could sign on to that. But then he veered: “This is not only germane to those of you who are married,” he said, “but also to those of you on the marriage market who are looking to be married.”

He could have stopped there, but instead he added, “Though, frankly, if you’re single and Christian and you want to get married, you’re in the wrong city—unless you’re male. It’s the same demographic story in all the churches in New York City. We have many bright, interesting single women and not too many single men.” He was trying, I think, to be funny. He failed. All the single women in my pew cringed. A single man across the aisle smirked.

I know what you’re thinking: Another article by a single Christian kvetching about how the church is so insensitive—how her needs aren’t being met, how she’s not being respected. Another single Christian demanding to have it both ways—”Please fix me up with your cute nephew, but while you’re at it, validate my singleness, and, whatever you do, don’t make me feel like there’s something wrong with me because I’m not married.”

I hope this isn’t another “beat up on the church” session. Not that I don’t think there are areas in which the church could improve its outreach to single adults. Sensitivity to single people is a problem that we should take seriously, if only because many single Christians report they’ve stopped attending church because of jokes like the one my pastor attempted.

“The church is mostly unaware that there’s even a question to be asked,” says Debra Farrington, author of One Like Jesus: Conversations on the Single Life (Loyola). “Churches have unconsciously bought into the belief that being single is being miserable. They might pat singles’ heads and say it’s okay, but they don’t really believe that.”

For starters, we should give some thought to language. Farrington, for instance, wonders why we call 20s and 30s fellowship groups “pairs and spares.” Judging by their vocabulary, many churches make unmarried Christians sound like an afterthought. Our words matter—not only what we say, but what we don’t say.

“The church doesn’t realize how many people avoid services because they are too focused on families and alienate singles,” says Lana Trent, the 37-year-old coauthor of Single and Content (Word). “It doesn’t take much to throw in an example about singles. You can talk about someone’s roommate instead of their spouse.”

But sensitivity is not the main question. The main question is, How do we think about singleness? Do single Christians have special needs? And, if so, how does the church go about meeting them?

Redefining Singles Ministry

When I moved to New York, I visited churches for a year. One of the reasons I settled at the church I joined is that it doesn’t have a singles ministry. No one asked me to serve on the worship team of the singles service or teach in the singles Sunday-school class; my pastor instead asked me to serve on the education committee. And no one invited me to a singles mixer; instead, I mingle with married friends, engaged friends, widowed friends, and other single twentysomethings at the church suppers on Sunday evenings.

I didn’t want to be part of a singles ministry because the majority of my needs don’t have anything to do with being single. I need prayer. I need to serve others. I need to be held accountable for my sins. And I figure married people need those things, too. I don’t want to be segregated with people who, superficially, are just like me. The eye cannot say to the hand, after all, “I don’t need you.”

Lots of single Christians don’t agree with me. Indeed, a lot of my Christian friends, who go to different churches, say they chose their church precisely because it offers a vital singles ministry. Singleness, they say, does come with special needs, and thank God the church is recognizing that more than it did 20 years ago and is responding.

Sue Nilson, singles ministry pastor at Ginghamsburg United Methodist Church, a large seeker-sensitive congregation just north of Dayton, Ohio, has worked with single Christians for almost 15 years. Good singles ministry isn’t a holding tank where single Christians wallow in those issues, she says; it is “a place to process them so that singles can then go on to be great leaders for Christ, in the church and the world.” Those issues include “defining success in one’s life.” Sometimes the world defines success as marriage, children, and a time-share in Florida. Single Christians have to think about retooling their dreams in a way that doesn’t leave them “bitter,” says Nilson, and the church can, should, and in many congregations is helping them do that.

Nilson, a single parent of a teenager, has become popular nationally as a seminar and conference speaker. She is not so much interested in helping people celebrate their singleness as discovering their gifts. She believes that all people can be a “Michael Jordan” at something, and it’s just a matter of providing them a stage for their talents to emerge. Nilson was hired in 1998 to start a singles ministry at St. Mark’s United Methodist Church in Lincoln, Nebraska. (She recently left there to take the Ginghamsburg position.) She says the ministry “grew like wildfire” in the 4,000-member church and, within a few years, the singles ministry had an outreach to the entire southeastern region of Nebraska.

“Eventually the church statistician notified me that our overall church membership had become 50 percent single adults,” she recalls. “Singles were chairing the administration board, filling the churchwide committees for missions, music, education, everything—as well as leading the many facets of the single adult ministry itself.”

Not everyone is as enthusiastic about singles ministry as Nilson. Terry Hershey was once one of the country’s leading singles ministers. In 1981 he joined the staff of Robert Schuller’s Crystal Cathedral in southern California, and he cofounded the now defunct National Association of Single Adult Leaders. His books and seminars established him as an authoritative voice. But in the last 20 years, he’s done some rethinking on the singles issue. “Churches should never be divided along gender or marital or generational lines,” he now says. “As soon as we ghettoize people—Oh I’m glad you’re in our church today; are you single? Then go to room 207—then we’ve done something wrong. The mistake we made 25 years ago, when churches were first getting into singles ministry, was to assume that every church had to have a singles minister and a singles program.”

Hershey now believes churches don’t need singles ministers as much as singles advocates. And advocacy, he says, “has nothing to do with instituting a program. It has to do with how we help provide childcare for single parents who are in our church. It has to do with how we plug people in who are single adults so they know they can serve here and have support here. That’s singles ministry. The churches that are doing that don’t have a program—they don’t have a class of 200 singles.”

Missing: A Theology of Sex

There is one area where single Christians are stuck wrestling with an issue that is specifically related to their singleness: it’s not community or ministry; it’s sex. While all Christians are called to chastity, for married folks that means forsaking all others besides their spouse. For the rest of us, it means forsaking sex, period. This is tough enough when you’re 19 and single. It’s an even greater challenge if you’re still single—or single again—at 32.

As more Christians are single longer and longer, we need to think about sex. The issue is not whether we want to cave into cultural pressures and toss the church’s teachings about sexual morality out the window; instead it’s why many single Christians do not give those teachings the time of day, and what we can do to help people live chastely after, say, college. “It’s difficult sexually to keep on keeping on as one year stretches into five,” says Julia Duin, 44, assistant national editor of The Washington Times and author of Purity Makes the Heart Grow Stronger (Servant).

Debra Farrington agrees. “Sex is a complicated question, and we just don’t speak about it. There should be an opportunity for conversation in the church, but the church is too busy seeing no evil and hearing no evil, so singles hang out alone.”

What we need, it seems, are at least three things. First, we need venues for frank communication. A single Christian ought to be able to sit down with her pastor and say, “My boyfriend and I are finding it harder to only go as far as kissing, and I’m not sure what to do about that,” without fearing that he’ll never again take her seriously as a committed Christian.

Second, we should not act like sex outside of marriage is the unforgivable sin. A sin, indeed, but one of many that Christians struggle with. It is likely that more Christians ignore the biblical prohibition against gossip than are engaging in premarital sex, but the church is more exercised about the latter issue than the former. When we place too much emphasis on one sin, we risk not only hypocrisy, but we also make it harder for those guilty of that sin to come openly to the church for help.

Finally, we need to do more than just point to a couple of verses in Paul’s epistles that warn against fornication; we need to present single Christians with a whole theology of chastity and sexuality. “We lack a sexual theology in the church,” says Ben Young, coauthor of The Ten Commandments of Dating (Thomas Nelson) and the singles pastor at Houston’s Second Baptist Church. Sex inside marriage, he says, is a mere shadow of the higher reality of oneness in the Trinity—but you don’t hear a lot about that on Sunday mornings. “If we want people to give up premarital sex, we’ve got to do more than just getting into the pulpit and saying, ‘No, don’t.'”

Steve Tracy, a professor of theology and ethics at Phoenix Seminary, has spent years counseling young adults on relationship issues. He believes the development of a holistic “sexual theology” is deterred because evangelicals tend to segregate sexuality into something that only married people should be thinking about. “We need to think of it as the whole of what we are as a man or woman,” Tracy says. “All of it belongs to God and should be developed under the lordship of Christ.” He adds that the church should not send the tacit message that single people are somehow not sexual beings because they shouldn’t be having sex. Instead, he says the church should encourage single Christians to “celebrate the whole of their maleness and femaleness in healthy, nonerotic ways,” such as spending time in coed fellowship groups where single people can experience the opposite sex in real, uncontrived situations. “It won’t erase the sexual pressures that they face, but it puts things in a positive framework.”

Building a Better “Meet Market”

When I start railing against singles ministries, my other unmarried friends often look at me like I’m crazy. Not only, they say, do singles groups provide them with a sense of community with others who are wrestling with their unmarried state; the groups also provide a place to meet potential dates.

America’s megachurches draw huge numbers not just because of the laid-back atmosphere and contemporary worship; large, bustling churches offer single Christians greater opportunities to meet other single Christians. Indeed, the church is doing more now than ever before to help Christians find suitable partners, which, if you aren’t marrying your Christian college sweetheart, can be tough.

Most of us single Christians spend the bulk of our weeks living and working in non-Christian settings. Meeting someone who is kind, intelligent, and charming is difficult enough (my non-Christian friends complain about the dearth of interesting partners, too); add “Christian” to the list of requirements, and the pool shrinks even more.

The world has changed. As people become more mobile, they move increasingly farther from their community of origins—the networks that existed in our grandparents’ day to pair people up with acceptable mates are, at best, frayed. Today, people meet at work, they meet at health clubs, they meet on blind dates. Perhaps one of the reasons the church has gotten serious about helping pair its single members up is 2 Corinthians 6:14—”Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common?” We all know we’re not supposed to be unequally yoked, and most of us don’t want to be, but when the majority of the available folks you meet are pagans, what’s a girl (or guy) to do?

Julia Duin, for one, does not date non-Christians (“I’ve had bad experiences,” she says), but she speaks of a good friend who has decided to look outside the church. “All the Christian men she dated were jerks, and this nominal Catholic treats her like a princess. I have several friends who will compromise on a man’s spirituality; they figure a woman controls the home anyway.”

The church—or at least a few creative individuals with an entrepreneurial streak and a burden for single Christians—is realizing that, if we want Christians to marry, and we want them to marry other Christians, we’re going to have to do something more than throw a mixer in the church basement.

In 1999, Sam Moorcroft, a Toronto businessman, founded an online matchmaking service called ChristianCafé.com. Today, the site has about 25,000 members. “There’s tremendous pressure to meet and get married,” he says, “but no help on how to do that. There are thousands and thousands of Christian singles in Toronto, but the Christian singles events tend to be ‘loser fests.’ They just throw you in a room together and say, ‘Go to it.'”

Moorcroft, who is single, confesses to using ChristianCafé.com himself. He hasn’t met his future wife yet, but he estimates that about 200 people have gotten hitched using his site. He admits that online matchmaking isn’t perfect. “A lot of women over 50 are having trouble meeting people on the site because men over 50 want thirtysomething women. That social stigma of men dating older women is still there, even among Christians.” Still, he says, the church needs to get creative in helping people meet other Christians, and his site is a step in the right direction.

Kim Hartke says the problem isn’t just meeting people but also knowing how to conduct yourself once you’ve met them. Hartke was a middle-aged single woman when, as she puts it in jogger’s parlance, she “hit the wall.” She was so discouraged by her lack of marital prospects that she verged on depression and was worried that she might be losing her faith. She even dropped out of the children’s drama ministry she led.

Hartke’s story ended happily—she married at 40, and shortly thereafter, in 1997, she founded True Love Ministries, a parachurch organization in the Washington, D.C., area that helps prepare single Christians, especially women, for marriage. Hartke, who describes herself as an advocate for the older, never-married single Christian, believes that most women want to get married; indeed, she believes that most women are called to marriage.

The problem comes, she says, when women take their dating cues from Cosmo and Elle rather than Scripture. In True Love Ministries, Hartke undertakes what she calls “feminist deprogramming.” The Bible, she says, is very clear that wives are to be subject to their husbands. “You’re not subject in a dating situation, of course, but allowing the man to be the leader in the dating dance is a very good idea; it sets up the pattern for marriage.”

Hartke swears by The Rules: Time-Tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right, Ellen Fein and Sherrie Schneider’s controversial and much-maligned 1996 book that tells women—secular, Bridget Jones-style career gals—that the way to hook a man is to let him lead. Scripture, says Hartke, bolsters those rules. “A lot of church retreat leaders say that it’s okay for women to ask men out—something that is directly contradictory to Christianity. But because that’s part of the culture, we’ve accepted it.”

Taking Paul Seriously

I’m glad Kim Hartke wants to help single Christians get married, but I’m troubled by her gender politics. I’ve asked men out, and I don’t see anything in Scripture that suggests it’s displeasing to God. But, more important, I’m troubled by her assumption that God calls almost all Christians to marriage. Paul’s comments in 1 Corinthians 7 are not the most ringing endorsement of marriage: “Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I am. But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.”

Hartke says that Genesis offers a general call to marriage to the entire human race, and only “a very few people are called to lifelong celibacy.” For Protestants, she says, the call to celibacy is generally a secondary call, subordinated to a primary call of full-time evangelism, missionary work, or other ministry.

She may take a more extreme stand on this than most, but Hartke’s contention is not that different from what most evangelicals seem to believe implicitly. Never mind how much we intone that singleness is great, the general attitude is that marriage is better. Indeed, as I was working on this article, a good friend who works at an evangelical organization told me that he thinks people cannot be “fully mature” until they marry: “I know that’s unpopular and not politically correct,” he said, “but that’s what I think.” He spoke of the demands that marriage and parenting put on him, forcing him to grow up.

His remarks put voice to what many of us really think: Yes, we know Jesus didn’t marry. Yes, we know what Paul wrote about marriage. But, let’s face it; marriage makes you grow up more than anything that can happen while you’re unmarried. Sure, you think you’re growing and developing while single, but just wait till you’re married—you ain’t seen nothing yet.

Evangelicals have made great strides in addressing questions of singleness in the last generation, but we still have a long way to go. We must respond to my friend’s comment about the superiority of marriage, and not simply because such remarks might hurt single Christians’ feelings. We must creatively develop a theology of marriage and singleness that grapples honestly with the challenging but unambiguous message in the New Testament that sometimes marriage, and not singleness, may be the lesser of two options. My friend failed to entertain the idea that singleness can nurture a type of maturity that married people will never understand. Singleness is sometimes lonely, it’s sometimes difficult, and it does not comport with our prepackaged notions of family values. But it may well be where God wants a lot of us to be.

The sad thing is that there is very little space in today’s evangelical churches for discerning a call to singleness. Catholics—at least Catholics who believe they are called not just to celibacy but also to religious orders—have something positive to do. They don’t fall into a monastery by default. Rather, prayerfully and in community, they discern God’s calling them there. Protestants, on the other hand, don’t often begin imagining they might be called to singleness until their 35th birthday rolls around. Then they woefully begin to think, Well, maybe I have the gift of celibacy.

Ben Young, whose various singles ministries at Second Baptist of Houston typically draw 7,000 people, says that one of the greatest challenges he faces as a singles pastor is, on the one hand, helping prepare people who will eventually marry to be in healthy relationships while, on the other hand, “affirming that singleness is a healthy, legitimate lifestyle.” He wants to make it clear that “some of you are going to be single for the rest of your life, and that is great—you can be fulfilled and never be married, never have sex, never have kids. Singleness may still be an evangelical sin, but it’s not a biblical sin. It’s not God’s will for everyone to be married.”

Stumbling Into a New Possibility

I always assumed I was supposed to get married. Since I was 15, I never went more than a few months without dating someone.

I have begun to wonder, however, if that is really God’s plan for my life. Not because, at 24, I feel aged out of the dating pool. And not because I think being single will leave me with more time to serve God. (That argument seems laden with strange notions about marriage and singleness—to wit that once you marry you retreat into some sort of cocoon from which you never emerge, or that a single person’s daily obligations are not as pressing or legitimate as a married person’s.)

I have begun to wonder if I am called to singleness because God, it seems, has been planting new ideas in my head. He has sent me stumbling into contact with new, unmarried people, and into the clutches of new books with more interesting things to say about singleness than the usual jabber.

I haven’t drawn any conclusions or sworn off dating, but I am approaching the issue with more openness than I used to. It’s not that I think I will be a better minister if I am single; it’s that God may be calling me to remember how dependent I am on him—and that no man will ever be an adequate substitute.

It would be lovely if a single person, rather than a man-woman-child trinity, lit the Advent candle at church; if sermons were sprinkled with occasional examples about unmarried people; if my Christian friends would, on the whole, treat me like an adult even though I’m not married.

But lovelier than all those things would be a church universal that took seriously Paul’s apparent preference for chastity over marriage. And that, I think, is not a task I can lay at the doorstep of my married pastor, or my friend who said true maturity only comes with marriage. It is a task that has to begin with me. After all, it is I, not they, whom God called—maybe for a season, and maybe forever—to live as a single Christian.

Lauren F. Winner, a contributing editor for Christianity Today, is writing a book for Brazos Press about evangelicals and sex.

Copyright © 2001 Christianity Today. Click for reprint information.

Related Elsewhere

A ready-to-download Bible Study on this article is available at ChristianBibleStudies.com. These unique Bible studies use articles from current issues of Christianity Today to prompt thought-provoking discussions in adult Sunday school classes or small groups.

Articles on Christian online matchmaking services, Christian dating books, and an interview with Joshua Harris (I Kissed Dating Goodbye) will appear on our site later this week.

See today’s related article, “A Singular Mission Field | There are more single people in America than ever—and they need the church as much as ever.”

ChristianityToday.com’s singles area has articles from many Christianity Today sister publications of interest to unmarried Christians, including Camerin Courtney’s “Single Minded” column.

re:generation quarterly has had articles on singleness and the church, especially in its Fall 1997 issue, which contained Paige Benton’s “Singled Out By God for Good” and Andy Crouch’s “Extended Family Values.”

Bill Haley, publishers of re:generation quarterly, has a 1999 sermon on “thriving single” at his church’s Web site.

Christian Single magazine, published by the Southern Baptist Convention’s Lifeway Resources, isn’t just about being unmarried.

Associated Baptist Press recently noted that though more adults are single, fewer singles are going to church.

Christianity Today‘s earlier coverage of Christian single life includes

Sex and the Single Christian | What about the unmarried in their postcollege years? (July 7, 2000))

Women Churchgoers ‘Face Growing Difficulty in Finding Partner | British magazine says church is out of single men, especially older ones. (June 7, 2000)

Apple PodcastsDown ArrowDown ArrowDown Arrowarrow_left_altLeft ArrowLeft ArrowRight ArrowRight ArrowRight Arrowarrow_up_altUp ArrowUp ArrowAvailable at Amazoncaret-downCloseCloseEmailEmailExpandExpandExternalExternalFacebookfacebook-squareGiftGiftGooglegoogleGoogle KeephamburgerInstagraminstagram-squareLinkLinklinkedin-squareListenListenListenChristianity TodayCT Creative Studio Logologo_orgMegaphoneMenuMenupausePinterestPlayPlayPocketPodcastRSSRSSSaveSaveSaveSearchSearchsearchSpotifyStitcherTelegramTable of ContentsTable of Contentstwitter-squareWhatsAppXYouTubeYouTube