Speaking into Crisis - Christianity Today

I have long been romanced by the story of Paul’s bold intervention among the soldiers and sailors in charge of a ship that is breaking up in the middle of a Mediterranean storm. Having exhausted their routine responses to severe conditions, they had given up hope of being saved.

Enter Paul! “Men,” (and I’m paraphrasing here) “you should have listened to me earlier when I said not to leave port, but you didn’t. But don’t be afraid. I’ve received a word from God. The good news is that no life is to be lost; the bad news is that the ship has made its last voyage. Keep courageous, men; God will do as he’s promised.”

Here was a voice speaking confidently into crisis, offering a message that steadies people and provides reliable direction. It’s an apt subject for our times in which people are scared, wonder of the future, and speculate on their personal security. Not always the most important issues, ultimately, but nevertheless the ones on people’s minds.

In times of crisis, people listen for a voice. They’re tuned to receive messages of hope, courage, God’s purposes, and meaning. Augustine’s was such a voice when Rome was coming apart. Luther’s was heard when the Holy Roman Empire was crumbling. Wesley’s spoke into the turbulent times of industrial revolution.

More recently two insightful voices spoke into the crisis in Germany during the 1930s and ’40s. Amid the economic, political, and military upheaval, only a few stood to speak for God. Among them: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and Helmut Thielicke. The two stand like human bookends at the beginning and the end of World War II. Bonhoeffer’s greatest years were from 1932 to 1945 while Thielicke ascended to his prime in the mid-war years and those that followed.

It was given to Bonhoeffer to warn the German people of the political and moral consequences should they select Hitler as their national leader and then follow him to his grave. Thielicke’s task was to challenge the German people to the task of spiritual and moral reconstruction. Both men did their jobs admirably.

The cost of Dietrich’s discipleship

In 1933, just two days after Hitler became Chancellor of Germany, Bonhoeffer preached on the radio, warning of a leader “who allow(s) himself to succumb to the wishes of those he leads, who will always seek to turn him into their idol, then the image of the leader will gradually become the image of the ‘misleader’. … This is the leader who makes an idol of himself and his office, and who thus mocks God.”

Bonhoeffer was cut off the air as he spoke, presumably by Hitler sympathizers, and he was forced to publish the talk in print to make sure that his audience heard everything he had to say. But he’d made his stand, and soon there were those who questioned his patriotism.

His preaching and his instruction to student preachers took on an increasingly confrontive tone. “Do not try to make the Bible relevant,” he said. “Its relevance is axiomatic … Do not defend God’s Word, but testify to it … Trust to the Word. It is a ship loaded to the very limits of her capacity.”

Bonhoeffer’s greatest books come out of this era. The Cost of Discipleship called for one to pursue the selfless life, or, to use a more modern phrase, Bonhoeffer was trying to say, “It’s not about me!”

“The cross is laid on every Christian,” Bonhoeffer wrote. “As we embark upon discipleship … we give over our lives to death.”

In 1939, Dietrich Bonhoeffer visited New York, and friends in the church world passionately tried to keep him there for fear that if he returned to Germany, he would lose his life. But Bonhoeffer chose to sail back to Germany.

“I will have no right to participate in the reconstruction of Christian life in Germany after the war if I do not share the trials of this time with my people,” he said.

“Christians in Germany will face the terrible alternative of either willing the defeat of their nation in order that Christian civilization may survive, or willing the victory of their nation and thereby destroying our civilization. I know which of these alternatives I must choose; but I cannot make that choice in security.”

In the wartime years that followed, Bonhoeffer’s logic led to relationships with people (including members of his extended family) who plotted to take Hitler’s life. When they were almost successful, many were arrested thoughout Germany, including Bonhoeffer, and he spent his last years in prison before being executed at Flossenburg in 1945, shortly before the war ended.

Even in prison, Bonhoeffer was ever the preacher. At one point he reflected on the hope generated in a fresh Christian marriage. “Welcome one another, therefore, as Christ welcomed you, for the glory of God,” he quoted from the Scriptures, then expounded: “In a word, live together in the forgiveness of your sins, for without it no human fellowship, least of all a marriage, can survive. Don’t insist on your rights, don’t blame each other; don’t judge or condemn each other, don’t find fault with each other, but accept each other as you are, and forgive each other every day from the bottom of your hearts.”

The larger significance of these comments is that Bonhoeffer never accepted the notion that life is only about the crisis. Rather, life goes on, and the more hopeful, new-start-oriented statements we can make—like marriage—the better.

Bonhoeffer was one tough preacher, and he called people to resistance against evil, to courage, to nobility of life and witness, to pure fellowship among Christ-following people.

“Who stands fast?” Bonhoeffer wrote in 1943. “Only the man whose final standard is not his reason, his principles, his conscience, his freedom, or his virtue, but who is ready to sacrifice all this when he is called to obedient and responsible action in faith and in exclusive allegiance to God—the responsible man, who tries to make his whole life an answer to the question and call of God. Where are these responsible people?”

Bonhoeffer was even preaching when they came to take him away to the place of execution. In his last hours, he was asked to speak to the prisoners. At first reluctant, Bonhoeffer relented. The text, from Isaiah, was “by his stripes we are healed.”

Then he was led to the gallows, where after his execution, his biographer records, “his body was taken down and burned, along with his suitcase and manuscript.” His manuscript! Bonhoeffer never stopped preaching and writing, even in the worst of times.

Sermons in a bombed-out church

If Bonhoeffer’s calling was to warn the German people of the consequences of Hitler’s political philosophy, Helmut Thielicke’s calling was to sustain people through the war and then to help them rebuild their lives spiritually and morally afterward.

In 1936 Thielicke was awarded a professorship at the University of Heidelberg. But four years later he lost his position when the Nazis became sensitive to his growing criticisms of the Hitler regime. He eventually moved to St. Mark’s Church in Stuttgart, where he preached despite changes in venue from week to week due to damage from Allied bombing. John Doberstein, Thielicke’s English translator, says that, after each sermon, “hundreds of volunteer stenographers remained and took down dictated excerpts, which they then duplicated privately. Printing was forbidden, but these copies of the Christian message, handed from person to person, found their way to thousands of eager readers.”

At one point during the war Thielicke felt in desperate need of rest. He reasoned that some weeks spent in a quiet village in the countryside would be good medicine. Yet the retreat to the country failed to restore him, and he soon returned to the city. Yes, the village had been peaceful. But something was missing, which left him restless.

He concluded that people in the village were of a different mind, not deeply touched (yet!) by the war. And he craved to return to the city where people were clawing for survival. Among them he found a spiritual strength and vitality that was far more restorative than the “escapist” life of the countryside. So Thielicke returned to the bombs, the damage, and the suffering. Because there he found reality and courage and community. And that became the seedbed of much of his preaching.

“I have been interested in the theological question of what change takes place in a man,” writes Thielicke, “when he finds God and so also finds himself. For of one thing I was always sure, that when a man seeks himself, he fails to find himself, and that he gains and realizes himself only when he loses his life in God.”

He was bold when he called men and women to Christ. “I believe,” he said, “that one can do justice to the seeker only if one leaves him under no illusions about the existence of a steep wall at which decisions must be made. He must be led to face the granite greatness of a message that brooks no evasion.”

In another place: “Anybody who looks downward and measures himself by the weaknesses of his fellow men immediately becomes proud … ” And again: “When a man really turns to God with a burdened conscience, he doesn’t think of other people at all. There he is utterly alone with God.”

Are his comments out of date? Or do they call us back to something that may be lost in our time of sermons that smack more of self-help than deep-spirited and thoughtful gospel. When we look for the voices that have spoken out most eloquently and spiritually since September 11, will we hear any of the substance that these two “bookends” gave to the German people?

Some time after the war Thielicke visited the United States and toured the United Nations building in New York. When he was shown the “chapel” in the UN building, he was appalled. It was a room decorated by spotlights and little else.

“The spotlights were ignorant of what they were illuminating, and the responsible men who were invited to come to this room were not shown to whom they should direct their thoughts. It was a temple of utterly weird desolation, an empty, ruined field of faith long since fled … only here, where the ultimate was at stake, only here was emptiness and desolation. Would it not have been more honest to strike this whole pseudo temple out of the budget and use the space for a cloakroom or a bar?”

The man was a prophet.

What do they say today?

What can we say of these two World War II “bookends”? Certainly that they in fact did speak into their crisis. They were tough on their hearers; they expected much from the people to whom they preached and wrote. Their preaching was not parochial, pandering to the fears and superficial patriotism of their people. And they were willing to accept the consequences that came from proclaiming biblical truth.

For Bonhoeffer, this meant not just proclaiming but living out the message that ministry is more important than security. Instead of escaping the place of danger, he stayed where he could do the most good and paid the ultimate price for doing so.

Likewise, I hear Thielicke saying that the greatest preaching is most likely to come from the lips of a preacher who suffers alongside his or her people. We are not called—neither preacher nor hearer—to run fearfully from affliction or to curse it (and those who cause it), but rather to stand and face it, to squeeze from it everything God might like to say to us.

In the wake of the horror of the World Trade Center/Pentagon attacks we need to ask ourselves some challenging questions. Who speaks for God now? And how is His message heard, both in the churches and in the larger public?

Billy Graham’s eloquent remarks at the National Cathedral on September 14 will (or should) long remain a textbook in prophetic preaching. In a few brief moments the raspy and aging voice of this Christian statesmen called the country to alertness, courage, grace, and truth.

We need such voices that are tender, firm, thoughtful, timeless, and candid enough to call us to a life higher than the ordinary.

What we do not need are voices that speak out in vindictiveness, even, supposedly, in the name of biblical truth. It is not a time to blame various people groups with the word evil or warlike (a selective reading of our Older Testament will not make the Jewish/Christian tradition look too peaceable either). It is not a time to take advantage of people’s fears to raise money or prestige.

Speaking into crisis means focusing on themes such as:

Hope because people wonder if there is a tomorrow.
Courage because people succumb too easily to fear.
Nobility in the normal Christian life because living for the glory of God is our calling every day, but especially in times of crisis, and because loving (and forgiving) one’s enemies is imperative.
Repentance in those circumstance where we have come across as an arrogant and materialistic nation.
Biblical justice because so few of us really understand what it is.
And what substantial prayer looks and sounds like—praying for the leaders of this world, for peace, for those who suffer far more than we do.

Finally, how would a larger, God’s-eye-view perspective on world events take shape in preaching? The horror of the World Trade Center losses (some 4,000 people dead), as New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani put it, is unbearable. But Christians need to be reminded by their preachers that as many as seven times that number (mostly children) die every day in the world because of disease and malnutrition. Additionally, preachers may need to help some hearers understand that terrorism has been around for a long time in other parts of the world. We simply cared too little when it was inflicted upon others not of our nationality.

But the most important theme to speak into crisis is theological at its base. It is to preach the sovereignty of a great and powerful God, of a Christ who weeps over the city (or the country, and not ours only) and who longs to come again to create a new heaven and a new earth. This kingdom-dream leaps off the pages of Scripture from beginning to end and tells us that life and relationship will be better, much better than we know today, when everyone shall bow to confess Him as Lord of All.

What a day that shall be! And what a privilege to preach about it in the midst of crisis.

Gordon MacDonald is editor-at-large of Leadership and lives in New Hampshire.